Article

How Do the Experiences of Medicare Beneficiary Subgroups Differ between Managed Care and Original Medicare?

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.78). 02/2011; 46(4):1039-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01245.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To examine whether disparities in health care experiences of Medicare beneficiaries differ between managed care (Medicare Advantage [MA]) and traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare.
132,937 MA and 201,444 FFS respondents to the 2007 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey.
We defined seven subgroup characteristics: low-income subsidy eligible, no high school degree, poor or fair self-rated health, age 85 and older, female, Hispanic, and black. We estimated disparities in CAHPS experience of care scores between each of these groups and beneficiaries without those characteristics within MA and FFS for 11 CAHPS measures and assessed differences between MA and FFS disparities in linear models.
The seven subgroup characteristics had significant (p<.05) negative interactions with MA (larger disparities in MA) in 27 of 77 instances, with only four significant positive interactions.
Managed care may provide less uniform care than FFS for patients; specifically there may be larger disparities in MA than FFS between beneficiaries who have low incomes, are less healthy, older, female, and who did not complete high school, compared with their counterparts. There may be potential for MA quality improvement targeted at the care provided to particular subgroups.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Paul D Cleary, Jan 05, 2016
    • " different hospital staff work conditions , and lower pay for nonphysician staff in for - profit hospitals com - pared with nonprofit and government hospitals , as reported previously in the literature ( Arrington and Haddock 1990 ; Kessler and McClellan 2000 ; Bacon , Hughes , and Mark 2009 ) . Alternatively , recent work in outpatient settings ( Elliott et al . 2011 ) suggests that managed care forms of Medicare ( Medicare Advantage ) have bigger gender gaps than those in fee - for - service Medicare . Because a similar pattern was found for other groups whose care , like women ' s , tends to be more costly ( Owens 2008 ) , cost considerations may play a similar role in for - profit hospitals . Fut"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine gender differences in inpatient experiences and how they vary by dimensions of care and other patient characteristics. A total of 1,971,632 patients (medical and surgical service lines) discharged from 3,830 hospitals, July 2007-June 2008, and completing the HCAHPS survey. We compare the experiences of male and female inpatients on 10 HCAHPS dimensions using multiple linear regression, adjusting for survey mode and patient mix. Additional models add additional patient characteristics and their interactions with patient gender. We find generally less positive experiences for women than men, especially for Communication about Medicines, Discharge Information, and Cleanliness. Gender differences are similar in magnitude to previously reported HCAHPS differences by race/ethnicity. The gender gap is generally larger for older patients and for patients with worse self-reported health status. Gender disparities are largest in for-profit hospitals. Targeting the experiences of women may be a promising means of improving overall patient experience scores (because women comprise a majority of all inpatients); the experiences of older and sicker women, and those in for-profit hospitals, may merit additional examination.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2012 · Health Services Research
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medicare managed care enrollees who disenroll to fee-for-service (FFS) historically have worse health and higher costs than continuing enrollees and beneficiaries remaining in FFS. To examine disenrollment patterns by analyzing Medicare payments following disenrollment from Medicare Advantage (MA) to FFS in 2007. Recent growth in the MA program, introduction of limits on timing of enrollment/disenrollment, and initiation of prescription drug benefits may have substantially changed the dynamics of disenrollment. The study was based on MA enrollees who disenrolled to FFS in 2007 (N=248,779) and a sample of "FFS stayers" residing in the same counties as the disenrollees (N=551,616). Actual Medicare Part A and Part B payments (excluding hospice payments) in the six months following disenrollment were compared with predicted payments based on claims experience of local FFS stayers, adjusted for CMS-Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) risk scores. Disenrollees incurred $1,021 per month in Medicare payments, compared with $798 in predicted payments (ratio of actual/predicted=1.28, p < 0.001). Differences between actual and predicted payments were smaller for disenrollees of Preferred Provider Organizations and Private Fee-for-Service plans than of Health Maintenance Organizations. Analysis of 10 individual MA plans revealed variation in the degree of selective disenrollment. Despite substantial changes in policies and market characteristics of the Medicare managed care program, disenrollment to FFS continues to occur disproportionately among high-cost beneficiaries, raising concerns about care experiences among sicker enrollees and increased costs to Medicare.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2012 · Medicare and Medicaid Research Review
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Affordable Care Act of 2010 authorized the continued availability of Medicare Advantage Chronic Condition Special Needs Plans (C-SNPs). This case study examines the model of care used by the largest such plan, Care Improvement Plus, and compares utilization rates among its diabetes patients with those of other beneficiaries enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare in the same five states. This special-needs plan emphasizes direct contacts with patients to help identify gaps in care and promote primary and preventive health care. The comparative analysis indicates that people with diabetes in the special-needs plan-particularly nonwhite beneficiaries-had lower rates of hospitalization and readmission than their peers in fee-for-service Medicare. For example, risk-adjusted hospital days per enrollee among special-needs plan participants were 19 percent lower than for fee-for-service Medicare enrollees (27 percent lower for nonwhite enrollees). Risk-adjusted physician office visits were 7 percent higher among C-SNP enrollees than among comparable fee-for-service enrollees (26 percent higher for nonwhite enrollees). Although this study does not include a cost analysis, we believe that savings from reduced hospitalizations are likely to more than offset the additional costs of enhanced primary care programs. Our study suggests that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may be able to adapt methods used by the C-SNP program to improve care and outcomes for beneficiaries with a broad range of chronic diseases.
    Preview · Article · Jan 2012 · Health Affairs
Show more