Differences in Self-reported Attentional Fatigue Between Patients With Breast and Prostate Cancer at the Initiation of Radiation Therapy

School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0610, USA.
Cancer nursing (Impact Factor: 1.97). 09/2011; 34(5):345-53. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318202520a
Source: PubMed


Attentional fatigue is experienced as a decreased ability to concentrate, engage in purposeful activity, and maintain social relationships when there are competing demands on attention. Breast and prostate cancer are the 2 most common cancers in women and men, respectively. Most previous studies on self-reported attentional fatigue evaluated patients with breast cancer.
The objectives of the study were to determine if self-reported attentional fatigue differed in patients with breast cancer and prostate cancer before radiation therapy (RT) and to determine the relationships between attentional fatigue and other symptoms in these 2 groups.
Patients (n = 155) completed questionnaires before RT. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and analysis of covariance were used for data analyses.
After controlling for age, patients with breast cancer reported significantly higher levels of attentional fatigue. In both groups, more attentional fatigue correlated significantly with more anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and physical fatigue. These correlations were stronger for patients with breast cancer.
The present study is the first to identify differences in self-reported attentional fatigue between these 2 groups before RT. Additional research is warranted to determine factors that contribute to these differences, as well as mechanisms that underlie the development of attentional fatigue.
Clinicians should consider the capacity of their patients to direct attention when learning about RT and other treatments. It is important to simplify confusing healthcare terminology and reinforce teaching that is most important both verbally and in writing. Appropriate interventions for anxiety and depression may decrease attentional fatigue in these patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Laura B Dunn, Feb 02, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purposes of this study were to identify distinct subgroups of patients based on self-reported sleep disturbance prior to through 6 months after breast cancer surgery and evaluate for differences in demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics among these latent classes. Women (n = 398) who underwent unilateral breast cancer surgery were enrolled prior to surgery. Patients completed measures of functional status, sleep disturbance (i.e., General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS); higher scores indicate higher levels of sleep disturbance), fatigue, attentional fatigue, depressive symptoms, and anxiety prior to surgery and monthly for 6 months. Three distinct classes of sleep disturbance trajectories were identified using growth mixture modeling. The high sustained class (55.0%) had high and the low sustained class (39.7%) had low GSDS scores prior to surgery that persisted for 6 months. The decreasing class (5.3%) had high GSDS score prior to surgery that decreased over time. Women in the high sustained class were significantly younger, had more comorbidity and poorer function, and were more likely to report hot flashes compared to the low sustained class. More women who underwent mastectomy or breast reconstruction were in the decreasing class. Decreasing and high sustained classes reported higher levels of physical fatigue, attentional fatigue, depressive symptoms, and anxiety compared to the low sustained class. A high percentage of women has significant sleep disturbance prior to surgery that persists during subsequent treatments (i.e., radiation therapy and chemotherapy). Clinicians need to perform routine assessments and initiate appropriate interventions to improve sleep prior to and following surgery.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2012 · Supportive Care in Cancer
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: Sleep disturbance is a problem for oncology patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how sleep disturbance and daytime sleepiness (DS) changed from before to six months following surgery and whether certain characteristics predicted initial levels and/or the trajectories of these parameters. METHODS: Patients (n=396) were enrolled prior to surgery and completed monthly assessments for six months following surgery. The General Sleep Disturbance Scale was used to assess sleep disturbance and DS. Using hierarchical linear modeling, demographic, clinical, symptom, and psychosocial adjustment characteristics were evaluated as predictors of initial levels and trajectories of sleep disturbance and DS. RESULTS: All seven General Sleep Disturbance Scale scores were above the cutoff for clinically meaningful levels of sleep disturbance. Lower performance status; higher comorbidity, attentional fatigue, and physical fatigue; and more severe hot flashes predicted higher preoperative levels of sleep disturbance. Higher levels of education predicted higher sleep disturbance scores over time. Higher levels of depressive symptoms predicted higher preoperative levels of sleep disturbance, which declined over time. Lower performance status; higher body mass index; higher fear of future diagnostic tests; not having had sentinel lymph node biopsy; having had an axillary lymph node dissection; and higher depression, physical fatigue, and attentional fatigue predicted higher DS prior to surgery. Higher levels of education, not working for pay, and not having undergone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy predicted higher DS scores over time. CONCLUSION: Sleep disturbance is a persistent problem for patients with breast cancer. The effects of interventions that can address modifiable risk factors need to be evaluated.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2012 · Journal of pain and symptom management
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:: Insomnia, the most commonly reported sleep-wake disturbance in people with cancer, has an adverse effect on quality of life including emotional well-being, distress associated with other symptoms, daily functioning, relationships, and ability to work. OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to describe the content of discussions between clinicians and 120 patients with self-reported insomnia and to examine the associations of sociodemographic, clinical, and environmental factors with insomnia. METHODS:: A secondary analysis was conducted with self-reported symptom data and sociodemographic, clinical, and environmental factors. Recordings of clinician and patient discussions during clinic visits were examined by conducting a content analysis. RESULTS:: Severe insomnia was more likely to be reported by women, minority, and lower-income individuals. Seven major topics were identified in the discussions. The clinicians did not always discuss insomnia despite receiving printed summaries of reported symptoms; and this did differ by diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS:: Reporting of insomnia by the patient and clinician communication about insomnia may have differed by demographic and clinical characteristics. Clinicians attended to insomnia about half the time with management strategies likely to be effective. Explanations may be that insomnia had a low clinician priority for the clinic visit or lack of clear evidence to support insomnia interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:: A better understanding is needed about why insomnia is not addressed even when reported by patients; it is well known that structured assessments and early interventions can improve quality of life. Research is warranted to better understand potential disparities in cancer care.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2013 · Cancer nursing
Show more