ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Occupational Risks and Challenges of Seafaring

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Unlabelled: Seafarers are exposed to a high diversity of occupational health hazards onboard ships. Objective: The aim of this article is to present a survey of the current, most important hazards in seafaring including recommendations on measures how to deal with these problems. Methods: The review is based on maritime expert opinions as well a PubMed analysis related to the occupational risks of seafaring. Results: Despite recent advances in injury prevention, accidents due to harmful working and living conditions at sea and of non-observance of safety rules remain a main cause of injury and death. Mortality in seafaring from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is mainly caused by increased risks and impaired treatment options of CVD at sea. Further, shipboard stress and high demand may lead to fatigue and isolation which have an impact on the health of onboard seafarers. Communicable diseases in seafaring remain an occupational problem. Exposures to hazardous substances and UV-light are important health risks onboard ships. Because of harsh working conditions onboard including environmental conditions, sufficient recreational activities are needed for the seafarers' compensation both onboard and ashore. However, in reality there is often a lack of leisure time possibilities. Discussion: Seafaring is still an occupation with specific work-related risks. Thus, a further reduction of occupational hazards aboard ships is needed and poses a challenge for maritime health specialists and stakeholders. Nowadays, maritime medicine encompasses a broad field of workplaces with different job-related challenges.
Content may be subject to copyright.
J Occup Health 2010; 52: 249–256
Received Mar 14, 2010; Accepted Jun 23, 2010
Published online in J-STAGE Jul 22, 2010
Correspondence to: M. Oldenburg, Department of Maritime
Medicine, Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine
(ZfAM), Seewartenstra
β
e 10, D-20459 Hamburg, Germany
(e-mail: marcus.oldenburg@bsg.hamburg.de)
Journal of
Occupational Health
Occupational Risks and Challenges of Seafaring
Marcus OLDENBURG1, 2, Xaver BAUR2, 3 and Clara SCHLAICH2
1Department of Maritime Medicine, 2Hamburg Port Health Centre, Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine
and 3University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
Abstract: Occupational Risks and Challenges of
Seafaring: Marcus OLDENBURG, et al. Department of
Maritime Medicine, Institute for Occupational and
Maritime Medicine, Germany—Seafarers are
exposed to a high diversity of occupational health
hazards onboard ships. Objective: The aim of this
article is to present a survey of the current, most
important hazards in seafaring including
recommendations on measures how to deal with these
problems. Methods: The review is based on maritime
expert opinions as well a PubMed analysis related to
the occupational risks of seafaring. Results: Despite
recent advances in injury prevention, accidents due to
harmful working and living conditions at sea and of non-
observance of safety rules remain a main cause of
injury and death. Mortality in seafaring from
cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is mainly caused by
increased risks and impaired treatment options of CVD
at sea. Further, shipboard stress and high demand
may lead to fatigue and isolation which have an impact
on the health of onboard seafarers. Communicable
diseases in seafaring remain an occupational problem.
Exposures to hazardous substances and UV-light are
important health risks onboard ships. Because of harsh
working conditions onboard including environmental
conditions, sufficient recreational activities are needed
for the seafarers’ compensation both onboard and
ashore. However, in reality there is often a lack of
leisure time possibilities. Discussion: Seafaring is
still an occupation with specific work-related risks.
Thus, a further reduction of occupational hazards
aboard ships is needed and poses a challenge for
maritime health specialists and stakeholders.
Nowadays, maritime medicine encompasses a broad
field of workplaces with different job-related challenges.
(J Occup Health 2010; 52: 249–256)
Review
Key words: Communicable diseases, Disaster,
Occupational cancer, Occupational risks, Seafaring,
Stress
Occupational Risks in Seafaring
Disasters and accident rates
In the last few decades the disaster and accident rates
in seafaring have fallen sharply1). According to a study
on fatal work-related accidents onboard UK merchant
shipping from 1919 to 2005, large reductions were found
for mortality rates in fatal disasters and personnel
accidents over the course of time2). This trend has been
confirmed by other studies. Major causes of mortality in
shipping disasters were vessels foundering in typhoons,
storms and heavy gales, explosions in cargo holds and
collisions due to poor visibility. Considering the types
of ship the highest mortality rates, up to 400 per 100,000
seafarer-years, were found among fishermen3).
