Article

FMRI of the Face-Processing Network in the Ventral Temporal Lobe of Awake and Anesthetized Macaques

Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Neuron (Impact Factor: 15.05). 04/2011; 70(2):352-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.048
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The primate brain features specialized areas devoted to processing of faces, which human imaging studies localized in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and ventral temporal cortex. Studies in macaque monkeys, in contrast, revealed face selectivity predominantly in the STS. While this discrepancy could result from a true species difference, it may simply be the consequence of technical difficulties in obtaining high-quality MR images from the ventral temporal lobe. By using an optimized fMRI protocol we here report face-selective areas in ventral TE, the parahippocampal cortex, the entorhinal cortex, and the hippocampus of awake macaques, in addition to those already known in the STS. Notably, the face-selective activation of these memory-related areas was observed although the animals were passively viewing and it was preserved even under anesthesia. These results point to similarly extensive cortical networks for face processing in humans and monkeys and highlight potential homologs of the human fusiform face area.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Andreas S Tolias, Feb 28, 2014
  • Source
    • "Face-selective brain circuits appear to be strikingly similar in macaques and humans (see Ku et al. 2011). Furthermore, even in human brains single neurons were detected 9 The comparative approach is primarily intended here as a comparison between humans and other animals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we propose a way in which cognitive neuroscience could provide new insights on three aspects of social cognition: intersubjectivity, the human self, and language. We emphasize the crucial role of the body, conceived as the con-stitutive source of pre-reflective consciousness of the self and of the other. We provide a critical view of contemporary social cognitive neuroscience, arguing that the brain level of description is a necessary but not sufficient condition for study-ing intersubjectivity, the human self, and language; which are only properly vis-ible if coupled with a full appreciation of their intertwined relationship with the body. We introduce mirror mechanisms and embodied simulation and discuss their relevance to a new account of intersubjectivity and the human self. In this context, we focus on a specifically human modality of intersubjectivity: language. Aspects of social cognition related to language are discussed in terms of embodiment, while emphasizing the progress and limitations of this approach. We argue that a key aspect of human language consists in its decoupling from its usual denotative role, hence manifesting its power of abstraction. We discuss these features of hu-man language as instantiations of the Greek notion of paradeigma, originally ex-plored by Aristotle to refer to a typical form of rhetorical reasoning and relate it to embodied simulation. Paradigmatic knowledge connects the particular with the particular, moving from the contingent particular situation to an exemplary case. Similarly, embodied simulation is the suspension of the " concrete " application of a process: reuse of motor knowledge in the absence of the movement it realizes is an example of " paradigmatic knowledge. " This new epistemological approach to intersubjectivity generates predictions about the intrinsic functional nature of our social cognitive operations, cutting across, and not subordinated to, a specific on-tology of mind.
    Full-text · Chapter · Jan 2015
  • Source
    • "In contrast, other types of stimuli are processed in a more piecemeal manner, based on their feature components. Face-specific processing mechanisms are anatomically segregated in specialized pathways in the brain in both humans and monkeys (Kanwisher et al., 1997; Tsao et al., 2008; Pinsk et al., 2009; Rajimehr et al., 2009; Ku et al., 2011; Nasr and Tootell, 2012). Thus, it is possible that these unique aspects of face perception influence the generalization of fear responses across perceptually similar faces. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fear generalization is the production of fear responses to a stimulus that is similar – but not identical - to a threatening stimulus. Although prior studies have found that fear generalization magnitudes are qualitatively related to the degree of perceptual similarity to the threatening stimulus, the precise relationship between these two functions has not been measured systematically. Also, it remains unknown whether fear generalization mechanisms differ for social and non-social information. To examine these questions, we measured perceptual discrimination and fear generalization in the same subjects, using images of human faces and non-face control stimuli (“blobs”) that were perceptually matched to the faces. First, each subject’s ability to discriminate between pairs of faces or blobs was measured. Each subject then underwent a Pavlovian fear conditioning procedure, in which each of the paired stimuli were either followed (CS+) or not followed (CS-) by a shock. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) were also measured. Subjects were then presented with the CS+, CS- and five levels of a CS+-to-CS- morph continuum between the paired stimuli, based on individual discrimination thresholds. Finally, subjects rated the likelihood that each stimulus had been followed by a shock. Subjects showed both autonomic (SCR-based) and conscious (ratings-based) fear responses to morphs that they could not discriminate from the CS+ (generalization). For both faces and non-face objects, fear generalization was not found above discrimination thresholds. However, subjects exhibited greater fear generalization in the shock likelihood ratings compared to the SCRs, particularly for faces. These findings reveal that autonomic threat detection mechanisms in humans are highly sensitive to small perceptual differences between stimuli. Also, the conscious evaluation of threat shows broader generalization than autonomic responses, biased towards labeling a stimulus as threatening.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
    • "This motion issue could be largely mitigated by using contrast agents at low field, increasing the contrast-to-noise ratio by $5 at 1.5 T and $3 at 3 T (Vanduffel et al., 2001). Later improvements included developments of implanted focal single loop coils (Logothetis et al., 2002), external phased array coils (Ekstrom et al., 2008), spin-echo imaging (Ku et al., 2011), and implanted phased array coils (Janssens et al., 2012). Here we provide an overview of what has been achieved using fMRI in alert monkeys over the past 15 years, focusing on the visual system, by far the most investigated modality. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 1998 several groups reported the feasibility of fMRI experiments in monkeys, with the goal to bridge the gap between invasive nonhuman primate studies and human functional imaging. These studies yielded critical insights in the neuronal underpinnings of the BOLD signal. Furthermore, the technology has been successful in guiding electrophysiological recordings and identifying focal perturbation targets. Finally, invaluable information was obtained concerning human brain evolution. We here provide a comprehensive overview of awake monkey fMRI studies mainly confined to the visual system. We review the latest insights about the topographic organization of monkey visual cortex and discuss the spatial relationships between retinotopy and category- and feature-selective clusters. We briefly discuss the functional layout of parietal and frontal cortex and continue with a summary of some fascinating functional and effective connectivity studies. Finally, we review recent comparative fMRI experiments and speculate about the future of nonhuman primate imaging.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2014 · Neuron
Show more