Comparative structural analysis of human DEAD-Box RNA helicases

Structural Genomics Consortium, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2010; 5(9). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012791
Source: PubMed


DEAD-box RNA helicases play various, often critical, roles in all processes where RNAs are involved. Members of this family of proteins are linked to human disease, including cancer and viral infections. DEAD-box proteins contain two conserved domains that both contribute to RNA and ATP binding. Despite recent advances the molecular details of how these enzymes convert chemical energy into RNA remodeling is unknown. We present crystal structures of the isolated DEAD-domains of human DDX2A/eIF4A1, DDX2B/eIF4A2, DDX5, DDX10/DBP4, DDX18/myc-regulated DEAD-box protein, DDX20, DDX47, DDX52/ROK1, and DDX53/CAGE, and of the helicase domains of DDX25 and DDX41. Together with prior knowledge this enables a family-wide comparative structural analysis. We propose a general mechanism for opening of the RNA binding site. This analysis also provides insights into the diversity of DExD/H- proteins, with implications for understanding the functions of individual family members.

  • Source
    • "In most helicases, these domains contain sequence motifs that are conserved within the SF and are involved in ATP binding and hydrolysis, RNA binding and interdomain contacts. Since the helicase core is highly conserved between RNA helicases (Schütz et al., 2010), specificity for particular cellular roles must arise outside of these conserved regions and at least partially derive from the N-and C-terminal extensions that surround the two RecA-like domains. These additional sequences are unique to each helicase. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RNA helicases are involved in all aspects of RNA metabolism. Since the helicase core is conserved between all helicases, specificity for particular cellular roles must arise from interactions with specific cofactors, which can regulate RNA binding and enzymatic activity. While recent structural studies have provided invaluable insight into some mechanisms of cofactor effects on RNA helicases, biochemical experiments must ultimately be conducted in order to validate these predictions. Here, we provide a guide for identifying helicase-specific cofactors and then studying their effects on helicase function. By measuring RNA binding and release, ATPase activity, nucleotide affinity, and unwinding and annealing activities, cofactor effects on an RNA helicase can be fully characterized.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2012 · Methods in enzymology
  • Source
    • "The Q380 residue in motif IIa interacts with RNA through main chain atoms of the peptide backbone, which may explain the low sequence conservation of this motif (Fig. 2A and Fig. 3, top panel). The close proximity between motif II (essential for divalent metal ion binding and ATP hydrolysis) and motif IIa (important for second-strand RNA binding) also suggests direct mechanical coupling between these two activities of RNA helicase enzymes (Schutz et al., 2010). It is worth noting that, in the absence of dsRNA, motif IIa is completely disordered in MDA-5 HEL1 (Fig. 4D) (Karlberg et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intracellular RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs, including RIG-I, MDA-5, and LGP2) recognize viral RNAs as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and initiate an antiviral immune response. To understand the molecular basis of this process, we determined the crystal structure of RIG-I in complex with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). The dsRNA is sheathed within a network of protein domains that include a conserved "helicase" domain (regions HEL1 and HEL2), a specialized insertion domain (HEL2i), and a C-terminal regulatory domain (CTD). A V-shaped pincer connects HEL2 and the CTD by gripping an α-helical shaft that extends from HEL1. In this way, the pincer coordinates functions of all the domains and couples RNA binding with ATP hydrolysis. RIG-I falls within the Dicer-RIG-I clade of the superfamily 2 helicases, and this structure reveals complex interplay between motor domains, accessory mechanical domains, and RNA that has implications for understanding the nanomechanical function of this protein family and other ATPases more broadly.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2011 · Cell
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies of the Escherichia, Neisseria, Thermotoga, and Mycobacteria clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) subtypes have resulted in a model whereby CRISPRs function as a defense system against bacteriophage infection and conjugative plasmid transfer. In contrast, we previously showed that the Yersinia-subtype CRISPR region of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain UCBPP-PA14 plays no detectable role in viral immunity but instead is required for bacteriophage DMS3-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa. The goal of this study is to define the components of the Yersinia-subtype CRISPR region required to mediate this bacteriophage-host interaction. We show that the Yersinia-subtype-specific CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins Csy4 and Csy2 are essential for small CRISPR RNA (crRNA) production in vivo, while the Csy1 and Csy3 proteins are not absolutely required for production of these small RNAs. Further, we present evidence that the core Cas protein Cas3 functions downstream of small crRNA production and that this protein requires functional HD (predicted phosphohydrolase) and DEXD/H (predicted helicase) domains to suppress biofilm formation in DMS3 lysogens. We also determined that only spacer 1, which is not identical to any region of the DMS3 genome, mediates the CRISPR-dependent loss of biofilm formation. Our evidence suggests that gene 42 of phage DMS3 (DMS3-42) is targeted by CRISPR2 spacer 1 and that this targeting tolerates multiple point mutations between the spacer and DMS3-42 target sequence. This work demonstrates how the interaction between P. aeruginosa strain UCBPP-PA14 and bacteriophage DMS3 can be used to further our understanding of the diverse roles of CRISPR system function in bacteria.
    Preview · Article · Mar 2011 · Journal of bacteriology
Show more