ArticlePDF Available

Positional Plagiocephaly among Infants: Identification, Management and Prevention

Authors:
University of Toronto Medical Journal
202
the flattened side to be positioned anteriorly and the forehead
and hemiface to protrude relative to the opposite side. The
skull takes on a classic parallelogram appearance when viewed
from above. This presentation differs from that of craniosyn-
ostosis, an uncommon condition that results in premature
fusion of the sutures of the skull (Figure 1). Unlike craniosyn-
ostosis, positional plagiocephaly is primarily a cosmetic problem
with no adverse effect on either brain growth or normal motor
development.
The frequency of reported PP has increased dramatically since
the early 1990’s with incidence reported to be between 8% to
48% of healthy newborns.
1,2,3
There are several contributing fac-
tors leading to the development of PP. The most significant
factor contributing to the development of PP is a child’s pref-
erence to look in one direction when placed on his/her back
to sleep. Congenital muscular torticollis, although less common
than positional preference, can also contribute to the develop-
Abstract
There has been a dramatic increase in the incidence of
infant positional plagiocephaly (PP) within the last 8
years, most likely associated with the supine sleep recom-
mendations for the prevention of Sudden Infant Death
Syndrome (SIDS). Although not a medical condition,
skull and facial deformity associated with PP causes a
great deal of anxiety among parents, resulting in signifi-
cant use of medical time and resources. Fortunately, PP
is preventable and responds favourably to conservative
management. A multi-disciplinary group at the The
Hospital for Sick Children (i.e. health promotion specialist,
physical therapists, craniofacial surgeon) developed a multi-
level educational initiative to reduce the incidence of PP.
This education program is unique because of its preventative
approach targeting new parents and caregivers as well as
infant health care practitioners (IHCP) such as pediatricians,
family physicians and public health nurses. Resources
include 1) a poster entitled “Why time on his tummy is good
for his head”; 2) a parent pamphlet entitled “You can pre-
vent baby flathead” and 3) an IHCP guide entitled “A
Clinician’s Guide to Positional Plagiocephaly”. This infor-
mation is relevant to paediatric health care professionals and
professionals involved in health promotion and prevention at
paediatric health facilities.
Defining the Problem
Positional plagiocephaly (PP) is a deformation of the skull
resulting from extrinsic forces acting on an intrinsically normal
skull. Typically the cranial vault is shifted causing the ear on
Rehabilitation Medicine
Positional Plagiocephaly among Infants: Identification, Management
and Prevention
Rita Damignani, M.Sc.,B.Sc.PT*
Karen Klar, B.Sc.PT**
Christopher Forrest, M.D., M.S., FRCS(C)**
Supported by the Hospital for Sick Children Foundation and the Centre for Health Information and Promotion (CHIP).
*Academic & Clinical Specialist/Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation
Services, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario
**Physical Therapist, Plastic Surgery, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Hospital
for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario
***Medical Director, Craniofacial Program, Head, Division of Plastic Surgery, Centre
for Craniofacial Care & Research, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital for Sick
Children, Toronto, Ontario
Figure 1. Illustration of parallelogram-shape skull associated with positional
plagiocephaly (left diagram) versus trapezoid-shape skull associated with cranial
synostosis (right diagram).
ment of PP when the sternocleidomastoid muscle is tight.
Limited rotation toward the affected side makes it difficult to
achieve an equal distribution of forces on the infant’s cranium
resulting in secondary skull asymmetry. Referral to physical
therapy to address the tight muscle is indicated in these
patients.
In 1992, a study published by the American Academy of
Pediatrics demonstrated an association between infant sleeping
position and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), prompt-
ing the subsequent “Back to Sleep Campaign”.
4
This initiative
recommended that infants be placed on their backs to sleep. In
the ensuing years, there has been a dramatic increase in the inci-
dence of infants with deformation changes of the cranium and
face as noted by multiple craniofacial centers across North
America.
