Article

Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: The TERRACE study

University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gastrointestinal endoscopy (Impact Factor: 5.37). 11/2010; 73(3):480-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Although colonoscopy is currently the optimal method for detecting colorectal polyps, some are missed. The Third Eye Retroscope provides an additional retrograde view that may detect polyps behind folds.
To determine whether the addition of the Third Eye Retroscope to colonoscopy improves the adenoma detection rate.
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Nine European and U.S. centers.
Of 448 enrolled subjects, 395 had data for 2 procedures.
Subjects underwent same-day tandem examinations with standard colonoscopy (SC) and Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC). Subjects were randomized to SC followed by TEC or TEC followed by SC.
Detection rates for all polyps and adenomas with each method.
In the per-protocol population, 173 subjects underwent SC and then TEC, and TEC yielded 78 additional polyps (48.8%), including 49 adenomas (45.8%). In 176 subjects undergoing TEC and then SC, SC yielded 31 additional polyps (19.0%), including 26 adenomas (22.6%). Net additional detection rates with TEC were 29.8% for polyps and 23.2% for adenomas. The relative risk of missing with SC compared with TEC was 2.56 for polyps (P < .001) and 1.92 for adenomas (P = .029). Mean withdrawal times for SC and TEC were 7.58 and 9.52 minutes, respectively (P < .001). The median difference in withdrawal times was 1 minute (P < .001). The mean total procedure times for SC and TEC were 16.97 and 20.87 minutes, respectively (P < .001).
Despite randomization and a large cohort, there was disparity in polyp prevalence between the 2 groups of subjects.
The Third Eye Retroscope increases adenoma detection rate by visualizing areas behind folds. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01044732.).

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Olivier Dewit
  • Source
    • "Three studies involving over 900 patients examined the TER in regard to both polyp and adenoma detection rates. 84-86(See table 2.) All of the studies showed an increase in the PDR and ADR and the results were similar among the three groups with respect to the right colon. An interesting and unexpected finding was that a high number of additional polyps and adenomas detected on the left side with the third eye retroscope. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Many, if not most, cases arise from premalignant lesions (adenomas) which may be identified and removed prior to becoming frankly malignant. For over a decade, colonoscopy has been the preferred modality for both CRC screening and prevention in the US. Early reports suggested that colonoscopic screening imparted a 90% risk reduction for colorectal cancer. Subsequent studies showed that estimate to be overly optimistic. While still an outstanding CRC screening and detection tool, colonoscopy has several important limitations. Some of these limitations relate to the mechanics of the procedure such as the risk of colonic perforation, bleeding, adverse consequences of sedation, and the inability to detect all colonic polyps. Other limitations reflect issues with patient perception regarding colonoscopy which, at least in part, drive patient non-adherence to recommended testing. This review examines the literature to address several important issues. First, we analyze the effect of colonoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality. Second, we consider the patient-based, periprocedural, and intraprocedural factors which may limit colonoscopy as a screening modality. Third, we explore new techniques and technologies which may enhance the efficacy of colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Finally, we discuss the short and long-term future of colonoscopy for CRC screening and the factors which may affect this future.
    Preview · Article · Mar 2013 · Journal of Cancer
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This ethnographic research examines the daily life and institutional conditions under which low-income Black women in urban North Carolina perceived and attended to HIV health-related needs. I focus specifically on the interplay among women’s living conditions, programmatic service needs, and their strategies for navigating the local system of care to explore and refine the categorical label “low income.” I found that there were significant differences among study participants in terms of their monthly incomes and financial resources, housing quality and status, and personal experiences with incarceration and substance abuse. The economic differences among women translated into social differences within the context of federally-funded AIDS care programs. Social differences were realized as the differential ability to transform programmatic services enrollment into beneficial social networks. Ultimately, financially stable women were better positioned than their more economically vulnerable counterparts to reap the economic and social benefits of programmatic services eligibility and enrollment. It is in this context that I explore federally-funded AIDS care services as one social field through which processes of class unfold and articulate with processes of race and gender.
    No preview · Article ·
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Le polype de moins de 6 mm ou minuscule polype (≤ 5 mm) représente la moitié des polypes, et une fois sur deux est un adénome. La présence de lésions histologiquement avancées est rare et la présence de carcinomes, intramuqueux ou invasifs, nulle ou exceptionnelle. Le potentiel évolutif de ces lésions de moins de 6 mm est peu décrit ou sans augmentation de leur taille après un suivi court de deux-trois ans. Leur diagnostic est délicat avec près d’un quart de faux-négatifs en vidéocoloscopie. Le rendement pour leur diagnostic par l’endoscopie à bande spectrale étroite, autofluorescence, capuchon distal ne permet pas de diminuer leur taux d’omission. Le diagnostic de leur nature adénomateuse ou non néoplasique par ces technologies n’est pas actuellement usuel en pratique quotidienne. Ces méthodes ou leur association sont en évaluation dans des centres experts. Cependant, la méthode la plus répandue, l’endoscopie à bande spectrale étroite (NBI ou FICE ou I-Scan), permet de diagnostiquer leur nature néoplasique avec une précision d’environ 90 %. Leur exérèse avec ou sans analyse histologique doit être totale, et la biopsie-exérèse à la pince froide ne remplit pas ces conditions. Ce type d’ablation est générateur de résidus adénomateux dans 20 à 30 % des cas. La préparation colique de mauvaise qualité est pourvoyeuse de faux-négatifs, mais il n’existe pas d’argument pour attribuer le caractère protecteur incomplet de la coloscopie spécifiquement à l’omission du polype inférieur ou égal à 5 mm. L’attitude consistant à réséquer ces polypes sans les analyser est pourvoyeuse d’une économie notable, mais la preuve de l’innocuité de cette stratégie n’est pas prospectivement démontrée. Les considérations économiques sont très discordantes du fait du caractère partiel et faible des fréquences ou incidences des polypes de moins de 5 mm à haut risque et des modélisations qui ne sont que des études de minimisation des coûts et non pas des études de coût-efficacité à long terme.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2012 · Acta Endoscopica
Show more