ArticlePDF Available

Hemoperitoneum as severe and unusual complication in the stapler recto-anopexy for hemorrhoidal prolapse. Case report

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

We report unusual but severe complication after Longo recto-anopexy for hemorrhoidal prolapse, i.e. large intramural hematoma of the rectum and subsequent hemoperitoneum. We make some assessment about the technique.
Content may be subject to copyright.
G Chir Vol. 32 - n. 5 - pp. 272-274
May 2011
272
methods, tecniques, drugs
Introduction
Nowadays, rectopexy using staplers according to Lon-
go’s technique (1) for treatment of the mucosal hemor-
roidal rectal prolapse is widely diffused in all countries,
above all due to incontestable postoperative patient sa-
tisfaction and quick comeback into social life.
Overcoming of the learning curve has also made su-
rer the technique, limiting to low percentages (1-2%) anal
bleeding that initially was more feared the complication.
Nevertheless, rare and unusual complications have spo-
radically been reported, because of their objective gravity.
Many Authors have judged disproportionate these com-
plications versus the type of surgical procedure and some
of them put this technique in discussion (2, 3).
We report a case of a very unusual hemorrhagic com-
plication with our personal remarks.
Case report
Z.A.M., male, 32 years old, came to our observation (Outpa-
tient Coloproctology) in July 2007. He was affected by hypertension;
he also referred many episodes of allergic reaction during previous
surgical procedures (including glottid edema). Diagnosis was he-
morroid prolapse, III grade. We suggested patient Longo’s rectopexy,
explaining him risks and benefits.
The patients underwent routine preoperative tests for elective sur-
gery: blood examination, EKG and chest X-ray. Different anae-
sthesiological consultations have been performed. Patient signed infor-
med consent and underwent surgery in September.
Anaesthesist, as usually, decided to perform spinal anesthesia. Sur-
geon had a large experience of Longo’s technique (about 350 personally
operated patients, complications according to literature).
When surgeon was firing the stapler, patient underwent an im-
portant allergic reaction, with glottid edema; his abdominal and pel-
vic muscles started to contract, so completing the operation was more
difficult than usually. Patient was intubated and went to Intensive
Care Unit (ICU).
Exubation occurred few hours later; conditions were good even
if anaesthesist reported mild abdominal pain during palpation at ni-
ght. The day after, at surgical check, severe abdominal pain and ten-
derness were verified. A CT scan was immediatly performed, de-
monstrating abdominal bleeding together with remarkable thickness
of rectal and sigmoidal wall with air inside .
The patient was immediately treated by laparoscopic exploration
that showed bleeding in the pelvic cavity between the small bowel
loops and adjacent to the liver and the spleen, with many blood cloats
SUMMARY: Hemoperitoneum as severe and unusual complication
in the stapler recto-anopexy for hemorrhoidal prolapse. Case re-
port.
A. RACALBUTO, I. ALIOTTA, M. SANTANGELO, R. LANTERI, P.V. FOTI,
V. MINUTOLO, A. LICATA
We report unusual but severe complication after Longo recto-ano-
pexy for hemorrhoidal prolapse, i.e. large intramural hematoma of the
rectum and subsequent hemoperitoneum. We make some assessment
about the technique.
RIASSUNTO: Un caso di emoperitoneo come complicanza grave ed
inusuale nella chirurgia con stapler del prolasso rettale mucoso emor-
roidario.
A. RACALBUTO, I. ALIOTTA, M. SANTANGELO, R. LANTERI, P.V. FOTI,
V. MINUTOLO, A. LICATA
Gli Autori, da una rara ma grave complicanza della rettoanopes-
sia secondo la tecnica di Longo - un esteso ematoma intramurale del ret-
to con conseguente emoperitoneo - espongono alcune considerazioni sul-
la tecnica.
KEY WORDS: Hemorroidal prolapse - Stapler recto-anopexy - Hemoperitoneum.
Prolasso emorroidario - Rettoanopessia con stapler - Emoperitoneo.
