ArticlePDF Available


Chemical pollutants, coastal zone destruction, habitat loss, nutrient discharges, hypoxic zones, algal blooms and catastrophic overfishing have all heavily impacted life in our oceans (Bowen and Depledge, 2006). Major efforts are being made worldwide to manage and minimise these threats. However, one particular pollutant, light, is still permitted to flood into our seas almost unchecked. It is alarming that as the intentional and unintentional illumination of the coastal zone and nearshore environment increases unabated, we still have little idea of the extent to which intertidal and sublittoral ecosystems are being affected. There is also growing concern regarding the introduction of light into the deep sea (Widder et al., 2005).
Light pollution in the sea
Chemical pollutants, coastal zone destruction, habitat loss,
nutrient discharges, hypoxic zones, algal blooms and catastrophic
overfishing have all heavily impacted life in our oceans (Bowen
and Depledge, 2006). Major efforts are being made worldwide to
manage and minimise these threats. However, one particular
pollutant, light, is still permitted to flood into our seas almost
unchecked. It is alarming that as the intentional and unintentional
illumination of the coastal zone and nearshore environment in-
creases unabated, we still have little idea of the extent to which
intertidal and sublittoral ecosystems are being affected. There is
also growing concern regarding the introduction of light into the
deep sea (Widder et al., 2005).
1. Sensitivity to light
Almost all living organisms are sensitive to changes in the qual-
ity and intensity of natural light in the environment (Longcore and
Rich, 2004). This is such a widely distributed characteristic that it
seems likely to have arisen very early in evolutionary history, pos-
sibly on several occasions. It might even suggest that the evolution
of life in the oceans proceeded largely in the photic zone. Obvi-
ously, for algae and seaweeds, photosynthetic activity is critically
dependent on available light, while in marine animals, tidal, daily,
monthly and seasonal cycles in natural light intensity and quality
are reflected in rhythmical fluctuations in behaviour and physiol-
ogy that are appropriately tuned to the prevailing ecological cir-
cumstances (Depledge, 1984).
Humans use the influence of light on several kinds of organisms
to great advantage. For example, for centuries fishermen have de-
ployed lanterns to attract fish to their nets, while modern day nat-
ural resource managers set out lights to attract larval fish to coral
reefs to boost fish stocks and enhance biodiversity (Munday et al.,
1998). There are numerous vivid accounts in the literature of peo-
ple using their knowledge of light-entrained rhythms to reap re-
wards. South Pacific islanders for example, exploit moon phase
spawning of polychaete worms to ensure bountiful harvests of
eggs and sperm that are considered a culinary delicacy (Thorson,
2. Light pollution
Light pollution of the sea has only become a really significant
issue over the last ca. 50–80 years. It has been defined as the
‘‘degradation of the photic habitat by artificial light” (Verheijhen,
1985). Simply put, light pollution occurs when organisms are ex-
posed to light in the wrong place, at the wrong time or at the
wrong intensity. Following the mounting, well-publicised evidence
of disturbance of the behaviour of birds, bats and insects, there is
now growing concern that light pollution might exert damaging ef-
fects on aquatic species in lakes, rivers and our seas, especially in
coastal areas. All organisms equipped with an optic orientation
system are potentially susceptible. In the sea, the behaviour, repro-
duction and survival of marine invertebrates, amphibians, fish and
birds have been shown to be influenced by artificial lights (Verheij-
hen, 1985). These effects arise from changes in orientation, disori-
entation, or misorientation and attraction or repulsion from altered
light environments (Longcore and Rich, 2004; Salmon et al., 1995).
In animals exhibiting compulsive stimulus behaviour, the strength
and number of artificial lights may override any feedback control
mechanisms. This is exemplified by sea turtles hatchlings that rely
on visual cues to orient themselves seaward, which consequently
renders them vulnerable to light pollution. In one anecdotal report,
500 green sea turtle hatchlings crawled to their deaths in an unat-
tended bonfire on a beach of Ascension Island (Mortimer, 1979).
On a Turkish beach, light pollution arising from a paper mill, a
tourist resort and a coastal village led to less than 40% of logger-
head turtle hatchlings reaching the surf (Peters and Verhoeven,
1994). The construction of buildings in close proximity to critically
important nesting beaches, as seen in the recent urban develop-
ment in Gabon’s capital, Libreville, places human populations and
their attendant light sources close to critical nesting sites for the
endangered leatherback sea turtle (Bourgeois et al., 2009). Disori-
entation and misorientation due to light pollution often divert
hatchlings along their paths to the sea leading to unnecessary en-
ergy expenditure and increased risks of dehydration and terrestrial
predation (Bourgeois et al., 2009; Verheijhen, 1985). Urban sky-
lines can present irregular silhouettes and as a result, unreliable
cues to female turtles. The confusing horizon field presented to
new hatchlings which rely heavily on horizon elevation cues re-
sults in increased mortality (Salmon, 2006). Indirect adverse effects
of artificial lighting include a higher risk of human interference via
greater likelihood of approach towards more visible animals and of
abandonment of nesting attempts if turtles become aware of hu-
mans prior to oviposition.