1,5,6
Positional preference is exacerbated by the fact
that infants under the age of 3 months are positioned on their
backs for the majority of the time. Recently, the Canadian
Paediatric Society has amended its infant positioning message
to include the recommendation that infants be repositioned
periodically and placed in prone during playtime. Despite this
amendment, the incidence of PP continues to rise.
A Multi-disciplinary Prevention Initiative
The escalating incidence of PP resulted in the establishment of
a multi-disciplinary prevention initiative at The Hospital for
Sick Children. The objective of the task force, which was com-
prised of a multi-disciplinary team (physical therapists, health
promotion specialist, craniofacial surgeon) was to reduce the
incidence of positional skull deformities in infants and thereby
reduce the demand on medical resources. The rationale for a
multi-level educational initiative was based on the following:
• positional plagiocephaly is preventable
although information regarding plagiocephaly is available (i.e.
websites), there is no information addressing prevention
easily identifiable target groups of parents and infant health
care providers (IHCP) (i.e. paediatricians and family physi-
cians, public health nurses, midwives etc.) exist; these indi-
viduals could be targeted both pre- and post-natally.
Key Messages
There were 4 key messages that were considered pertinent to
the group’s mission:
volume 81, number 3, May 2004 203
Figure 2. Photograph of parent pamphlet entitled, “You Can Prevent Baby
Flathead.”
Figure 3. Photograph of poster entitled, “Why time on his tummy is good for
his head.”
Figure 4. Photograph of clinician’s guidebook entitled, “A Clinician’s Guide to
Positional Plagiocephaly: Everything you need to understand, prevent, identify
and treat ‘Baby Flathead’.”
University of Toronto Medical Journal
204
4-6 Months: Infants are beginning to roll and move independently
at this age, therefore counter-positioning may be less effective at
reversing skull flattening. Other aspects of conservative manage-
ment, such as reducing the amount of awake time infants spend
on their backs and increasing tummy time are, however, very ben-
eficial at this time. If severe skull flattening persists, a skull-mold-
ing helmet can be used. Using the molding helmet at this age is
most successful because the infant’s skull is still very flexible and
malleable.
7-12 Months: The degree of skull flattening usually plateaus by
this age because infants are usually rolling and sitting independently
and therefore spending less time on their backs. Counter-posi-
tioning to reverse skull flattening is less effective at this time. With
normal growth and development the shape of the skull will con-
tinue to improve until approximately 12-14 months of age when
the majority of the skull growth has occurred. As the child
approaches one year of age, the skull is more resistant to molding.
Helmets, therefore, are not a reasonable option to begin treatment
when the child is beyond 12 months of age.
Summary
Positional plagiocephaly is a widespread problem that in most
cases can be prevented, easily diagnosed and successfully managed
by the paediatrician or other primary health care clinician.
Prevention, however, should be the first line of defense in address-
ing this problem. Parental guilt and anxiety related to the devel-
opment of their infant’s skull asymmetry is significant and if left
to progress can result in utilization of a great deal of health care
resources. There has been a trend for infant healthcare profes-
sionals to advise parents that cranial dysmorphism will resolve over
time. This may occur in milder cases of PP, but if not appropri-
ately managed infants can have some degree of permanent resid-
ual deformity. The PP educational tools were developed to be
widely utilized by IHCP’s and to be promoted in health care facil-
ities across Ontario. For more information regarding these
resources contact:
The Centre for Health Information and Promotion (CHIP)
The Hospital for Sick Children
555 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X8
Tel: (416) 813-5819 Fax: (416) 813-6715
Or visit www.sickkids.ca/plasticsurgery under Craniofacial
Program to download these resources.
References
1. Kane AA, Mitchell LE, Craven KP and March JL. (1996). Observations on
a Recent Increase in Plagiocephaly Without Synostosis. Pediatrics. 97: 877-885.
2. Bruneteau RJ and Mulliken JB. (1992). Frontal plagiocephaly: synostotic, com-
pensational, or deformational. Plast Reconstr Surg. 89: 21-31.
3. Boere-Boonekamp MM and van der Linden-Kuiper LT. (2001). Positional
Preference: Prevalence in Infants and Follow-up after Two Years. Pediatrics.
107: 339-343.
4. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Infant Positioning and SIDS.
(1992). Pediatrics. 89: 1120-1126.
5. Turk AE, McCarthy JG, Thorne CHM and Wisoff JH. (1996). The “Back to
Sleep Campaign” and Deformational Plagiocephaly: Is There Cause for
Concern? J Craniofac Surg. 7: 12-18.
6. Argenta L, David L, Wilson J and Bell, W. (1996). An Increase in Infant
Cranial Deformity with Supine Sleeping Position. J Craniofac Surg. 7: 5-11.
1) Infants should be positioned on their backs to sleep as rec-
ommended by the Canadian Paediatric Society and the
“Back to Sleep Campaign”
2) Parents must be made aware of the importance of using the
prone position for supervised infant play, starting at a very
early age
3) Parents/caregivers should be aware of an increased risk of
developing positional plagiocephaly that occurs as the result
of an infant demonstrating a preference to look to one side
when positioned on their back
4) Positional plagiocephaly is preventable through pre- and
postnatal education that specifically addresses newborn and
infant positioning strategies
Educational Resources
With the support of the Foundation and the Centre for Health
Information and Promotion (CHIP) the following educational
resources were developed:
A) Parent Pamphlet (Figure 2)
The parent pamphlet is designed as a useful reference for par-
ents and caregivers of infants. It reinforces why ‘tummy time’
is so important while the infant is awake. It explains what posi-
tional preference is and gives helpful suggestions on position-
ing and handling strategies to prevent positional preference.
The pamphlet informs parents that infants can also develop
skull asymmetry from spending long periods of time in a car
seat or reclining seat (a frequently seen problem), particularly
within the first few months of life. It also advises parents and
caregivers on how to counter-position the infant if positional
skull flattening has been confirmed by an IHCP.
B) Poster (Figure 3)
The poster is designed to catch the eye of parents/caregivers in
physician’s offices, pre- and post-natal classes and other appro-
priate public places. The poster reinforces the supine sleep
position but addresses the issue of positional skull deformities
among infants. Its major focus is to reinforce the benefits of
supervised ‘tummy time’ when the infant is awake.
C) Clinician’s Guide Book (Figure 4)
The guidebook is written for all health professionals who see
newborns and infants in their practice. It contains all the infor-
mation needed to understand, prevent, identify early, and treat
positional plagiocephaly. It enables IHCPs to educate parents
on strategies to decrease the likelihood of positional skull defor-
mities. It also clearly defines when to refer for medical paedi-
atric expertise. The general guidelines for managing PP, as
summarized in the clinician’s guidebook, are as follows:
0-4 Months: Conservative treatment is most effective within
the first 4 months of life. Counter-positioning can be used to
reverse early skull flattening. The brochure for parents, You Can
Prevent Baby Flathead, contains important treatment strategies and is
a helpful resource to share with parents during this time.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
To verify and determine the cause of an increase in the referral of infants with plagiocephaly without synostosis (PWS) to a single tertiary craniofacial center. A chart review was performed for 269 infants with a diagnosis of PWS who presented to a single tertiary craniofacial center between 1979 and 1994. The pattern of referral for PWS was analyzed using both simple linear regression and time series regression analyses. In addition, the referral pattern for PWS was compared with that for infants seen at the same center who received a diagnosis of synostotic plagiocephaly. Changes in the distribution of several demographic, perinatal, and clinical variables during the study period were also assessed. Finally, in an effort to identify correlates of the risk of PWS developing, characteristics of patients who were Missouri residents and presented between 1992 and 1994 were evaluated and compared with those of the 1993 Missouri live birth cohort. The Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Deformities Institute, St Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University Medical Center. The average annual number of referrals to our center for PWS in the period 1992 to 1994 was more than sixfold greater than that for the preceding 13 years. There was a statistically significant increase in the annual number of referrals to our center during the 16-year study period. Moreover, there was evidence that the average annual increase in referrals was significantly greater during the last 3 years (1992 through 1994) of the study than in the first 13 years. This shift in the referral patterns is roughly contemporaneous with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations regarding infant sleep position. There was no evidence that either the mean number of referrals or the average annual increase in referrals for patients with synostosis changed during the study period. Among patients with PWS, the average age at presentation did not change during the study period. There were also no significant changes in the distribution of other demographic, perinatal, and clinical variables. When compared with the Missouri birth cohort, infants with PWS were significantly more likely to be boys and to have been delivered by forceps. There was also some evidence that patients with PWS were more likely to be born prematurely and to be products of multiple-gestation pregnancies. These associations were, however, of only borderline statistical significance. Referrals to our center for PWS increased markedly in 1992 relative to previous years. The temporal coincidence of this increase with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation to avoid the prone sleeping position, to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, suggests a possible causal relationship. If this association is causal, education regarding the need for head position rotation coupled with that for sudden infant death syndrome should obviate positional PWS.