Rough weather, insufficient awareness of safety, lack
of use of personal protective devices as well as
inexperience are regarded as the main causes of fatal
injuries related to work. Many of the fatal occupational
accidents happen among deck ratings and deck officers
and a recurrence of similar accident types is observed,
such as falls into or inside cargo holds, falls overboard
or being struck by heavy seas on deck. Fatal injuries
during off-duty hours are often associated with alcohol
consumption. International Maritime Organization (IMO)
statistics reveal that 80% of accidents onboard cargo ships
are caused by the human factor4).
The available mortality studies about English, Danish
and Polish seafarers onboard merchant ships cover the
1980s and 1990s5–7). The non-natural causes were divided
into accidents occurring during the off-duty hours,
occupational accidents occurring as a direct consequence
of work onboard and maritime disasters (death caused
by shipwreck or capsizing) (Fig. 1). In total, the non-
natural causes ranged between 40% and 50% of all deaths
in these studies. Natural causes in terms of diseases were
found in 36% to 42% of all deaths in the three studies.
250 J Occup Health, Vol. 52, 2010
According to a Danish mortality study, the incidence
of accidents among seafarers was 11.5 times higher than
among the Danish male workforce ashore6). An
explanation offered by the authors is the risk of maritime
disasters in which the workplace itself disappears or is
severely damaged.
Recommendations: Occupational measures are required
to diminish fatal accidents onboard. They should include:
·training and instruction of seafarers in safe behavior
on board, for example during the medical refresher
course
·comprehensive information onboard to raise awareness
on the use of personal protection devices, including
onboard programs in terms of primary and secondary
prevention
·intensified education in the official language on board
(usually English).
All these measures are of importance and a challenge for
maritime health specialists and researchers.
Piracy
In recent years, the issue of piracy has gained
international topicality. The International Maritime
Organization has summarized all incidents of piracy and
armed robbery against ships reported to the Organization
since 19848). The number of acts of piracy and armed
robbery against ships reported to have occurred or to have
been attempted from 1984 until December 2009 was
5,224. In 2009, 403 incidences were observed with a
rising tendency since mid 1990s. Worldwide, the areas
most affected by piracy are the South China Sea, the
coasts of East and West Africa and the Indian Ocean. In
2008, 774 crew members were reportedly taken hostage/
kidnapped and about 38 crew members were still
unaccounted for; 1 vessel was reportedly still unaccounted
for, and 51 ships were reportedly hijacked.
Recommendations: The IMO is implementing an anti-
piracy project, focusing on a number of regional seminars
and workshops attended by Government representatives
from countries in piracy-infested areas of the world. The
ship operators, shipmasters and crew should
comprehensively be advised on prevention and suppression
of acts of piracy and armed robbery against ships.
Impaired treatment options of cardiovascular diseases
at sea
Apart from accidents and work-related injuries acute
CVD is the main cause of death—both at sea and on land
in industrialized countries. In the 1980s and 1990s deaths
due to CVD accounted for 55% to 70% of all natural
causes of death among seamen on British and Danish
merchant ships5, 6). Deaths due to other illnesses
(gastrointestinal, infectious diseases or neoplasm) appears
to have played minor roles.
In other mortality studies, the CVD mortality rate was
found to be from 27 to 45 per 100,000 seafarer-years.
This mortality does not significantly differ from that of
the respective general population ashore, but a healthy
worker effect has to be taken into account among seafarers
who are subjected to pre-employment examinations and
medical surveillance including medical-fitness tests for
nautical service9).
An important difference in the treatment of seafarers
at sea is that medical care onboard is applied by a medical
health officer who is not a medical professional. The
STCW Code (Seafarers’ Training Certification and
Fig. 1. Causes of deaths of seafarers employed on English, Danish, and Polish merchant ships.
251Marcus OLDENBURG, et al.: Occupational Medicine
Watchkeeping, 1978) defines the standard of competence
for such seafarers designated to provide medical first aid
onboard ship10). These seafarers must be able to take
immediately effective actions in the case of accidents or
illness likely to occur on ships.
The treatment options for CVD occurring at sea are
impaired owing to the nature of the rescue team onboard,
the frequently delayed resuscitation actions, the
limitations of treatment onboard as well as the problems
of evacuation ashore. Jaremin and Kotulak (2003)11)
showed in their mortality study covering more than 11,000
Polish seafarers and deep sea fishermen that only one
quarter of the persons with myocardial infarction at sea
was still alive one year after the onset of the acute cardiac
event. As this survival rate significantly differs from that
of Polish employees ashore, it was assumed by the authors
that the myocardial infarction prognosis at sea is worse.
Recommendations: Generally, it should be mentioned
that the possibilities of modern treatment of
cardiovascular diseases (such as acute percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), lysis or
aortocoronary venous bypass (ACVB)) have
fundamentally improved the survival of affected patients
ashore. However, these treatment options necessitate
profound medical/surgical experience; thus they are not
available onboard ships.
During medical surveillance examinations, seafarers
at high risk of cardiac events need to be identified in a
reliable way in order to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Nowadays, well established risk-scores exist allowing
assessment of the likelihood of an initial episode of heart
disease. Seamen with an observed high coronary risk
should be advised and treated according to the
recommendations of the International Task Force for the
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease12). Based on our
results, the most important practical measures available
to decrease CVD risks among seafarers are training cooks
in low-fat diets, offering smoking cessation programs and
treatment of elevated blood pressure9).
For medical treatment at sea the responsible officer
should seek telemedical advice from a radiomedical
physician ashore. It is strongly recommended that
transmissions of telemedical ECG be made available to
the telemedical assistant service to facilitate diagnoses
of patients with unspecific chest pains, especially in cases
of potentially arrhythmic heart diseases.
High load of work-related stress in seafaring
As early as 1998 Agterberg and Passchier described
higher work-related stress in seamen than in the general
population13). Seafaring is associated with special mental,
psychosocial and physical stressors and cannot be
compared with jobs ashore. The working and living
conditions of seafaring are characterized by long-time
separation from family and home for months, economic
pressure as well as considerable and sometimes extreme
psychosocial problems.
In a standardized interview, 134 male seafarers sailing
on German-flagged vessels were asked about their living
and working conditions onboard14). The seamen rated
the individual stress level of 23 different stressors aboard.
This study revealed that separation from the family, time
pressure/ hectic activities, long working hours per day,
heat in workplaces, and insufficient qualifications of
subordinate crew members were the most important
stressors onboard. This study also showed considerable
differences in the duration of shipboard stay between
European and non-European seafarers. Some studies
found an average contract duration from 3 to 6 mo for
European seamen and from 6 to 9 mo for Non-European
ones9, 15). Seafarers with a shipboard stay of more than
12 mo often feel confined onboard a ship. This extreme
long stay is a serious occupational problem because
seamen on such contracts normally have no possibilities
to meet their families during this time period or to follow
other leisure time activities.
Recommendations: On account of the extraordinary
multiplicity of job-related stressors in seafaring, particular
attention should be paid to preventive occupational and
organizational measures. According to the above
mentioned results, it is especially important to shorten
the duration of shipboard stay in order to reduce long-
time separation from family and to minimize extremely
long working hours.
Further, the medical training courses for ship officers
should include prevention messages. The high smoking
consumption of seafarers needs to be paid more attention
through anti-smoking campaigns9, 16, 17). Besides life-style
factors, seafarers should learn how to prevent and how
to manage stress, for instance by making use of relaxation
techniques.
Current studies exploring the efficiency of stress-
prevention strategies are needed.
1) Fatigue
High stress load and isolation may cause
psychosomatic disorders including burn-out syndrome
and fatigue.
There are several reasons for fatigue among seafarers
and fatigue is a major occupational problem aboard many
modern ships. According to the Maritime Labour
Convention (2006) all ships must have a sufficient number
of seafarers employed onboard to ensure that ships are
operated safely and efficiently18). In the last decade,
however, the number of crew members onboard has
decreased considerably. Reduction of Safe Manning
Level leads to reduced shipboard safety and increases
the risk of accidents with possible severe, life-threatening,
environmental and economic consequences.
Further, high job demands and long working hours
252 J Occup Health, Vol. 52, 2010
which are often present in 2 watch systems can result in
fatigue. Crews become more exhausted and tired due to
long working days, especially when having frequent port
turnarounds. Although the relationship between working
hours and mental health problems has not been fully
clarified yet, it is assumed that occupational stressors,
such as long working hours, might impair workers’ health
both psychologically and physically19, 20).
The duration and the quality of sleep are also important.
Sleep requirements and habits may individually vary
considerably but everyone requires unbroken periods of
rest. According to the Maritime Labour Convention
(2006) the maximum hours of work should not exceed
14 h in any 24-hour period and 72 h in any 7-day period18).
There is a strong association between the number of hours
seamen work and sleep deprivation.
Environmental factors such as noise, vibration and
adverse weather conditions also disturb sleep quality.
Recommendations: According to the UK Maritime and
Coastguard Agency (2007) suitable measures to
counteract acute fatigue are to take a break, to have a
nap, to have a drink (water is best) and/ or to have
something to eat (not too heavy). To cope with fatigue,
seafarers should get enough recreational and rest time.
Further, seafarers should ensure that the schedule of their
duties is realistic and can be adhered to in all normal
circumstances. Additionally, shipping companies need
to check the manning levels onboard their ships.
2) Isolation
In recent years, a development in merchant seafaring
has occurred in which reduced crew size owing to modern
techniques has lead to increased workload aboard. The
shortening of turn-around times has resulted in decreased
duration of ship’s stay in port and it has consequently
minimized crews’ social contacts21). Further, the access
for seafarers to areas next to ships has been prohibited
for several years. As a preventive measure against
security incidents affecting ships or port facilities used
in international trade the International Ship and Port
Facility Security (ISPS) Code came into force in 2004.
It is a comprehensive set of measures to enhance the
security of ships and port facilities and was developed in
response to the perceived threats to ships and port
facilities in the wake of the 9/11 attacks in the United
States. The requirements for ships and for port facilities
include the monitoring and controlling of access of people
as well as cargo. In consequence, it is normally very
cumbersome for seamen to leave the ship during a port
stay and pass the port safety barriers. Thus, many seafarer
don’t make the effort to stay ashore in welfare facilities
which unfortunately are often far away from the vessels’
embarkation point.
Seafarers are among the most isolated demographic
working groups in the world, a circumstance which also
refers to access to medical care, both in emergency
situations and for primary health care. As the physical
demands and health requirements of seafaring are
rigorous and the job market appears competitive, many
seafarers are reluctant to seek medical and psychological
help. Some seamen compensate shipboard isolation with
high alcohol consumption. Cheng et al. (2008)
investigated the relationship of occupational stress and
social support with health-related behaviours of smoking
and alcohol consumption among Chinese offshore oil
workers and concluded that work-related stress can affect
health-related behaviours; e.g. alcohol consumption was
positively related to perceived stress from “interface
between job and family/social life”22). Further, it has also
been observed that occupational stress is associated with
digestive problems23). The results of another study
suggested that stress due to management problems and
relationships with others might promote work-related
unintentional injuries24).
In the worst cases strong isolation can lead to despair,
depression and finally to suicide. The largest cause of
traumatic work-related fatalities among British seafaring
sub-groups was suicide25). Couper (1996) cited a threefold
increase in suicide among seafarers, as compared to the
general population26). The main causes for seafarers’
suicides other than isolation are trouble with problems at
home, mental stress and strain onboard or motion sickness
leading to a breakdown in personality and/or the will to
live27).
Recommendations: Measures to diminish isolation in
seafaring are improvements in to-shore
telecommunications (at reasonable charge, guaranteed
privacy of the messages, free access to all ranks) and
promotion of social contacts onboard as well in the port
(shipboard sport events, easily accessible welfare
facilities, pastoral care and anonymous seafarer’s health
counselling). Further, much effort must be paid to
facilitate the access of the seafarers to port welfare
facilities.
In cases of strong isolation, which tends to increase
the risk of suicide, psychological support must be
available in seafarers’ port welfare facilities.
3) Multinational crews
Shipboard stress may be a consequence of the specific
psychosocial demands on ships. Besides a heavy work-
load and isolation, multinational crews have been
recognized as a stressor. Approximately 65% of the
world’s merchant fleet is manned with multinational
crews28). Crews consist not only of many different
nationalities but also of members from different religious
and cultural backgrounds. Reflecting this, different needs,
values and expectations exist29).
Today, most seafarers originate from South East Asia,
predominately from the Philippines. Generally, they
253Marcus OLDENBURG, et al.: Occupational Medicine
provide cheaper labour than seafarers from Western
Europe, they are easier to recruit and to keep in business.
Many Philippines seafarers are doing low skilled or
unskilled work and they are subject to poor social security.
Although their stays on board often last for a long time,
they usually have only short duration contracts. That
means that their contracts are restricted only to temporary
voyages and afterwards they have to reapply for a
subsequent contract at specific agencies. If they lose their
job due to temporary unfitness, it is scarcely possible for
them to find subsequent employment on a ship. Although
multinational crews do not necessarily lead to isolation,
the often observed communication problems onboard may
cause isolation30).
Most of the available studies about occupational health
and safety at sea concern populations from Europe.
However, little is known about the large number of
seafarers from South East Asia and other parts of the
world. The known lower level of emotionally expressive
behaviour of Asians may have an impact on seafarers’
safety and is possibly caused by neural time course
differences of the populations in the processing of
emotional events31). Due to genetic variations in the South
Asian population, differences in the individual genetic
susceptibility or resistance to diseases of Asians are
assumed32).
Recommendations: Kahveci et al. (2001) performed a
study from 1999 to 2001 aboard 14 ships and interviewed
more than 510 seafarers33). They found that multinational
crews can operate extremely successfully under conditions
which need to be introduced or developed onboard. These
were: high levels of fluency in the working language of
the ship among both officers and ratings; policies
encouraging stable crewing; promotion of social activities
onboard via masters and senior officers; minimize the
circulation of materials reinforcing cultural and national
stereotypes which can often be found onboard.
4) Limited opportunities for recreation
The often observed lack of leisure time facilities, such
as fitness-rooms or social events, often impairs seafarers’
well-being onboard ship. Regular, vigorous exercise
contributes to a general sense of physical, psychological
and social well-being and stops unused muscles becoming
flabby thereby reducing the risk of accident or injury.
Sport not only improves health but, due to social
interaction, it also encourages team-building. Well-being
onboard is essential for seafarer’s health promotion and
also for ship security. The occurrence of psycho-
emotional stress of seafarers is often associated with
disturbed sexual life and with disturbed working and
resting regimes due to time zone changes34).
Recommendations: Ship managers as well as the
shipping company can organize social and sport events
or provide well-equipped fitness-rooms onboard. Quality
of life onboard, especially leisure time as an important
source of recreation, needs to be improved.
Environmental stressors on board
Not only during working time but also during leisure
time seafarers are continuously exposed to ship-related
environmental stress factors such as ship motion, noise
and vibration. These factors are perceived as stressful
(especially during sleeping times) and can distinctly
impact the recreational value of leisure time. Further,
depending on the weather, ship motion can be very
stressful. Severe seasickness can distinctly impair a
crew’s well-being onboard and seafarers suffering from
it are incapable of changing it if they do not respond to
treatment or medication is not available on board.
Recommendations: Reduction of the exposure levels
to noise in all accommodation, recreational and catering
facilities is critical. Seafarers should be informed about
the adverse effects of exposure to excessive noise on the
hearing and instructed in the proper use of noise protection
devices and equipment.
Communicable diseases
International travel and trade is associated with an
increased risk of spreading communicable diseases across
borders. Outbreak reports and systematic studies mainly
rely on disease activity on cruise ships. A systematic
review of the literature conducted by the WHO revealed
that more than 100 disease outbreaks were associated with
ships during the period from 1970 to 200035).
Most publications of infectious disease risk onboard
are based on data from pre-employment exams, reports
of port clinics and case/outbreak examinations. In a study
conducted by our institute the documented entries in 49
medical log books from seagoing cargo ships under the
German flag between 2000 and 2008 were evaluated in
order to assess the incidence rate of communicable
diseases onboard. Nearly one fourth of the visits to the
ships’ infirmary were due to presumably communicable
diseases with 75% of those being classified as acute
respiratory diseases36).
Disease outbreaks due to Novovirus or influenza A and
B infection on cruise or military ships have been
repeatedly reported37, 38). Recently, the novel influenza A
H1N1 has attracted worldwide attention. Other
communicable disease risks which have been documented
in seafarers are vaccine-preventable diseases, such as
rubella, chickenpox, measles, influenza and other
respiratory diseases (tuberculosis)39, 40).
Vector-born diseases are a well known risk to seafarers.
The occurrence of malaria has been documented as an
occupational hazard. Other vector-born diseases have
not been described in seafarers yet, but occur frequently
among travellers in regions at risk of these diseases, such
as Dengue Fever and Chikungunya Fever; thus seafarers
254 J Occup Health, Vol. 52, 2010
can be assumed to be a population at risk41, 42).
Blood-born and sexually-transmitted diseases (Hep B,
C , HIV) also pose a risk to seafarers who have to rely on
local health systems in port. Also unsafe procedures,
such as tattooing or unsafe sex, play a role. According to
a survey among 158 seafarers visiting the International
Seamen’s Club in the port of Hamburg nearly 20% of
seafarers stated having casual sexual contacts while away
from home43).
A main cause for the spread of communicable diseases
onboard is that crew members with different susceptibility
to infection share living quarters, common food and water
supplies as well as sanitation and air-conditioning
systems44). At present, onboard food and water hygiene
is highly variable and may be a source of disease, such
as gastrointestinal or legionnaire’s disease45, 46).
Recommendations: Preventive measures such as
proper water and food sanitation, access to safe medical
care in ports (with anonymous testing of sexual
transmitted diseases and health counselling), vaccination
of crew, allocation of seafarers to single cabins, early
treatment and isolation of infectious/respiratory diseases
may be useful tools for safeguarding ship operation.
Occupational cancer
Most of the available cancer studies of seafarers are
from the Swedish Family-Cancer Database from 1961 to
1998. For example, according to Nilsson (1998), in
Swedish engine officers and ratings age-standardized
cumulative cancer incidence ratios (SIR) for lung cancer
were more than twice as high as expected47) (SIR 2.1).
Occupational exposure to benzene may have contributed
to the increased risk of chronic myeloid leukaemia (SIR
3.15)48). Further, exposure to sunlight has been found to
be associated with significantly elevated incidences of
lip cancer among seafarers (SIR 2.74)49).
The causes of the elevated risk of some cancers among
seamen are not clear, but life-style related factors such
as alcohol, smoking and diet have been regarded as
causative. Further, exposures to UV-light from the sun
during voyages represent a risk for skin cancer
(particularly near the equator where exposure is 2 to 4
times higher than in Northern-Europe).
