Article

A formal risk-benefit framework for genomic tests: Facilitating the appropriate translation of genomics into clinical practice

Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics (Impact Factor: 7.33). 11/2010; 12(11):686-93. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181eff533
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of genomic tests is often challenging because of the lack of direct evidence of clinical benefit compared with usual care and unclear evidence requirements. To address these issues, this study presents a risk-benefit framework for assessing the health-related utility of genomic tests.
We incorporated approaches from a variety of established fields including decision science, outcomes research, and health technology assessment to develop the framework. Additionally, we considered genomic test stakeholder perspectives and case studies.
We developed a three-tiered framework: first, we use decision-analytic modeling techniques to synthesize data, project incidence of clinical events, and assess uncertainty. Second, we defined the health-related utility of genomic tests as improvement in health outcomes as measured by clinical event rates, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life-years. Finally, we displayed results using a risk-benefit policy matrix to facilitate the interpretation and implementation of findings from these analyses.
A formal risk-benefit framework may accelerate the utilization and practice-based evidence development of genomic tests that pose low risk and offer plausible clinical benefit, while discouraging premature use of tests that provide little benefit or pose significant health risks compared with usual care.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Joshua A. Roth
  • Source
    • "pharmgkb.org), has combined genomic and clinical information to establish clinical practice guidelines for gene-based prescribing implementation of genomics [Meyer, 2004; Veenstra et al., 2010; Green and Guyer, 2011; Manolio and Green, 2011; Voora and Ginsburg, 2011; Wang et al., 2011]. A growing number of clinically actionable pharmacogenetic variants exists, and for at least 10 gene/ drug pairs, the "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the field of pharmacogenetics has existed for decades, practioners have been slow to implement pharmacogenetic testing in clinical care. Numerous publications describe the barriers to clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics. Recently, several freely available resources have been developed to help address these barriers. In this review, we discuss current programs that use preemptive genotyping to optimize the pharmacotherapy of patients. Array-based preemptive testing includes a large number of relevant pharmacogenes that impact multiple high-risk drugs. Using a preemptive approach allows genotyping results to be available prior to any prescribing decision so that genomic variation may be considered as an inherent patient characteristic in the planning of therapy. This review describes the common elements among programs that have implemented preemptive genotyping and highlights key processes for implementation, including clinical decision support. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology Volume 55 is January 06, 2015. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Annual Review of Pharmacology
  • Source
    • "Other Tier 2 examples include genetic risk indicators routinely assessed in practice, but without clear evidence for clinical utility (e.g., assessing family history during depression screening in primary care). The Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and other expert groups have endorsed similar three-tier models for evaluating genomic applications [4,57]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite advances in characterizing genetic influences on addiction liability and treatment response, clinical applications of these efforts have been slow to evolve. Although challenges to clinical translation remain, stakeholders already face decisions about evidentiary thresholds for the uptake of pharmacogenetic tests in practice. There is optimism about potential pharmacogenetic applications for the treatment of alcohol use disorders, with particular interest in the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism as a moderator of naltrexone response. Findings from human and animal studies suggest preliminary evidence for the clinical validity of this association; on this basis, arguments for clinical implementation can be made in accordance with existing frameworks for the uptake of genomic applications. However, generating evidence-based guidelines requires evaluating the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic tests. This goal will remain challenging, largely due to minimal data to inform clinical utility estimates. The pace of genomic discovery highlights the need for clinical utility and implementation research to inform future translation efforts. Near-term implementation of promising pharmacogenetic tests can help expedite this goal, generating an evidence base to enable efficient translation as additional gene-drug associations are discovered.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Addiction science & clinical practice
  • Source
    • "pharmgkb.org), has combined genomic and clinical information to establish clinical practice guidelines for gene-based prescribing implementation of genomics [Meyer, 2004; Veenstra et al., 2010; Green and Guyer, 2011; Manolio and Green, 2011; Voora and Ginsburg, 2011; Wang et al., 2011]. A growing number of clinically actionable pharmacogenetic variants exists, and for at least 10 gene/ drug pairs, the "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pharmacogenetics is frequently cited as an area for initial focus of the clinical implementation of genomics. Through the PG4KDS protocol, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital pre-emptively genotypes patients for 230 genes using the Affymetrix Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters (DMET) Plus array supplemented with a CYP2D6 copy number assay. The PG4KDS protocol provides a rational, stepwise process for implementing gene/drug pairs, organizing data, and obtaining consent from patients and families. Through August 2013, 1,559 patients have been enrolled, and four gene tests have been released into the electronic health record (EHR) for clinical implementation: TPMT, CYP2D6, SLCO1B1, and CYP2C19. These genes are coupled to 12 high-risk drugs. Of the 1,016 patients with genotype test results available, 78% of them had at least one high-risk (i.e., actionable) genotype result placed in their EHR. Each diplotype result released to the EHR is coupled with an interpretive consult that is created in a concise, standardized format. To support-gene based prescribing at the point of care, 55 interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) alerts were developed. Patients are informed of their genotyping result and its relevance to their medication use through a letter. Key elements necessary for our successful implementation have included strong institutional support, a knowledgeable clinical laboratory, a process to manage any incidental findings, a strategy to educate clinicians and patients, a process to return results, and extensive use of informatics, especially CDS. Our approach to pre-emptive clinical pharmacogenetics has proven feasible, clinically useful, and scalable. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2014 · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics
Show more