Article

Immunogenicity and Cross-Reactivity of 2009–2010 Inactivated Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in US Adults and Elderly

Hallym University, Republic of Korea
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 01/2011; 6(1):e16650. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016650
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The campaign of 2009-2010 Northern Hemisphere seasonal vaccination was concurrent with the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Using a hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay, we evaluated the immunogenicity and cross-reactivity of 2009-2010 inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in US adult and elderly populations. Vaccination of TIV resulted in a robust boost on the antibody response of all subjects to seasonal A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1) and A/Uruguay/716/2007 (H3N2) with over 70% of recipients reaching a seroprotective titer of 40. B/Brisbane/60/2008 was the least immunogenic among the three seasonal vaccine strains with <30% of TIV recipients reaching a seroprotective titer of 40. TIV vaccination also induced a moderate boost on the pandemic specific antibody responses. Twenty-four percent of adults and 36% of elderly reached a seroprotective HAI titer of 40 or more against pandemic A/South Carolina/18/2009 (H1N1) after receiving TIV compared to 4% and 7% at the beginning of vaccination, respectively. In addition, 22% of adults and 34% of elderly showed an increase of 4-fold or more in A/South Carolina/18/2009 specific HAI titers after TIV vaccination. The pandemic specific cross-reactive antibodies strongly correlated with the post-vaccination HAI titers against the seasonal H3N2 vaccine strain in all subjects.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Ewan P Plant
  • Source
    • "Regarding the relatively poor immune response to B antigen, our results were similar to the results of the study performed by Xie et al. [17]. They suggested that the low immunogenicity of B/Brisbane/60/2008 was probably due to the fact that it was a new strain, unlike the A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1) strain, which had been a vaccine component since the 2008-2009 season [17]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although influenza is regarded as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, vaccine coverage remains poor. We evaluated the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines in colorectal cancer patients. In this study, 40 colorectal cancer patients who received an influenza vaccine at the Korea Cancer Center Hospital during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 influenza seasons were analyzed. The blood samples were collected at prevaccination and 30 days post vaccination, and antibody titers were measured using the hemagglutination-inhibition tests. In the 2009-2011 season, the seroprotection rate for H1N1 (94.7%) was significantly higher than that for H3N2 (42.1%) and B (47.3%). The seroconversion rate was 52.6%, 26.3%, and 36.8% for H1N1, H3N2, and B, respectively. Fold increase of geometric mean titer (MFI) was 3.86, 1.49, and 3.33 for H1N1, H3N2, and B, respectively. In the 2010-2011 season, the seroprotection rate for H1N1 (57.1%) was significantly higher than that for H3N2 (52.4%) and B (38.1%). The seroconversion rate was 52.4%, 47.6% and 33.3% for H1N1, H3N2, and B, respectively. MFI was 12.29, 3.62 and 4.27 for H1N1, H3N2, and B, respectively. Our study cohort showed an acceptable immune response to an influenza vaccine without significant adverse effects, supporting the recommendation for annual influenza vaccination in colorectal cancer patients.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Source
    • "Antibodies generated as a result of influenza infection or vaccination typically are protective against homotypic infections but often fail to cross-react effectively with novel strains possessing distinct subtypes of the haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) proteins (Xie et al., 2011). Low levels of cross-reactivity with novel strains may exacerbate disease and enhance virus replication by a mechanism known as 'original antigenic sin' (Kim et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The 2009 swine-origin pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) influenza virus transmitted and caused disease in many individuals immune to pre-2009 H1N1 influenza virus. While extensive studies on antibody-mediated pH1N1 cross-reactivity have been described, few studies have focused on influenza-specific memory T cells. To address this, the immune response in pre-2009 H1N1 influenza-immune mice was evaluated after pH1N1 challenge and disease pathogenesis was determined. The results show that despite homology shared between pre-2009 H1N1 and pH1N1 strains, the effector memory T cell response to pre-2009 H1N1 was generally ineffective, a finding that correlated with lung virus persistence. Additionally, pH1N1 challenge generated T cells reactive to new pH1N1 epitopes. These studies highlight the importance of vaccinating against immunodominant T cell epitopes to provide for a more effective strategy to control influenza virus through heterosubtypic immunity.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2013 · Journal of General Virology
  • Source
    • "Interestingly, TIV vaccination prior to pandemic vaccine in these TIV-naïve study participants increased, moderately, A(H1N1)pmd09 specific HI titres in subjects on Day 21 even before they received adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted pandemic vaccines. Other studies also suggest that prior TIV vaccination is associated with increased pandemic specific antibody responses [9,10]. The mechanism of this phenomenon is not known, but could be explained by lack of specificity of HI antibody testing or cross-reactive antibody responses despite lack of epitope similarity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: At the time of the influenza A(H1N1)pmd09 pandemic it was not known if concurrent or sequential administration of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) with pandemic vaccine was preferred. Methods: Immunogenicity and safety were assessed in 871 healthy subjects aged 19-40 years who were randomised into six groups to receive co-administration or sequential administration of TIV and two doses of A(H1N1)pmd09 vaccine (either unadjuvanted or adjuvanted with AS03, an α-tocopherol and squalene-based oil-in-water emulsion). Results: Safety and immunogenicity data (by haemagglutination inhibition [HI] assay) after each dose and six months post-Dose 1 are reported here. Co-administration of A(H1N1)pmd09 vaccine with TIV reduced the HI immune responses to A(H1N1)pmd09 vaccine. However, serologic responses with both co-administration and sequential schedules met the European and US regulatory criteria for pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccines up to six months following the first vaccine dose. The AS03-adjuvanted formulation elicited higher immune responses at all time points. Prior administration or co-administration of A(H1N1)pmd09 vaccine did not affect immune responses to TIV. Conclusions: Co-administration of TIV and A(H1N1)pmd09 vaccine negatively influenced A(H1N1)pmd09 vaccine immunogenicity but had no effect on TIV responses. The non-adjuvanted and adjuvanted vaccines demonstrated strong immune responses against all vaccine strains for up to six months following the first vaccine dose.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2012 · BMC Infectious Diseases
Show more