Reexamining the link between gender and corruption: The role of social institutions

Courant Research Centre PEG, Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 01/2010;
Source: RePEc


This paper investigates how information affect voting behaviour. There exist a large literature suggesting that uninformed voters can use informational shortcuts or cues to vote as if they were informed. This paper tests this hypothesis using unique Swedish individual survey data on the preferences of both politicians and voters. I find that uninformed voters are significantly worse than informed voters at voting for their most preferred politicians. This suggests that uninformed voters can not make up for their lack of information using shortcuts. Furthermore, the errors uninformed voters make do not cancel out in large elections. Estimates suggest that the ruling majorities would have switched in almost 5% of Swedish municipalities had all voters been fully informed. The effects are estimated with both parametric and nonparametric estimation techniques.

Download full-text


Available from: Boris Branisa
  • Source
    • "This argument contends that 'liberal democratic institutions and spirit increase female participation in government and restrain systematic corruption, but the latter two factors are not causally related' (Sung, 2003: 708). In addition Goetz (2007) argues that it is the opportunities for corruption that differ for women and men (see also Branisa and Ziegler, 2010; Pande and Ford, 2012; Vijayalakshmi, 2008). Our study departs from previous research (Bjarnegård, 2013; Johnson et al., 2013; Stockemer, 2011) suggesting that corruption indicates the presence of shadowy arrangements that benefit the already privileged, which in most countries tend to be men. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article presents evidence from 18 European countries showing that where levels of corruption are high, the proportion of women elected is low. We hypothesize that corruption indicates the presence of ‘shadowy arrangements’ that benefit the already privileged and pose a direct obstacle to women when male-dominated networks influence political parties’ candidate selection. There is also an indirect signal effect derived from citizen’s experiences with a broad range of government authorities. The article uses data that are more fine-grained than usual in this literature. We conduct an empirical test on a new dataset on locally elected councilors in 167 regions in Europe. Using a novel measure of regional quality of government and corruption we perform a multi-level analysis with several regional- and national-level controls. This study provides a unique picture of the proportion of women in locally elected assemblies throughout Europe and a new way of understanding the variations found.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Party Politics
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study uses variables from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Centre's Gender, Institutions and Development (GID) Database to construct the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) and its subindices Family code, Civil liberties, Physical integrity, Son preference, and Ownership rights. Instead of measuring gender inequality in outcomes, the SIGI and its subindices measure long-lasting social institutions defined as societal practices and legal norms that frame gender roles. The SIGI combines them into a multidimensional index of women's deprivation caused by gendered social institutions. Inspired by the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke poverty measures, the SIGI offers a new way of aggregating gender inequality by penalizing high inequality in each dimension and allowing only partial compensation between subindices. The indices identify countries and dimensions of gendered social institutions that deserve attention. Empirical results confirm that the SIGI complements other gender-related indices.
    Preview · Article · Apr 2014 · Feminist Economics
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Dutch international policy for women’s rights and gender equality is based on both rights-based arguments – women have the same rights as men – and instrumental considerations: equality and equal rights will lead to better development results. These instrumental arguments have prompted the Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) to find out what is known of the premises underlying Dutch policies, and to find out if these premises can indeed be linked to the intended, promised changes in gender equality and women’s rights. This report summarises the findings of a study of existing research, including academic publications, reviews, grey literature and evaluations about themes related to gender equality. It is part of a number of sub-studies of the policy evaluation on women’s rights and gender equality conducted by IOB.
    Full-text · Book · Jun 2015