L1 retrotransposon in neurons is modulated by MECP2

University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics/Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0695, USA.
Nature (Impact Factor: 41.46). 11/2010; 468(7322):443-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature09544
Source: PubMed


Long interspersed nuclear elements-1 (LINE-1 or L1s) are abundant retrotransposons that comprise approximately 20% of mammalian genomes. Active L1 retrotransposons can impact the genome in a variety of ways, creating insertions, deletions, new splice sites or gene expression fine-tuning. We have shown previously that L1 retrotransposons are capable of mobilization in neuronal progenitor cells from rodents and humans and evidence of massive L1 insertions was observed in adult brain tissues but not in other somatic tissues. In addition, L1 mobility in the adult hippocampus can be influenced by the environment. The neuronal specificity of somatic L1 retrotransposition in neural progenitors is partially due to the transition of a Sox2/HDAC1 repressor complex to a Wnt-mediated T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) transcriptional activator. The transcriptional switch accompanies chromatin remodelling during neuronal differentiation, allowing a transient stimulation of L1 transcription. The activity of L1 retrotransposons during brain development can have an impact on gene expression and neuronal function, thereby increasing brain-specific genetic mosaicism. Further understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate L1 expression should provide new insights into the role of L1 retrotransposition during brain development. Here we show that L1 neuronal transcription and retrotransposition in rodents are increased in the absence of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), a protein involved in global DNA methylation and human neurodevelopmental diseases. Using neuronal progenitor cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells and human tissues, we revealed that patients with Rett syndrome (RTT), carrying MeCP2 mutations, have increased susceptibility for L1 retrotransposition. Our data demonstrate that L1 retrotransposition can be controlled in a tissue-specific manner and that disease-related genetic mutations can influence the frequency of neuronal L1 retrotransposition. Our findings add a new level of complexity to the molecular events that can lead to neurological disorders.

Download full-text


Available from: Gene W Yeo
  • Source
    • "More to our point,Williams et al. (2006), Chance and Crow (2007), or Crow (2008) argue that different chromosomal reorganizations/mutations affecting PCDH11 triggered a modification of the brain lateralization pattern that contributed to language emergence. Finally, the editing enzymes may also explain diversity in immunoglobulin and neuronal adhesion molecules, which could affect language evolution (seeDong et al., 2012on the downregulation of APOBEC3A and APOBEC3C in the inferior parietal lobule of psychotics; for LINE-1 and Alu elements, immobilized by these enzymes, as linked to cognitive disorders, seeMuotri et al., 2010;Hancks and Kazazian, 2012;Thomas et al., 2012). As a second aspect of crosstalk between the immune system and the brain (and, for us, the parallelism between immunity and syntax), note that immunoglobulin cell surface receptors are also active in the brain (Figure 2). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent research has added new dimensions to our understanding of classical evolution, according to which evolutionary novelties result from gene mutations inherited from parents to offspring. Language is surely one such novelty. Together with specific changes in our genome and epigenome, we suggest that two other (related) mechanisms may have contributed to the brain rewiring underlying human cognitive evolution and, specifically, the changes in brain connectivity that prompted the emergence of our species-specific linguistic abilities: the horizontal transfer of genetic material by viral and non-viral vectors and the brain/immune system crosstalk (more generally, the dialogue between the microbiota, the immune system, and the brain).
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • Source
    • "(C) Scatter plot analysis of BiPS cell clones vs. their parental BCD cell populations, ESCs, iPSCs, and PiPSCs. Bottom panel shows also scatter plot analysis of Fib-A, iPS-A, iPS-B and ES-C cell clones generated by a different laboratory (Muotri et al., 2010). "

    Full-text · Dataset · Apr 2015
  • Source
    • "In some organisms, epigenomic regulation modulates transposon activity (Creasey et al., 2014; Lorenz et al., 2012). Interestingly, MeCP2, which is mutated in patients with Rett syndrome (an autism spectrum disorder), can regulate L1 transposition (Amir et al., 1999; Muotri et al., 2010). MeCP2 is known for its role in regulating epigenetic processes; it binds 5mC residues, as well as the oxidized derivative, 5hmC. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Long-lived post-mitotic cells, such as the majority of human neurons, must respond effectively to ongoing changes in neuronal stimulation or microenvironmental cues through transcriptional and epigenomic regulation of gene expression. The role of epigenomic regulation in neuronal function is of fundamental interest to the neuroscience community, as these types of studies have transformed our understanding of gene regulation in post-mitotic cells. This perspective article highlights many of the resources available to researchers interested in neuroepigenomic investigations and discusses some of the current obstacles and opportunities in neuroepigenomics.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015
Show more