Computational Modeling of Distinct Neocortical Oscillations Driven by Cell-Type Selective Optogenetic Drive: Separable Resonant Circuits Controlled by Low-Threshold Spiking and Fast-Spiking Interneurons

ArticleinFrontiers in Human Neuroscience 4:198 · November 2010with15 Reads
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00198 · Source: PubMed
Selective optogenetic drive of fast-spiking (FS) interneurons (INs) leads to enhanced local field potential (LFP) power across the traditional "gamma" frequency band (20-80 Hz; Cardin et al., 2009). In contrast, drive to regular-spiking (RS) pyramidal cells enhances power at lower frequencies, with a peak at 8 Hz. The first result is consistent with previous computational studies emphasizing the role of FS and the time constant of GABA(A) synaptic inhibition in gamma rhythmicity. However, the same theoretical models do not typically predict low-frequency LFP enhancement with RS drive. To develop hypotheses as to how the same network can support these contrasting behaviors, we constructed a biophysically principled network model of primary somatosensory neocortex containing FS, RS, and low-threshold spiking (LTS) INs. Cells were modeled with detailed cell anatomy and physiology, multiple dendritic compartments, and included active somatic and dendritic ionic currents. Consistent with prior studies, the model demonstrated gamma resonance during FS drive, dependent on the time constant of GABA(A) inhibition induced by synchronous FS activity. Lower-frequency enhancement during RS drive was replicated only on inclusion of an inhibitory LTS population, whose activation was critically dependent on RS synchrony and evoked longer-lasting inhibition. Our results predict that differential recruitment of FS and LTS inhibitory populations is essential to the observed cortical dynamics and may provide a means for amplifying the natural expression of distinct oscillations in normal cortical processing.

3.02 MB

Sorry, there is no online preview for this file type.

To view this article, please download it below.

    • "Furthermore, no interneuron-targeting inhibitory, calretinin positive (CR + ) neurons were included, although dis-inhibition by altering CR + neurons has been shown to contribute to SZlike behavior in working memory models (Wang et al., 2004). We also did not include LTS, dendrite-targeting inhibitory neurons, although they have a pronounced influence on low frequency entrainment (Vierling-Claassen et al., 2010) and thus might play a role for the changes in the beta range. Gap junctions between interneurons were omitted as well although they have been shown to be powerful synchronizers in hippocampal networks (Bartos et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Despite a significant increase in efforts to identify biomarkers and endophenotypic measures of psychiatric illnesses, only a very limited amount of computational models of these markers and measures has been implemented so far. Moreover, existing computational models dealing with biomarkers typically only examine one possible mechanism in isolation, disregarding the possibility that other combinations of model parameters might produce the same network behaviour (what has been termed ’multifactoriality’). In this study we describe a step towards a computational instantiation of an endophenotypic finding for schizophrenia, namely the impairment of evoked auditory gamma and beta oscillations in schizophrenia. We explore the multifactorial nature of this impairment using an established model of primary auditory cortex, by performing an extensive search of the parameter space. We find that single network parameters contain only little information about whether the network will show impaired gamma entrainment and that different regions in the parameter space yield similar network level oscillation abnormalities. These regions in the parameter space, however, show strong differences in the underlying network dynamics. To sum up, we present a first step towards an in silico instantiation of an important biomarker of schizophrenia, which has great potential for the identification and study of disease mechanisms and for understanding of existing treatments and development of novel ones.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2016
    • "Mechanistic computational models of visual processing have also frequently incorporated an inhibitory neuronal subpopulation (Somers et al., 1995; Ben-Yishai et al., 1995; Ozeki et al., 2009; Hansel and van Vreeswijk, 2012). Few models have incorporated different subtypes of interneuron (Wang et al., 2004; Vierling-Claassen et al., 2010), with most studies assuming that inhibitory neurons can be grouped into a single population with homogeneous functional and anatomical properties (Vogels et al., 2005). However, recent work in mouse V1 has revealed substantial heterogeneity in the connectivity , function, and dynamics of different inhibitory neuron subtypes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Recent anatomical and functional characterization of cortical inhibitory interneurons has highlighted the diverse computations supported by different subtypes of interneurons. However, most theoretical models of cortex do not feature multiple classes of interneurons, and rather assume a single homogeneous population. We study the dynamics of recurrent excitatory-inhibitory model cortical networks with parvalbumin- (PV), somatostatin- (SOM), and vasointestinal peptide-expressing (VIP) interneurons, with connectivity properties motivated by experimental recordings from mouse primary visual cortex. Our theory describes conditions under which the activity of such networks is stable and how perturbations of distinct neuronal subtypes recruit changes in activity through recurrent synaptic projections. We apply these conclusions to study the roles of each interneuron subtype in disinhibition, surround suppression and subtractive or divisive modulation of orientation tuning curves. Our calculations and simulations determine the architectural and stimulus tuning conditions under which cortical activity consistent with experiment is possible. They also lead to novel predictions concerning connectivity and network dynamics that can be tested via optogenetic manipulations. Our work demonstrates that recurrent inhibitory dynamics must be taken into account to fully understand many properties of cortical dynamics observed in experiments.
    Article · Jan 2016
    • "Yet, we built the case for local generation from the following facts: (1) neocortical (somatosensory) theta oscillations are observed in vitro (Fanselow et al., 2008), (2) MEG, EEG, and combined EEG/FMRI recordings in humans show that theta activity phase-locks to speech amplitude envelope in A1 and immediate association cortex—but not beyond—(Ahissar et al., 2001; Luo and Poeppel, 2007; Cogan and Poeppel, 2011; Morillon et al., 2012), and (3) theta phase-locking to speech is not accompanied by power increase, arguing for a phase restructuring of a local oscillation (Luo and Poeppel, 2007). We assumed a similar generation mechanism for theta and gamma oscillations, with slower excitatory and inhibitory synaptic time constants for theta (Kopell et al., 2010; Vierling-Claassen et al., 2010). The distinct dynamics for the two modules reflect the diversity of inhibitory synaptic timescales observed experimentally, with Martinotti cells displaying slow synaptic inhibition (Ti neurons), and basket cells showing faster inhibition decay (Gi neurons) (Silberberg and Markram, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: eLife digest Some people speak twice as fast as others, while people with different accents pronounce the same words in different ways. However, despite these differences between speakers, humans can usually follow spoken language with remarkable ease. The different elements of speech have different frequencies: the typical frequency for syllables, for example, is about four syllables per second in speech. Phonemes, which are the smallest elements of speech, appear at a higher frequency. However, these elements are all transmitted at the same time, so the brain needs to be able to process them simultaneously. The auditory cortex, the part of the brain that processes sound, produces various ‘waves’ of electrical activity, and these waves also have a characteristic frequency (which is the number of bursts of neural activity per second). One type of brain wave, called the theta rhythm, has a frequency of three to eight bursts per second, which is similar to the typical frequency of syllables in speech, and the frequency of another brain wave, the gamma rhythm, is similar to the frequency of phonemes. It has been suggested that these two brain waves may have a central role in our ability to follow speech, but to date there has been no direct evidence to support this theory. Hyafil et al. have now used computer models of neural oscillations to explore this theory. Their simulations show that, as predicted, the theta rhythm tracks the syllables in spoken language, while the gamma rhythm encodes the specific features of each phoneme. Moreover, the two rhythms work together to establish the sequence of phonemes that makes up each syllable. These findings will support the development of improved speech recognition technologies. DOI:
    Full-text · Article · May 2015
Show more