Impact of Preload Alteration on Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony Using Tissue Velocity Imaging Echocardiography

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Echocardiography (Impact Factor: 1.25). 02/2011; 28(2):196-202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01288.x
Source: PubMed


We lack full understanding on the determinants of left ventricular (LV) systolic mechanical dyssynchrony. We here tried to evaluate the effect of preload alterations on LV dyssynchrony using echocardiographic tissue velocity imaging.
Thirty-eight patients with a history of heart failure who were in sinus rhythm (24 men, mean age of 61 ± 12 years [range, 26-82]) were consecutively recruited. Twenty-four patients were allocated into a mild diastolic dysfunction group (Gr 1), and 14 to an advanced diastolic dysfunction group, which included pseudonormalization or restrictive mitral inflow patterns (Gr 2). The leg-raising maneuver was performed for 5 minutes in Gr 1, whereas two tablets (1.2 mg) of sublingual nitroglycerin (SLNG) were given to Gr 2 to manipulate preload status. An index representing LV systolic mechanical dyssynchony (DYSsys) was defined as the maximal differences in time intervals from the QRS onset to the systolic peak velocities in 4 basal segments derived from the apical four- and two-chamber views.
DYSsys decreased significantly after SLNG administration (74.2 ± 50.2 vs. 46.9 ± 34.8 ms, P < 0.01), whereas it showed a significant elevation after leg-raising maneuver (76.3 ± 33.5 vs. 88.8 ± 37.5 ms, P < 0.05). Maximal difference in DYSsys between before and after SLNG administration in a patient of Gr 2 was estimated to be 120.2, whereas with the leg-raising maneuver, maximal difference in DYSsys in a patient of Gr 1 was found to be 66.8. Changes in heart rate induced by preload manipulation did not display any association with changes in DYSsys.
DYSsys is significantly affected by preload alterations, and thus it can be considered a "dynamic" parameter that could be modified depending on the loading status. Therefore, loading status of individual patients should be considered when DYSsys is assessed.

6 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Left-ventricular dyssynchrony (LVD) adversely affects systolic performance and has not been previously evaluated in children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We hypothesized (1) that LVD in children with ESRD would be significantly increased compared with controls and (2) that volume load and left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) would be associated with increased LVD. This was a prospective observational study in which real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data were acquired in 27 stable children with ESRD (13 peritoneal dialysis [PD] and 14 hemodialysis [HD]) and 29 normal controls. Data were acquired before and after an HD session. Dyssynchrony index (SDI) was defined per standard formulae and was normalized to cardiac cycle duration (SDIp). Left-ventricular mass (LVM) was obtained from M-mode echocardiography and was normalized to height(2.7) (LVM index). The mean age (13.8 vs. 11.3 years) and SDI, SDIp, LVM, and LVM index were significantly greater among children with ESRD than among controls (p < 0.05). Demographics and heart rates were comparable between HD and PD subgroups, whereas SDI 16 and 12 segments, SDIp 16 segments, and LVM were significantly greater in the HD group. SDI and SDIp 16 segments improved after an HD session (p < 0.05); LVM and LVM index remained unchanged. LVD was significantly greater in patients with LVH compared with those without LVH. Children with ESRD had significant LVD and increased LVM compared with controls. Increased LVD in those undergoing HD rather than PD, as well as the improvement in synchrony after HD, suggest that volume may modulate LVD. LVD was increased in children with LVH. LVD in children with ESRD may have pathogenic implications.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2012 · Pediatric Cardiology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Left ventricular (LV) twist mechanics are a promising, sensitive tool for assessing pathophysiologic changes in patients with systolic heart failure. Although LV twist is known to be load dependent in healthy volunteers, this has not been examined in patients with "long-standing" dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The aim of this study was to determine whether LV twist remains load dependent in the setting of long-standing, nonischemic DCM. Thirty-four patients with DCM with baseline LV ejection fractions (LVEFs) < 40% and 13 subjects with preserved LVEFs (≥50%) were enrolled. After baseline measurements, pneumatic compression of the lower extremities (Pcom) was used to increase LV afterload. Subsequently, sublingual nitroglycerin (SL-NG) was administered to modify preload. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, LV end-systolic wall stress, net LV twist angle, and apex-to-base-rotation delay (ABRD) were assessed under each condition. In patients with DCM, although LV end-systolic wall stress significantly increased under Pcom (196.9 ± 64.9 g/m(2) at baseline vs 231.8 ± 78.9 g/m(2) under Pcom, P < .017) and decreased after SL-NG application (231.8 ± 78.9 g/m(2) under Pcom vs 197.4 ± 67.4 g/m(2) after SL-NG, P < .017), net LV twist angle and ABRD showed no significant changes depending on LV loading condition (for LV twist, 7.63 ± 4.47° at baseline vs 7.03 ± 4.13° under Pcom vs 7.35 ± 4.36° after SL-NG, P = 0.65; for ABRD, 16.56 ± 13.81% at baseline vs 17.19 ± 14.81% under Pcom vs 15.95 ± 13.27% after SL-NG, P = .53). Careful examination of individual patient data revealed that LV twist was load independent when patients had LV twist < 12°. ABRD was also found to be load independent, but only in patients with LVEFs < 34%. In contrast, LV twist and ABRD were load dependent in patients with preserved LVEFs. LV twist and its component, ABRD, had relatively load insensitive properties in patients with long-standing DCM and can be used in future clinical trials as load-independent indexes of LV dyssynchrony.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2012 · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Source

    Full-text · Article · Dec 2012 · Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound
Show more