Other ecological effects of light pollution include disruption of
predator–prey relationships. For example, Harbor seals (Phoca vitu-
lina) congregate to feed in illuminated areas on juvenile salmon as
they migrated downstream. Predation falls off when the lights are
turned off (Yurk and Trites, 2000). In zooplankton, vertical migra-
tions in the water column with the day–night cycle help to reduce
predation by fish and other marine organisms, when light is avail-
able (Gliwicz, 1986). Artificial light disturbs this activity. Commu-
nity changes arising from light pollution may have knock on effects
for ecosystem functions (Gliwicz, 1986, 1999). Even remote areas
can still be exposed to sky glow. Along the expanding front of
suburbanization, light may spill into wetlands and estuaries that
0025-326X/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright Ó2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 (2010) 1383–1385
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Marine Pollution Bulletin
journal homepage:
are often the last open spaces in, or close to, cities (Longcore and
Rich, 2004).
Perhaps surprisingly, light pollution penetrates into deep ocean
environments (Kochevar, 1998). Here, only very dim, homochro-
matic, down light is available, supplemented by bioluminescence
from marine organisms. Most inhabitants possess highly special-
ized visual systems, which are incredibly sensitive to even minute
amounts of light. This renders these organisms extremely vulnera-
ble to damage associated with bright artificial lights of manned
and unmanned submersible vehicles (Kochevar, 1998). The current
efforts to deal with the oil well disaster in the Gulf of Mexico has
revealed the extent to which light pollution can occur in the deep
sea, albeit that the effects are secondary to the effects of oil pollu-
tion in this case.
There is a widely held, but incorrect belief that organisms living
in caves (whether under the sea or under land masses) do not come
into contact with light and are therefore insensitive to it. However,
as with deep sea creatures, many cave dwelling organisms are bio-
luminescent and are exquisitely sensitive to any ambient light and
light pollution. Most if not all, cave dwelling organisms and others
living remotely from daylight, evolved from organisms that at one
time dwelt in the light and hence retain vestiges of light sensing
3. Growing concerns regarding light pollution
Over the last ca. 150 years there has been an exponential in-
crease in the use of artificial light to illuminate the night. This
trend continues to this day. On land, street lights, lighting in office
buildings and homes, and floodlit sports facilities, industrial com-
plexes, etc., are the sources which inadvertently introduce light
into nature (RCEP, 2009). In coastal areas, where many of our major
cities such as Mumbai, Shanghai, Alexandria, Miami, New York City
and London are located, long stretches of the shoreline are strongly
illuminated. Indeed, light pollution of shallow seas has become a
global phenomenon (Elvidge et al., 1997). There are at least 3351
cities in the coastal zones around the world shedding light onto
beaches and into sublittoral areas. In Asia, 18 of the region’s 20
largest cities are located on the coast, on river banks or in deltas.
Even in Africa where the availability of electric lighting is some-
times limited, coastal light pollution is emitted from major cities
such as Abidjan, Accra, Algiers, Cape Town, Casablanca, Dakar,
Dar es Salaam, Djibouti, Durban, Freetown, Lagos, Luanda, Maputo,
Mombasa, Port Louis and Tunis (UN-HABITAT, 2009).
Our understanding of the polluting nature of artificial light is
emerging concurrently with an understanding of how patterns of
human development and economic globalization are intensifying
its impact. The UN estimates that the global population will in-
crease to a point where there are two and one half billion more hu-
man inhabitants than today (UNPOPIN). Inevitably, this growth
will be associated with further light pollution. The nature and scale
of growth provides an even louder clarion call for focus on the
environmental consequences of artificial light as well the need to
mitigate those consequences. The main conclusion to be drawn
from looking at the changing population dynamics over the next
generation is that virtually all of the two and half billion new citi-
zens of our World will live in small and medium sized cities within
emerging economies (Balk et al., 2008). Thus, while mega-cities
continue in their dominant position, more modest sized cities will
serve as the true future centres of growth. This means that artificial
light will not only continue to intensify with population growth,
but that the number of locations of high intensity light pollution
will also increase dramatically. Even in areas where total popula-
tion growth is low, such as in the OECD countries, analysis suggests
that the environmental influences of night light will continue to
spread. Consideration of data provided by the US National Geo-
physical Data Center (NOAA), reveals that total population growth
and the spatial patterns of human growth can be, and often are,
unrelated (Bowen et al., 2006; FAO, 2005). Migration to the coast,
so common in many parts of the world, and the ‘‘sprawl” of devel-
opment, present a challenge regardless of total population growth
While most of the future increase in artificial light will reside
with permanent resident populations, economic globalization will
also play a role. In 2009, the UN World Tourism Organization
(UNWTO) estimated that there were nearly 900 million interna-
tional tourist arrivals worldwide. The economic growth and devel-
opment pressure (very often coastal) of new supporting
infrastructure, driven by international tourism, cannot be ignored.
