No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Metabolic profile of a continuous versus a cyclic low-dose combined oral contraceptive after one year of use
Abstract
To compare the effects of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) taken continuously with those of one of similar composition taken cyclically on 30 variables related to haemostasis, lipids, carbohydrates, bone metabolism, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).
Randomised, open-label, multicentre, comparative substudy of a larger phase 3 trial involving 147 healthy women (age 18-49 years). Participants received the COC either continuously (levonorgestrel [LNG] 90 μg/ethinylestradiol [EE] 20 μg) or cyclically (21/7 days pattern; LNG 100 μg/EE 20 μg).
After 13 pill packs, changes in total cholesterol (+0.23 vs. -0.06 mmol/l), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+0.25 vs. -0.12 mmol/l), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(3) (-0.06 vs. -0.15 mmol/l) differed significantly (p<0.05) between the continuous and cyclic regimens, respectively. Increases were significantly greater (p <0.05) for protein C antigen (+11.8% vs. +6.1%) and SHBG (+791 vs. +565 nmol/l), and significantly smaller (p <0.05, ranks) for D-dimer (+19 vs. +37 μg FE/l).
Overall, the continuous and cyclic regimens affected metabolic variables similarly. The larger increase in SHBG with the continuous COC is consistent with a higher net oestrogenic effect due to a lower daily dose of LNG. Prospective studies are required to determine the long-term effects of this continuous COC regimen.
... Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass zwischen der zyklischen (21 d) und der kontinuierlichen oder Langzyklusanwendung kein Unterschied im Hinblick auf den Lipid-, Kohlehydrat-, und Gerinnungsstoffwechsel besteht. Ebenso konnte nach einem Jahr Anwendung kein Unterschied im Effekt auf die SHBG("sex hormone binding globulin")-Sekretion gesehen werden [45]. ...
Zur Anwendung oraler hormonaler Kontrazeptiva stehen heute verschiedene Einnahmeschemata zur Verfügung. Neben dem konventionellen Modus (21 Tage Hormoneinnahme gefolgt von 7 hormonfreien Tagen) hat sich der sog. Langzyklus etabliert, bei dem über mehr als 28 Tage Hormone eingenommen werden. In seiner stärksten Ausprägung kann der Langzyklus kontinuierlich erfolgen, d. h. ohne hormonfreies Intervall. Die Anwendung des Langzyklus ist vor allem für Frauen vorteilhaft, die unter zyklusabhängigen Beschwerden leiden. Auch bei Endometriose, Uterus myomatosus, polyzystischem Ovarsyndrom sowie beim prämenstruellen Syndrom oder Migräne bietet der Langzyklus erhebliche Vorteile. Unabhängig von den medizinischen Indikationen nutzen viele Frauen den Langzyklus aufgrund persönlicher Präferenz. Als Nachteil des Langzyklus gilt vor allem in der ersten Einnahmephase das Auftreten von Blutungsstörungen. Die Risiken im Hinblick auf das Gerinnungssystem bzw. den Stoffwechsel sind beim Langzyklus vergleichbar mit denen bei der zyklischen Einnahme. Die meisten in Deutschland verfügbaren Pillenpräparate sind nicht für die Anwendung im Langzyklus zugelassen. Das sollte bei der Verordnung und für die Aufklärung der Patientin (Off-label-Use) berücksichtigt werden.
... 4 41 Limited data also confirm no clinically significant differences between regimens with respect to lipid and carbohydrate profiles, bone markers, or haemostatic variables. 43 Such metabolic data are reassuring, but possible circulatory risks (or benefits) of continuous or extended regimens using 20 µg EE pills will need full epidemiological evaluation. ...
Aim
This review summarises the available data on the disadvantages of the 7-day contraceptive-free interval (CFI) of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), in contrast to shorter CFIs or continuous use – including flexible regimens – and provides recommendations for practice.
Methods
Relevant papers were identified by Medline and PubMed. The final reference list was generated on the basis of relevance to the review, with priority given to systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.
Results
There is considerable inter- and intra-individual variation in the absorption and metabolism of COCs. Even with perfect use, the loss of endocrine suppression during the standard 7-day CFI allows follicular development with the risk of escape ovulation in a vulnerable minority. This risk increases in typical users whenever the CFI is prolonged: late restarts are a common reason for pill omissions. Shortening or eliminating the CFI improves contraceptive efficacy using the lowest doses available, without evidence to date of compromised safety.
Conclusions
There is no scientific evidence to support a 7-day CFI and it should be replaced either by a continuous flexible regimen, or extended regimens with a shortened CFI, prescribed first-line. In women preferring a monthly ‘bleed’, a 4-day CFI similarly provides a greater safety margin when pills are omitted.
... De langetermijneffecten van de continue schema's zijn nog niet gedocumenteerd. Eén studie vond een gelijkaardig effect op de metabole parameters (lipiden, koolhydraten, SHBG, stollingsfactoren) na één jaar cyclische of continue schema's (24). ...
The development of new hormonal contraceptives has long been led by the investigation of novel progestogens, but the focus is now gravitating towards new estrogens, in particular the .,natural" estrogens 17-beta-estradiol and estetrol. It is still to be determined if adding androgens to hormonal contraceptives will be clinically relevant to the sexual wellbeing of the female patient, especially considering the multifaceted aspect of the sexual experience and the possible side effects of androgens. Extended regimens are a new application of generally existing oral contraceptives for the treatment of symptoms associated with menstruation/withdrawal bleedings. This seems to be a relatively simple solution for women who prefer a life without bleedings.
