Content uploaded by Ernesto A Gomez
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ernesto A Gomez
Content may be subject to copyright.
139
WORLD
RABBIT
SCIENCE
World Rabbit Sci. 2004, 12: 139 - 148
© WRSA, UPV, 2003
Correspondence: M. Piles
E-mail: miriam.piles@irta.es
CROSSBREEDING PARAMETERS OF SOME PRODUCTIVE
TRAITS IN MEAT RABBITS
PILES M.1, RAFEL O.1, J. RAMON1, GÓMEZ E.A.1
Unitat de Cunicultura – IRTA, 08140 CALDES DE MONTBUÍ, Barcelona, Spain.
ABSTRACT: A crossbreeding experiment using animals from C and R rabbit strains was conducted. Direct
and maternal additive genetic effects and direct heterosis were estimated for some productive traits
during the post-weaning growing period. Growth rate, daily feed consumption, and feed conversion
ratio, between 32 to 60 days of age, were recorded for 1377 young rabbits. At 66 days of age, 736
animals were weighed and slaughtered in a commercial slaughter-house. No fastening was practiced.
Carcasses were weighed 30 min after slaughter and then they were chilled (4ºC, 24 hours) and weighed
again. Carcass yield and drip loss percentage were computed. Model of analysis included the genetic
type effect (C, CxR, RxC, R), batch effect, parity effect, litter size at birth effect, live weight at 60 days
as a covariate to adjust growth, consumption and feed efficiency for differences in live weight at 60
days of age, common environmental litter effects and the additive genetic effects. Main relationships
between individuals were taken into account through the relationship matrix. Crossbreeding parameters
were computed from linear contrasts between levels of genetic type effect following Dickerson’s model.
Despite the differences between genetic types found, the difference between direct additive genetic
effects was only significant for live weight at 60 days and daily feed intake. Neither heterosis nor
maternal effects were significant for any of the traits analyzed.
Key words: rabbit, crossbreeding parameters, growth, feed efficiency, carcass yield.
INTRODUCTION
Efficiency of meat production can be improved by taking advantage of the
diversity of rabbit breeds through crossbreeding. Genetic parameters such as additive
genetic effects and direct or maternal heterosis are generally important for maternal
performance but they are not well known for post weaning performance of growing
rabbits, especially for traits related to feed efficiency and carcass merit. Besides,
140
PILES et al.
crossbreeding parameters can differ dramatically among environments and they can
also evolve with selection of the lines.
In meat rabbit production, post weaning daily weight gain or weight at the end
of the fattening period are used as selection criteria of sire lines in most breeding
programmes (ROCHAMBEAU et al., 1989; RAFEL et al. 1990; ESTANY et al, 1992). Feed
efficiency is one of the most commercially important traits because post-weaning
feeding accounts for around 40 % of total cost (ARMERO and BLASCO, 1992). This
trait is improved through the negative genetic correlation with growth rate (MOURA
et al., 1997; PILES et al., 2003) because direct selection is difficult and costly. Carcass
yield is also an important trait in Spain, because carcasses are generally graded and
the price is established according to this value in commercial slaughter- houses.
The aim of the present study was to estimate heterosis and additive genetic, direct
and maternal, effects on several post-weaning growth and feed efficiency traits using
a diallel crossbreeding design involving two sire lines of different genetic origin.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Animals and experimental conditions
A complete diallel cross between two lines of rabbit C and R led to the production
of 4 genetic types of individuals (C, CxR, RxC and R).
Line C was set up in 1979 from five New Zealand White sources and a 6th strain
formed by California x New Zealand White animals (RAFEL et al., 1990). It was
selected for litter weight at 60 days by the independent culling levels method using
as selection criteria litter weight at weaning and individual daily weight gain between
32 and 60 days of age. Since 1993, it has been selected for individual daily weight
gain by individual selection.
Line R was created by mating animals from a California line with animals from
another synthetic line created by mating two commercial populations of crossbred
141
CROSSBREEDING PARAMETERS OF PRODUCTIVE TRAITS
rabbits. It has been selected for increased post-weaning daily weight gain by
individual selection since 1980 (ESTANY et al., 1992).
