Knee Injuries and the Use of Prophylactic Knee Bracing in Off-road Motorcycling Results of a Large-Scale Epidemiological Study

Sanders Clinic for Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.36). 02/2011; 39(7):1395-400. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510394431
Source: PubMed


The effectiveness of prophylactic knee bracing in preventing knee injuries during sports has been evaluated; however, because of the variability in study conclusions, the topic remains controversial. Despite a paucity of data, the authors believe that prophylactic knee bracing is frequently used in off-road motorcycling.
No statistically significant difference exists in the frequency and types of knee injuries incurred between braced and nonbraced riders using commercially available knee braces in off-road motorcycling.
Descriptive epidemiology study.
Data from 2115 off-road motorcycle riders was obtained using an Internet-based survey over a 1-year period. Participants were grouped by use or nonuse of prophylactic knee bracing, and an incidence rate ratio was used for injury rate comparison.
Participants recorded 39 611 riding hours over the study period. A total of 57 riders (2.7%) sustained at least 1 knee injury, for a total of 89 injuries. The most common injuries involved the anterior cruciate ligament, menisci, and medial collateral ligament. There was a significantly higher rate of overall injuries in the nonbraced group versus the braced group (3.675 vs 1.587 per 1000 rider hours, P < .001). Significantly higher incidence rates of anterior cruciate ligament rupture (1.518 vs 0.701 per 1000 rider hours, P = .0274) and medial collateral ligament injury (0.799 vs 0.111 per 1000 rider hours, P = .002) were found among nonbraced riders compared with braced riders.
The most common knee injuries in off-road motorcycling involve the anterior cruciate ligament, menisci, and medial collateral ligament. The use of prophylactic knee bracing appears to have a beneficial effect in preventing medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament injuries as well as overall knee injury occurrence. These findings may be applicable to other sports that involve similar forces and mechanics.

  • Source

    Preview · Article · Jul 2011 · The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The origins of mountain biking understandably began as a means of transport rather than recreation during nineteenth-century wartime when “Buffalo” soldiers are reported to have cycled home, cross-country from Missoula, Montana, to Yellowstone. Japanese forces recognized that cycle provided faster travel on some jungle paths during the Second World War.
    No preview · Chapter · Jan 2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Injury incidence rates are commonly reported using either a time-based denominator, such as injuries per 1000 player hours, or an event-based denominator, such as injuries per 1000 athletic exposures. Unless researchers give very detailed baseline information on their study population, it is not possible to convert between these units. We previously observed an apparent geographic split in reporting injury incidence rates between American and non-American researchers. Methods: We manually searched all issues of The American Journal of Sports Medicine and British Journal of Sports Medicine published between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013 for studies reporting injury risk or incidence during organized sporting events. For each article, the following information was recorded: journal, geographic location of the senior author, method of injury reporting (risk or incidence), incidence rate reporting method (time-based vs. event-based), sports studied, event types included (practice, game/match, or both), injury types reported. Results: A total of 109 articles that reported injury risk or rate were identified. Seventy-four articles reported injury incidence. Twenty-five of the 74 articles reporting injury incidence were written by American researchers, and 92% of these utilized an event-based denominator. Forty-five of the 49 (92%) articles reporting injury incidence written by non-American authors utilized a time-based denominator. Conclusions: Over the last five years, American researchers have chosen to report rates in terms of injuries per athletic exposure, while non-American researchers have preferred time-based rate reporting. Standardization of reporting measures would facilitate cross-sport comparisons of injury rates and metaanalyses of existing studies.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2015