Acts of self-harm cover a wide range of behaviors that mainly differ in severity, from minor cuts to violent suicides (Fulwiler et al., 1997).
Despite some authors suggest that both the phenomena could be understood as lying on a continuum of lethality and consider a differentiation as irrelevant or even confusing and dangerous (Haycock, 1989; Verona et al., 2004), deliberate self-harm (DSH) and suicide attempt (SA) could be better identified as distinct phenomena because they differ with regard to lethality, the presence of suicidal intent and general clinical characteristics (Fulwiler et al., 1997; Lohner and Konrad, 2006). Unfortunately, there are only few empirical studies supporting either argument or providing specific risk factors for both behaviors, particularly in prison settings (Lohner and Konrad, 2006).
Nonetheless, maladaptive responses such as DSH and SA are among the most widespread self-injuring behaviors in prisons (Carli et al., 2011), and represent a major concern for prisons and jails because of the legal obligation for suicide prevention, the stress for officers (Lohner and Konrad, 2006) and the significant costs to institutional resources (Dixon-Gordon et al., 2012).
In prisons, DSH has been seen to increase an individual’s risk for suicide (Hawton et al., 2015a, 2014), particularly when underlying psychiatric conditions are present (Fazel et al., 2008). In addition, SA was found to be the best predictor of a later potentially lethal attempt (Cooper et al., 2005).
As a consequence, detecting and treating those who committed DSH and inmates with previous SA may reduce the overall rate of suicide in prisoners (Mann et al., 2005). With this objective in mind, the assessment of DSH appears to be one of the most problematic aspects in prisons.
The U.K.’s National Institute for Clinical Excellence (“Self-Harm: The Short-Term Physical and Psychological Management and Secondary Prevention of Self-Harm in Primary and Secondary Care - PubMed - NCBI,” n.d.) prepared clinical guidelines for the management of DSH, suggesting to conduct an assessment of needs and risks addressing features related to DSH and suicide. The type and function of DSH, past and present mental health treatment, history of SA and DSH, family history of suicide, significant life events, present suicide ideation and planning should be assessed. Despite this, very few studies (Daffern and Howells, 2007; Gray et al., 2003; Perry and Gilbody, 2009; Perry and Olason, 2009) evaluated DSH in prisoners by the means of self-reported measures together with underlying clinical correlated features. In
4
addition, the majority of the studies were record-based (Hawton et al., 2014; Ireland, 2000) or subjected to limitations, such as the lack of a clinical assessment of PD by the means of a diagnostic tool (Carli et al., 2011; Kirchner et al., 2008).
Finally, very few studies (Carli et al., 2011; Gunter et al., 2013; Sarchiapone et al., 2009; Young et al., 2006) investigated the specific risk factors associated with both DSH and SA.
The present study was developed by the Psychiatric Functional Area (which includes the Division of Psychiatry of the University of Perugia and the Mental Health Department (DSM) of the USL n. 2 of Umbria, Italy) in collaboration with the Prof. Karen M. Abram of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Health Disparities and Public Policy Program of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine of Chicago (US). The last part of the study was completed under the supervision of Dr. Andrea Murru at the Bipolar Disorder Unit of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (S), directed by Prof. Eduard Vieta.
The research project sought to identify the prevalence and risk factors of self-injurous behaviors within the correctional setting of the Spoleto Prison, Umbria, trying to overcome the limitations of previous studies.
The Spoleto Prison is a District Penitentiary as well as a Penal Home, consequently holding both offenders awating trial and already convicted felons. It processes about 700 male detainees each year and the sociodemographic characteristics of the detainees are representative of other medium and maximum security prisons in Umbria and Italy (ProvveditoratoRegionale Amministrazione Penitenziaria Regione Umbria, Italia)*.
The authors of this research project considered DSH and SA as linked conditions presenting underlying clinical factors that they sought to understand, searching for specific risk factors related with the clinical presentation of the two behaviors. For example, Axis I disorders could relate with SA whilst PD may precipitate DSH as well as drug related disorders, comorbid physical conditions and traumatic life events may play an important additional role in predicting DSH and SA.
The inmates considered as eligible for the study were assessed by doctors with at least three years of experience in psychiatric practice by means of a structured clinical interview combined with tools that assess DSH, the history of SA as well as other clinical features such as the presence of psychiatric disorders, the co-occurrence of drug-related problems or medical conditions. Furthermore, an evaluation of the needs for treatment was performed both from the interviewers’ and the inmates’ point of view.
The study has been developed not only in the perspective of a clinical research but also with the aim of helping clinicians and health providers, both in Umbria and worldwide, in
5
preventing and managing inmates with specific clinical conditions that can lead to a higher risk of both DSH or SA.