A Decade of Experience Using mTor Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Journal of Transplantation 03/2011; 2011:913094. DOI: 10.1155/2011/913094
Source: PubMed


Some studies suggest that Sirolimus (SRL) is associated with an increased risk of death in liver transplant recipients compared to treatment with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). We compared patients who received SRL or CNI in the first year after liver transplant. Our database included 688 patients who received a liver transplant. The patients were divided into groups. (1) CNI + MPS (mycophenolate sodium) at time of discharge. (2) CNI + MPS at time of discharge; SRL was added within the first 6 months and continued through the first year. (3) CNI + MPS at time of discharge; SRL was added within the first 6 months and discontinued before the first year. (4) SRL as primary immunosuppression. (5) SRL as primary immunosuppression and discontinued before the first year. We used mortality and graft loss as the primary measures of outcome. We also quantified renal function using the change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the presence of biopsy proven acute cellular reject (ACR), and steroid-resistant rejection (SRR). There were no significant differences in mortality or graft loss. There was no difference in patient or graft survival. Patients that received SRL as primary immunosuppression had 50% less rejection compared to controls.

Download full-text


Available from: PubMed Central · License: CC BY
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The acronym mTOR defines a family of serine-threonine protein kinase called mammalian target of rapamycin. The major role of these kinases in the cell is to merge extracellular instructions with information about cellular metabolic resources and to control the rate of anabolic and catabolic processes accordingly. In mammalian cells mTOR is present in two distinct heteromeric protein complexes commonly referred to as mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2), involved in the control of a wide variety of cellular processes. It has been recently reported that compounds acting modulating mTOR activity, beside mediating the well recognized processes exploited in the anticancer and immunosuppressant effects, are provided with neuroprotective properties. In fact, mTOR is involved in the mechanism of PI3K/Akt-induced upregulation of glutamate transporter 1, GLT1, that is linked to several neuronal disorders such as stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Furthermore, in adult brain mTOR is crucial for numerous physiological processes such as synaptic plasticity, learning, memory, and brain control of food uptake. Moreover, the activation of mTOR pathway is involved in neuronal development, dendrite development and spine morphogenesis.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2011 · Current Opinion in Pharmacology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite recent advances in the understanding of the biologic basis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development, the clinical management of the disease remains a major challenge. Deregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, which is a prototypic survival pathway, is increasingly implicated in HCC carcinogenesis. In this article, we detailed the role of this pathway in the pathogenesis of HCC and provide an update on the preclinical and clinical development of various agents targeting this key survival/proliferation pathway, which include various PI3K inhibitors, Akt inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors for HCC. In addition, we highlighted the therapeutic potential of combination strategy for mTOR inhibitors with conventional chemotherapy, in particular, antimicrotubule agents, other molecular targeting agents, as well as radiotherapy.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2011 · Future Oncology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Key Points 1. Our increasing understanding of the signaling pathways and cellular interactions in transplant immunobiology has facilitated targeted strategies using novel immunosuppressive agents. 2. The pattern of immunosuppressive drug use in the United States continues to change, and the changes include the use of antibody induction therapy and the agents used in maintenance therapy. 3. The driving forces behind the development of new immunosuppressive regimens are the long-term complications of current immunosuppressive regimens (particularly renal dysfunction and metabolic disturbances). Liver Transpl, 2011.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2011 · Liver Transplantation
Show more