Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen (1845-1923) and the Early Development of Radiology

Canadian Medical Association journal (Impact Factor: 5.81). 01/1946; 54(12):61-7.
Source: PubMed

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The notion that headaches may originate from disorders of the cervical spine and can be relieved by treatments directed at the neck is gaining recognition among headache clinicians but is often neglected in the spine literature. To review and summarize the literature on cervicogenic headaches in the following areas: historical perspective, diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, and treatment. A systematic literature review of cervicogenic headache was performed. Three computerized medical databases (Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], Mantis) were searched for the terms "cervicogenic" and "headache." After cross-referencing, we retrieved 164 unique citations; 48 citations were added from other sources, for a total of 212 citations, although all were not used. Hilton described the concept of headaches originating from the cervical spine in 1860. In 1983 Sjaastad introduced the term "cervicogenic headache" (CGH). Diagnostic criteria have been established by several expert groups, with agreement that these headaches start in the neck or occipital region and are associated with tenderness of cervical paraspinal tissues. Prevalence estimates range from 0.4% to 2.5% of the general population to 15% to 20% of patients with chronic headaches. CGH affects patients with a mean age of 42.9 years, has a 4:1 female disposition, and tends to be chronic. Almost any pathology affecting the cervical spine has been implicated in the genesis of CGH as a result of convergence of sensory input from the cervical structures within the spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve. The main differential diagnoses are tension type headache and migraine headache, with considerable overlap in symptoms and findings between these conditions. No specific pathology has been noted on imaging or diagnostic studies which correlates with CGH. CGH seems unresponsive to common headache medication. Small, noncontrolled case series have reported moderate success with surgery and injections. A few randomized controlled trials and a number of case series support the use of cervical manipulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and botulinum toxin injection. There remains considerable controversy and confusion on all matters pertaining to the topic of CGH. However, the amount of interest in the topic is growing, and it is anticipated that further research will help to clarify the theory, diagnosis, and treatment options for patients with CGH. Until then, it is essential that clinicians maintain an open, cautious, and critical approach to the literature on cervicogenic headaches.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2001 · The Spine Journal
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cervicogenic headaches are a relatively new nosological entity. The diagnostic criteria are still under discussion. They are rare: the diagnostic is based on anamnestic and clinical considerations. Rx investigation is mandatory. The aetiology is multifactorial. In case of cervical trauma, the relationship with the primary peripheral lesion must be carefully discussed. The actual opinion from the neurophysiological point of view is based on the hypothesis of "central hypersensitivity". This progressive dysfunction is probably modulated by genetic characteristics: the mechanism is triggered by the initial peripheral nociceptive input. In chronic situations, psychosocial factors are important. The treatment must be considered individually. It is based on a pharmacological approach and, in selected cases, includes anaesthetic block.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2006 · Revue médicale suisse