Sonography in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis Are Negative Sonographic Findings Good Enough?

Department of Radiology, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.54). 12/2010; 29(12):1749-55.
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Right lower quadrant sonograms of 193 patients (158 female and 35 male; age range, 3-20 years) with suspected acute appendicitis over a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Sonographic findings were graded on a 5-point scale, ranging from a normal appendix identified (grade 1) to frankly acute appendicitis (grade 5). Sonographic findings were compared with subsequent computed tomographic (CT), surgical, and pathologic findings. The diagnostic accuracy of sonography was assessed considering surgical findings and clinical follow-up as reference standards.
Forty-nine patients (25.4%) had appendicitis on sonography, and 144 (74.6%) had negative sonographic findings. Computed tomographic scans were obtained in 51 patients (26.4%) within 4 days after sonography. These included 39 patients with negative and 12 with positive sonographic findings. Computed tomography changed the sonographic diagnosis in 10 patients: from negative to positive in 3 cases and positive to negative in 7. Forty-three patients (22.2%) underwent surgery. The surgical findings were positive for appendicitis in 37 (86%) of the 43 patients who had surgery. Patients with negative sonographic findings who, to our knowledge, did not have subsequent CT scans or surgery were considered to have negative findings for appendicitis. Seven patients with negative sonographic findings underwent surgery and had appendicitis; therefore, 137 of 144 patients with negative sonographic findings did not have appendicitis. On the basis of these numbers, the NPV was 95.1%.
Sonography has a high NPV and should be considered as a reasonable screening tool in the evaluation of acute appendicitis. Further imaging could be performed if clinical signs and symptoms worsen.

Download full-text


Available from: Leann E Linam
  • Source
    • "However, sensitivity in the surgical group is high (88.1%). We agree with the previous literature to use US as a screening tool in children suspected of appendicitis [21] [24]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound (US) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Patients and methods We reviewed all sonograms for acute appendicitis in children suspected of having appendicitis from January 2009 to December 2012. Sonographic findings were positive when the largest axial diameters were >6 mm. The sonograms that were unable to find the appendix were classified into an other group and were considered separately. Sonographic findings were compared with surgical pathological findings or discharge diagnoses in cases of no surgery. Subgroup analysis in the surgical group, including patient age (<11 years or 11–16 years) and sex, was also performed. Results The appendix was identified in 270/428 cases (63.1%). The overall sensitivity was 71.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 56.9–82.9%], specificity 97.7% (95% CI: 94.7–99.3%), positive predictive value 88.1% (95% CI: 74.4–96.0%), negative predictive value 93.4% (95% CI: 89.4–96.3%), accuracy 92.6%, and receiver operating characteristic = 0.84. The specificity (47.1%), negative predictive value (61.5%), and accuracy (76.3%) were significantly lower in the surgical group. The efficacy of US between the sexes and age groups showed no significant difference, except the lower positive predictive values in the younger age group. Conclusion US efficacy for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children is high enough to use as an imaging modality of first choice to reduce complications, hospital stay, and negative appendectomy rate.
    Preview · Article · Jun 2014 · Journal of Medical Ultrasound
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purposes of this study were to revisit the utility of ultrasonography (USG) as a primary imaging modality in acute appendicitis (AA) and to establish the role of CT scan as a second-line/problem-solving modality. All cases of suspected AA were referred for urgent USG. USG was done with standard protocol for appendicitis. Limited computed tomographic (CT) scan [NCCT ± CECT (IV contrast only)] was done for the lower abdomen and pelvis where sonographic findings were equivocal. One hundred and twenty-one patients were referred for USG for suspected appendicitis. Eight-four patients underwent surgery for AA based on clinical as well as imaging findings, of whom 76 had appendicitis confirmed at histopathology. Three patients were misdiagnosed (3.6 %) on USG as appendicitis. Of 76 patients of appendicitis confirmed histopathologically, 63 (82.8 %) had features of appendicitis on USG and did not require any additional imaging modality. Of 121 patients, 12 (10 %) needed CT scan because of atypical features on USG. Of these 12 patients, seven had retrocecal appendicitis, and three high-up paracolic appendicitis. USG alone had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of 81, 88, 92.6, 71.6, and 83 %, respectively. When combined with CT scan in select cases, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of combined USG + CT scan were 96 % (P = 0.0014), 89 %, 93 %, 93.5 % (P = 0.0001), and 93 % (P = 0.0484), respectively. Twenty-eight (23 %) patients were given alternative diagnosis on USG. Dedicated appendiceal USG should be used as a primary imaging modality in diagnosing or excluding AA. Appendiceal CT can serve as a problem-solving modality.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2012 · Indian Journal of Surgery

  • No preview · Article · May 2011 · African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
Show more