Article

Learn before Lecture: A Strategy That Improves Learning Outcomes in a Large Introductory Biology Class

Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, 92697-1280, USA.
CBE life sciences education (Impact Factor: 1.89). 12/2010; 9(4):473-81. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Actively engaging students in lecture has been shown to increase learning gains. To create time for active learning without displacing content we used two strategies for introducing material before class in a large introductory biology course. Four to five slides from 2007/8 were removed from each of three lectures in 2009 and the information introduced in preclass worksheets or narrated PowerPoint videos. In class, time created by shifting lecture material to learn before lecture (LBL) assignments was used to engage students in application of their new knowledge. Learning was evaluated by comparing student performance in 2009 versus 2007/8 on LBL-related question pairs, matched by level and format. The percentage of students who correctly answered five of six LBL-related exam questions was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in 2009 versus 2007/8. The mean increase in performance was 21% across the six LBL-related questions compared with <3% on all non-LBL exam questions. The worksheet and video LBL formats were equally effective based on a cross-over experimental design. These results demonstrate that LBLs combined with interactive exercises can be implemented incrementally and result in significant increases in learning gains in large introductory biology classes.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Diane K O'Dowd
  • Source
    • "Instead, with the use of technology and flipped learning, a teaching approach prominent in recent discussions pertaining to computer assisted language learning (CALL), an environment in which teachers have the opportunity to provide students with individualized instruction and feedback on their learning progress may be achieved. Researchers, such as Alvarez (2011) and Moravec et al. (2010), describe a flipped classroom as a teaching methodology in which practice exercises and assignments that are usually completed by students at home in a regular classroom are done during class under the individual guidance of the teacher. Conversely, lectures and textbook explanations, which would traditionally be performed by the teacher in front of the classroom with students listening, are instead recorded and made available to students via an online video sharing website, such as YouTube®. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors discuss the empirical results of a study comparing two English composition courses conducted with Japanese university students. One course was taught in a traditional way and the other using the flipped method. The results showed that those studying under the flipped method spent a significantly higher number of hours preparing for class (t(20) = 2.67, p = .014, d = 1.14) and produced a significantly higher number of words in compositions written in the posttest (t(10) = 3.37, p = .007, d = 1.44). The flipped method also appeared to result in significantly greater improvements in the writing proficiency of participants (t(32) = 5.17, p < .001, d = 1.15) and when using a one-way ANCOVA to make a comparison with the traditional method in the posttest (F (1, 63) = 13.50, p < .001, η 2 = .18). The capability to view explanations of the text as many times as participants wished, as well as opportunities for direct and immediate individual feedback from the instructor for participants in the flipped group are discussed as possible reasons for the salient differences.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015
  • Source
    • "They also noted that studies tended to focus on perceptions of flipping rather than outcomes -with only two studies reporting on performance. Bishop and Verleger noted that the two studies that did report on student performance were atypical in that one (Day and Foley 2006) used a participant group drawn from students on a computer interaction course where high levels of at-home online activity would be expected, and the other (Moravec et al. 2010) used a semiflipped format which included in-class lectures. It is clear from this, that while there is a generally positive perception of the flipped classroom, there is a gap in the research on Educ Inf Technol performance in the flipped classroom and that there is Bnot strong enough evidence to support the claim that student learning was enhanced by this format^ (Chin 2014, p.1). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changes in the conceptualisation of higher education have led to instructional methods that embrace technology as a teaching medium. These changes have led to the flipped classroom phenomenon - where content is delivered outside class, through media such as video and podcast, and engagement with the content, through problem-solving and/or group work, occurs in class. Studies investigating the impact of the flipped classroom have mainly looked at the student experience with little focus on whether exam outcomes are enhanced by flipping. An undergraduate Material Technology course at The University of the West Indies was taught in two formats over two successive years. The course was taught during the 2012/13 academic year in a ‘traditional’ format but, after reflecting on student feedback and personal pedagogy, the lecturer restructured the class and taught it in a flipped format during the 2013/14 academic year. This research examines whether the flipped format improved the learning experience in relation to exam performance and student perception. Data was gathered through analysis of course grades and student evaluation questionnaires. The lecturer’s reflective comments were also reviewed before and after the study. Analysis of the qualitative data shows that the flipped format led to a slight improvement in how students perceived the course and the lecturer’s reflection shows that they are keen to continue with the flipped format as it allowed more time for them to work with students at an individual level. While no significant change in relation to average cohort exam performance was found, fewer students in the flipped classroom achieved marks at the highest level. It is therefore recommended that practitioners who intend to flip their classroom pay as much attention to student performance as they do to student perception.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · Education and Information Technologies
  • Source
    • "Second, students tend to prefer ICM to traditional lecture once they have finished the course (Bates/Galloway 2012). Third, students tend to be more engaged in ICM courses than in traditional lecture classes, i.e. they spend more time on them, attend them more frequently and complete a higher number of exercises (Bates/Galloway 2012; Lage, et al. 2000; Moravec, et al. 2010). These findings are consistent with other research on educational techniques such as active learning, learning objectives or the use of videos (Agarwal/Day 1998; Loviscach 2012; Simkins 1999; Sosin 1997). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The inverted classroom model (ICM) has been successfully used in many disciplines. ICM is an active learning approach that reserves class meetings for hands-on exercises while shifting content learning to the preparatory stage. Multiple studies report better student learning, engagement and satisfaction in ICM classes. ICM is also alleged to better address the diversity of students with different learning styles and levels of preparedness. The technique has been used in IR but there have been few systematic evaluations of ICM's efficacy in large lecture classes in the discipline. Larger class size is a challenge for ICM but it allows the pursuit of higher-order learning objectives than the passive reception of content that characterizes traditional lectures. This paper reports results from an application of the inverted classroom to an introductory IR course during the winter semester 2014/15 at the University of Duisburg-Essen. It first reviews the literature on inverting large lecture classes and then presents our approach for this particular class. We then present preliminary results on ICM's effects on student learning, measured in terms of students' self-assessment, and on student attitudes about the ICM as a teaching method compared to a traditional lecture format.. This project has been funded by the Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft. We are grateful to Anna Ebert, Achim Görres, Florian Rabuza, Tobias Rammel and Sylvia Ruschin for their assistance. 2
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Feb 2015
Show more