... The average increase in SHBG associated with COCs was 200–300% for those containing DSG or gestodene, 150% for those including norgestimate, 250–300% for those containing drospirenone or DNG, and 300–400% for cyproterone acetate-based COCs23. Although changes in SHBG levels in our study were similar between cyclic and extended LNG/EE regimens, a study comparing continuous 90 μg LNG/20 μg EE versus cyclic 100 μg LNG/20 μg EE reported greater SHBG rises with continuous LNG/EE than with cyclic LNG/EE24. The authors hypothesised that the greater changes in SHBG with the continuous regimen could possibly be explained by the lower total daily dose of LNG. ...
Objectives
To evaluate the impact of a 91-day extended regimen combined oral contraceptive (150 μg levonorgestrel [LNG]/30 μg ethinylestradiol [EE] for 84 days, followed by 10 μg EE for seven days [Treatment 1]) compared with two traditional 21/7 regimens (21 days 150 μg LNG/30 μg EE [Treatment 2] or 150 μg desogestrel [DSG]/30 μg EE [Treatment 3], both with seven days’ hormone free), on several coagulation factors and thrombin formation markers.
Methods
Randomised, open-label, parallel-group comparative study involving healthy women (18–40 years). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) levels over six months.
Results
A total of 187 subjects were included in the primary analysis. In all groups, mean F1 + 2 values were elevated after six months of treatment. Changes were comparable between Treatments 1 and 2 (least squares mean change: 170 pmol/L and 158 pmol/L, respectively) but noticeably larger after Treatment 3 (least squares mean change: 592 pmol/L). The haemostatic effects of Treatment 1 were comparable to those of Treatment 2 and noninferior to those of Treatment 3 (lower limit of 95% confidence interval [− 18.3 pmol/L] > − 130 pmol/L).
Conclusions
The LNG/EE regimens had similar effects on F1 + 2. Noninferiority was demonstrated between extended regimen LNG/EE and DSG/EE.
Background:
Many hormonal contraceptives have been associated with changes in carbohydrate metabolism. Alterations may include decreased glucose tolerance and increased insulin resistance, which are risk factors for Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. These issues have been raised primarily with contraceptives containing estrogen.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effect of hormonal contraceptives on carbohydrate metabolism in healthy women and those at risk for diabetes due to overweight.
Search methods:
In April 2014, we searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, and LILACS for studies of hormonal contraceptives and carbohydrate metabolism. We also searched for clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. The initial search also included EMBASE.
Selection criteria:
All randomized controlled trials were considered if they examined carbohydrate metabolism in women without diabetes who used hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Comparisons could be a placebo, a non-hormonal contraceptive, or another hormonal contraceptive that differed in drug, dosage, or regimen. Interventions included at least three cycles. Outcomes included glucose and insulin measures.
Data collection and analysis:
We assessed all titles and abstracts identified during the literature searches. The data were extracted and entered into RevMan. We wrote to researchers for missing data. For continuous variables, the mean difference (MD) was computed with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model. For dichotomous outcomes, the Peto odds ratio with 95% CI was calculated.
Main results:
We found 31 trials that met the inclusion criteria. No new trials were eligible in 2014. Twenty-one trials compared combined oral contraceptives (COCs); others examined different COC regimens, progestin-only pills, injectables, a vaginal ring, and implants. None included a placebo. Of 34 comparisons, eight had any notable difference between the study groups in an outcome. Twelve trials studied desogestrel-containing COCs, and the few differences from levonorgestrel COCs were inconsistent. A meta-analysis of two studies showed the desogestrel group had a higher mean fasting glucose (MD 0.20; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.41). Where data could not be combined, single studies showed lower mean fasting glucose (MD -0.40; 95% CI -0.72 to -0.08) and higher means for two-hour glucose response (MD 1.08; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.71) and insulin area under the curve (AUC) (MD 20.30; 95% CI 4.24 to 36.36). Three trials examined the etonogestrel vaginal ring and one examined an etonogestrel implant. One trial showed the ring group had lower mean AUC insulin than the levonorgestrel-COC group (MD -204.51; 95% CI -389.64 to -19.38). Of eight trials of norethisterone preparations, five compared COCs and three compared injectables. In a COC trial, a norethisterone group had smaller mean change in glucose two-hour response than a levonorgestrel-COC group (MD -0.30; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.06). In an injectable study, a group using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate had higher means than the group using norethisterone enanthate for fasting glucose (MD 10.05; 95% CI 3.16 to 16.94), glucose two-hour response (MD 17.00; 95% CI 5.67 to 28.33), and fasting insulin (MD 3.40; 95% CI 2.07 to 4.73). Among five recent trials, two examined newer COCs with different estrogen types. One showed the group with nomegestrel acetate plus 17β-estradiol had lower means than the levonorgestrel group for incremental AUC glucose (MD -1.43; 95% CI -2.55 to -0.31) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.18 to -0.02). Two trials compared extended versus conventional (cyclic) regimens. With a dienogest COC, an extended-use group had greater mean change in AUC glucose (MD 82.00; 95% CI 10.72 to 153.28). In a small trial using two levonorgestrel COCs, the lower-dose group showed smaller mean change in fasting glucose (MD -3.00; 95% CI -5.89 to -0.11), but the obese and normal weight women did not differ significantly.
Authors' conclusions:
Current evidence suggests no major differences in carbohydrate metabolism between different hormonal contraceptives in women without diabetes. We cannot make strong statements due to having few studies that compared the same types of contraceptives. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses. Many of the earlier studies had limited reporting of methods. We still know very little about women at risk for metabolic problems due to being overweight. More than half of the trials had weight restrictions as inclusion criteria. Only one small trial stratified the groups by body mass index (obese versus normal).
A 27-year-old woman, MB, comes to your clinic to discuss starting to use birth control pills. She reports heavy periods and mild acne, but is otherwise healthy. She has seen ads in magazines for a new brand of pill and asks you how this new pill differs from older formulations. She asks whether there are benefits that might warrant a higher copay at the pharmacy and what risks are associated with the new pill. Are you prepared to answer her questions?
Objective To assess whether continuous and extended regimens (CRs/ERs) of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) improve symptoms related to withdrawal bleeding or the hormone-free interval and to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of CRs/ERs to those of conventional 28-day regimens. Study design A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies published in any language between 2006 and 2013. Results Sixteen RCTs and 14 observational studies evaluated issues related to our objectives. CRs/ERs, whose efficacy and safety were comparable to those described for conventional regimens, were preferred due to their improvement of symptoms related to withdrawal bleeding or the hormone-free interval and the lower costs resulting from the reduced incidence of these symptoms. Conclusion The contraceptive efficacy and safety of CR/ER use of CHCs is at least equal to that of 28-days conventional regimens, and this use may have some cost savings. CRs/ERs are recommended for women willing to take a CHC for treatment of symptoms related to withdrawal bleeding or the hormone-free interval.
Although age is the most crucial predictor of a woman's reproductive capacity, it is assumed that there is still a risk of pregnancy in menopause transition, as occasional spontaneous ovulation is possible. Moreover, age alone is not sufficient to contraindicate the use of any contraceptive method, whether hormonal or not. The use of new CHC in women over 40 has not only been associated with an improved safety profile but has also been associated with other non-contraceptive benefits or the consolidation of already-known benefits. The studies with new CHC have demonstrated that efficacy and safety do not differ from the corresponding parameters observed in younger women. Additionally, the new CHC offers specific and especially useful benefits for women over 40 in the treatment of menstrual disorders. Finally, interest is currently focused on the potential of early diagnosis and the prevention of cardiovascular disease and depression, both of which may be alleviated by the CHC.
Background:
Many hormonal contraceptives have been associated with changes in carbohydrate metabolism. Alterations may include decreased glucose tolerance and increased insulin resistance, which are risk factors for Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. These issues have been raised primarily with contraceptives containing estrogen.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effect of hormonal contraceptives on carbohydrate metabolism in healthy women and those at risk for diabetes due to overweight.
Search methods:
In April 2014, we searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, and LILACS for studies of hormonal contraceptives and carbohydrate metabolism. We also searched for clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. The initial search also included EMBASE.
Selection criteria:
All randomized controlled trials were considered if they examined carbohydrate metabolism in women without diabetes who used hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Comparisons could be a placebo, a non-hormonal contraceptive, or another hormonal contraceptive that differed in drug, dosage, or regimen. Interventions included at least three cycles. Outcomes included glucose and insulin measures.
Data collection and analysis:
We assessed all titles and abstracts identified during the literature searches. The data were extracted and entered into RevMan. We wrote to researchers for missing data. For continuous variables, the mean difference (MD) was computed with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model. For dichotomous outcomes, the Peto odds ratio with 95% CI was calculated.
Main results:
We found 31 trials that met the inclusion criteria. No new trials were eligible in 2014. Twenty-one trials compared combined oral contraceptives (COCs); others examined different COC regimens, progestin-only pills, injectables, a vaginal ring, and implants. None included a placebo. Of 34 comparisons, eight had any notable difference between the study groups in an outcome.Twelve trials studied desogestrel-containing COCs, and the few differences from levonorgestrel COCs were inconsistent. A meta-analysis of two studies showed the desogestrel group had a higher mean fasting glucose (MD 0.20; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.41). Where data could not be combined, single studies showed lower mean fasting glucose (MD -0.40; 95% CI -0.72 to -0.08) and higher means for two-hour glucose response (MD 1.08; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.71) and insulin area under the curve (AUC) (MD 20.30; 95% CI 4.24 to 36.36).Three trials examined the etonogestrel vaginal ring and one examined an etonogestrel implant. One trial showed the ring group had lower mean AUC insulin than the levonorgestrel-COC group (MD -204.51; 95% CI -389.64 to -19.38).Of eight trials of norethisterone preparations, five compared COCs and three compared injectables. In a COC trial, a norethisterone group had smaller mean change in glucose two-hour response than a levonorgestrel-COC group (MD -0.30; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.06). In an injectable study, a group using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate had higher means than the group using norethisterone enanthate for fasting glucose (MD 10.05; 95% CI 3.16 to 16.94), glucose two-hour response (MD 17.00; 95% CI 5.67 to 28.33), and fasting insulin (MD 3.40; 95% CI 2.07 to 4.73).Among five recent trials, two examined newer COCs with different estrogen types. One showed the group with nomegestrel acetate plus 17β-estradiol had lower means than the levonorgestrel group for incremental AUC glucose (MD -1.43; 95% CI -2.55 to -0.31) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.18 to -0.02). Two trials compared extended versus conventional (cyclic) regimens. With a dienogest COC, an extended-use group had greater mean change in AUC glucose (MD 82.00; 95% CI 10.72 to 153.28). In a small trial using two levonorgestrel COCs, the lower-dose group showed smaller mean change in fasting glucose (MD -3.00; 95% CI -5.89 to -0.11), but the obese and normal weight women did not differ significantly.
Authors' conclusions:
Current evidence suggests no major differences in carbohydrate metabolism between different hormonal contraceptives in women without diabetes. We cannot make strong statements due to having few studies that compared the same types of contraceptives. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses. Many of the earlier studies had limited reporting of methods.We still know very little about women at risk for metabolic problems due to being overweight. More than half of the trials had weight restrictions as inclusion criteria. Only one small trial stratified the groups by body mass index (obese versus normal).
Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. Osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally.
To evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women
We searched for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives in MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. We wrote to investigators to find additional trials.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Interventions could include comparing a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or another hormonal contraceptive or could compare providing a supplement versus a placebo.
We assessed all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches. Mean differences were computed using the inverse variance approach. For dichotomous outcomes, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Both included the 95% confidence interval (CI) and used a fixed-effect model. Due to different interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis.
Of the 16 RCTs we found, 2 used a placebo and 1 used a non-hormonal method as the comparison, while 13 compared two hormonal contraceptives. No trial had fracture as an outcome. Most measured BMD and several assessed bone turnover. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density. The placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo. Combination contraceptives did not appear to negatively affect bone health, but none were placebo-controlled. For implants, the single-rod etonogestrel group showed a greater BMD decrease versus the two-rod levonorgestrel group. However, results were not consistent across all implant comparisons.
Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses to follow up. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.
We investigated the effects of ethinylestradiol dose (50, 30 and 20 μg) and progestogen type [desogestrel (DSG), gestodene (GSD), levonorgestrel (LNG) and norgestimate (NGM)] in oral contraceptives on 24 hemostatic variables. In a multicenter, randomized, comparative study, 707 healthy, nonsmoking, nulliparous women were treated for six cycles with one of the seven monophasic oral contraceptives tested. Significantly greater increases in prothrombin fragment 1+2 and factor VII (activity and antigen), were found in the DSG, NGM and GSD groups compared to the LNG group. Similarly, significantly lower levels of protein S (free and total) and increased APC-sr (endogenous thrombin potential based) were found in the same groups compared with the LNG group. In addition, the estradiol dose (50 vs. 30 μg) significantly influenced these parameters. All changes were within the normal range and have not been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic event (VTE). However, raised levels of these variables are associated with prothrombotic states such as pregnancy. The significance of the haemostatic changes found in this study in relation to VTE risk remains to be determined, but results of this study probably cannot explain the differences in risk of VTE between OCs containing different progestogens.
An ideal oral contraceptive should either be neutral as regards metabolic risk markers for arterial disease or should only change them in directions that would be expected to reduce risk. Depending on their formulation, modern low dose oral contraceptives affect systems such as hemostasis, lipoprotein metabolism, and glucose and insulin metabolism. Some of these actions would be expected to decrease the risk of arterial disease and some might be expected to increase risk. Despite these associations there is at present no justification for widespread metabolic screening as a strategy to further improve oral contraceptive safety. Recent developments in atherosclerosis research support the introduction of progestogens such as desogestrel that allow the estrogenic increase in high density lipoprotein levels to persist and that may cause less of an elevation in plasma insulin responses to glucose. The predicted benefit of these formulations in terms of arterial disease is difficult to demonstrate in an epidemiological setting because of the rarity of the disease in young women.
Background. Recent studies have indicated that the risk of thromboembolic disease (VTE) in users of combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) varies not only with estrogen dose, but also with the progestogen in pills with the same estrogen dose. The aim of this article is to discuss sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) as a marker of estrogenicity and as a surrogate indicator for the potential risk of VTE in users of COC.
Material and methods. Using data from the literature, we investigated the relationship between the risk of VTE with various COCs and their effects on SHBG. We also collected data on the effects on SHBG by some combined preparations, where there are no VTE data.
Results. There appears to be a relationship between the risk of VTE and the effect on SHBG. Monophasic preparations containing levonorgestrel, having the lowest risk of VTE, cause an average SHBG increase of around 50%. COCs containing desogestrel or gestodene cause an average SHBG increase of 200–300%. A preparation with cyproterone acetate, carrying a higher risk of VTE than desogestrel and gestodene, cause a 300–400% SHBG increase. With the recently developed combined preparations, there is a 150% SHBG increase with norgestimate and a 250–300% increase with drosperinone and dienogest.
Conclusions. We propose that the change in SHBG with a COC could be interpreted as a measure of total estrogenicity and used as a predictor of the risk of VTE. Preparations containing drosperinone, dienogest, cyproterone acetate and norgestimate are equally or more estrogenic than the more thoroughly studied COCs, containing desogestrel or gestodene and should not be considered a safer substitute.
The efficacy and safety of a low-dose 21-day combination oral contraceptive containing 100 μg levonorgestrel and 20 μg ethinyl estradiol were evaluated in an open-label, multicenter trial. A total of 1708 subjects with regular menstrual cycles (27,011 cycles) were evaluated. The oral contraceptive was administered once a day for 21 days, followed by 7 days of placebo for a complete cycle. During 26,554 cycles evaluated for efficacy, 18 pregnancies occurred (Pearl index of 0.88); 6 of these events were attributable to subject noncompliance. After 30 cycles of exposure the cumulative rate of withdrawal as a result of accidental pregnancy was 1.9%. Breakthrough bleeding (with or without spotting) occurred in 12.9% of the cycles and spotting alone occurred in 10.1% of the cycles. The 2 most common adverse events cited as reasons for discontinuation were headache (2% of subjects) and metrorrhagia (2%). One serious event led to withdrawal of a subject. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that the monophasic regimen of 100 μg levonorgestrel and 20 μg ethinyl estradiol offers effective contraception, acceptable cycle control, and a good tolerability profile. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:S39-44.)
LR: 20061115; JID: 7501160; 0 (Antilipemic Agents); 0 (Cholesterol, HDL); 0 (Cholesterol, LDL); 57-88-5 (Cholesterol); CIN: JAMA. 2001 Nov 21;286(19):2401; author reply 2401-2. PMID: 11712930; CIN: JAMA. 2001 Nov 21;286(19):2400-1; author reply 2401-2. PMID: 11712929; CIN: JAMA. 2001 Nov 21;286(19):2400; author reply 2401-2. PMID: 11712928; CIN: JAMA. 2001 Nov 21;286(19):2400; author reply 2401-2. PMID: 11712927; CIN: JAMA. 2001 May 16;285(19):2508-9. PMID: 11368705; CIN: JAMA. 2003 Apr 16;289(15):1928; author reply 1929. PMID: 12697793; CIN: JAMA. 2001 Aug 1;286(5):533-5. PMID: 11476650; CIN: JAMA. 2001 Nov 21;286(19):2401-2. PMID: 11712931; ppublish
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a contraceptive pill containing ethinylestradiol (30 mcg) and drospirenone (3 mg) in a continuous regimen on lipid, carbohydrate and coagulation parameters.
This open, prospective, randomized study included 78 participants (mean age 27.8 years) who were randomized into two groups to use the pill continuously for 168 days or for six 28-day cycles with a 7-day hormone-free interval between cycles. Markers of lipid, carbohydrate and coagulation profiles were measured prior to initiation and after the 6 months of pill use.
No statistically significant differences were found between the two contraceptive regimens with respect to carbohydrate or lipid profiles or in the parameters related to coagulation.
The contraceptive combination of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone used in a continuous regimen was associated with metabolic alterations similar to those found during the traditional cyclic regimen of oral contraceptive use.
This Phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study conducted at 44 sites in Europe evaluated the safety and efficacy of a continuous, daily regimen of levonorgestrel (LNG) 90 mcg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mcg compared with a 21-day, cyclic LNG 100 mcg/EE 20 mcg regimen.
Three hundred twenty-three healthy women were randomized to continuous LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg and 318 subjects to cyclic LNG 100 mcg/EE 20 mcg for 1 year (13 pill packs). Pearl index, adverse event (AE) incidence and bleeding profiles were assessed.
No pregnancies occurred with the continuous oral contraceptive (OC) (Pearl index=0.00). As the study progressed, the percentage of women who achieved amenorrhea during each 28-day pill pack increased: 40% at pill pack 7, 53% at pill pack 13. The percentage of women with no bleeding [with or without spotting (defined as not requiring sanitary protection)] was 50%, 69% and 79% at pill packs 3, 7 and 13, respectively. The incidence of AEs was similar to that of the cyclic OC (except for metrorrhagia and vaginal bleeding in the first 6 months).
Continuous LNG 90 mcg/EE 20 mcg was shown to be a safe and effective OC in this direct comparison to a cyclic OC. Suppression of menses and the potential for no bleeding requiring sanitary protection may be provided by this continuous, low-dose OC.
Desogestrel is a gonane progestogen that in early studies had an improved ratio between desired progestational effects and undesired androgenic effects. A review of more than 50 clinical studies suggests that desogestrel differs from progestins currently used in oral contraception in that it does not interfere with the estrogen effects on lipoprotein metabolism. This profile is attributable to the high selectivity of desogestrel.
PIP
Desogestrel is a gonane progestogen that is rapidly metabolized to 3-keto-desogestrel, the metabolite believed to be exclusively responsible for the progestational effects of desogestrel after oral administration. More than 50 prospective studies have reported on the effects of the monophasic OC containing 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and 150 mcg of desogestrel. The results of a cross-sectional study were recently reported which was funded by the National Institutes of Health and involved 925 women who used seven combination OCs and 418 untreated controls. The desogestrel-containing OC induced a statistically significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in 40% of the observations and a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in 10% of the observations. An increase in HDL3-C was measured in 43% of the observations, whereas little effect on HDL2-C was apparent. The desogestrel-containing OC was associated with an average 25% increase in plasma triglyceride levels compared with a 31% average increase observed with low estrogen dose OCs. In this series, 54% of the studies reported an increase in HDL-C in women taking the desogestrel-containing OC. In women taking the levonorgestrel-containing triphasic OC, only 5% of the studies reported an increase, whereas 10% of the studies reported a decrease. For the monophasic levonorgestrel-containing OC, 53% of the studies reported a decrease in HDL-C. The desogestrel-containing OC was associated with a tendency to reduce LDL-C, whereas use of the triphasic levonorgestrel-containing OC was not associated with changes in LDL-C. In contrast, in 32% of the studies involving the monophasic levonorgestrel-containing OC, an increase in LDL-C was observed. The results of the large cross-sectional study concurred with the findings of the prospective studies. OC use ranged from 1.5 to 4 years. HDL2-2 was the most sensitive discriminator of the dose and type of progestin taken.
Individuals with elevated plasma concentrations of HDL cholesterol are at lower risk for ischemic heart disease (IHD). Whether the cardioprotective effects of HDL can be attributed to one or both HDL subfractions (HDL2 and HDL3) remains, however, controversial. The relationship of HDL subfractions to the incidence of IHD was investigated in a sample of 1169 French-Canadian men younger than 60 years and living in the Quebec City suburbs. Between 1980 to 1981 and 1990, 83 of the 944 men with complete follow-up in 1990 (80.8%) had a first IHD. Men who developed IHD had lower HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 cholesterol concentrations at baseline than men who remained free from IHD. Adjusted relative risk (RR) of IHD was calculated among quartiles of HDL cholesterol and HDL subfractions with the use of Cox survival models. Men in the fourth quartile of HDL2 (RR = 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.56) and HDL3 cholesterol distributions (RR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.94) were at lower risk for IHD than men in the first quartile. Despite the fact that the respective contributions of HDL2 and HDL3 to IHD risk were of the same magnitude in a multivariate model that included both subfractions, the contribution of the HDL2 subfraction was statistically significant (standardized RR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95), whereas it did not reach significance for HDL3 (standardized RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.11). Neither the linear combination of HDL2 and HDL3 nor their ratio provided further information on the risk of IHD compared with HDL cholesterol alone or with the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol. From a statistical standpoint, the present data suggest that the HDL2 subfraction may be more closely related to the development of IHD than the HDL3 subfraction. However, the qualitative difference in the relative predictive value of each subfraction was trivial, since it only corresponded to a modest quantitative difference. Thus, the possibility that a significant proportion of the cardioprotective effect of elevated HDL cholesterol levels may be mediated by the HDL3 subfraction still cannot be excluded. Finally, from a clinical point of view and within the limits of resolution provided by these data, the measurement of HDL subfractions does not appear to provide any additional information on the risk of IHD than HDL cholesterol alone or the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol.
An ideal oral contraceptive should either be neutral as regards metabolic risk markers for arterial disease or should only change them in directions that would be expected to reduce risk. Depending on their formulation, modern low dose oral contraceptives affect systems such as hemostasis, lipoprotein metabolism, and glucose and insulin metabolism. Some of these actions would be expected to decrease the risk of arterial disease and some might be expected to increase risk. Despite these associations there is at present no justification for widespread metabolic screening as a strategy to further improve oral contraceptive safety. Recent developments in atherosclerosis research support the introduction of progestogens such as desogestrel that allow the estrogenic increase in high density lipoprotein levels to persist and that may cause less of an elevation in plasma insulin responses to glucose. The predicted benefit of these formulations in terms of arterial disease is difficult to demonstrate in an epidemiological setting because of the rarity of the disease in young women.
PIP
Depending on their formulation, modern low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs) affect systems such as hemostasis, lipoprotein metabolism, and glucose and insulin metabolism. This paper reviews the research literature on these effects and assesses their clinical implications for arterial disease. At greatest risk are women with high plasma levels of the potentially atherogenic lipoproteins (low, intermediate, and very low density lipoproteins) and low plasma levels of high density lipoprotein. Recent studies suggest that the quality of lipoproteins, especially their ability to resist oxidative modification, may be as important as their plasma levels. At present, there is no justification for widespread metabolic screening as a strategy to further improve OC safety. Recent developments in atherosclerosis research support the introduction of progestogens such as desogestrel that allow the estrogenic increase in high density lipoprotein levels to persist and that may cause less of an elevation in plasma insulin responses to glucose. The predicted benefit of these formulations in terms of arterial disease is difficult to demonstrate in an epidemiologic setting, however, because of the rarity of the disease in young women.
This multicenter, randomized, open-label study was undertaken to compare the effects on menstrual cycle control of two oral contraceptive regimens: monophasic levonorgestrel (LNG) 100 micrograms/ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 micrograms (Alesse or Loette) and triphasic norethindrone (NET) 500-750-1000 micrograms/EE 35 micrograms (OrthoNovum 7/7/7).
Healthy women with normal menstrual cycles were enrolled and completed up to four cycles of study medication. A total of 384 cycles in the LNG/EE group and 400 cycles in the NET/EE group were evaluable for analysis of cycle control.
For all treatment cycles, the percentage of cycles classified as normal was consistently higher in the LNG/EE group than in the NET/EE group. By cycle 4, 69.9% of cycles with LNG/EE and 54.4% with NET/EE (p < 0.05) were normal. In individual cycles, consistently lower occurrences of intermenstrual bleeding (total bleeding and/or spotting) were seen for the LNG/EE group, although these differences were not statistically significant. Withdrawal bleeding characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the length of the latent period, which was significantly longer in the LNG/EE group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in the two groups.
This study indicates that the monophasic LNG/EE 100 micrograms/20 micrograms provides better cycle control than the multiphasic NET/EE product, despite its lower EE dose.
The aim of this 24-cycle study was to evaluate the effects on serum lipid concentrations of an oral contraceptive preparation containing 100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinyl estradiol. Study Design: Forty-two healthy women were enrolled in a study designed to evaluate the effects on serum lipid concentrations of an oral contraceptive containing 100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinyl estradiol. Lipid data were evaluated for 28 women who completed 24 cycles of treatment with a preparation of 100 microg levonorgestrel with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol for 21 days followed by placebo for 7 days. Concentrations of triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions 2 and 3, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoproteins A-I and B were analyzed. Mean percentage changes from baseline were tested for significance by means of paired Student t tests.
Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein subfraction 2, and apolipoprotein A-I concentrations were not significantly changed from baseline. Neither was the ratio of high-density lipoprotein subfraction 2 to high-density lipoprotein subfraction 3. Mean percentage increases in concentrations of triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein subfraction 3, apolipoprotein B, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increases in the ratios of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A-I were significant (P <.05) at >/=1 cycle. By cycle 24, however, only the concentration of high-density lipoprotein subfraction 3 remained significantly elevated.
Changes in the plasma lipid profiles among women receiving monophasic 100 microg levonorgestrel with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol were similar to those seen with other low-dose oral contraceptives, but by cycle 24 only 1 of 7 mean values remained significantly different from baseline.
The efficacy and safety of a low-dose 21-day combination oral contraceptive containing 100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinyl estradiol were evaluated in an open-label, multicenter trial. A total of 1708 subjects with regular menstrual cycles (27,011 cycles) were evaluated. The oral contraceptive was administered once a day for 21 days, followed by 7 days of placebo for a complete cycle. During 26,554 cycles evaluated for efficacy, 18 pregnancies occurred (Pearl index of 0.88); 6 of these events were attributable to subject noncompliance. After 30 cycles of exposure the cumulative rate of withdrawal as a result of accidental pregnancy was 1.9%. Breakthrough bleeding (with or without spotting) occurred in 12.9% of the cycles and spotting alone occurred in 10.1% of the cycles. The 2 most common adverse events cited as reasons for discontinuation were headache (2% of subjects) and metrorrhagia (2%). One serious event led to withdrawal of a subject. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that the monophasic regimen of 100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinyl estradiol offers effective contraception, acceptable cycle control, and a good tolerability profile.
The effect of a second and third generation oral contraceptive and of the progestagens used in these pills on lipid metabolism was studied in the absence or presence of the factor V Leiden mutation.
A single centre, double blind randomized trial.
University Medical Centre.
A total of 51 women without and 35 women with the factor V Leiden mutation.
A second generation (30 microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg levonorgestrel) or a third generation (30 microg ethinylestradiol/l 50 microg desogestrel) oral contraceptive. After two cycles of use and a wash-out period of two cycles, the participants received the corresponding progestagen-only preparation containing 150 microg levonorgestrel or 150 microg desogestrel.
Mean difference in changes between the treatment groups on total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides and total/HDL cholesterol ratio.
Compared with levonorgestrel, desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives caused in women without the factor V Leiden mutation significant changes in HDL (0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.61), LDL (-0.55; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.20), triglycerides (0.19; 95% CI 0.06-0.32) and total/ HDL cholesterol ratio (-0.87; 95% CI -1.21 to -0.53). When the progestagen-only preparations were used, differential changes were found for HDL (0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.29), LDL (-0.31; 95% CI - 0.56 to -0.05) and total/HDL cholesterol ratio (-0.55; 95% CI -0.84 to -0.26). Desogestrel-only caused changes opposite to those of desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives. For cholesterol and triglycerides, this effect was also found for levonorgestrel-only in comparison with levonorgestrel-combined oral contraceptives. Levonorgestrel appeared to induce the effect on HDL. Almost all results were similar for women with the factor V Leiden mutation.
It appears that desogestrel counteracts the effects of oestrogens to a lesser extent than levonorgestrel. Desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives have therefore a more favourable influence on cholesterol metabolism in comparison with levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptives.
In this open label, randomized study we compared the influence of a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 100 microg levonorgestrel (20 EE) with a reference preparation containing 30 microg EE and 150 microg levonorgestrel (30 EE) on hemostatic, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism variables. Data from 48 volunteers were obtained. The direction of the change (increase or decrease) in most of the hemostatic variables were similar in both treatment groups. In particular, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 increased during treatment, reaching a median percent change of 40% in the 20 EE group and of 17% in the 30 EE group after one year. D-Dimer fibrin split products remained virtually unchanged, with no change at Cycle 13. The median HDL2 cholesterol levels decreased by 26% in the 20 EE group and by 39.8% in 30 EE group (p = 0.0045 for group difference) after one year. The median one year change for LDL cholesterol was 3.23% in the 20 EE group, compared to 25% in the 30 EE group, for VLDL 11.1% compared to 38.8%, respectively, and for total triglycerides 10.0% compared to 37.5%, respectively. The median absolute change for the area under the curve (AUC)(0-3h) for glucose at treatment Cycle 13 was 41.25 mmol/L x min in the 20 EE group and 73.50 mmol/L x min in the 30 EE group. The AUC(0-3h) insulin at treatment Cycle 13 decreased in the 20 EE group by 1635.0 pmolL x min and increased in the 30 EE group by 11797.5 pmolL x min (p = 0.0491 for group difference). Both study treatments were safe and well tolerated by the volunteers. In conclusion, the balanced one-third dose reduction in this new oral contraceptive evoked similar effects on the hemostatic variables, but favorable results for the lipid and carbohydrate profiles.
Recent studies have indicated that the risk of thromboembolic disease (VTE) in users of combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) varies not only with estrogen dose, but also with the progestogen in pills with the same estrogen dose. The aim of this article is to discuss sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) as a marker of estrogenicity and as a surrogate indicator for the potential risk of VTE in users of COC.
Using data from the literature, we investigated the relationship between the risk of VTE with various COCs and their effects on SHBG. We also collected data on the effects on SHBG by some combined preparations, where there are no VTE data.
There appears to be a relationship between the risk of VTE and the effect on SHBG. Monophasic preparations containing levonorgestrel, having the lowest risk of VTE, cause an average SHBG increase of around 50%. COCs containing desogestrel or gestodene cause an average SHBG increase of 200-300%. A preparation with cyproterone acetate, carrying a higher risk of VTE than desogestrel and gestodene, cause a 300-400% SHBG increase. With the recently developed combined preparations, there is a 150% SHBG increase with norgestimate and a 250-300% increase with drosperinone and dienogest.
We propose that the change in SHBG with a COC could be interpreted as a measure of total estrogenicity and used as a predictor of the risk of VTE. Preparations containing drosperinone, dienogest, cyproterone acetate and norgestimate are equally or more estrogenic than the more thoroughly studied COCs, containing desogestrel or gestodene and should not be considered a safer substitute.
The prospective association between insulin levels and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is controversial. The objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), as well as insulin levels, with risk of nonfatal and fatal CVD over the 8-year follow-up of the San Antonio Heart Study.
Between 1984 and 1988, randomly selected Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white residents of San Antonio participated in baseline examinations that included fasting blood samples for glucose, insulin, and lipids, a glucose tolerance test, anthropometric measurements, and a lifestyle questionnaire. Between 1991 and 1996, 2,569 subjects who were free of diabetes at baseline were reexamined using the same protocol.
Over the follow-up period, 187 subjects experienced an incident cardiovascular event (heart attack, stroke, heart surgery, angina, or CVD death). Logistic regression analysis indicated that risk of a CVD event increased across quintiles of HOMA-IR after adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity (P for trend <0.0001; quintile 5 vs. quintile 1, odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95% CI 1.46-4.36). Additional adjustment for LDL, triglyceride, HDL, systolic blood pressure, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, and waist circumference only modestly reduced the magnitude of these associations (P for trend 0.02; quintile 5 vs. quintile 1, OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.05-3.59). Furthermore, there were no significant interactions between HOMA-IR and ethnicity, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, glucose tolerance (impaired glucose tolerance versus normal glucose tolerance), or obesity. The magnitude and direction of the relationship between insulin concentration and incident CVD were similar.
We found a significant association between HOMA-IR and risk of CVD after adjustment for multiple covariates. The topic remains controversial, however, and additional studies are required, particularly among women and minority populations.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects on lipid metabolism of a new low-dose monophasic combination oral contraceptive with 100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinylestradiol. Sixty healthy women aged 18-45 years were administered the medication during three cycles. The study participants were screened for lipid changes. The differences in cholesterol and triglyceride levels were not statistically significant, but high-density lipoprotein levels were significantly lower and low-density lipoprotein levels were significantly higher than the baseline. Women at risk of cardiovascular disease should be carefully monitored even when using low-dose preparations.
The effects of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol 20 microg in combination with levonorgestrel 100 microg (EE20/LNG100) or 30 microg and 150 microg (EE30/LNG150), respectively, on lipoprotein metabolism was investigated in a double-blind, randomized study of 12 treatment cycles in healthy female volunteers. Total triglycerides (+32% to +46%, p < 0.05 in comparison to baseline) increased significantly. Triglycerides were highest after six cycles of treatment, decreasing thereafter. Total cholesterol (+1% to +7%), apolipoprotein (apo) B (+21% to +29%) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (+7% to +17%) increased slightly. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol decreased slightly (-11% and -5%), HDL triglycerides increased (+16% and +26%). Apo AI did not change during the study, suggesting that the molar concentration of HDL particles did not change. Apo E (-23% to -14%) decreased, and there was a transitory decrease of lipoprotein (a). Essentially, there was no difference regarding the changes in lipoprotein metabolism between the two treatment groups. The effects of the two combinations of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins appear less pronounced than those produced by preparations containing third-generation progestins. It is not likely that the changes in lipoprotein metabolism brought about by the two preparations will alter the risk of future cardiovascular disease in a clinically relevant fashion.
This open, prospective, noncomparative study evaluated clinical and metabolic aspects of the use of a contraceptive combination of ethinyl estradiol (30 microg) and gestodene (75 microg) continuously for 24 weeks in 45 women aged 25 +/- 3.7 years. No alterations in weight or blood pressure were observed. Few side effects were recorded. Amenorrhea rates increased from the fourth month of observation onwards, reaching 81.2% by week 24. A reduction in the levels of cholesterol and LDL and an increase in HDL and triglycerides were observed. Insulin levels increased but not significantly, while levels of glycemia remained unchanged. Levels of antithrombin III, fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) increased, whereas a reduction was observed in proteins C and S and in prothrombin time (PT). Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) remained unchanged. The treatment was associated with satisfactory clinical effects, high rates of amenorrhea after the third treatment cycle, and resulted in metabolic changes similar to those encountered during the classic use of contraceptive pills with monthly interruption for withdrawal bleeding.
To evaluate the impact on lipid and carbohydrate variables of a combined one-third ethinyl estradiol (EE)/levonorgestrel (LNG) dose reduction in oral contraceptives.
In an open-label, randomized study, a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg EE and 100 microg LNG (20 EE/100 LNG) was compared with a reference preparation containing 30 microg EE and 150 microg LNG (30 EE/150 LNG). One-year data from 48 volunteers were obtained.
We found a decrease of HDL2 cholesterol and increases of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total triglycerides in both treatment groups from baseline to the 13th treatment cycle. Although for four of six variables, the changes in the 20 EE group were lower compared with the 30 EE group, none of the differences between the two treatments were statistically significant. The median values for the fasting levels of insulin, C-peptide and free fatty acids slightly increased or remained unchanged while the fasting glucose levels slightly decreased after 13 treatment cycles. While the glucose area under the curve (AUC) (0-3 h) was similar in both groups during the OGTT, the insulin AUC(0-3 h) was less increased in the 20 EE/100 LNG group compared with the 30 EE/150 LNG group. None of the differences between the treatment groups for any of the carbohydrate metabolism variables were statistically significant at any time point. Both study treatments were safe and well tolerated by the volunteers.
Similar effects on the lipid and carbohydrate profiles were found for both preparations. The balanced one-third EE dose reduction in this new oral contraceptive caused slightly lower, but insignificant, changes in the lipid and carbohydrate variables compared with the reference treatment.