Hemoperitoneum as severe and unusual complication
in the stapler recto-anopexy for hemorrhoidal prolapse. Case report
A. RACALBUTO, I. ALIOTTA, M. SANTANGELO, R. LANTERI,
P.V. FOTI1, V. MINUTOLO, A. LICATA
University of Catania, Italy
Department of Surgical Sciences, Organs Transplant and New Technologies
1 Institute of Radiology
© Copyright 2011, CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Roma
0199 9 Hemoperiton_Racalbuto:- 14-04-2011 15:51 Pagina 272
© CIC Edizioni Internazionali
273
Hemoperitoneum as severe and unusual complication in the stapler recto-anopexy for hemorrhoidal prolapse. Case report
into the pelvis. After many plentifull and washing, a 1 cm diameter
hole was identified in the intraperitoneal rectal wall . We decided to
perform a laparotomy. During surgery we removed residual blood
cloats in the pelvis and sutured the laceration of the intraperitoneal
rectum that involved only the serosa and the muscle of the rectum
whereas the mucosa was intact. We also performed a rectoscopy: a
very great hematoma was present in the wall of rectum hearly pro-
ducing the collapse of its lumen. So we decided to drain making a
small cut in the mucosa.
The patient went to ICU and was readmitted to our Surgical Unit
two days later. He was discharged without any other complication
seven days after surgery.
Discussion
Recto-anopexy according to Longo technique re-
presents nowadays a diffused surgical approach: its ad-
vantages and possible complications are ever described
and discussed with the patient before surgery.
Most frequent complications are free bleeding from
rectal lumen and simple small hematomas of the rectal
wall. These complications are generally simply to resol-
ve. Bleeding occurs in 3-4% of patients, according to li-
terature. We published a series in which rectal bleeding
was present in 3% of patients (4). Furthermore we found
some cases with pain due to rectal hematoma wall, that
we resolved with a trans-anal drainage.
In literature just few cases like ours have been reported
(5). Of 47 reports recently collected by SIUCP (Italian
Unitary Society of Coloproctology), consisting of rare
but severe complications, 15 bulky rectal hematomas was
reported, 10 stable and 5 active, but only one with hea-
ring of the peritoneum and abdominal bleeding as in the
our case. To explain the bleeding into the peritoneum
in our patient we think that probably the respiratory cri-
sis occurred during surgery (allergic reaction with glot-
tid edema), with sudden intubation, the increase of ar-
terial pressure, patient’s agitation, with stretching of ab-
dominal and pelvic muscles, caused an important trac-
tion at the suture level; the consequent hematoma pu-
shed way, through the rectal wall, opening into the ab-
dominal cavity.
This dynamic is supported by peritonism signs and
CT scan finding (Figs. 1-3). It’s important to note that
in our patient, unlike the similar case previously men-
tioned, that needed a colostomy, rectal mucosa was not
broken; so, no bacterial contaminations occurred and the
patient recovered in few days. No surgical techniques is
exempt from complications and the same occours for
Longo’s technique. Nevertheless many Authors have been
criticizing these techniques for the serious complications
described in literature (2, 3, 5).
We conclude with some remarks:
- hemorrhoid pathology is often underestimated and
considerated like simple surgery, not considering
and accepting probable complications;
- severe complications have been described for all
kinds of hemorrhoid surgical techniques (6);
- rectal prolapse is nowadays considered the cause
of hemorrhoid glide and, if we accept this con-
cept, surgery has to be directed to prolapse re-
Fig. 1 - CT scan shows the staple line along the wall of the rectum.
Fig. 2 - Plain CT scan shows hyperdense hematoma within the right wall of the
rectum. Note small. gas bubble within the left wall of the rectum (arrow) . He-
moperitoneum is also present.
Fig. 3 - Postcontrast CT scan shows hemoperitoneum adjacent to the liver and
spleen.
0199 9 Hemoperiton_Racalbuto:- 14-04-2011 15:51 Pagina 273
© CIC Edizioni Internazionali
274
A. Racalbuto et al.
section (recto-anopexy, STARR);
- rectopexy using stapler is to consider like a
(complete) rectal resection; so it should be cata-
logued in complex surgery;
- so severe complications of this surgery, quietly rare,
should be accepted; this is a recent technique, in
evolution, and above all, susceptible of improve-
ment.
1. Longo A. Treatment of hamorrhoidal disease by reduction of mu-
cosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing devi-
ce: a new procedure. Proceedings of 6° World Congress of En-
doscopic Surgery and 6° International Congress of European As-
sociation for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Rome, 1998; 777-84
2. Nisar PJ, Achenson AG, Neal K, Scholefield JH. Stapled he-
morrhoidopexy compared with conventional haemorrhoidec-
tomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Co-
lon Rectum 2004; 47: 1837-45
3. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G. Postoperative complications after pro-
cedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal
resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 2008; 12: 7-
19
4. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Li-
cata A. Haemorrhoidal stapler prolassectomy vs Milligan Mor-
gan hemorrhoidectomy: a long term randomized trial. Int. Co-
lorectal Disease 2004; 19: 239-244.
5. Naldini G .Complicanze gravi non convenzionali della chirur-
gia con stapler per prolasso emorroidario e defecazione ostrui-
ta da rettocele ed intussuscezione rettale: SIUCP report. Osp Ital.
Chir. 2007; 13: 291-99
6. Mc Cloud IM, Jameson GS, Scott AN. Life –threathening se-
psis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review.
Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 748-755.
References
0199 9 Hemoperiton_Racalbuto:- 14-04-2011 15:51 Pagina 274
© CIC Edizioni Internazionali
... The high cost of haemorrhoidopexy equipment could be justified by the prompt reintroduction of the patient to the work force [4] that is demonstrated to be slower in patients to whom haemorrhoidectomy was performed. Complications involve postoperative thrombosis, urinary retention, anal stenosis, abscess, and anal fistula formation as well as sphincter damages with resulting incontinence disturbs: no statistical differences were reported for each complication between haemorrhoidectomy and haemorrhoidopexy [4], even though rare but severe complications are described after Longo procedure (hemoperitoneum [7], acute rectal obstruction [8], bacteraemia [9], persistent postoperative pain, and lethal sepsis [10]). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction . In the last years many mini-invasive approaches were developed in order to reduce postoperative pain and complication after haemorrhoid surgery: one of these alternatives is represented by Hemorpex System, a relatively young technique that combines transanal dearterialization with mucopexy through a dedicated proctoscope. Case Presentation . A 78-year-old male patient was admitted to the Emergency Department for acute urinary retention and elevated temperature. Hemorpex procedure was performed 4 years before. Clinical, endoscopic, and radiological findings demonstrated the presence of multiple diverticula-like structures fulfilled by purulent fluid and a deep alteration of the normal anatomy of the rectum. He was treated following the standard protocol of acute diverticulitis and full recovery from symptoms was achieved. Discussion . Hemorpex System is a young technique, and nowadays-available studies lack long-term follow-up data. Anatomical changes induced by the procedure are consistent and definitive. Our patient luckily demonstrated a prompt response to conservative treatment, but it must be taken into account that, in case of medical treatment failure, surgical approach would be necessary and the actual patient anatomical changes could lead the surgeon to unavoidable threatening maneuvers.
... La complicació n má s precoz tras AMC es el sangrado postoperatorio a nivel de la línea de grapado en las primeras 24 h, que puede llevar a reintervenció n inmediata 52,53 . Es una complicació n grave que requiere reexploració n bajo anestesia. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Circular mucosal anopexy (CMA) achieves a more comfortable postoperative period than resective techniques. But complications and recurrences are not infrequent. This study aims to evaluate of the efficacy of CMA in the treatment of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse (RMP). Method From 1999 to 2011, 613 patients underwent surgery for either hemorrhoids or RMP in our hospital. CMA was performed in 327 patients. Gender distribution was 196 male and 131 female. Hemorrhoidal grades were distributed as follows: 28 patients had RMP, 46 2nd grade, 146 3rd grade and 107 4th grade. Major ambulatory surgery (MAS) was performed in 79.9%. Recurrence of hemorrhoids was studied and groups of recurrence and no-recurrence were compared. Postoperative pain was evaluated by Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) as well as early complications. Results A total of 31 patients needed reoperation (5 RMP, 2 with 2nd grade, 17 with 3rd grade, 7 with 4th grade). No statistically significant differences were found between the non-recurrent group and the recurrent group with regards to gender, surgical time or hemorrhoidal grade, but there were differences related to age. In the VAS, 81.3% of patients expressed a postoperative pain ≤2 at the first week. Five patients needed reoperation for early postoperative bleeding. Six patients needed admission for postoperative pain. Conclusions Recurrence rate is higher in CMA than in resective techniques. CMA is a useful technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids in MAS. Pain and the rate of complications are both low.
... La complicació n má s precoz tras AMC es el sangrado postoperatorio a nivel de la línea de grapado en las primeras 24 h, que puede llevar a reintervenció n inmediata 52,53 . Es una complicació n grave que requiere reexploració n bajo anestesia. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Circular mucosal anopexy (CMA) achieves a more comfortable postoperative period than resective techniques. But complications and recurrences are not infrequent. This study aims to evaluate of the efficacy of CMA in the treatment of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse (RMP). Method: From 1999 to 2011, 613 patients underwent surgery for either hemorrhoids or RMP in our hospital. CMA was performed in 327 patients. Gender distribution was 196 male and 131 female. Hemorrhoidal grades were distributed as follows: 28 patients had RMP, 46 2nd grade, 146 3rd grade and 107 4th grade. Major ambulatory surgery (MAS) was performed in 79.9%. Recurrence of hemorrhoids was studied and groups of recurrence and no-recurrence were compared. Postoperative pain was evaluated by Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) as well as early complications. Results: A total of 31 patients needed reoperation (5 RMP, 2 with 2nd grade, 17 with 3rd grade,/with 4th grade). No statistically significant differences were found between the non-recurrent group and the recurrent group with regards to gender, surgical time or hemorrhoidal grade, but there were differences related to age. In the VAS, 81.3% of patients expressed a postoperative pain ≤ 2 at the first week. Five patients needed reoperation for early postoperative bleeding. Six patients needed admission for postoperative pain. Conclusions: Recurrence rate is higher in CMA than in resective techniques. CMA is a useful technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids in MAS. Pain and the rate of complications are both low.
Article
Objectives To know the influence of the stapled line height (SLH) in the recurrence rate and the postoperative disturbances in stapled anopexy (SA) for the treatment of hemorrhoids.DesignSimple randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Randomization with closed-envelope technique in two groups with two different SLH.SettingColorectal Surgery Unit. Department of General Surgery. Hospital de Mataró (Barcelona, Spain).Participants119 patients with the diagnosis of symptomatic third- and fourth-grade hemorrhoids were included.InterventionSA was performed with two different SLH: group A, 4.5 cm (58 patients) and group B, 6 cm (61 patients) from the external anal verge. Postoperative disturbances were evaluated by a colorectal surgeon who was blind for the randomization and pain was measured (visual analogic scale) one week and 3 months after surgery. Mean operative time, number of hemostatic stitches performed and resected mucosal area were considered as well. Mean follow-up was 11.05 ± 1.6 years.ResultsDifferences between the operative time and resected mucosa-submucosa area were not found. The patients of group A needed a significantly higher number of stitches for intraoperative bleeding control along the stapled line. We did not found differences between both groups in terms of postoperative pain neither anorectal disturbances. At the follow-up, persistence of symptomatology was 10.41% in group A and 10.71% in group B, without statistically significance. Neither mortality nor undesirable effects occurred in the series.ConclusionsSLH do not influence the recurrence rate neither the postoperative evolution in SA.Trial registrationClinical Trials NCT03383926.
Article
Full-text available
Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.
Article
The notable success of stapled prolapsectomy in recent years led us to compare this technique with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in terms of the results obtained both in the immediate postoperative period and in the long term. We performed conventional hemorrhoidectomy on 50 randomly selected patients and operated on a further 50 using the stapler technique. The patients were monitored over the immediate postoperative period (e.g., type of anesthesia, mean duration of operation, mean hospitalization time, analgesic administration, time before returning to work) and over a long-term follow-up period of 48 months (later complications such as prolapse relapse, bleeding, stenosis, incontinence). The stapled group experienced significantly less pain (mean number of analgesic tablets 2.60 vs. 15.9) and returned to normal activity sooner (8.04 vs. 16.9 days), as reported by other authors. In the long-term follow-up at 48 months, stapled hemorrhoidectomy was found to control prolapse, discharge, and bleeding, with no stenosis or significant incontinence, in 94% of cases. Our conclusions confirm the excellent advantages of stapled hemorrhoidectomy which allows the rapid recovery of patients and also promises the complete resolution of hemorrhoidal prolapse in the long term.