Article
Plagiocephaly is a term commonly used to describe congenital forehead asymmetry. Sixty patients with frontal plagiocephaly were evaluated retrospectively and separated into three types: synostotic (N = 24), compensational (N = 3), and deformational (N = 33). Categorization of frontal plagiocephaly as synostotic or deformational was reliably made by physical examination, focusing on the supraorbital rims, nasal root, ears, and malar eminences. Other anatomic parameters useful in the differential diagnosis included chin point, palpebral fissures, and facial height. This study documented that birth histories were similar for synostotic and deformational frontal plagiocephalic infants. However, other deformational anomalies were more common in deformational frontal plagiocephalic infants, whereas malformations had an equal incidence in deformational and synostotic frontal plagiocephalic infants. Torticollis was an associated finding in 64 percent of infants with deformational frontal plagiocephaly; almost all were ipsilateral. In contrast, head tilt, usually to the contralateral side, was noted in 14 percent of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. Female preponderance was noted in both synostotic (79 percent) and deformational (76 percent) frontal plagiocephaly. Left-sided involvement was seen in 73 percent of patients with deformational frontal plagiocephaly and in 46 percent of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. Premature pelvic descent, in the left occipital anterior position, may account for the high incidence of left-sided deformational plagiocephaly and ipsilateral torticollis.
Article
In April 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended back or side sleeping for healthy newborns to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Subsequently, the US Public Health Service organized a health care coalition to promote a "Back to Sleep Campaign" to advocate back or side sleeping for infants. Since 1992, our craniofacial anomalies center has witnessed a marked increase in the incidence of infants with defomational changes of the cranium and face. The purpose of this project was to study the etiologies of deformational plagiocephaly and possible correlation with infant head position. We reviewed 52 consecutive patients presenting with deformational plagiocephaly from January 1992 to December 1994. A diagnosis of deformational plagiocephaly was determined by (1) history (date when head shape change was first noted), (2) clinical examination (occipital flattening, contralateral forehead flattening, lowering of the eyebrow, and ear shearing), and (3) skull radiographs (patent cranial sutures). All infants had medical photography to document baseline craniofacial morphology and any follow-up changes after nonsurgical therapy. Cranial asymmetry was first noted after birth at a mean time of 3.6 months. All infants were initially positioned on their back/side. In 52 patients, 61% had right-sided flattening of the occiput (vs 39% left-sided). All infants had flattening of the occiput, contralateral brow lowering or inferior displacement of the brow, contralateral forehead flattening, and posterioinferior displacement of the ear. All skull radiographs demonstrated patent sutures. Follow-up of patients ranged from 3 to 22 months with a mean of 10.5 months. Follow-up clinical examination and photography demonstrated significant improvement of cranial form in all patients with recommended frequent head turning (73%), helmet molding (23%), and surgery (4%). Our unit has seen an increase in the number of infants with deformational plagiocephaly over the last three years. All of the affected infants in this study had been managed according to the officially recommended protocol of back/side positioning. These findings suggest a possible relationship between this type of infant positioning and the development of a deformational plagiocephaly. However, cranial asymmetry in this group of patients decreased significantly with nonsurgical therapy. We have not recommended cranial vault remodeling surgery for the mild and moderate types of this deformity. However, if there is evidence of increasing asymmetry of deformational plagiocephalic infants during follow-up and evidence of severe variants of these deformities, surgical correction of the cranial vault is recommended.
