Comparative Safety of Simultaneous and Staged Anterior and Posterior Spinal Surgery

Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Spine (Impact Factor: 2.3). 02/2011; 37(3):247-55. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821350d0
Source: PubMed


Analysis of population-based national hospital discharge data collected for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
To study perioperative outcomes of circumferential spine surgery performed on either the same or different days of the same hospitalization.
Circumferential spine fusion surgery has been linked to an increased adjusted risk in perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with procedures involving only 1 site. To minimize these risks, some surgeons elect to perform the 2 components of this procedure in separate sessions during the same hospitalization. The value of this approach is uncertain.
Data collected between 1998 and 2006 for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed. Hospitalizations during which a circumferential noncervical spine fusion was performed were identified. Patients were divided into those who had their anterior and posterior portion performed on the same and those performed on different days of the same hospitalization. The prevalence of patient and health care system-related demographics was evaluated. Frequencies of procedure-related complications and mortality were determined. Multivariate regression models were created to identify whether timing of procedures was associated with an independent increase in risk for adverse events.
We identified a total of 11,265 entries for circumferential spine fusion. Of those, 71.2% (8022) were operated in 1 session. Complications were more frequent among staged- versus same-day surgery patients (28.4% vs. 21.7%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of venous thrombosis and adult respiratory distress syndrome also increased among staged candidates, while the trend toward higher mortality (0.5% vs. 0.4%) did not reach significance. In the regression model, staged circumferential spine fusions were associated with a 29% increase in the odds morbidity and mortality compared with same-day procedures.
Staging circumferential spine surgery procedures during the same hospitalization offers no mortality benefit and may even expose patients to increased morbidity.

Download full-text


Available from: Federico P Girardi, Oct 11, 2015

  • No preview · Article · Aug 2012 · Anesthesiology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To investigate whether the posterior surgery and one-stage combined anterior-posterior surgery for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis had the same effect. Methods: From May 2003 to October 2008, fifty-eight patients of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis were treated by posterior pedicle screw fixation combined debridement, bone graft and fusion. Thirty of them were treated with posterior surgical procedure alone (group 1). Twenty-eight patients were treated with one-stage combined anterior-posterior surgery (group 2). All patients were managed by standard courses of chemotherapy with triple or quadruple anti-TB drugs. The perioperative indicators were compared. The clinical effects, laboratory and image data were followed up for 43-108 months. Results: There were statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay, operative time, bleeding, blood transfusions, drainage time and drainage amount in two groups. The clinical symptoms had obvious relief in all cases. In group 1, one patient had rib tuberculosis and a fistula formation in the 3rd year, one patient had pulmonary and knee tuberculosis in the 4th year, but spinal tuberculosis and psoas abscess did not recurred. The kyphosis was corrected obviously and the loss of correction was not significant. Conclusions: The two surgeries have good clinical effects in the short segment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. The posterior surgery alone has less operative trauma. It is proper for the patients who have bilateral psoas abscess or can't tolerate the anterior surgery.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2013 · Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND CONTEXT: To our knowledge, the effect of the staging regimen on the surgical outcome in patients undergoing combined anterior/posterior surgery for the treatment of spinal deformity has not been previously studied. PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of anterior/posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity staged less than 21 days apart versus those 21 or more days apart. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparison study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients aged 40 years or older who underwent combined anterior/posterior fusions for spinal deformities. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported measures, physiological measures, and functional measures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data for 63 consecutive patients (50 females and 13 males) older than 40 years who underwent combined anterior/posterior fusions for spinal deformities and who had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. We divided them into those who had surgery staged less than 21 days apart (Group 1, N=29) and those who had surgery staged 21 or more days apart (Group 2, N=34). The groups were not statistically different in age; preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists, Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores; number of previous surgeries; number of levels fused; or total operative time. Hotelling t square test and the chi-squared test were used to compare clinical and radiographic parameters, complications, and functional outcomes between groups (significance, p<.05). RESULTS: Compared with Group 1 patients, Group 2 (staged) patients had a lower total estimated blood loss (average, 4.5 L [range, 1.90-8.75 L] vs. 4 L [range, 1.8-10.1 L], respectively), fewer combined hospital days (average, 14 days [range, 7-70 days] vs. 12 days [range, 6-44 days], respectively), and fewer major complications (total, 10 [35%] vs. 6 [18%], respectively). Preoperative SRS-22 and ODI scores were significantly better in Group 2 than in Group 1 at 6 weeks (p<.001) and at final follow-up (p<.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients who require both anterior and posterior surgery for spinal deformity correction, staging the two procedures 21 or more days apart decreases total perioperative transfusion requirements although significantly improving functional outcomes.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2013 · The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society
Show more