Single-incision total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Department of Gynaecological Endoscopy, BEAMS Hospital, 674, 16 Cross Road, Behind Khar Gymkhana, Khar Pali, Mumbai 400052, India.
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (Impact Factor: 0.81). 01/2011; 7(1):78-82. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.72389
Source: PubMed


Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopy. Single-access laparoscopy using a transumbilical port affords maximum cosmetic benefits because the surgical incision is hidden in the umbilicus. The advantages of single-access laparoscopic surgery may include less bleeding, infection, and hernia formation and better cosmetic outcome and less pain. The disadvantages and limitations include longer surgery time, difficulty in learning the technique, and the need for specialized instruments. Ongoing refinement of the surgical technique and instrumentation is likely to expand its role in gynecologic surgery in the future. We perform single-incision total laparoscopic hysterectomy using three ports in the single transumbilical incision.

15 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents findings on hysterectomy prevalence from a 2010 cross-sectional household survey of 2,214 rural and 1,641 urban, insured and uninsured women in low-income households in Ahmedabad city and district in Gujarat, India. The study investigated why hysterectomy was a leading reason for use of health insurance by women insured by SEWA, a women's organisation that operates a community-based health insurance scheme. Of insured women, 9.8% of rural women and 5.3% of urban women had had a hysterectomy, compared to 7.2% and 4.0%, respectively, of uninsured women. Approximately one-third of all hysterectomies were in women younger than 35 years of age. Rural women used the private sector more often for hysterectomy, while urban use was almost evenly split between the public and private sectors. SEWA's community health workers suggested that such young women underwent hysterectomies due to difficulties with menstruation and a range of gynaecological morbidities. The extent of these and of unnecessary hysterectomy, as well as providers' attitudes, require further investigation. We recommend the provision of information on hysterectomy as part of community health education for women, and better provision of basic gynaecological care as areas for advocacy and action by SEWA and the public health community in India.
    No preview · Article · May 2011 · Reproductive health matters
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) is an ideal approach for gynecologic surgery and yields better cosmetic results. However, a standard umbilical approach with LESS is not appropriate for gynecologic surgery requiring intra-abdominal suturing and dissection requiring traction. Therefore, we have developed a new multitrocar access system for gynecologic LESS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gynecologic LESS using this access system. This access system consists of one 12-mm trocar, two 5-mm trocars, and a 5-mm flexible laparoscope. Two 5-mm trocars with small port heads were inserted cross-wise on opposite sides of the sleeve of the centrally positioned 12-mm trocar to maintain triangulation. Thirty-eight patients with various gynecologic conditions underwent LESS with this access system. The results of these surgeries were retrospectively compared to those of conventional laparoscopic procedures. Of the 38 LESS procedures performed with this access system, none was up-converted, converted to an open laparotomy, or required blood transfusion. The Salpingo-oophorectomy with LESS had several benefits, such as no extension of the skin incision of the trocar site and no leakage of the contents of the ovarian cyst into the peritoneal cavity, over that with conventional laparoscopy. A comparison of LESS (11 patients) and conventional laparoscopy (16 patients) for total hysterectomy showed no significant difference in total blood loss (234.0 mL vs. 221.6 mL) or the weight of the resected uterus (276.0 g vs. 285.0 g), although the mean total operative time was greater with LESS (199.0 min vs. 168.5 min). Our multitrocar access system is safe and secure, and can be adapted for various gynecologic surgeries involving complicated procedures. LESS with this access system achieves results comparable to those of conventional laparoscopy with 4 ports, although the operative time is longer.
    Preview · Article · Aug 2011 · Journal of Nippon Medical School
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total abdominal colectomy is the procedure of choice for debilitated patients with acute, medical refractory ulcerative colitis in our practice. A laparoscopic approach has been previously shown to be safe and effective, and has become our preferred strategy. This study illustrates the laparoscopic evolution towards a truly minimally invasive approach comparing three phases of a single colorectal surgeon experience. In May 2010 single incision laparoscopy was introduced in our practice and has become our preferred approach. Ten consecutive ulcerative colitis patients were case matched and compared with 10 previous laparoscopic-assisted (Feb 2003-Jan 2007) and 10 hand-assisted (Feb 2006-Apr 2010) total abdominal colectomies. Patient, disease and surgery-related factors were analyzed and short-term outcomes were compared. Given the study design, there were no differences in demographics, smoking history, disease duration and severity, nutritional and inflammatory parameters, and indication for surgery between groups. Single incision patients were more likely to have received immunosuppressive therapy within 30 days of the surgery (p = 0.016). In the single incision group we noticed significantly shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.001) and faster resumption of solid diet (p = 0.019) compared to the other groups. Other short-term outcomes did not differ between groups. Single incision laparoscopy offers a safe alternative to other laparoscopic approaches. Despite the higher technical complexity, the duration of surgery is shorter with faster resumption of oral intake. Studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up will be required to confirm the benefits of this approach.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2011 · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Show more