Ships transport all kinds of goods including toxic
cargoes. Particularly, crews on chemical and product
tankers can have contact with them. Product tankers
mainly carry petroleum products such as gasoline,
whereas chemical tankers transport a wide range of
chemicals including petroleum products. Especially
during tank cleaning, loading and unloading of gasoline,
high benzene concentrations up to some 100 ppm have
been measured47). Transport containers frequently have
high concentrations of fumigants and/or toxic industrial
chemicals50). Although these containers are not usually
opened during the voyage they are not tight and some
exposures take place.
Further, the engine room crew is exposed to a variety
of exposures with possible harm to health, such as
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Moen et al. (1996)
found traces of degraded hydrocarbon products and other
chemicals in the urine of ship engineers51). The clinical
importance of these findings, however, is still unclear.
In accommodation aboard tankers, toxic substances can
also accumulate and affect the indoor climate in some
cases. Asbestos was commonly used as an insulating
material in ship building until the mid 1970s. In the last
30 yr, however, asbestos has only been used in
shipbuilding to a very limited extent.
Recommendations: Ongoing training and safe handling
of hazardous substances as well as in the proper use of
personnel protection devices is needed. As heavy
smoking and alcohol habits may also considerably
contribute to the increased risk of some cancers, seafarers
should be advised on abandoning unhealthy lifestyles
including excessive exposure to UV-light.
Seafarers handling toxic substances should be subjected
to repeated bio-monitoring examinations during their
medical fitness tests for nautical service in order to detect
hazardous exposures at an early stage.
Conclusions
Seafaring is characterized by several occupational
risks: accidents and maritime disasters, piracy, impaired
treatment options for CVD, high shipboard stress levels
including fatigue and isolation, communicable diseases
and exposures to hazardous substances. Despite
improvements in occupational safety standards onboard,
seafaring is still a high risk occupation, not only during
working hours but also during leisure time.
The most important measures for diminishing the
occupational health risks of seafaring include primary
and secondary prevention of work-related hazards arising
from unsafe practices and toxic substances, psychological
stress and lifestyle risks. Also, measures should be
focused on improving the first-aid education of crews,
and the optimization of medical care as well as the
hygiene conditions on vessels. Additionally, long
separation from families, long working hours and
communication problems owing to different shipboard
languages are all promoters of fatigue and isolation and
should be minimized.
References
1) Hisamune S, Amagai K, Kimura N, Kishida K. A study
of factors relating to work accidents among seamen.
Ind Health 2006; 44: 144–9.
2) Roberts SE. Fatal work-related accidents in UK
merchant shipping from 1919 to 2005. Occup Med
(Lond) 2008; 58: 129–37.
3) Roberts SE. Occupational mortality in British
commercial fishing, 1976–95. Occup Environ Med
255Marcus OLDENBURG, et al.: Occupational Medicine
2004; 61: 16–23.
4) International Maritime Organization (IMO, 2002)
IMO’S 50th Anniversary—a record of success.
[Online]. 2002 [cited 2010 Mar 6]; Available from:
URL:http://www.imo.org/About/
mainframe.asp?topic_id=321
5) Roberts SE, Hansen HL. An analysis of the causes of
mortality among seafarers in the British merchant fleet
(1986–1995) and recommendations for their reduction.
Occup Med (Lond) 2002; 52: 195–202.
6) Hansen HL. Surveillance of deaths on board Danish
merchant ships, 1986–93: implications for prevention.
Occup Environ Med 1996; 53: 269–75.
7) Jaremin B, Kotulak E, Starnawska M, Tomaszunas S.
Causes and circumstances of deaths of Polish seafarers
during sea voyages. J Travel Med 1996; 3: 91–5.
8) International Maritime Organization (IMO, 2010).
MSC.4 (Reports on Piracy and armed robbery against
ships). [Online]. 2010 [cited 2010 Mar 6]; Available
from: URL: http://www.imo.org/includes/
blastDataOnly.asp/data_id%3D27321/147.pdf
9) Oldenburg M, Jensen H-J, Latza U, Baur X. Coronary
risks among seafarers aboard German-flagged ships.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008; 81: 735–41.
