Article

Family physician and obstetrician episiotomy rates in low-risk obstetrics in southern Alberta

South Alberta Rural Residency Program, University of Calgary, Canada.
Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien (Impact Factor: 1.34). 04/2011; 57(4):450-6.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To examine the episiotomy rate for women delivering in a regional hospital versus the rate in rural hospitals.
Retrospective review of low-risk delivery charts for a 12-month period (2006 to 2007).
One regional and 3 rural hospitals in southern Alberta.
Charts were reviewed for a random sample of 10% of the women with low-risk deliveries at the regional hospital, and all such women at the participating rural hospitals. Eligible women were nulliparous or multiparous, were at 37 or more weeks' gestation, and delivered live newborns vaginally, including spontaneous and assisted vaginal deliveries. Low-risk deliveries were defined by the absence of high-risk maternal, prenatal, and perinatal features.
Details of the delivery, including use of episiotomy.
Charts were reviewed for 115 women who delivered in the regional hospital and for 140 women from the rural hospitals. Maternal and infant characteristics did not differ between settings (mean age 26 years, median parity 1, mean birth weight 3433 g [regional] and 3462 g [rural], and mean head circumference 35 cm). Episiotomies were performed in 13% of regional and 4% of rural deliveries (P = .01). Perineal tears occurred in 65% of regional (3 with third- to fourth-degree tears) and 57% of rural (2 with third- to fourth-degree tears) deliveries (P = .20). Deliveries were carried out by 12 FPs and 6 obstetricians in the regional centre, and by 19 FPs in the rural hospitals.
In our study, both rural and regional practitioners in southern Alberta demonstrated a "restrictive" use of episiotomy, in keeping with current evidence-based guidelines. Further prospective research is needed to examine how physician, maternal, and pregnancy characteristics affect episiotomy and perineal tear rates.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Tyler Williamson, Dec 17, 2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Routine episiotomy is a controversial issue among gynecologists. The aim of this study was to compare early maternal and neonatal complications of restrictive episiotomy and routine episiotomy in primiparus vaginal delivery. In this descriptive cross-sectional study, two groups of primiparus normal vaginal delivery (NVD) cases with routine and restrictive episiotomy were studied. Immediately and in the first 24 and 48 hours after delivery, specific charts were used to compare the two groups in terms of perineal laceration size, neonatal Apgar score and post-delivery. For data analysis, SPSS was used to conduct student t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Forty primiparus pregnant women were studied in each group. Episiotomy was performed in 7.5% of the restrictive group. Perineal laceration was measured as 3.68 ± 0.47 cm and 1.21 ± 1.1 in routine and restrictive episiotomy groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Intact perineum or first-degree laceration was seen in 80% of the restrictive group. However, second- and third-degree laceration were respectively observed in 75% and 15% of the routine episiotomy group (p < 0.05). Pain relief (immediately, 24 and 48 hours after delivery) was significantly higher in the restrictive group (p < 0.05). On the contrary, no significant difference in Apgar scores at the first and fifth minutes after birth was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). Restrictive episiotomy results in low maternal complications. Therefore, avoiding routine episiotomy in unnecessary conditions would increase the rate of intact perineal and minor perineal trauma and reduce postpartum delivery pain with no adverse effects neither on maternal nor neonatal morbidities.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2011 · Journal of research in medical sciences
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pregnancy, birth, and the early newborn period are times of high use of health care services. As well as opportunities for providing quality care, there are potential missed opportunities for health promotion, safety issues, and increased costs for the individual and the system when quality is not well defined or measured. There has been a need to identify key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure quality care within the provincial maternal-newborn system. We also wanted to provide automated audit and feedback about these KPIs to support quality improvement initiatives in a large Canadian province with approximately 140 000 births per year. We therefore worked to develop a maternal-newborn dashboard to increase awareness about selected KPIs and to inform and support hospitals and care providers about areas for quality improvement. We mapped maternal-newborn data elements to a quality domain framework, sought feedback via survey for the relevance and feasibility of change, and examined current data and the literature to assist in setting provincial benchmarks. Six clinical performance indicators of maternal-newborn quality care were identified and evidence-informed benchmarks were set. A maternal-newborn dashboard with "drill down" capacity for detailed analysis to enhance audit and feedback is now available for implementation. While audit and feedback does not guarantee individuals or institutions will make practice changes and move towards quality improvement, it is an important first step. Practice change and quality improvement will not occur without an awareness of the issues.
    Preview · Article · Jan 2013 · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the process of transition from routine episiotomy to restrictive episiotomy and to compare the results of these different approaches. Material and Methods: Birth data of women delivering live-born infant weighting more than 1000 g in the period of routine episiotomy (2011-2012) and restrictive episiotomy (2012-2013) in Erciyes University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology were compared retrospectively. Results: In 651 birth, the episiotomy rate was 88.6% (577/651) between 2011-2012. This ratio was 87.7% (307/350) in multiparous, and 89.7% (270/301) in nulliparous. Two cases were complicated with third degree perineal laceration (2/651, %0.3). 619 vaginal delivery were performed between 2012-2013. The mean maternal age and birth weight were higher in multiparous women [30 (17-49 years) vs 23 (16-40 years) and 3130g (1000-4440 g) vs 2910g (1000-4400 g), p=0.007, respectively]. The episiotomy rate in general was 27.9% (173/619), and was 6.8% (24/350) in multiparous, and was 55.4% (149/269) in nulliparous. The prevalance of first degree, second degree and paraurethral laceration were higher in non- episiotomy group (p<0.01). No cases of third, or fourth degree perineal laceration was seen between 2012 and 2013 during which restrictive episiotomy was performed. There was no statistically significant relationship between the experience, and gender of the residents, and episiotomy ratio. Conclusion: Restrictive episiotomy application has comparable perineal complication ratio to that of routine episitomy. It is possible to switch from routine episiotomy to restrictive episiotomy, and to decrease episiotomy ratio by the application of certain simple principles.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2013 · Turkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik