Content uploaded by Jackie Wood
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jackie Wood on Feb 21, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2011, 17, 1573-1575 1573
1381-6128/11 $58.00+.00 © 2011 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Visceral Pain: Spinal Afferents, Enteric Mast Cells, Enteric Nervous System and
Stress
Jackie D. Wood*
Department of Physiology & Cell Biology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus, Ohio, USA
Abstract: This review aims to examine current basic and clinical concepts, the results of which are expanding our understanding of vis-
ceral hypersensitivity and functional abdominal pain of intestinal origin in relation to the enteric nervous system (ENS), spinal sensory
neurons and enteric mast cells. Advances in this sphere are translating to improved insight into chronic functional abdominal and pelvic
pain syndromes in general.
Keywords: Stress, corticotropin releasing factor, irritable bowel syndrome, sensory afferents, abdominal pain.
INTRODUCTION
Functional abdominal/pelvic pain syndromes are those for
which no abnormal physical or metabolic processes can be found
that explain the symptoms. Functional pain syndromes include
urologic chronic pain, the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), prostati-
tis, fibromyalgia and vulvodynia with overlapping morbidity occur-
ring for one or more of these. High comorbidity is reported, for
example, for IBS with the painful urinary bladder syndrome of
interstitial cystitis and with fibromyalgia [1,2] . These are debilitat-
ing syndromes, with unknown etiologies, which cause major mor-
bidity and economic impact. Patients with IBS have significantly
higher rates of urinary system problems including interstitial cysti-
tis [3]. Approximately one-third of patients attending urological
clinics for symptoms of pelvic pain are reported to have a diagnosis
of IBS [3]. Women are affected in a majority of the cases and the
symptoms can be sufficiently severe as to compromise ability to
function in daily life. Comorbidity of IBS with fibromyalgia is in-
teresting in terms of the underlying basic science because IBS is a
visceral pain syndrome with lowered threshold to bowel distension
while fibromyalgia is somatic with lowered thresholds for tactile
stimulation. Comorbidity is of interest for the present topic in that
only the subset of patients who have both IBS and fibromyalgia
experience both visceral and somatic hypersensitivity [4].
CROSS-SENSITIZATION
Presently, there is no clear explanation for how hypersensitivity
in one visceral organ might be transferred to another organ or for
that matter between a visceral organ and tactile allodynia in the
skin. Nevertheless, it is becoming clear in animal models that mast
cells, spinal afferents and neurogenic inflammation form a common
denominator in the sharing of hypersensitivity between abdominal
viscera. Uterine inflammation induced by either chemical irritation
or endometriosis in rat models induces inflammation and hypersen-
sitivity in the urinary bladder and colon and the inflammatory cros-
stalk is interrupted by resection of sensory afferents in the hypogas-
tric nerve [5]. Likewise, colonic irritation by either mucosal irritants
(e.g., TNBS colitis) or mechanical distension induces inflammation
associated with sensitization of spinal afferents and mast cell acti-
vation in the urinary bladder of rats [6,7].
Studies in which capsaicin is Instilled in the urinary blader to
stimulate the afferents, which transmit information out of the blad
der, evokes hypersensitivity to distention in the colon [8-10]. Instil-
lation of a local anesthetic (e.g., lidocaine), along with capsaicin,
*Address Correspondence to this author at the Department of Physiology
and Cell Biology, 304 Hamilton Hall, 1645 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio
43210, U.S.A; Tel: 1-614-2925449; Fax: 1-614-2924888;
E-mail: wood.13@osu.edu
prevents the sensitizing cross talk to the colon. In similar manner
experimentally-induced inflammation in the bladder evokes tactile
cutaneous allodynia in mouse models. Investigators doing this kind
of research suggest that the evidence points to mast cell release of
histamine as the primary factor in the sensitization of the bladder
afferent innervation to distension [9,8].
It has long been known that antidromic stimulation and backfir-
ing of the sensory innervation inside the lungs or skeletal joints
evoke neurogenic inflammation and hypersensitivity in the airways
and arthritic pain in the joints [11,12]. The evidence suggests that
this might be the case also for the urinary bladder and the gut. Sub-
stance P release from the afferent innervation is implicated as the
stimulus for neurogenic inflammation in both the joints and airways
[13].
A logical explanation for the cross talk between the intestine
and neighboring pelvic organs (e.g., urinary bladder) is that infor-
mation transmitted by sensitized intestinal afferents project to the
same spinal interneurons that receive input from bladder afferents.
Earlier studies showed that the majority of spinal neurons that re-
spond to bladder stimulation also respond to colon stimulation and
vice versa, and that activity in the colonic nerves modulates the
neural control of micturition [14,15]. Based on the available litera-
ture (see next two topics), it can be logically assumed that sensitiza-
tion of intestinal afferents by mediators released from enteric mast
cells underlies both the well documented hypersensitivity to colonic
distension associated with inflammation or stress in rodent models
and the neurogenic cross talk now known to take place between the
colon and urinary bladder.
SPINAL AFFERENTS
Noxious stimulation in the intestinal tract is detected by specific
sensory neurons that have their cell bodies located in dorsal root
ganglia (DRG). Beyak et al. (2004; 2005) [16,17] reported evidence
from a mouse model for colitis that hyperalgesia develops as a re-
sult of enhanced excitability of subsets of neurons in the DRG [16].
This kind of sensory information from the bowel is transmitted by
mesenteric afferents to the DRG and on to second order interneu-
rons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Anterograde tracing tech-
niques for following sensory afferents into the intestinal wall show
how the afferents branch within the ENS myenteric plexus and send
projections into the ganglia where some form synapses with neuron
cell somas and others form specialized endings that discharge ac-
tion potentials in response to mechanical stimulation [18,19]. Elec-
trical stimulation of mesenteric afferents, at the same time as re-
cording from neurons in the ENS, evokes excitatory responses in
the neurons [20]. These responses reflect release of substance P and
calcitonin gene related peptide from presynaptic sensory terminals
1574 Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 16 Jackie D. Wood
on ENS neurons within the ganglia that are seen in the anterograde
tracings of Tassicker et al. [18].
Receptors for bradykinin, ATP, adenosine, prostaglandins, leu-
kotrienes, histamine and mast cell proteases are expressed on sen-
sory nerve terminals in the intestine, which include the terminal
endings found inside myenteric ganglia [21]. Any of these mast cell
or ischemia-related mediators fire the afferent terminal when ap-
plied experimentally and have potential for elevating the sensitivity
of the terminal to its preferred stimulus modality, especially in the
disordered conditions associated with inflammation or ischemia.
This suspicion is reinforced by findings that a reduced threshold for
painful responses to balloon distension in the large bowel is associ-
ated with degranulation of mast cells in animal models. Treatment
with mast cell stabilizing drugs prevents lowering of the pain
threshold to distension, which occurs during mucosal inflammation
in the animal models [22]. Based on discoveries of this nature, it
has been suggested that mast cell stabilization might prove to be an
efficacious treatment in human IBS [23, 24].
ENTERIC MAST CELLS
Signaling between enteric mast cells and the neural elements of
the ENS in food allergies and parasitic infections is a significant
aspect of neurogastroenterology [25-27]. Enteric mast cells are
packed with granules that are sites of storage for a broad mix of
preformed chemical mediators. Antigens stimulate the mast cells to
release the mediators, which then diffuse in paracrine manner into
the extracellular space inside the ENS. Evidence that enteric mast
cells express receptors for corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and
that CRF stimulates release of mediators from mast cells is accumu-
lating. This includes evidence that subepithelial mast cells in mu-
cosal biopsies from human colon express immunoreactivity for
CRF1 and CRF2 receptors [28,29] and early results in my laboratory
at Ohio State University shows coexpression of CRF1 and CRF2
receptors by mast cells in guinea pig colon and human jejunum
[29].
Release of mast cell proteases (e.g., mast cell protease II) into
the systemic circulation and intestinal lumen is a marker for de-
granulation of enteric mucosal mast cells. Release of proteases into
the circulation occurs as a conditioned response in laboratory ani-
mals to either light or auditory stimuli after pairing with antigenic
sensitization [30]. In humans release of mast cell proteases into the
lumen of the small intestine occurs as a response to stress [31],
which like the animal studies, reflects a brain to enteric mast cell
connection [31]. Stimulation of neurons in the brain stem by intrac-
erebroventricular injection of thyrotropin-releasing hormone evokes
degranulation of mast cells in the rat small intestine and adds to the
evidence in support of a CNS to mast cell connection [32]. Electri-
cal stimulation to backfire sensory afferents in the intestinal mesen-
tery evokes release of mast cell mediators (e.g., histamine and mast
cell proteases) inside the walls of the small and large intestine [29].
Restraint stress exacerbates nociceptive responses to distension that
are associated with increased release of histamine from mast cells
[33]. The brain-to-mast cell connection is significant because mast
cell hyperplasia is associated with the diarrhea-predominant form of
IBS [34](Barbara et al., 2004) and the gastrointestinal symptoms of
cramping lower abdominal pain, urgency and diarrhea, which are
associated with mast cell degranulation, are expected to be the same
whether the mast cells are degranulated by antigen-antibody cross-
linking as in food allergies or input from the brain during stress.
CORTICTROPIN RELEASING FACTOR AND STRESS
CRF is expressed predominantly in the hypothalamic paraven-
tricular nucleus in the brain where it is released during stress. The
majority of the endocrine, neurochemical, electrophysiological and
behavioral effects, which are reported to occur after experimental
injection of CRF into the brain, are essentially the same as those
associated with experimentally-induced stress in one form or the
other in animal models. Virtually all of the effects of intra-brain
applications of CRF can be reduced or abolished by administration
of CRF receptor antagonists and this reinforces belief in a predomi-
nant central role for CRF in stress [35]. Gastric and small intestinal
motility in animals are suppressed by CRF injection in the brain
[36-38]. Unlike the inhibitory effects in the upper GI tract, stress
evokes neurogenic secretory diarrhea, increases permeability of the
mucosal epithelial barrier, and accelerates colon transit in animal
models, human volunteers, and IBS patients [40,41]. Intracerebral
administration of non-selective or selective CRF1 receptor antago-
nists suppresses the effects of both stress and administration of CRF
[40,42, 43].
CONCLUSION
Release of CRF inside the “big brain” and inside the ENS in
concert with ENS/spinal afferent interactions with enteric mast cells
during stress are transformed into symptoms of cramping abdomi-
nal pain, fecal urgency and watery diarrhea, which are hallmarks of
diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, infectious enteritis,
food allergy, and inflammatory bowel disease in humans. Interac-
tive signaling between the ENS, spinal sensory afferent nerves and
enteric mast cells is a key to understanding visceral pain. A positive
feed-back signaling loop connecting spinal afferents, ENS neurons
and enteric mast cells amplifies nociceptive and other forms of
sensory input from the gut to the central nervous system. This trans-
lates to basic understanding of visceral hypersensitivity, sensory
crosstalk among pelvic viscera and the emerging recognition that
functional abdominal pain can involve comorbidity of gut hyper-
sensitivity with other pain syndromes elsewhere in the body (e.g.,
interstitial cystitis, prostatitis, vulvodynia, vulvar vestibulitis and
fibromyalgia). This suggests that ENS, mast cells and spinal affer-
ents might be productive targets for pharmacotherapy in human
functional gastrointestinal symptoms associated with psychogenic
stress, postinfectious enteritis and anti-enteric autoimmune events.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The opinions expressed in this review are my own. Neverthe-
less, they are based on work and interactions in my laboratory with
a progression of outstanding students and visiting scientists whose
discoveries have helped shape current concepts of Neurogastroen-
terology. Work on enteric neurophysiology in my laboratory has
been supported continuously by the National Institutes of Health
NIDDK Institute since 1973.
REFERENCES
[1] Whitehead WE, Palsson O, Jones KR. Systematic review of the
comorbidity of irritable bowel syndrome with other disorders: what
are the causes and implications? Gastroenterology 2002; 22: 1140-
56.
[2] Zimmerman J. Extraintestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syn-
drome and inflammatory bowel diseases: nature, severity, and rela-
tionship to gastrointestinal symptoms. Dig Dis Sci 2003; 48: 743-9.
[3] Francis CY, Whorwell PJ. The irritable bowel syndrome. Postgrad
Med J 1997; 73: 1-7.
[4] Chang L, Mayer, EA, Johnson T, FitzGerald LZ, Naliboff B. Dif-
ferences in somatic perception in female patients with irritable
bowel syndrome with and without fibromyalgia. Pain 2000; 84:
297-307.
[5] Winnard KP, Dmitrieva N, Berkley KJ. Cross-organ interactions
between reproductive, gastrointestinal, and urinary tracts: modula-
tion by estrous stage and involvement of the hypogastric nerve. Am
J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006; 291: R1592-601.
[6] Ustinova EE, Fraser MO, Pezzone MA. Cross-talk and sensitiza-
tion of bladder afferent nerves. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 77-81.
[7] Malykhina AP. Neural mechanisms of pelvic organ cross-
sensitization. Neuroscience 2007; 149: 660-72.
[8] Sant GR, Kempuraj D, Marchand JE, Theoharides TC. The mast
cell in interstitial cystitis: role in pathophysiology and pathogene-
sis. Urology 2007; 69(4 Suppl): 34-40
Visceral Pain Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 16 1575
[9] Rudick CN, Bryce PJ, Guichelaar LA, Berry RE, Klumpp DJ. Mast
cell-derived histamine mediates cystitis pain. PLoS ONE 2008; 3:
e2096.
[10] Rudick CN, Chen MC, Mongiu AK, Klumpp DJ. Organ cross talk
modulates pelvic pain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
2007; 293: R1191-8.
[11] Butler CA, Heaney LG. Neurogenic inflammation and asthma.
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2007; 6: 127-32.
[12] Elekes K, Helyes Z, Nemeth J, et al. Role of capsaicin-sensitive
afferents and sensory neuropeptides in endotoxin-induced airway
inflammation and consequent bronchial hyperreactivity in the
mouse. Regul Pept 2007; 141: 44-54.
[13] O'Connor TM, O'Connell J, O'Brien DI, Goode T, Bredin CP,
Shanahan F. The role of substance P in inflammatory disease. J
Cell Physiol 2004; 201: 167-80.
[14] McMahon SB, Morrison JF. Two group of spinal interneurones that
respond to stimulation of the abdominal viscera of the cat. J Physiol
1982; 322: 21-34.
[15] Floyd K, McMahon S B, Morrison JF. Inhibition of the micturition
reflex by stimulation of pelvic nerve afferents from the colon. J
Physiol 1978; 284: 39P-40P.
[16] Beyak MJ, Ramji N, Krol KM, Kawaja MD, Vanner SJ. Two TTX-
resistant Na+ currents in mouse colonic dorsal root ganglia neurons
and their role in colitis-induced hyperexcitability. Am J Physiol
Gastrointest Liver Physiol.2004; 287: G845-55.
[17] Beyak MJ Vanner S. Inflammation-induced hyperexcitability of
nociceptive gastrointestinal DRG neurones: the role of voltage-
gated ion channels. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2005; 7: 175-86.
[18] Tassicker BC, Hennig GW, Costa M, Brookes SJ. Rapid an-
terograde and retrograde tracing from mesenteric nerve trunks to
the guinea-pig small intestine in vitro. Cell Tissue Res 1999; 295:
437-52.
[19] Lynn PA, Olsson C, Zagorodnyuk V, Costa M, Brookes SJ.
Rectal intraganglionic laminar endings are transduction sites of ex-
trinsic mechanoreceptors in the guinea pig rectum.
Gastroenterology 2003; 125(3): 786-94.
[20] Takaki M, Nakayama S. Effects of mesenteric nerve stimulation on
the electrical activity of myenteric neurons in the guinea pig ileum.
Brain Res 1988; 442: 351-3.
[21] Beyak MJ, Bulmer DCE, Jiang W, Keating C, Rong W, Grundy D.
Extrinsic sensory afferent nerves innervating the gastrointestinal
tract. Johnson LR; Barrett KE; Ghishan FK; Merchant JL; Said
HM, and Wood JD. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, 4th
Edition. San Diego: Academic Press; 2006; pp. 685-725.
[22] Coelho AM, Fioramonti J, Bueno L. Mast cell degranulation in-
duces delayed rectal allodynia in rats: role of histamine and 5-HT.
Dig Dis Sci 1998; 43: 727-37.
[23] Siddiqui AA, Miner PB. The role of mast cells in common gastro-
intestinal diseases. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2004; 4: 47-54.
[24] Santos J; Alonzo C; GuilarteM; Vicario M, and Malagelada JR.