Article
This study was designed to determine whether conventional hemorrhoidectomy or stapled hemorrhoidopexy is superior for the management of hemorrhoids. A systematic review of all randomized trials comparing conventional hemorrhoidectomy with stapled hemorrhoidopexy was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the terms "hemorrhoid*" or "haemorrhoid*" and "stapl*." A list of clinical outcomes was extracted. Meta-analysis was calculated if possible. Fifteen trials recruiting 1,077 patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 37 months. Qualitative analysis showed that stapled hemorrhoidopexy is less painful compared with hemorrhoidectomy. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has a shorter inpatient stay (weighted mean difference, -1.02 days; 95 percent confidence interval, -1.47 to -0.57; P = 0.0001), operative time (weighted mean difference, -12.82 minutes; 95 percent confidence interval, -22.61 to -3.04; P = 0.01), and return to normal activity (standardized mean difference, -4.03 days; 95 percent confidence interval, -6.95 to -1.10; P = 0.007). Studies in a day-case setting do not prove that stapled hemorrhoidopexy is more feasible than conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has a higher recurrence rate (odds ratio, 3.64; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.40-9.47; P = 0.008) at a minimum follow-up of six months. Although stapled hemorrhoidopexy is widely used, the data available on long-term outcomes is limited. The variability in case selection and reported end points are difficulties in interpreting results. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has unique potential complications and is a less effective cure compared with hemorrhoidectomy. With this understanding, it may be offered to patients seeking a less painful alternative to conventional surgery. Hemorrhoidectomy remains the "gold standard" of treatment.
Article
Haemorrhoids are a common complaint with estimates suggesting a prevalence of 4% of the adult population. Treatments such as rubber band ligation (RBL), sclerotherapy and excisional surgery have been in use for many years, and recently stapled haemorrhoidopexy, or procedure for prolapsing haemorrhoids (PPH) has gained acceptance. However, there have been consistent reports of severe sepsis, including a number of deaths. The purpose of this review was to assess the scale of the problem, and identify any predisposing factors, common presenting features, and treatment options in those who suffer these complications. Twenty-nine papers were identified, reporting 38 patients. Of these, 17 had undergone RBL, three had sclerotherapy, one had cryotherapy, 10 had excisional surgery and seven had PPH. Ten died as a result of their sepsis. The cases included 16 with perineal sepsis, seven with retroperitoneal gas and oedema, and six with liver abscesses. Common presenting features were urinary difficulties, fever, severe pain, septic shock and leucocytosis. Most were managed by means of surgery, although a minority survived having received conservative therapy. With the exception of two patients (one of whom was human immunodeficiency virus positive and the other had a drug-induced agranulocytosis) all were well prior to surgery. Although extremely uncommon, severe sepsis does occur post-treatment for haemorrhoids and all surgeons who treat such patients should be aware of the potential complications and alert to their presenting features. Early presentation without evidence of tissue necrosis may be managed conservatively, although most cases are managed by means of surgery.
Treatment of hamorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure
  • A Longo
Longo A. Treatment of hamorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of 6° World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery and 6° International Congress of European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Rome, 1998; 777-84
Complicanze gravi non convenzionali della chirurgia con stapler per prolasso emorroidario e defecazione ostruita da rettocele ed intussuscezione rettale: SIUCP report
  • G Naldini
Naldini G.Complicanze gravi non convenzionali della chirurgia con stapler per prolasso emorroidario e defecazione ostruita da rettocele ed intussuscezione rettale: SIUCP report. Osp Ital. Chir. 2007; 13: 291-99
Life –threathening sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review
  • Mc Cloud
  • Im Jameson
  • Gs Scott
Mc Cloud IM, Jameson GS, Scott AN. Life –threathening sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 748-755.