Predictors of Osteoporosis Screening Completion Rates in a Primary Care Practice

Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Center for Innovation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Population Health Management (Impact Factor: 1.51). 04/2011; 14(5):243-7. DOI: 10.1089/pop.2010.0057
Source: PubMed


The United States Preventive Services Task Force and the National Osteoporosis Foundation recommend routine osteoporosis screening for women aged 65 years or older. Previous studies have shown that the use of a clinical decision-support tool significantly improves screening rates. In a recently published study, a statistically significant improvement was found in the screening rates for eligible women with use of the tool. To evaluate whether a clinical decision-support tool independently predicts completion of osteoporosis screening tests and to identify predictors of screening completion, we examined the records of 2462 female patients who were eligible for osteoporosis screening but had no prior baseline screening and who were seen in our primary care practices in 2007 and 2008. Patient and provider characteristics and clinic visit type were identified, and their association with screening test completion was statistically analyzed using both univariate and multivariate models. Screening completion rates increased significantly from 2007 to 2008. Factors associated with increased likelihood of screening completion included race, marital status, residence, presence of comorbidity (cancer, rheumatologic disease), and the year and type of visit. Screening was less likely for women aged 80 years or older. The use of a point-of-care decision-support tool not only improved osteoporosis screening rates significantly but appeared to be an independent predictor of screening completion. It potentially can facilitate the systematic and effective delivery of preventive health services to patients in the primary care setting.

Download full-text


Available from: Kurt B Angstman
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Whether patients with 1 or more chronic illnesses are more or less likely to receive recommended preventive services is unclear and an important public health and health care system issue. We addressed this issue in a large national practice-based research network (PBRN) that maintains a longitudinal database derived from electronic health records. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study as of October 1, 2011, of the association between being up to date with 10 preventive services and the prevalence of 24 chronic illnesses among 667,379 active patients aged 18 years or older in 148 member practices in a national PBRN. We used generalized linear mixed models to assess for the association of being up to date with each preventive service as a function of the patient's number of chronic conditions, adjusted for patient age and encounter frequency. Results: Of the patients 65.4% had at least 1 of the 24 chronic illnesses. For 9 of the 10 preventive services there were strong associations between the odds of being up to date and the presence of chronic illness, even after adjustment for visit frequency and patient age. Odds ratios increased with the number of chronic conditions for 5 of the preventive services. Conclusions: Rather than a barrier, the presence of chronic illness was positively associated with receipt of recommended preventive services in this large national PBRN. This finding supports the notion that modern primary care practice can effectively deliver preventive services to the growing number of patients with multiple chronic illnesses.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2013 · The Annals of Family Medicine
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Osteoporosis is the most prevalent bone health issue for the elderly in the United States, creating huge economic, social and emotional burdens in the US population. Unfortunately, primary care providers do a poor job at providing adequate osteoporosis prevention (OP) to patients over 50 years of age. At Linda Vista Health Care Center (LVHCC) in San Diego, the number of missed opportunities to provide OP to our patients over 50 years old is consistent with other primary care sites in the US. Aim / Purpose of the Project: The purpose of this program improvement project is to increase both the frequency and depth of osteoporosis prevention by primary care providers at Linda Vista Health Care Center, which hopefully will translate into better bone health for the LVHCC patients. This will entail increasing both understanding and application of the National Osteoporosis Guidelines, as put forth by the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Design and Methods: This project utilizes a quasi-experimental, prospective pre and post intervention design. It is largely quantitative, but does collect some qualitative information for program evaluation and improvement. A multi-faceted program to increase the incidence of OP by clinicians at LVHC will be used. Based on the National Osteoporosis guidelines (by the National Osteoporosis Foundation), we used a provider education class, guideline summaries for easy reference, computerized screening tool for risk assessment of fracture, and reminder tools within the chart and patient exam rooms. To assess effectiveness of this intervention, 50 randomly chosen charts meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed for percent of patients with documented OP before intervention. Chart review at 3 months post intervention was then done on 50 charts, and this data is being analyzed for improved OP using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Data analysis is in progress. Conclusions and Implications: It is hoped that once analysis is complete, the interventions will have measurably increased the provision of OP by LVHCC providers, and will ultimately decrease the osteoporosis-related morbidity and mortality of older LVHCC patients.
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Apr 2012
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The FRAX(®) tool that calculates the 10-year probability of having a fracture has recently been validated for Belgium. Little is known about the perception and knowledge that GPs have about this tool in their daily practice. A survey has been conducted as part of a screening campaign for various diseases. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the perception and the knowledge of the FRAX(®) tool by GPs. The secondary objective was to assess the impact of an information brochure about the FRAX(®) tool on these outcomes. The survey was sent to a sample of 700 GPs after only half of them had received the information brochure. The survey results show that, out of the 193 doctors who responded to the survey, one-third know the FRAX(®) tool but less than 20 % use it in their daily clinical practice. Among those who use it, the FRAX(®) tool is largely seen as a complementary but not as an essential tool in the diagnosis or in the management of osteoporosis. It appears that the brochure could improve the knowledge of the FRAX(®) tool but it would not be more efficient on its use in daily practice than the other sources of information. At present, the use of the FRAX(®) tool in Belgium is limited but an information brochure could have a positive impact on the knowledge of the FRAX(®) tool.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2012 · Rheumatology International
Show more