Indeed, touristic development may be a disproportionately impor-
tant driver of artificial light use simply because it tends to occur in
areas of enhanced natural beauty – and environmental vulnerabil-
ity. In other words, wherever tourism increases, so too does light
Holiday visits to beaches vividly reveal the extent to which arti-
ficial lighting systems have been deployed along coastlines. More
systematic studies demonstrate the extent of the change that has
occurred. Innovative research using satellite imagery has tracked
the movement of populations over time. This is based on the prin-
ciple that wherever human population density increases it is
almost always associated with increased use of artificial light at
night. From a comparison of images taken at various times over
the past 50 years with present day images, it is clear that not only
has population density increased in many coastal areas around the
World, but this is associated with dramatic increases in light inten-
sity in the coastal zone.
4. What can be done?
From a mitigatory/regulatory perspective the above mentioned
patterns of human population change may provide vehicles to
more efficiently limit future environmental damage associated
with artificial light. If intensifying urbanization is effectively antic-
ipated and understood, it might be easier to coordinate regulatory
responses and technological efficiencies of scale. Thus, if most of
the future growth is geographically concentrated, the ability to
coordinate light pollution control measures could be enhanced.
The same might be said of touristic development. It provides a
commonality of activity that can be dealt with by a more concerted
and directed response.
In all other spheres of activity that result in artificial light
impacting marine life, there are clearly possibilities to regulate
light spillage into the sea. Whether from coastal developments or
fishing, or from oil and mining exploration or from cruise liners
and other merchant shipping activities, there are a wide range of
opportunities to regulate and thereby minimise potential adverse
effects of light pollution. Simply embedding the idea that in every-
thing we do, consideration needs to be given to minimising the
amount of light we release into the environment, would be a help-
ful step forward.
5. Summary
Whatever is done, it is first and foremost essential to recognize
the scale and scope of the potential problem in hand. It is almost
unimaginable that if we discovered a new pollutant today that
had pronounced effects on fundamental cellular processes, that af-
fected biological rhythms of cells, and that potentially affect photo-
synthesis, that we would not control or regulate its release into
natural ecosystems! Yet this is precisely what we do when we
allow light to spill into our seas, estuaries, rivers and lakes, as well
as into terrestrial ecosystems. The evidence is clear that the
1384 Editorial / Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 (2010) 1383–1385
feeding, reproductive and migratory behaviour of some species is
already affected. It seems timely therefore to reconsider our prof-
ligate use of light and to pay more attention to its biological effects.
If nothing else, more prudent use of artificial light would also re-
duced energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions,
surely a worthy goal in itself?
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the UK Government
Foreign and Commonwealth Office and of the Peninsula Founda-
tion, UK, for providing financial support to facilitate collaboration
among the authors.
Balk, D., McGranahan, G., Anderson, B., 2008. Urbanization and ecosystems: recent
patterns and future implications. In: Martine, G., McGranahan, G., Montgomery,
M. (Eds.), The New Global Frontier: Cities, Poverty and Environment in the 21st
Century. Earthscan Publishers, London, pp. 183–201.
Bourgeois, S., Gilot-Fromont, E., Viallefont, A., Boussamba, F., Deem, S.L., 2009.
Influence of artificial lights, logs and erosion on leatherback sea turtle hatchling
orientation at Pongara National Park, Gabon. Biol. Conserv. 142, 85–93.
Bowen, R.E., Depledge, M.H., 2006. Rapid assessment of marine pollution. Mar.
Pollut. Bull. 53, 541–544.
Bowen, R.E., Davis, M., Frankic, A., 2006. Human development and resource use in
the coastal zone: influences on public health. Oceanography 19 (2), 62–71.
Depledge, M.H., 1984. Disruption of endogenous rhythms in Carcinus maenas
following exposure to heavy metal pollution. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78A (2),
Elvidge, C., Baugh, K.E., Kihn, E.A., Davis, E.R., 1997. Mapping city lights with
nighttime data from DMSP Operational Linescan System. Photogramm. Eng.
Rem. Sens. 63, 727–734.
FAO, 2005. Coastal GTOS draft strategic design and phase I implementation plan. In:
Christian, Robert, Baird, D., Bowen, Robert E., Clark, David, DiGiacomo, Paul, de
Mora, S., Jimenez, J., Kineman, John, Mazzilli, S., Servin, G., Talaue-McManus, L.,
Viaroli, P., Yap, Helen (Eds.). GTOS Report No. 36. FAO, Rome, 93pp.
Gliwicz, Z.M., 1986. A lunar cycle in zooplankton. Ecology 67, 883–897.
Gliwicz, Z.M., 1999. Predictability of seasonal and diel events in tropical and
temperate lakes and reservoirs. In: Tundisi, J.G., Straskaba, M. (Eds.), Theoretical
Reservoir Ecology and Its Applications. International Institute of Ecology, Sao
Kochevar, R.E., 1998. Effects of Artificial Light on Deep Sea Organisms:
Recommendations for Ongoing Use of Artificial Lights on Deep Sea
Submersibles. Technical Report to the Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary Research Activity Panel.
Longcore, T., Rich, C., 2004. Ecological light pollution. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2 (4),
Mortimer, J.A., 1979. Ascension Island: British Jeopardize 45 years of conservation.
Mar. Turtle Newslett. 10, 7–8.