Article
Abnormalities of the occipital cranial suture in infancy can cause significant posterior cranial asymmetry, malposition of the ears, distortion of the cranial base, deformation of the forehead, and facial asymmetry. Over the past 2 years, we have noted a dramatic increase in the incidence of deformation of the occipital skull in our tertiary referral center. Our patient referral base has not changed appreciably over the past 5 years and patients have been referred from the same primary practitioner base. The timing of this increase correlates closely with the acceptance in our area of recommended changes in sleeping position to supine or side positioning for infants because of the fear of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). A total of 51 infants with occipital cranial deformity, with a mean age of 5.5 months at presentation, have been evaluated and treated by a single craniofacial surgeon in the 16-month period from September 1993 to December 1994. Older infants were treated with continuous positioning by the parent keeping the infant off the involved side. Younger infants and those with poor head control were treated with a soft-shell helmet. Mean timing of initial diagnosis and start of treatment was 5.5 months. Mean duration of helmet for positional treatment was 3.8 months. To date, only 3 of 51 patients have required surgical intervention, and other patients demonstrated spontaneous improvement of all measured parameters. Follow up has ranged from 8 to 24 months. We believe that most occipital plagiocephaly deformities are deformations rather than true cranio-synostoses. Despite varying amounts of suture abnormality evidenced on computed tomographic scans, most deformities can be corrected without surgery. In cases where progression of the cranial deformity occurs, despite conservative therapy, surgical intervention should be undertaken at approximately 1 year of age. The almost universal acceptance in the State of North Carolina of positioning neonates on their backs to avoid SIDS, may well increase the incidence of these deformities in the future.
Article
1) To determine the prevalence of positional preference in the general population of infants up to the age of 6 months; 2) to gather information on possible risk factors; 3) to determine the percentage of children with positional preference undergoing diagnostic evaluation and/or treatment; and 4) to assess the overall outcome of positional preference in infants and toddlers, with currently used diagnostic and treatment practices. Infant health care centers in The Netherlands. Seven thousand six hundred nine infants below the age of 6 months were screened for positional preference (cases: n = 623). Anamnestic data and physical signs of asymmetry of the range of motion and the shape of the head were recorded. These data were also registered of an immediate next child visiting the infant health care center with the same sex and about the same age but without positional preference (controls: n = 554). In a first follow-up study, 6 to 8 months after the original study, 468 of the 623 children with positional preference were reexamined for asymmetry of the range of motion and the shape of the head. In a second follow-up study, 24 to 32 months after the original study, 129 of 259 children who still had shown signs of asymmetry in the first follow-up study were again reexamined. The prevalence of positional preference was 8.2% and was highest in children below 16 weeks of age. The boy:girl ratio was 3:2. Firstborns, premature children, and children with breech position at the time of delivery proved to have a higher risk for positional preference. The supine sleeping position of the child and a strong preference in offering the feeding always from the right or the left side were positively correlated with positional preference. In the first follow-up study, 12% still showed restricted active range of motion, 8% restricted passive range of motion, 47% asymmetric flattening of the occiput, and 23% of the forehead. Thirty-two percent of the children with positional preference had been referred for diagnostical/therapeutical intervention. In the second follow-up study, active range of motion was restricted in 6%, passive rotation in 2%, 45% had an asymmetric flattening of the occiput, and 21% of the forehead. Positional preference is frequently observed (8.2%) in The Netherlands. It leads to referral, additional diagnostics and, if necessary, treatment of almost 1 of every 3 affected children. Extrapolated to the original population in 1995, 2.4% of all children would still have a restricted range of motion and/or flattening of the skull at the age of 2 to 3 years. The high prevalence of positional preference in infancy, the persistency of accompanying signs, the large number of children referred for further diagnostic and/or treatment, and the resulting high medical expenses strongly call for a primary preventive approach.positional preference, deformational plagiocephaly, asymmetry, infants, population-based study.