Article

The Impact of Capital Market Imperfections on Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity

School of Business, George Washington University, 2201 G Street, Funger Hall 505, Washington, DC 20052, United States
Journal of Banking & Finance (Impact Factor: 1.29). 02/2008; 32(2):207-216. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.686812
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT

We examine the investment-cash flow sensitivity of US manufacturing firms in relation to five factors associated with capital market imperfections - fund flows, institutional ownership, analyst following, bond ratings, and an index of antitakeover amendments. We find a steady decline in the estimated sensitivity over time. Furthermore, we find that investment-cash flow sensitivity decreases with increasing fund flows, institutional ownership, analyst following, antitakeover amendments and with the existence of a bond rating. The overall evidence suggests that investment-cash flow sensitivity decreases with factors that reduce capital market imperfections.

Full-text preview

Available from: efmaefm.org
  • Source
    • "Regarding internal net cash flow, many previous studies include a measure of internal net cash flow to gauge the effects of financial constraints on external financing of investment, though the justification for doing so has been hotly debated. 4 Fixed effects are also commonly added to account for unobserved factors [4,21,23242544]. While we accept this justification, we suspect that the explanatory power of fixed effects is due, at least in part, to individual firms' differential investment propensities. "

    Preview · Article · Jan 2015
  • Source
    • "We examine the sensitivity of expenditure in year t to cash flow in year t within a framework similar to that in Malmendier and Tate (2005). This type of investment-cash-flow sensitivity model has been widely studied in the literature (see e.g., Agca and Mozumdar (2008); Almeida et al. (2004); Brown and Petersen (2009); Fazzari et al. (1988, 2000); Hovakimian "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prior literature posits that while some CEO overconfidence may benefit shareholders, high levels of overconfidence do not. We investigate whether improvements in governance can help to mitigate the adverse effects of overconfidence while harnessing its positive aspects. We use the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act as a natural experiment to examine whether improvements in regulation and governance help to mitigate investment distortions and moderate risk-taking tendencies of the more overconfident CEOs. We conduct tests using options and press based proxies for CEO overconfidence. The results indicate that, after SOX, overconfident CEOs reduced investment, improved performance and market value, reduced their risk-exposure, increased dividends and substantially improved long-term performance following acquisitions. We also find that these SOX-related benefits are concentrated in the firms that were SOX non-compliant prior to its passage. While the beneficial aspects of SOX in harnessing overconfident CEOs may have been an unintended consequence, the message of our paper is simple: CEO over-confidence can be monitored and regulated -- just like any other CEO attribute.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2013
  • Source
    • "Whited, 1992; Gérard and Verschueren, 2003), bonds rating (e.g. Whited, 1992; Gilchrist and Himmelberg, 1995; Agca and Mozumdar, 2008) and interest coverage ratio (e.g. Whited, 1992) constitute some of the proxies used in the assessment of financial constraints. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to test the moderating role of corporate strategy and industry environment in the effect of liquidity on investment for Portuguese manufacturing firms, we developed a multiple linear regression model for panel data. It is a static model with three types of variables: financial; strategic/environmental; and interactive. The estimated model was validated through the Breusch-Pagan/Cook-Weisberg and Wald Modified tests (heteroscedasticity tests), Lagrange Multiplier (industry random effects test, using the two-digit National Classification of Economic Activities), Hausman robust test (fixed effects model vs. random effects model test) and likelihood-ratio test (joint effect of industry and time test). The statistical processing of the data revealed that a company’s strategy (diversification and innovation) and the industry environment (growth) moderate the effect of liquidity on investment, which can be explained by the effect of these factors on the cost of asymmetric information.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2013
Show more