Munday, P.L., Jones, G.P., Öhman, M.C., Kaly, U.L., 1998. Enhancement of recruitment
to coral reefs using light-attractors. Bull. Mar. Sci. 63, 581–588.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), US National
Geophysical Data Center, Version 4 DMSP-OLS Nighttime Lights Time Series.
Peters, A., Verhoeven, K.J.F., 1994. Impact of artificial light on the seaward
orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles. J. Herpetol. 28, 112–114.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 2009. Artificial Light in the
Environment. TSO, London, 43pp.
Salmon, M., 2006. Protecting sea turtles from artificial night lighting at Florida
oceanic beaches. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T. (Eds.). Ecological Consequences of
Artificial Night Lighting. pp. 141–168.
Salmon, M., Tolbert, M.G., Painter, D.P., Goff, M., Reiners, R., 1995. Behavior of
Loggerhead turtles on an urban beach: hatchling orientation. J. Herpetol. 29,
Thorson, G., 1971. Life in the Sea. World University Library, London. 256pp.
UN-HABITAT (2009). ‘‘State of the World’s Cities 2008/9: Harmonious Cities”
launched by the United Nations Human Settlements Program (UN-HABITAT).
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division
(UNPOPIN). <>.
Verheijhen, F.J., 1985. Photopollution: artificial light optic spatial control systems
fail to cope with incidents, causations, remedies. Exp. Biol. 44, 1–18.
Widder, E.A., Robinson, B.H., Reisenbichler, K.R., Haddock, S.H.D., 2005. Using red
light for in situ observations of deep-sea fishes. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr.
Res. Papers 52 (11), 2077–2085.
Yurk, H., Trites, A.W., 2000. Experimental attempts to reduce predation by harbor
seals on out-migrating juvenile salmonids. Trans. Am. Fish Soc. 129, 1360–1366.
Michael H. Depledge
European Centre for Environment and Human Health,
Peninsula Medical School,
Universities of Exeter and Plymouth,
Truro, TR1 3HD, UK
E-mail address:
Céline A.J. Godard-Codding
Department of Environmental Toxicology,
The Institute of Environmental and Human Health,
Texas Tech University,
Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
Robert E. Bowen
Environmental, Coastal and Ocean Sciences,
University of Massachussetts,
Boston, MA, USA
Editorial / Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 (2010) 1383–1385 1385
... Pollution can be broadly defined as any natural or human-derived substance or energy that is introduced into the environment by humans and that can have a detrimental effect on living organisms and natural environments (UNEP 1982). Pollutants, including light and sound in addition to the more commonly recognised forms, can enter the marine environment from a multitude of sources and transport mechanisms (Carroll et al. 2017;Depledge et al. 2010;Longcore and Rich 2004;Williams et al. 2015). These may include long range atmospheric movement (Amunsen et al. 1992) and transport from inland waterways (Lebreton et al. 2017). ...
... Trace amounts of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in organisms have the capacity to cause physiological harm (Capaldo et al. 2018;Hoffman et al. 2011;Salamat et al. 2014) and alter behaviours (Brodin et al. 2014;Mattsson et al. 2017). Artificial lights along coasts at night can disrupt organism navigation, predation and vertical migration (Depledge et al. 2010). Pharmaceutical pollutants, such as contraceptive drugs, have induced reproductive failure and sex changes in a range of fish species (Lange et al. 2011;Nash et al. 2004). ...
Full-text available
In the age of the Anthropocene, the ocean has typically been viewed as a sink for pollution. Pollution is varied, ranging from human-made plastics and pharmaceutical compounds, to human-altered abiotic factors, such as sediment and nutrient runoff. As global population, wealth and resource consumption continue to grow, so too does the amount of potential pollution produced. This presents us with a grand challenge which requires interdisciplinary knowledge to solve. There is sufficient data on the human health, social, economic, and environmental risks of marine pollution, resulting in increased awareness and motivation to address this global challenge, however a significant lag exists when implementing strategies to address this issue. This review draws upon the expertise of 17 experts from the fields of social sciences, marine science, visual arts, and Traditional and First Nations Knowledge Holders to present two futures; the Business-As-Usual, based on current trends and observations of growing marine pollution, and a More Sustainable Future, which imagines what our ocean could look like if we implemented current knowledge and technologies. We identify priority actions that governments, industry and consumers can implement at pollution sources, vectors and sinks, over the next decade to reduce marine pollution and steer us towards the More Sustainable Future. Graphic abstract
... Falchi et al., 2011;Falchi et al., 2019;Gallaway et al., 2010;Longcore and Rich, 2004;Owens et al., 2020) and a concerted effort to limit artificial illumination has been undertaken in many regions (Gaston et al., 2012). Relative to terrestrial environments, comparatively little is known about the influence of artificial light on marine life (Davies et al., 2014;Depledge et al., 2010). The pollution resulting from these artificial light sources can severely impact natural ecosystems. ...
