Article

An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto ON M4N3M5, Canada.
BMC Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 1.71). 01/2011; 11(1):20. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-20
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Studies comparing the access to health care of rural and urban populations have been contradictory and inconclusive. These studies are complicated by the influence of other factor which have been shown to be related to access and utilization. This study assesses the equity of access to health care services across the rural-urban continuum in Canada before and after taking other determinants of access into account.
This is a cross-sectional study of the population of the 10 provinces of Canada using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 2.1). Five different measures of access and utilization are compared across the continuum of rural-urban. Known determinants of utilization are taken into account according to Andersen's Health Behaviour Model (HBM); location of residence at the levels of province, health region, and community is also controlled for.
This study found that residents of small cities not adjacent to major centres, had the highest reported utilisation rates of influenza vaccines and family physician services, were most likely to have a regular medical doctor, and were most likely to report unmet need. Among the rural categories there was a gradient with the most rural being least likely to have had a flu shot, use specialist physicians services, or have a regular medical doctor. Residents of the most urban centres were more likely to report using specialist physician services. Many of these differences are diminished or eliminated once other factors are accounted for. After adjusting for other factors those living in the most urban areas were more likely to have seen a specialist physician. Those in rural communities had a lower odds of receiving a flu shot and having a regular medical doctor. People residing in the most urban and most rural communities were less likely to have a regular medical doctor. Those in any of the rural categories were less likely to report unmet need.
Inequities in access to care along the rural-urban continuum exist and can be masked when evaluation is done at a very large scale with gross indicators of rural-urban. Understanding the relationship between rural-urban and other determinants will help policy makers to target interventions appropriately: to specific demographic, provincial, community, or rural categories.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: PubMed Central · License: CC BY
  • Source
    • "Rural populations of geographically large, developed countries such as Australia, the USA and Canada continue to experience poorer health outcomes than metropolitan populations (AIHW, 2008; Jones et al., 2009; Kulig and Williams, 2011). A consistent contributor to these health differentials is the poorer spatial access to health care for rural residents, both to primary health care (PHC) services as well as more centralised specialist care (Sibley and Weiner, 2011; Wakerman and Humphreys, 2012). Geography is widely acknowledged as a critical component of health care access, most notably for dispersed rural and remote populations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poor spatial access to health care remains a key issue for rural populations worldwide. Whilst geographic information systems (GIS) have enabled the development of more sophisticated access measures, they are yet to be adopted into health policy and workforce planning. This paper provides and tests a new national-level approach to measuring primary health care (PHC) access for rural Australia, suitable for use in macro-level health policy. The new index was constructed using a modified two-step floating catchment area method framework and the smallest available geographic unit. Primary health care spatial access was operationalised using three broad components: availability of PHC (general practitioner) services; proximity of populations to PHC services; and PHC needs of the population. Data used in its measurement were specifically chosen for accuracy, reliability and ongoing availability for small areas. The resultant index reveals spatial disparities of access to PHC across rural Australia. While generally more remote areas experienced poorer access than more populated rural areas, there were numerous exceptions to this generalisation, with some rural areas close to metropolitan areas having very poor access and some increasingly remote areas having relatively good access. This new index provides a geographically-sensitive measure of access, which is readily updateable and enables a fine granulation of access disparities. Such an index can underpin national rural health programmes and policies designed to improve rural workforce recruitment and retention, and, importantly, health service planning and resource allocation decisions designed to improve equity of PHC access.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Geospatial health
  • Source
    • "However, these contrasts are not consistent, and can depend on the measures of access examined, the populations studied, and the particular definition of " rural. " For example, Sibley and Weiner (2011) found that while urban residents were more likely to have a regular medical doctor, use specialist health-care services, and have received a flu shot, the most rural populations were less likely to have reported unmet health-care need in the previous year. Roos and Walld (2007) have also reported higher health-care utilization rates by adolescents in rural areas versus more urban adolescents. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research has shown persistent inequalities in access to health care between and within sociodemographic groups and geographic areas. Yet much of what we know about geographical disparities in access comes from studies of regional and urban/rural contrasts, or from studies of intra-urban, neighborhood-level variations. We know relatively little about variations in access to primary health care across different urban areas, and whether such variations translate into differences among residents’ health. This study examines how health status and access to primary care vary across five of Canada’s largest cities, paying particular attention to populations that may be particularly vulnerable based on age and income. Across all outcomes, there was a consistently strong relationship with individual socioeconomic status. We show that city of residence is important for access to health care but not for health status. Results are discussed in terms of their relevance for urban health-care policy and delivery, and impacts on health and access to care.
    Preview · Article · Nov 2014 · Urban Geography
  • Source
    • "Although school-based immunization coverage data among 17-year old students within the province reveals high vaccine coverage (96.6%) [6], the general population may not be representative of high risk populations such as pregnant adolescents, and immunization status was not available for analysis in this study. Increased susceptibility in northern regions of Ontario could reflect barriers to immunization due to geographic isolation and sub-optimal access to primary health care services particularly among First Nations communities [22-24]. Health units in the northern region are more rural and tend to be more sparsely populated compared to the southern and central regions of the province. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Countries of the Americas have been working towards rubella elimination since 2003 and endemic rubella virus transmission appears to have been interrupted since 2009. To contribute towards monitoring of rubella elimination, we assessed rubella seroprevalence among prenatal screening tests performed in Ontario. Methods: Specimens received for prenatal rubella serologic testing at the Public Health Ontario Laboratory, the provincial reference laboratory, between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed. A patient-based dataset was created using all tests occurring among 15-49 year-old females, where prenatal screening was indicated. Multiple tests were assigned to the same patient on the basis of health card number, name and date of birth. Only unique tests performed at least nine months apart were included. SAS version 9.2 was used for analysis. Results: Between 2006 and 2010, we identified 459,963 women who underwent 551,160 unique prenatal screening tests for rubella. Of these, 81.6%, 17.1% and 1.4% had one, two and three or more tests respectively. Conclusion: Rubella susceptibility among prenatal women in Ontario supports elimination goals as population immunity in this group is relatively high. Higher susceptibility among young women and women living in the north highlights an opportunity for greater focus on identification and immunization of susceptible women in these groups.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013 · BMC Infectious Diseases
Show more