At weaning age (32 days), 320 animals from lines C and R were housed in
individual wire cages in the experimental farm of the Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia
Agroalimentàries (IRTA). These animals were born in January 2001. The farm has
isolated roof and walls, controlled lighting and ventilation, and a cooling-system to
avoid high temperatures in summer. During the fattening period (32 to 60 days of
age), animals were fed ad libitum with a commercial pelleted diet (16.4% raw protein,
4% fat, 15.2% fiber). Fresh water was always supplied ad libitum. Individual weights
and feed consumption were recorded weekly. Then, 19 and 23 females and 12 and
13 males form lines C and R respectively, were allocated to reproductive wire cages
and fed with 180 g/d of another pelleted diet (16% raw protein, 4.3% fat, 17%
fiber). Does followed a semi-intensive reproductive rhythm (first mating at four
and a half months of life and reproductive cycles of 42 days). Offspring were born
between July 2001 and April 2002. After weaning, they were also housed and fed in
the same conditions as their parents during the fattening period. Individual weights
and feed consumption were also recorded weekly. Data of individuals with symptoms
of illness were excluded from the analysis. At 66 days of age, animals were weighed
and slaughtered in a commercial slaughterhouse. No fastening was practiced. Animals
were bled by cutting the jugular vein and the carotid artery after electrical stunning.
Carcasses were weighed after slaughter and then they were chilled (4ºC, 24 hours)
and weighed again.
Experimental design
A 2 x 2 diallel crossing design was applied. Bucks were randomly assigned to
does but repeated matings and matings between related individuals were avoided.
Traits
GR: growth rate between 32 and 60 days of age (g/d).
DFI: daily feed intake between 32 and 60 days of age (g/d).
142
PILES et al.
FCR: Fed conversion ratio between 32 and 60 days of age.
LW: Live weight at 60 days of age (g).
SW: Slaughter weight (g).
CCW: Chilled carcass weight (g).
DoP: Dressing out percentage (%). DoP= 100 x CCW / SW.
DLP: Drip loss percentage (%). DLP=100 x (HCW-CCW)
Statistical analysis
The number of records per genetic type (C, CxR, RxC, and R) for each trait is
shown in table 1. The following mixed model was applied:
y=X
ββ
ββ
β
+Zu+Wp+e
where: y is the data vector,
β
is a vector containing the genetic type effect (4 levels),
batch effect (10 levels), parity effect (first, second and third or more), litter size at
birth effect (8 levels: less than 6, six levels from 6 to 11, and more than 11) and LW
as a covariate to adjust growth, consumption and feed efficiency for differences in
live weight at 60 days of age. p is a vector containing the environmental common
litter effects (335 levels), u is a vector containing the additive genetic effects. There
were 1625 animals in the pedigree file containing individuals, parents, and grandparents
to take into account the main relationships between individuals. X, Z and W are the
corresponding incidence matrices and e is the vector of residuals.
Crossbreeding parameters were computed from linear contrast between levels
of genetic type effect. The model of DICKERSON (1969) was chosen:
where yij is the mean performance of offspring of sire line i mated with dam line j, is
ijijj
ji
ij ehm
2
gg
y+++
+
+=
δµ
143
CROSSBREEDING PARAMETERS OF PRODUCTIVE TRAITS
µ
the mean of parental lines, gi (gj) is the direct additive genetic effect of the ith sire
line (the jth dam line), mj is the maternal genetic effect of the jth dam line, hij is the
direct heterosis of the cross between lines i and j,
δ
is 1 for crosses between lines
i≠j and 0 for lines i=j, e is the residual effect.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Descriptive statistics
Table 1 shows the number of records of each genetic type (C, CxR, RxC, R),
and some descriptive statistics (overall mean, standard deviation and coefficient of
variation) of the traits analyzed. In Spain, there is a demand for light carcasses.
Live slaughter weight and chilled carcass weight averaged 2670g and 1574g
respectively. These values are high but correspond to animals that are used as sires
in terminal crosses, not as commercial fryers. Most of the traits had a coefficient of
variation around 0.14. DoP and DLP had small and large coefficient of variation
respectively (0.03 and 0.29).
Table 1: Number of records by genetic type (C, CxR, RxC, R), overall mean, standard
deviation and coefficient of variation (CV) of the traits analyzed.
Trait C CxR RxC R Mean SD CV
LW 435 295 211 436 2411 343 0.14
GR 435 295 211 436 55.6 7.5 0.13
DFI 435 295 211 436 160 30 0.19
FCR 435 295 211 436 2.87 0.36 0.13
SW 198 217 130 191 2671 362 0.14
CCW 198 217 130 191 1574 223 0.14
DoP 198 217 130 191 58.9 1.6 0.03
DLP 198 217 130 191 2.23 0.65 0.29
LW: live weight at 60 d ays of age, GR: growth rate, DF I: daily feed inta ke, FC R: feed conve rsion rate, S W: slaughter weight,
CCW: chilled carcass weight, DP: dressing percentage and DLP: drip lo ss percenta ge.
C = C line, R = R line
144
PILES et al.
Breed type comparison
Table 2 shows estimated mean and standard error of levels of genetic type effect
(C, CxR, RxC, R) for all traits analyzed. Significant differences between genetic
types were observed in all of them except in GR, FCR and DLP. Kits of genetic type
C were lighter at 60 days of age, grew slower and ingested less feed than kits of
genetic type R, CxR and RxC. Slaughter weight and CCW followed the same pattern:
animals belonging to group C were lighter than animals from groups CxR and R,
being the values for the intermediate group RxC. A significant difference was also
found in DoP between genetic types CxR and R the lower value corresponding to
genetic type R and genetic types C and RxC being the intermediate between them.
No differences between the two types of crossbred animals were found for any trait.
These results agree with those reported in previous experiments for LW and CCW,
comparing the same lines of selection. RAMON et al. (1996) and GOMEZ et al. (1998)
reported differences in live weight at 60 and 63 days of age, CCW, GR and DP,
among other carcass quality traits. Animals from line R, selected exclusively for
increased growth rate, were heavier at all ages (313 g and 347 g), had a heavier
carcass (133 g), grew faster (6.4 g/d) and had a lower FCR (0.2) and DoP (2.8 %)
Table 2: Mean and standard error (in brackets) of the estimated genetic type effects (C,
CxR, RxC, R) of the traits analyzed.
Trait C CxR RxC R
LW 2331 (27) a2459 (31) b2429 (34) b2460 (27) b
GR (g/d) 55.4 (0.4) 54.9 (0.4) 55.8 (0.5) 55.8 (0.4)
DFI (g/d) 158 (1) a159 (1) ab 162 (1) b161 (1) b
FCR 2.84 (0.03) 2.89 (0.03) 2.89 (0.04) 2.90 (0.03)
SW (g) 2549 (44) a2704 (41) b2620 (45) ab 2701 (44) b
CCW (g) 1505 (27) a1595 (25) b1541 (28) ab 1579 (27) b
DoP (%) 58.9 (0.2) ab 59.0 (0.2) b58.8 (0.2) ab 58.5 (0.2) a
DLP (%) 2.2 (0.1) 2.2 (0.1) 2.2 (0.1) 2.3 (0.1)
LW: live weight at 60 days of age, GR: growth rate, DFI: daily feed intake, FCR: feed conversion rate, SW: slaughter
weight, CCW: chilled carcass weight, DP: dressing percentage and DLP: drip loss percentage.
C = C line, R = R line.
Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P<0.05).
145
CROSSBREEDING PARAMETERS OF PRODUCTIVE TRAITS
with respect to animals from line C, selected for a history of litter weight. Some of
the differences between lines R and C could be partly explained by the different
origin of the lines and by the more intensive process of selection for individual
growth rate in line R, leading to heavier animals throughout all the growth period,
higher adult weight and less mature animals at slaughter weight (PILES et al., 2000;
BLASCO et al., 2003).
Additive genetic effects and direct heterotic effects
Table 3 shows mean and standard error of the estimated direct heterosis effect
(h), direct additive genetic effect (dC-dR) and maternal genetic effect (mC-mR) in
lines C and R, for all traits. Despite the differences found between genetic groups,
the difference between additive genetic effects was only significant for DFI. Neither
heterosis nor maternal effects were significant for any of the traits analyzed in
agreement with GOMEZ et al. (1999) who analyzed data of animals from line R and
two other dam lines of different genetic origin. LUKEFAHR et al. (1986) and MEDELLÍN
and LUKEFAHR (2001), in studies involving large and medium size breeds, showed
Table 3: Mean and standard error (in brackets) of the estimated direct heterosis
effect (h), direct additive effect (dC-dR) and maternal genetic effect (mC-mR) in lines
C and R, of the traits analyzed.
Trait hCR dC- dR mC- mR
LW (g) 49 (27) -99 (46) ** -29 (37)
GR (g/d) -0.3 (0.4) -1.3 (0.7) 0.9 (0.6)
DFI (g/d) 1 (1) -6 (2) ** 3 (2)
FCR 0.02 (0.03) -0.05 (0.06) 0.00 (0.05)
SW (g) 36 (33) -67 (63) -84 (46)
CCW (g) 26 (20) -19 (39) -55 (28)
DoP (%) 0.20 (0.18) 0.60 (0.33) -0.2 (0.2)
DLP (%) - 0.06 (0.08) -0.10 (0.15) 0.01 (0.11)
LW: live weight at 60 days of age, GR: growth rate, DF I: daily feed intake, FC R: feed conversion rate, SW: slaughter
weight, CCW: chilled carcass weight, DP: dressing percentage and DLP: drip loss percentage.
C = C line, R = R line.
**P<0.01
146
PILES et al.
that additive genetic effects were higher in magnitude than maternal genetic effects
or direct and maternal heterotic effects on individual live weight at 56 or 70 days of
age. However, BRUN and OUHAYOUN (1989), AFFIFI et al. (1994) and ABDEL-GHANY et
al. (2000), in studies involving medium-sized breeds, found that maternal breed
effects were comparable to or higher than additive genetic effects for individual
growth. BRUN et al. (1992), EIBEN et al. (1996), SZENDRO et al. (1996) and MEDELLIN
and LUKEFAHR (2001) observed direct heterosis effect in live weight at different
ages (from 2.4 % to 6.8 %), in GR (from 4.8 % to 7.3 %) and also in DoP (from 1 %
to 2.3 %) in crosses between strains of different composition.
Non-genetic effects
Least square means of the levels of the different environmental effects were
also estimated. Batch was the most important effect. Summer had a negative effect
on feed intake because of high temperatures, leading to low values of live weights,
growth rate and carcass weight as other authors have reported (TORRES et al., 1992;
FEKI et al., 1996). Batch effect was also significant on feed efficiency and drip loss
percentage as in TORRES et al (1992), FEKI et al. (1996) and GOMEZ et al. (1998).
Parity effect was low, the higher difference between levels, with respect to the overall
mean, being for DFI (7.5 %). Litter size effect was also small, the higher difference
between levels being for CCW (23 % of the mean).
In conclusion, direct additive genetic effects, but not heterosis and maternal
genetic effects, were found for growth, consumption and carcass traits in a complete
diallel cross between two large-size lines of rabbit, both selected for growth rate
during the fattening period.
Acknowledgements: Research was supported by INIA SC00-011. The authors acknowledge the staff of the
farm at IRTA (N. Picornell, O. Perucho, N. Aloy and C. Requena) for their contribution to the experimental
work.
REFERENCES
ABDEL-GHANY A.M., HASSAN N.S., AMIN A.A. 2000. Heterosis, direct and maternal
abilities of post-weaning daily gain in weight traits of two Egyptian native breeds
147
CROSSBREEDING PARAMETERS OF PRODUCTIVE TRAITS
on account of crossing with New Zealand White rabbits. In: Proc. 7th World
Rabbit Congress, Valencia, Spain, pp 325-331.
AFIFI E.A., KHALIL M.H., KHADR A.F., YOUSSEF Y.M.K. 1994. Heterosis, maternal
and direct effects for post weaning growth traits and carcass performance in
rabbit crosses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 111:138-147.
ARMERO E., BLASCO A. 1992. Economic weights for rabbit selection indices. Journal
of Applied Rabbit Research, 15:637-642.
BLASCO A., PILES M., VARONA L. 2003. A Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection
for growth rate on growth curves in rabbits. Genetic, Selection and Evolution,
35: 21-42.
BRUN J.M., OUHAYOUN J. 1989. Growth performance and carcass traits in three strains
of rabbits and their two-way crosses. Annales de Zootechnie, 38:171-179.
BRUN J.M., BOLET G. OUHAYOUN J. 1992. The effects of crossbreeding and selection
on productive and reproductive traits in a triallel experiment between three
strains of rabbits. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research, 15: 181-189.
BRUN J.M., OUHAYOUN J. 1994. Qualités bouchères de lapereaux issus d’un croisement
diallèle de 3 souches: interaction du type génétique et de la taille de portée
d’origine. Annales de Zootechnie, 43: 173-183.
DICKERSON G. 1969. Experimental approaches in utilizing breed ressources. Animal
Breeding Abstracts, 37: 191-202.
EIBEN C., SZENDRÕ Z.S., ALLAIN D., THEBAULT R.G., RADNAI I., BIRÓ-NÉMETH E., LANSZKI
J. 1996. Study of the performance of normal hair, angora and their reciprocal
crossbred rabbits: 3. Growth and carcass traits. In: Proc. 6th World Rabbit
Congress, Toulouse, France, 1996, Vol 1, 351-357.
ESTANY J., CAMACHO J., BASELGA M., BLASCO A. 1992. Selection response of growth
rate in rabbit for meat production. Genetics, Selection, Evolution, 24: 527-537.
FEKI S., BASELGA M. BLAS E., CERVERA C., GÓMEZ E.A. 1996. Comparison of growth
and feed efficiency among rabbit lines selected for different objectives. Livestock
Production Science, 45:87-92.
GOMEZ E.A., RAFEL O., RAMON J. 1998. Caractères de croissance dans le croisement
de trois souches de lapin sélectionnées en Espagne. In: Proc. 7èmes Journées
de la Recherche Cunicole Française., Lyon, France, 1998, pp. 33-36. ITAVI
Ed., Paris.
GOMEZ E.A., RAFEL O., RAMON J., BASELGA M. 1999. Feeding efficiency in
crossbreeding among three of the strains selected in Spain. Cahiers Options
Méditerranéennes, 41: 153-158.
LUKEFAHR S.D., CHEEKE P.R., PATTON N.M., GROBNER M.A. 1986. Genetic, maternal
and seasonal factors affecting 56-day market weight in rabbits. Journal of Animal
Science, 63:195 (Abstract).
MEDELLIN M.F., LUKEFAHR S.D. 2001. Breed and heterotic ffects on post weaning
traits in Altex and New Zealand White straightbred and crossbred rabbits.
Journal of Animal Science, 79:1173-1178.
148
PILES et al.
MOURA A.S.A.M.T., KAPS M., VOGT D.W., LAMBERSON W.R. 1997. Two-way selection
for daily gain and feed conversion in a composite rabbit population. Journal of
Animal Science, 75:2344-2349.
PILES M., BLASCO A. PLA M. 2000. The effect of selection for growth rate on carcass
composition and meta characteristics of rabbits. Meat Science, 54: 347-355.
PILES M., GOMEZ E.A., RAFEL O., RAMON J., BLASCO A.. 2003. Elliptical selection
experiment for the estimation of genetic parameters of the growth rate and feed
conversion ratio in rabbits. Journal of Animal Science, 82: 654-660.
RAFEL O., TRAN G., UTRILLAS M., RAMON J., PERUCHO O., DUCROCQ V., BOSCH,A. 1990.
Sélection pour un objectif global (poids de la portée à 60 jours) en générations
chevauchantes dans une lignée blanche synthétique de lapins. Etude de la
variabilité non génétique de la taille et du poids de portée a différents stades.
Options Méditerranéennes, série Séminaires nº 8, pp75-82.
RAMON J., GÓMEZ E. A., PERUCHO O., RAFEL O., BASELGA M. 1996. Feed efficiency
and post weaning growth of several Spanish selected lines. In: Proc. 6th World
Rabbit Congress, Toulouse, France, 1996, 2:351-353.
ROCHAMBEAU H., DE LA FUENTE L. F., ROUVIER R. 1989. Sélection sur la vitesse de
croissance post-sevrage chez le lapin. Genetic, Selection, Evolution, 21:527-
546.
SZENDRÕ Z.S., BIRÓ-NÉMETH E., RADNAI I., JENSEN N.E., KENESSEY A. 1996. The
performance of Danish White and Pannon White purebred and reciprocal
crossbred rabbits. In: Proc. 6th World Rabbit Congress, Toulouse, France, 1996.
Vol 2: 359-364.
TORRES C., BASELGA M., GÓMEZ E.A. 1992. The effect of weight daily gain selection
on gross feed efficiency in rabbit. In: Proc. 5th World Rabbit Congress, Corvallis,
USA, 1992, Vol B: 884-888.