A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
LCA OF WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
The environmental impact of activities after life: life cycle
assessment of funerals
Elisabeth Keijzer
1
Received: 23 August 2015 /Accepted: 5 August 2016 / Published online: 16 September 2016
#Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Abstract
Purpose Although the funeral market is propagating new
‘green’alternatives and exploring innovative techniques like
resomation, very little is known about the environmental im-
pact of funerals. This research aimed to develop a benchmark
of funerals, by quantifying the environmental impacts of the
most common funeral techniques, i.e. burial and cremation, by
identifying where the main impacts originate from and by
comparing these impacts to impacts of other activities during
aperson’s life.
Methods The environmental impacts of funerals were
analysed by means of a life cycle assessment (LCA), based
on Dutch company information, literature and expert judge-
ments. The results were analysed per impact category but also
on an aggregated level by means of shadow prices. Two sen-
sitivity analyses were performed: one examined the high im-
pact of cotton in funeral coffins; the other checked the results
by means of another weighting method.
Results and discussion The results showed no significant dif-
ference between the two funeral techniques in five impact
categories. Burial has the lowest impact in more than half of
the categories, but its impact is many times higher in the two
most differing categories than for cremation. The total shadow
price of burial is about 30 % higher than the shadow price of
cremation, but the main cause for this difference is a highly
debated category, namely land use. If the results would be
considered without the shadow prices of land impact catego-
ries, burial would score 25 % lower than cremation. These
results are representing average practise and may deviate on
certain aspects for other countries, but as a starting point for
further studies, this benchmark is well applicable.
Conclusions and recommendations This study delivered an
environmental benchmark of funerals and insights in the im-
pacts of the individual processes, which can be used in further
assessment of ’green’funeral options. The benchmark results
show that the environmental impact of funerals is largely de-
termined by secondary processes and that the total impact can
be quite small in comparison to other human activities.
Besides these environmental insights, it is important to take
into account social, cultural, climatic, local, economical and
ethical arguments before changing policies or giving
recommendations.
Keywords Burial .Cremation .Environmental impacts .
Funerals .LCA
1 Introduction
Humans carry out many activities during their lifetime which
influence the world’s environment (e.g. UNEP 2011)and
many of these activities have been subject of environmental
research (e.g. see Feifel et al. 2010). Very little is known,
however, about the environmental impact of post-mortem ac-
tivities: the disposal of human remains. Isolated issues have
been discussed, like the emissions of crematoria (Elzenga
1996; Santarsiero et al. 2005), the potential groundwater pol-
lution of cemeteries (van Haaren, 1951; Brinkmann et al.
1987;Dent2002; Spongberg and Becks, 2000a and 2000b;
Trick et al. 2005) and the decomposition process in the soil
Responsible editor: Adriana Del Borghi
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1183-9) contains supplementary material,
which is available to authorized users.
*Elisabeth Keijzer
elisabeth.keijzer@tno.nl
1
TNO, Post box 80015, 3508TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Int J Life Cycle Assess (2017) 22:715–730
DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1183-9
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.