The human population is increasingly reliant on the marine environment for food, trade, tourism, transport, communication and other vital ecosystem services. These services require extensive marine infrastructure, all of which have direct or indirect ecological impacts on marine environments. The rise in global marine infrastructure has led to light, noise and chemical pollution, as well as facilitation of biological invasions. As a result, marine systems and associated species are under increased pressure from habitat loss and degradation, formation of ecological traps and increased mortality, all of which can lead to reduced resilience and consequently increased invasive species establishment. Whereas the cumulative bearings of collective human impacts on marine populations have previously been demonstrated, the multiple impacts associated with marine infrastructure have not been well explored. Here, building on ecological literature, we explore the impacts that are associated with marine infrastructure, conceptualising the notion of correlative, interactive and cumulative effects of anthropogenic activities on the marine environment. By reviewing the range of mitigation approaches that are currently available, we consider the role that eco-engineering, marine spatial planning and agent-based modelling plays in complementing the design and placement of marine structures to incorporate the existing connectivity pathways, ecological principles and complexity of the environment. Because the effect of human-induced, rapid environmental change is predicted to increase in response to the growth of the human population, this study demonstrates that the development and implementation of legislative framework, innovative technologies and nature-informed solutions are vital, preventative measures to mitigate the multiple impacts associated with marine infrastructure.
... Anthropogenic lighting has increasingly been viewed as a pollutant and ecological stressor, which should be further investigated and addressed with technological solutions and best practices to reduce its potential widespread impacts on wildlife and adjacent habitats [4][5][6][7]. Studies of terrestrial light pollution have been conducted for a wide variety of organisms, but marine life has been less well studied [8][9][10][11]. Reviews of lighting effects on marine life largely focus on the effects on coastal regions where cities and towns can be nearby [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Light as a stressor can be broadly categorized as either discrete sources of light, such as individual streetlamps or buoy lights, and skyglow. ...
Full-text available
Marine energy is poised to become an important renewable energy contributor for the U.S., but widespread deployment of the technology hinges on its benefits outweighing the potential ecological impacts. One stressor marine energy installations introduce is light, which is known to cause varying responses among wildlife and has not yet been addressed as an environmental concern. This review discusses requirements and regulations for similar structures and how lighting design choices can be made to meet these requirements while minimizing environmental consequences. More practical guidance on implementing lighting for marine energy is needed, as well as updated guidelines to reflect technological and research advances. Known responses of wildlife to light are introduced in addition to how the responses of individuals may lead to ecosystem-level changes. The impact of light associated with marine energy installations can be reduced by following basic guidance provided herein, such as removing excess lighting, using lights with high directionality, and employing controls to reduce light levels. Continued research on animal responses to light, such as findings on minimum light levels for animal responses, alongside the development of highly-sensitivity spectral characterization capabilities can further inform lighting guidelines for deploying future open ocean marine energy devices.
... The light pollution of water bodies has been actively studied during the last decades, yet mostly marine coastal ecosystems have been studied (Depledge et al. 2010;Davies et al. 2014;Navarro-Barranco and Hughes 2015;Bolton et al. 2017;Sanders et al. 2021). It was discovered that light pollution changes the hydrobionts content (Davies et al. 2012), disorients specimens (Longcore and Rich 2004; Gaston et al. 2013), and concentrates them around light sources (Navarro-Barranco and Hughes 2015). ...
Full-text available
The role of light pollution in aquatic ecosystems functioning has increased in recent times. In addition, the effect of such pollution has mostly been studied in coastal marine ecosystems, leaving freshwater ecosystems much less studied. In the p resent work, we investigated the effect of light pollution on the coastal zone of the ancient Lake Baikal ecosystem. Both a laboratory experiment and field research were conducted. The results of the experiment showed the presence of statistically significant differences (р =0.009) between fish feeding on amphipods with and without daylight conditions, while there were no such differences between daylight and artificial light conditions. At the same time, video recordings revealed both a low number of specimens and a low species diversity of amphipods near to the village with a developed system of street lights, while in the village with a nearly nonexistent light system, the species diversity and a number of amphipods were much higher. One plausible explanation for such influence of light pollution on the quality and quantity of Baikal amphipod fauna might be the sum of several factors such as high water transparency and daily vertical migrations of amphipods.
... Also, it is relevant to highlight the number of articles aimed to assess animals in aquatic environments such as fishes (23), diverse aquatic ecosystems (21), turtles (19) or toads and frogs (9). Depledge et al. (2010) remark in their editorial that surprisingly light is one particular pollutant permitted to flood into the aquatic ecosystems and it is not foreseen to be addressed in the near future. Increasing illumination of the coastal zones, reefs, rivers, estuaries, deltas, gulfs and nearshore areas is threatening aquatic animals all over the world (e.g. ...
Light pollution is the consequence of elevated lighting emitted by human-made artefacts to the lower atmosphere. Recently, there have been major advances in the assessment and mitigation of light pollution impacts on humans and the natural ecosystems. Severe negative impacts of light pollution have been highlighted while very few mitigation measures have been implemented. People (scientists, policymakers or stakeholders) interested in light pollution may not have a holistic perspective of the problem, and also there is a need for incorporating social and natural dimensions. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to review the literature on light pollution using ISI Web of Science by paying attention to the (i) type of publication, year and journal; (ii) impacts on specific elements; (iii) location and (iv) methods used. Our results indicated that the elevated number of papers come from a diverse range of disciplines, methods, places and scales. It is clear that light pollution is getting enough attention from the scientific community but decisions on the implementation of mitigation measures are left with the stakeholders, ordinary inhabitants, policymakers and politicians. Nevertheless, light pollution is having impacts on the health of humans and the natural ecosystem as perceived by experts and inhabitants having divergent perspectives. Thus, light pollution is multifaceted but difficult to be faced, mitigated and not holistically understood. This review paper groups the total impacts of light pollution on the Earth presents some contradictory results, summarises mitigation measures, and provides specific future research directions.
... The same problem for marine organisms may arise from light pollution. The intentional and unintentional illumination of the oceans increases, but the extent and the interference with marine organisms have to be investigated [22]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The aim of the paper is to give an overview of negative effects of shipping business on marine environment as well as the protection of marine environment against pollutants that enter the environment from shipping activities. Many pollutants, that enter marine environment from ships and ports (oils, chemicals, sewage, waste, ballast water, greenhouse gases, ozone depleting substances, ...) can damage marine habitats and marine living resources. The scale of the impact of these pollutants on marine ecosystems varies from local environmental problems to global scale problems and it differs from place to place depending upon environmental factors but also socioeconomic factors. The shipping is international industry, and it is effective only if the regulations and standards are agreed, adopted and implemented internationally. The discharges of many of these pollutants are regulated through the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Conventions, as well as through national regulation by coastal states. Beside the regulatory framework developed and maintained by IMO, the development and implementation of global standards covering new technologies and innovations, as well as maritime education and training, are necessary for green and sustainable global maritime transportation system.
... Artificial lighting presented one of the most frequent threats to nests in Grand Cayman and has been recognised as a substantial anthropogenic threat in many coastal environments (Depledge et al., 2010). Firstly, it can deter turtles from nesting (Weishampel et al., 2016;Silva et al., 2017). ...
Full-text available
Given differing trajectories of sea turtle populations worldwide, there is a need to assess and report long-term population trends and determine which conservation strategies are effective. In this study, we report on sea turtle nest monitoring in the Cayman Islands over a 22-year period. We found that green (Chelonia mydas) and loggerhead (Caretta caretta) nest numbers increased significantly across the three islands since monitoring began in 1998, but that hawksbill nest numbers remained low with a maximum of 13 nests recorded in a season. Comparing the first 5 years of nest numbers to the most recent 5 years, the greatest percentage increase in green turtle nests was in Grand Cayman from 82 to 1,005 nests (1,126%), whereas the greatest percentage increase for loggerhead turtle nests was in Little Cayman from 10 to 290 nests (3,800%). A captive breeding operation contributed to the increase in the Grand Cayman green turtle population, however, loggerhead turtles were never captive-bred, and these populations began to increase after a legal traditional turtle fishery became inactive in 2008. Although both species have shown significant signs of recovery, populations remain at a fragment of their historical level and are vulnerable to threats. Illegal harvesting occurs to this day, with multiple females taken from nesting beaches each year. For nests and hatchlings, threats include artificial lighting on nesting beaches, causing hatchlings to misorient away from the sea, and inundation of nests by seawater reducing hatch success. The impacts of lighting were found to increase over the monitoring period. Spatial data on nest distribution was used to identify critical nesting habitat for green and loggerhead turtles and is used by the Cayman Islands Department of Environment to facilitate remediation of threats related to beachside development and for targeted future management efforts.
Full-text available
The growing global population has increased the demands for urban housing development not only in the cities but in suburbs and rural areas as well. This gradual but speedy urbanization and globalization have introduced a new kind of “night lifestyle” among people, who engage in various entertainment activities late in the evening till early mornings. This influx of urban architecture and changes in lifestyles have resulted in increased use of various kinds of lighting systems in our cities to a point where some cities like Mumbai and New York City are known as “the cities that never sleep.” Although this might be contributing significantly to the economy, they cause greater harm-light pollution, with little to no awareness. This paper, therefore, deals with the various types and causes, and thus the consequences of light pollution, ranging from plants, animals, humans to astronomy. The documentation done so far concerning light pollution has been done by scientists and astronomers from the West. Thus, an attempt has been made to assess the awareness ratio among Indians between the ages of 16–65 through an online questionnaire, analyzing the collected data qualitatively. It was found that majority of the participants were not aware about the term ‘light pollution’ and consequently were not aware about the threat that comes with it. So the objective of this review paper is to bring attention to the severity of the issue of light pollution and make people aware of the consequences it has on our lives. All the effective mitigation policies and regulations from various countries around the world that were theorized to deal with this risk and propagate awareness are included. Our goal is to bring these solutions to practice in the Asian and South Asian countries like India and make the masses informed as light pollution is still a relatively new and alien concept.
Full-text available
p> The growth of economy that encourage development sometimes cause damage to environment. One of the case is light pollution while many people do not realize this pollution is existed. This research analyses light as one kind of pollution that people tend to unrealize. It describes cause and effect of light pollution. This pollution occurs because overused and misdirected light. Moreover, economics growth and increasing of population encourage this phenomena. Further, It argues that light pollution gives bad impact to environment and animal as well as becomes a threat to human health. This research employs qualitative methods by collecting, categorizing data from library research. It found that light pollution give bad impact to environment and human health, such as miss direction in migration animals, we cannot see Milky Way, and potential breast cancer to human. In addition, light pollution also wastes of energy. So, more attention has to be paid to this pollution and several managements in development and regulation have to be taken to manage this pollution worse. Keywords: </p
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Budući da izvori nafte i prirodnog plina nisu neiscrpni, postoji potreba za razvojem obnovljivih izvora energije. Osim same sigurnosti opskrbe energijom, jedan od glavnih ciljeva europske energetske politike usmjeren je na zaštitu okoliša kroz smanjenje potrošnje energije te povećanje korištenja obnovljivih izvora. Tijekom poljoprivredne proizvodnje, biomasa često ostaje na poljima ili u proizvodnom procesu kao nusprodukt kojeg treba zbrinuti, no istovremeno poljoprivredni otpad predstavlja i vrlo vrijedan izvor energije. U radu će biti dan opis procesa kojima se dobiva energija iz poljoprivrednog otpada. Korištenje poljoprivredne biomase u svrhu energije ima svoje prednosti i nedostatke, a kroz te dvije stavke bit će razjašnjeno zašto je poljoprivredna biomasa bolja za proizvodnju energije od konvencionalnog načina, odnosno, po čemu su fosilna goriva bolja za proizvodnju energije naspram poljoprivredne biomase. Zaključno, naglasak će biti stavljen na mogućnosti korištenja biomase iz poljoprivrednog otpada u kontekstu ekološke krize.
Full-text available
Coastal watersheds and nearshore marine areas are the most valuable and dynamic places on Earth. Human population growth is great in these regions, which are home to some of the most sensitive habitats in the world. Coastal areas provide more than half of the overall service value derived from the global environment (Costanza et al., 1997). Natural (e.g., hurricanes and tsunamis) and human pressures on this environment require it to constantly adjust. More than any other area, the global coast has defined the progress of human culture and continues to be a singular influence in how humans connect to the world around them. For these reasons and others, the global coast should be a central focus in the environmental management decisions of governments at all levels. However, increasingly, we have come to understand that allowing the degradation and broad-scale change in coastal systems has another consequence—our own health.
Full-text available
A cycle of zooplankton density that fluctuated in phase with the moon was observed throughout 1982-1983 in Cahora Bassa Reservoir on the lower Zambezi, in southeastern Africa. Despite constant birth rates, densities of four cladoceran and two copepod species, as determined from vertically hauled plankton net samples taken every 2-6 d, fluctuated over one order of magnitude. The pattern followed by each species included an exponential increase in population density from the last quarter of the moon through the new moon and the first quarter, till the full moon, then a sudden decrease resulting in lowest numbers during the moon's last quarter. The cycle was shown to be induced by predation. Much higher death rates between the full moon and the last quarter were caused by the abundant Tanganyikan sardine Limnothrissa miodon. As seen from an examination of gut contents, sardines crop zooplankton most efficiently on nights when the full or nearly full moon rises after sunset, i.e., when zooplankton approach the surface during darkness and become suddenly vulnerable in the first light of the rising moon. After the last quarter, zooplankton density is low, the moon gives little light, the fish shift to alternate food resources, and zooplankton populations grow exponentially again. I suggest that the moon phase cycle in zooplankton is a global phenomenon, but, previously uninterpreted, has been seen only as distracting @'random@' variations in seasonal density patterns. I also suggest that similar prey-predator interactions might have been responsible for selecting for and fixing intrinsic monthly rhythms in behavior and physiology of animals with long life-spans.
Full-text available
At several locations on an urban nesting beach, loggerhead hatchlings emerging from their nests did not orient toward the sea. The cause was city lighting which disrupted normal seafinding behavior. Observations and experiments were conducted to determine why females nested where hatchlings were exposed to illumination, and how hatchlings responded to local conditions. In some cases, females nested late at night after lights were turned off, but hatchlings emerged earlier in the evening when lights were on. In other cases, the beach was shadowed by buildings directly behind the nest, but was exposed to lights from gaps between adjacent buildings. In laboratory tests, "urban silhouettes" (mimicking buildings with light gaps) failed to provide adequate cues for hatchling orientation whereas natural silhouettes (those without light gaps) did. Adding a low light barrier (simulating a dune or dense vegetation) in front of the gaps improved orientation accuracy. The data show that hatchling orientation is a sensitive assay of beach lighting conditions, and that light barriers can make urban beaches safer for emerging hatchlings. At urban beaches where it may be impossible to shield all luminaires, light barriers may be an effective method for protecting turtles.
Full-text available
During spring, harbor seals Phoca vitulina feed at night under two bridges spanning the Puntledge River in Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada. Posi- tioned parallel to one another, ventral side up, the seals form a feeding line across the river to intercept thou- sands of out-migrating salmonid smolts. During a 4- week observation period in the spring of 1996, we at- tempted to disrupt the seals' feeding patterns by (a) de- ploying a mechanical feeding barrier (cork line), (b) al- tering the lighting conditions (lights on a bridge were turned off), and (c) installing an acoustic harassment device. We found acoustic harassment to be the most effective feeding deterrent. Of the other two deterrents, turning off the bridge lights was more effective than deploying a cork line, which had little effect. Acoustic harassment devices appear to be the most effective, non- lethal means for protecting juvenile salmonids from har- bor seal predation in portions of the Puntledge River.