10) STCW. International convention of standards of
training, certification and watchkeeping for seafarers.
Seafarers’ training certification and watchkeeping code
1978. [Online]. 1978 [cited 2010 Mar 6]; Available
from: URL: http://www.imo.org/Conventions/
contents.asp?doc_id=651&topic_id=257
11) Jaremin B, Kotulak E. Myocardial infarction (MI) at
the work-site among Polish seafarers. The risk and the
impact of occupational factors. Int Marit Health 2003;
54: 26–39.
12) Assmann G, Carmena R, Cullen P, et al. Coronary heart
disease: reducing the risk: a worldwide view.
International task force for the prevention of coronary
heart disease. Circulation 1999; 100: 1930–8.
13) Agterberg G, Passchier J. Stress among seamen.
Psychol Rep 1998; 83: 708–10.
14) Oldenburg M, Jensen H-J, Latza U, Baur X. Seafaring
stressors aboard merchant and passenger ships. Int J
Public Health 2009; 54: 1–10.
15) Jensen OC, Sørensen JF, Thomas M, Canals ML,
Nikolic N, Hu Y. Working conditions in international
seafaring. Occup Med (Lond) 2006; 56: 393–7.
16) Kirkutis A, Norkiene S, Griciene P, Gricius J, Yang S,
Gintautas J. Prevalence of hypertension in Lithuanian
mariners. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 2004; 47: 71–5.
17) Hansen HL, Jensen J. Female seafarers adopt the high
risk lifestyle of male seafarers. Occup Environ Med
1998; 55: 49–51.
18) Maritime Labour Convention 2006. [Online]. 2006
[cited 2010 Mar 6]; Available from: URL: http://
www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—
normes/documents/normativeinstrument/
wcms_090250.pdf
19) Chen WQ, Wong TW, Yu TS. Influence of occupational
stress on mental health among Chinese off-shore oil
workers. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37: 766–73.
20) Fujino Y, Horie S, Hoshuyama T, Tsutsui T, Tanaka Y.
A systematic review of working hours and mental
health burden. San Ei Shi 2006; 48: 87–97.
21) Kaheveci E. Fast turnaround ships and their impact on
crews. Seafarers Int Res Centre (SIRC) 1999.
22) Chen WQ, Wong TW, Yu IT. Association of
occupational stress and social support with health-
related behaviors among chinese offshore oil workers.
J Occup Health 2008; 50: 262–9.
23) Chen WQ, Wong TW, Yu TS. Direct and interactive
effects of occupational stress and coping on ulcer-like
symptoms among Chinese male off-shore oil workers.
Am J Ind Med 2009; 52: 500–8.
24) Chen W, Huang Z, Yu D, Lin Y, Ling Z, Tang J. An
exploratory study on occupational stress and work-
related unintentional injury in off-shore oil production.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2002; 23: 441–4.
25) Mayhew C. Work-related traumatic deaths of British
and Australian seafarers: what are the causes and how
can they be prevented? Seafarers International Research
Centre; Cardiff University: Cardiff, 1999.
[Online].1999 [cited 2010 Mar 6]; Available from:
URL: http://www.sirc.cf.ac.uk/pdf/
Work%20related%20traumatic%20deaths.pdf
26) Couper A. Discussion comments in: proceedings of a
research workshop on fatigue in the maritime industry.
Cardiff: Seafarers international research centre,
university of Wales, April 23–25, and May 7–9, 1996.
27) Low A. Seafarers and passengers who disappear
without a trace from aboard ships. Int Marit Health
2006; 57: 219–29.
28) Lane AD, Obando-Rojas B, Wu B, Tasiran A. Crewing
the international merchant fleet. London: Lloyd’s
Register - Fairplay Ltd; 2002.
29) Knudsen F. “If you are a good leader, I am a good
follower”. Working and leisure relationships between
Danish and Filipino seafarers on board Danish ships.
Research Unit of Maritime Medicine. ISBN 87-90866-
09-6; 2004.
30) