Use of a Web-based clinical decision support system to improve abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in a primary care practice

Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Center for Innovation, Department of Family Medicine and Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (Impact Factor: 1.08). 03/2011; 18(3):666-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01661.x
Source: PubMed


The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends a one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with ultrasonography for men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked. However, despite a mortality rate of up to 80% for ruptured AAAs, providers order the screening for a minority of patients. We sought to determine the effect of a Web-based point-of-care clinical decision support system on AAA screening rates in a primary care practice.
We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of male patients aged 65 to 75 years who were seen at any of our practice sites in 2007 and 2008, before and after implementation of the clinical decision support system.
Overall screening rates were 31.36% in 2007 and 44.09% in 2008 (P-value: <0.001). Of patients who had not had AAA screening prior to the visit, 3.22% completed the screening after the visit in 2007, compared with 18.24% in 2008 when the clinical support system was implemented, 5.36 times improvement (P-value: <0.001).
A Web-based clinical decision support for primary care physicians significantly improved delivery of AAA screening of eligible patients. Carefully developed clinical decision support systems can optimize care delivery, ensuring that important preventive services are delivered to eligible patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Kurt B Angstman
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. However, 41% of patients do not receive adequate screening, since the surveillance guidelines for colonoscopy are complex and are not easily recalled by health care providers. As a potential solution, we developed a guideline based clinical decision support system (CDSS) that can interpret relevant freetext reports including indications, pathology and procedure notes. The CDSS was evaluated by comparing its recommendations with those of a gastroenterologist for a test set of 53 patients. The CDSS made the optimal recommendation in 48 cases, and helped the gastroenterologist revise the recommendation in 3 cases. We performed an error analysis for the 5 failure cases, and subsequently were able to modify the CDSS to output the correct recommendation for all the test cases. Results indicate that the system has a high potential for clinical deployment, but further evaluation and optimization is required. Limitations of our study are that the study was conducted at a single institution and with a single expert, and the evaluation did not include rare decision scenarios. Overall our work demonstrates the utility of natural language processing to enhance clinical decision support.
    No preview · Conference Paper · Sep 2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To develop a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) for cervical cancer screening that can interpret free-text Papanicolaou (Pap) reports. The CDSS was constituted by two rulebases: the free-text rulebase for interpreting Pap reports and a guideline rulebase. The free-text rulebase was developed by analyzing a corpus of 49 293 Pap reports. The guideline rulebase was constructed using national cervical cancer screening guidelines. The CDSS accesses the electronic medical record (EMR) system to generate patient-specific recommendations. For evaluation, the screening recommendations made by the CDSS for 74 patients were reviewed by a physician. Evaluation revealed that the CDSS outputs the optimal screening recommendations for 73 out of 74 test patients and it identified two cases for gynecology referral that were missed by the physician. The CDSS aided the physician to amend recommendations in six cases. The failure case was because human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was sometimes performed separately from the Pap test and these results were reported by a laboratory system that was not queried by the CDSS. Subsequently, the CDSS was upgraded to look up the HPV results missed earlier and it generated the optimal recommendations for all 74 test cases. Single institution and single expert study. An accurate CDSS system could be constructed for cervical cancer screening given the standardized reporting of Pap tests and the availability of explicit guidelines. Overall, the study demonstrates that free text in the EMR can be effectively utilized through natural language processing to develop clinical decision support tools.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2012 · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

  • No preview · Chapter · Jan 2013
Show more