Targeting Mast Cells in the Treatment of Functional Gastrointesti-
nal Disorders Curr Opin Pharmacol 2006; 6: 541-6.
[25] Frieling T, Palmer JM, Cooke HJ, Wood JD. Neuroimmune com-
munication in the submucous plexus of guinea pig colon after in-
fection with Trichinella spiralis. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 1602-
9.
[26] Frieling T, Cooke HJ, Wood JD. Neuroimmune communication in
the submucous plexus of guinea pig colon after sensitization to
milk antigen. Am J Physiol 1994; 267: G1087-93.
[27] Liu S, Hu HZ, Gao N, et al. Neuroimmune interactions in guinea
pig stomach and small intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver
Physiol 2003; 284: G154-64.
[28] Soderholm JD. Corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) regulates
macromolecular permeability via mast cells in normal human colo-
nic biopsies in vitro. Gut 2008; 57: 50-8.
[29] Wallon C, Yang P, Keita, et al. Corticotropin releasing hormone
(CRH) regulates macromolecular permeability via mast cells in
normal human colonic biopsies in vitro. Gut 2008; 57: 50-8.
[30] Wang X, Wang G, Xia Y, et al. Mast cell activation by corticotro-
pin releasing factor (CRF) in guinea pig and human intestine. Di-
gestive Disease Week Abstracts 2010; Abstract T2047.
[31] MacQueen G, Marshall J, Perdue M, Siegel S, Bienenstock J. Pav-
lovian conditioning of rat mucosal mast cells to secrete rat mast
cell protease II. Science 1989; 243: 83-5.
[32] Santos J, Saperas E, Nogueiras C, et al. Release of mast cell media-
tors into the jejunum by cold pain stress in humans. Gastroenterol-
ogy 1998; 114: 640-8.
[33] Santos J, Saperas E, Mourelle M, Antolin M, Malagelada JR.
Regulation of intestinal mast cells and luminal protein release by
cerebral thyrotropin-releasing hormone in rats. Gastroenterology
1996; 111: 1465-73.
[34] Gue M, Del Rio-Lacheze C, Eutamene H, Theodorou V, Fio-
ramonti J. Bueno L. Stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity to rec-
tal distension in rats: role of CRF and mast cells. Neurogastroen-
terol Motil 1997; 9: 271-9.
[35] Barbara G, Stanghellini V, De Giorgio R, et al. Activated mast
cells in proximity to colonic nerves correlate with abdominal pain
in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 693-702.
[36] Martinez V, Tache Y. CRF1 receptors as a therapeutic target for
irritable bowel syndrome. Curr Pharm Des 2006; 12: 4071-88.
[37] Bueno L, Fioramonti J. Effects of corticotropin-releasing factor,
corticotropin and cortisol on gastrointestinal motility in dogs. Pep-
tides 1986; 7: 73-7.
[38] Lenz HJ, Raedler A, Greten H, Vale WW, Rivier JE. Stress-
induced gastrointestinal secretory and motor responses in rats are
mediated by endogenous corticotropin-releasing factor. Gastroen-
terology 1988; 95: 1510-7.
[39] Wittmann T, Crenner F, Angel F, Hanusz L, Ringwald C, Grenier
JF. Long-duration stress. Immediate and late effects on small and
large bowel motility in rat. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 495-500.
[40] Gue M, Junien JL, Bueno L. Conditioned emotional response in
rats enhances colonic motility through the central release of corti-
cotropin-releasing factor. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 964-70.
[41] Sagami Y, Shimada Y, Tayama J, et al. Effect of a corticotropin
releasing hormone receptor antagonist on colonic sensory and mo-
tor function in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2004;
53: 958-64.
[42] Martinez V, Rivier J, Wang L, Tache Y. Central injection of a new
corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) antagonist, astressin, blocks
CRF- and stress-related alterations of gastric and colonic motor
function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997; 280: 754-60.
[43] Martinez V, Wang L, Rivier J, Grigoriadis D, Tache Y. Central
CRF, urocortins and stress increase colonic transit via CRF1 recep-
tors while activation of CRF2 receptors delays gastric transit in
mice. J Physiol 2004; 556: 221-34.
Received: April 8, 2011 Accepted: April 27, 2011
Copyright of Current Pharmaceutical Design is the property of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. and its content
may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express
written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.