Full-text available
Methods that enhance larval settlement are required to examine the importance of recruitment in the dynamics of coral reef fish populations. Although it is known that larval reef fishes are attracted to light, here we show for the first time that a light-attraction device positioned above patch reefs at Lizard Island (Great Barrier Reef) significantly increased the number of fish settling on the reefs below. The device was a modified light trap with a tube allowing the vertical movement of larvae from the trap to the reef. The number of species of settling fishes, and the abundance and diversity of immigrant fishes were also greater on the light-enhanced reefs. By comparison, the alternative technique of enhancing recruitment using surface buoys moored to reefs was unsuccessful. Further studies are now required to determine whether enhanced recruitment using light-attractors leads to a longer-term increase in population size, as opposed to temporarily concentrating juveniles on the reef.
The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Operational Linescan System (OLS) has a unique capability to detect low levels of visible and near-infrared (VNIR) radiance at night. With the OLS 'VIS' band data, it is possible to detect clouds illuminated by moonlight, plus lights from cities, towns, industrial sites, gas flares, and ephemeral events such as fires and lightning illuminated clouds. This paper presents methods which have been developed for detecting and geolocating VNIR emission sources with nighttime DMSP-OLS data and the analysis of image time series to identify spatially stable emissions from cities, towns, and industrial sites. Results are presented for the United States.
1.1. Carcinus maenas (L.) were exposed to alternating 6-hr periods of submersion (seawater, 9–10°C) and aerial exposure (air, 13°C) for 8–10 days.2.2. Following transfer to non-tidal conditions cardiac and locomotor endogenous rhythms persisted for at least 7–8 days.3.3. When 0.05 mg l−1 mercuric sulphate was added to the non-tidal seawater system 12–30 hr after transfer of the crabs, endogenous rhythms were disrupted.4.4. Locomotor activity increased and mean heart rate rose from 32.1 ± 4.6 bpm prior to pollution, to 44.7 ± 8.9 bpm after pollution.5.5. Impedance cardiograph trace heights remained unchanged implying little, if any, change in heart stroke volume.6.6. Masking or ablation of endogenous rhythms persisted throughout the period of recording.7.7. The significance of the results is discussed with regard to the lives of crabs in situ.
Observations of animals in the deep ocean typically require the use of bright lights that can damage eyes and disrupt normal behaviors. Although the use of infrared light is an effective means of unobtrusive observation on land, it is far less effective in the ocean where long wavelength light is rapidly attenuated by seawater. Here we describe in situ observations of the behavior of the sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, around a baited site under different lighting conditions. Fish were observed with low-light-level imaging that had adequate sensitivity to compensate for the attenuation losses associated with the use of long wavelength light in water. ROV-based experiments compared the number of sablefish seen around bait, illuminated alternately with red vs. white light. Significantly more fish were seen under red light than white light with the average number of sablefish observed per 10 min viewing interval under red light being 38.9 (±18.5 SD) compared to 7.5 (±7.1 SD) under white light. Under both red and white light sablefish spent only brief periods in the illumination field (10.5 s [±8.7 SD] under red light and 6.6 s [±8.7 SD] under white light). It appeared that sablefish were responding to competing drives of attraction to the bait and avoidance of the lights and that the avoidance was greater for white light than for red light. Observations were also made with the newly developed deep-sea observatory, Eye-in-the-Sea, using long wavelength LED illumination. The onset of LED illumination did not generally produce a startle response from fish around the bait, and in some cases invoked no response at all. However, in the majority of cases the fish moved out of the circle of red-light illumination during the 7.5 s recording period, indicating that the light was detectable and aversive to these fish. This was true with both 660 and 680 nm LED illuminators. We conclude that while a sharper short-wavelength cutoff of the illumination source is required to achieve truly unobtrusive observation, red light is nonetheless significantly less disruptive than white light for observing deep-sea fish behavior, and can provide adequate illumination when used in combination with image-intensified cameras.
The coast of Gabon is one of the most important nesting sites for the endangered leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea. In this study, hatchling orientation was recorded during natural emergences at Pongara National Park, Gabon. This nesting beach is located close to both the capital of Gabon and a developing resort area, Pointe Denis. Under natural conditions most sea turtle hatchlings emerge at night and orient to the ocean by crawling away from dark, high silhouettes landward towards the bright, low seaward horizons. Artificial lights interfere with natural cues and disrupt hatchling orientation. The relative influence of artificial lights, logs and erosion were assessed on the nesting beach in Pongara National Park using a linear mixed model. We found that the attraction to artificial lights was higher than the effect of silhouette cues landward alone, but could be balanced by the simultaneous presence of the moon. Based upon these results, we recommend combining light management in the resort area to reduce the light pollution on the nesting beach and reinforcement of natural cues landward to minimize the effect of the remaining light pollution from the capital.