G-CSF-mediated thrombopoietin release triggers neutrophil motility and mobilization from bone marrow via induction of Cxcr2 ligands

Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Blood (Impact Factor: 10.45). 04/2011; 117(16):4349-57. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-308387
Source: PubMed


Emergency mobilization of neutrophil granulocytes (neutrophils) from the bone marrow (BM) is a key event of early cellular immunity. The hematopoietic cytokine granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulates this process, but it is unknown how individual neutrophils respond in situ. We show by intravital 2-photon microscopy that a systemic dose of human clinical-grade G-CSF rapidly induces the motility and entry of neutrophils into blood vessels within the tibial BM of mice. Simultaneously, the neutrophil-attracting chemokine KC (Cxcl1) spikes in the blood. In mice lacking the KC receptor Cxcr2, G-CSF fails to mobilize neutrophils and antibody blockade of Cxcr2 inhibits the mobilization and induction of neutrophil motility in the BM. KC is expressed by megakaryocytes and endothelial cells in situ and is released in vitro by megakaryocytes isolated directly from BM. This production of KC is strongly increased by thrombopoietin (TPO). Systemic G-CSF rapidly induces the increased production of TPO in BM. Accordingly, a single injection of TPO mobilizes neutrophils with kinetics similar to G-CSF, and mice lacking the TPO receptor show impaired neutrophil mobilization after short-term G-CSF administration. Thus, a network of signaling molecules, chemokines, and cells controls neutrophil release from the BM, and their mobilization involves rapidly induced Cxcr2-mediated motility controlled by TPO as a pacemaker.

Download full-text


Available from: Martin Philip Hosking
  • Source
    • "In agreement with this, G-CSF-deficient mice have very few neutrophils in their blood and bone marrow (Semerad et al., 2002). Further, many circulatory inflammatory agents are involved in neutrophil mobilization during inflammation (leukotriene B4, CXCR2 ligands, C5a) in experimental animal models (Kohler et al., 2011). Thus, a single G-CSF injection results in rapid neutrophilia and neutropenic patients can be treated with G-CSF, CXCR2 ligands, or CXCR4 inhibitors to increase their numbers of circulating neutrophils (McDermott et al., 2011; Dale et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lack of sleep greatly affects our immune system. The present study investigates the acute effects of total sleep deprivation on blood neutrophils, the most abundant immune cell in our circulation and the first cell type recruited to sites of infection. Thus, the population diversity and function of circulating neutrophils were compared in healthy young men following one night of total sleep deprivation (TSD) or after 8 h regular sleep. We found that neutrophil counts were elevated after nocturnal wakefulness (2.0±0.2×109/l vs. 2.6±0.2×109/l, sleep vs. TSD, respectively) and the population contained more immature CD16dim/CD62Lbright cells (0.11±0.040×109/l [5.5±1.1%] vs. 0.26±0.020×109/l [9.9±1.4%]). As the rise in numbers of circulating mature CD16bright/CD62Lbright neutrophils was less pronounced, the fraction of this subpopulation showed a significant decrease (1.8±0.15×109/l [88±1.8%] vs. 2.1±0.12×109/l [82±2.8%]). The surface expression of receptors regulating mobilization of neutrophils from bone marrow was decreased (CXCR4 and CD49d on immature neutrophils; CXCR2 on mature neutrophils). The receptor CXCR2 is also involved in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and in line with this, total neutrophils produced less ROS. In addition, following sleep loss, circulating neutrophils exhibited enhanced surface levels of CD11b, which indicates enhanced granular fusion and concomitant protein translocation to the membrane. Our findings demonstrate that sleep loss exerts significant effects on population diversity and function of circulating neutrophils in healthy men. To which extent these changes could explain as to why people with poor sleep patterns are more susceptible to infections warrants further investigation.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2014 · Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Source
    • "The small number of HSCs normally present in circulation is dramatically increased in response to inflammation, and their homing to peripheral organs such as the liver, lung, and, in experimental animals, spleen establishes foci of extra medullary hematopoiesis. BM emargination of neutrophils depends on the expression of ligands for the chemokine receptor CXCR2 (Kö hler et al., 2011), whereas signaling through TLRs induces the secretion of the chemokine ligand CCL2, which stimulates the egression of monocytes expressing the cognate chemokine receptor CCR2 into the peripheral blood (Serbina and Pamer, 2006). Then, CCR2 + inflammatory monocytes migrate in a mostly CCR2-independent way to inflamed tissues or tumors, where they can differentiate into distinct subsets of activated myeloid cells sharing characteristics with macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) (Serbina and Pamer, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both microbes and tumors activate innate resistance, tissue repair, and adaptive immunity. Unlike acute infection, tumor growth is initially unapparent; however, inflammation and immunity affect all phases of tumor growth from initiation to progression and dissemination. Here, we discuss the shared features involved in the immune response to infection and cancer including modulation by commensal microbiota, reactive hematopoiesis, chronic immune responses and regulatory mechanisms to prevent collateral tissue damage. This comparative analysis of immunity to infection and cancer furthers our understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying innate resistance and adaptive immunity and their translational application to the design of new therapeutic approaches.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2014 · Cell host & microbe
  • Source
    • "Neutrophils are essential for early immune responses against microbial pathogens (K€ ohler et al, 2011). Thereby they feature two well-known main mechanisms of defence: phagocytosis (Behnsen et al, 2007) and intra-as well as extra-cellular destruction by chemical means (Segal, 2005; Nauseef, 2007; Winterbourn & Kettle, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For a long time neutrophil granulocytes were considered simply as terminally differentiated cells with a limited life span and pathogen killing by phagocytosis and chemical toxicity being the sole mode of action. However, work during the last 10 years has started to change this view fundamentally. Modern understanding is that neutrophils have an enormous complexity of functions. This review discusses very recent findings on how neutrophils can control the spread of pathogens and mediate their killing by mechanisms such as formation of DNA nets, how they influence tumour growth and adaptive immune responses and how they manoeuvre inside the diverse compartments of the body. It will also describe how the normally protective functions of neutrophils can have deleterious consequences if they occur in an uncontrolled fashion. These exciting novel findings are likely to completely and permanently change our view of this central leucocyte population.
    Preview · Article · Oct 2013 · British Journal of Haematology
Show more