Interaction between fluid balance and disease severity on patient outcome in the critically ill

Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Journal of critical care (Impact Factor: 2). 04/2011; 26(6):613-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.02.008
Source: PubMed


There is evidence in literature regarding the benefits of immediate aggressive fluid resuscitation together with conservative fluid management approach after initial stabilization. This retrospective study assesses the relationship between fluid balance during intensive care unit (ICU) stay and outcomes among general critically ill patients. In addition, we also aim to see the effect of fluid gain among patients with different disease severity.
A total of 639 patients admitted into ICU who stayed for 3 days or more were evaluated. Fluid balances during ICU stay were recorded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant factors associated with hospital mortality.
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV predicted risk of death, fluid balance on the second plus third ICU days, and total fluid balance during ICU stay were positively associated with hospital death. Significant positive fluid balance on first ICU day, in contrast, was negatively associated with hospital mortality. The positive correlation between standardized mortality ratio (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV) and fluid gain on the second plus third ICU days increases with disease severity.
Early adequate fluid resuscitation together with conservative late fluid management may provide better patient outcomes. The effect of fluid management strategy on patient outcome may depend on the underlying disease severity.

Download full-text


Available from: Hoi Ping Shum, Apr 30, 2014
  • Source
    • "Several studies have identified a relationship between fluid balance and mortality in critically ill patients [1] [2] [3], indicating that assessment and management of fluid balance may be critical in this patient population. In clinical practice, fluid balance is estimated by calculating the difference between fluid intake and output or scaling body weight on a daily basis. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Body weight fluctuates daily throughout a patient's stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to a variety of factors, including fluid balance, nutritional status, type of acute illness, and presence of comorbidities. This study investigated the association between change in body weight and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients during short-term hospitalization in the ICU. All patients admitted to the Gyeongsang National University hospital between January 2010 and December 2011 who met the inclusion criteria of age 18 or above and ICU hospitalization for at least 2 days were prospectively enrolled in this study. Body weight was measured at admission and daily thereafter using a bed scale. Univariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with mortality and the association between changes in body weight and clinical outcomes, including duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) use, length of ICU stay, and ICU mortality. Of the 140 patients examined, 33 died during ICU hospitalization, yielding an ICU mortality rate of 23.6%. Non-survivors experienced higher rates of severe sepsis and septic shock and greater weight gain than survivors on days 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of ICU hospitalization (P < .05). Increase of body weight on days 2 through 7 on ICU admission was correlated with the longer stay of ICU, and increase on days 3 through 7 on ICU admission was correlated with the prolonged use of mechanical ventilation. Increase of body weight on days 3 through 5 on ICU admission was associated with ICU mortality. Increase in body weight of critically ill patients may be correlated with duration of mechanical ventilation use and longer stay of ICU hospitalization and be associated with ICU mortality.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2013 · Journal of critical care
  • Source
    • "CKD had the highest hazard ratio (3.795) among independent outcome predictors, and it reminds us that baseline characteristics of patients should always be concerned even when investigators focus on biomarkers. Recent studies reported that fluid overload was associated with increased mortality and suggested fluid balance as a biomarker for adverse outcome (23-25). In this study, day one and day three fluid balance did not independently predict 90 day mortality, although patients with AKI had less 6 hr urine output and higher positive fluid balance with wider range than the non-AKI group. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although several urinary biomarkers have been validated as early diagnostic markers of acute kidney injury (AKI), their usefulness as outcome predictors is not well established. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic and prognostic abilities of urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) in heterogeneous critically ill patients. We prospectively collected data on patients admitted to medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) from July 2010 to June 2011. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and L-FABP at the time of ICU admission were quantitated. Of the 145 patients, 54 (37.2%) had AKI defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. AKI patients showed significantly higher level of urinary NGAL and L-FABP and also higher mortality than non-AKI patients. The diagnostic performances, assessed by the area under the ROC curve, were 0.773 for NGAL and 0.780 for L-FABP, demonstrating their usefulness in diagnosing AKI. In multivariate Cox analysis, urinary L-FABP was an independent predictor for 90-day mortality. Urinary L-FABP seems to be promising both for the diagnosis of AKI and for the prediction of prognosis in heterogeneous ICU patients. It needs to be further validated for clinical utility.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2013 · Journal of Korean medical science
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of fluid balance as an important contributor to patient morbidity and mortality in the peri-operative period is only now being understood. Numerous studies in disparate populations undergoing different surgeries suggest that. There is wide disparity in fluid administration regimen between speciality, country, and clinician. Recent meta-analyses of published studies have shown that restrictive fluid administration strategies may improve patient-centred outcomes when compared to liberal regimens. Current evidence suggests a significant role for fluid accumulation in the development of peri-operative complications. Fluid balance is best achieved using goal-directed techniques. The evidence base is, at present, sub-optimal, with a paucity of level 1 evidence for clinical decision-making. In the absence of level 1 evidence it is difficult to make firm recommendations about practice, though observational and single-centre data suggest a significant survival advantage may be conferred by the peri-operative administration of fluids to monitored physiological targets only. The Australian approach to peri-operative fluid management is to create level 1 evidence. To this end, the development of a large multicentre randomized controlled trial of peri-operative fluid administration is underway.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2011 · Current opinion in anaesthesiology
Show more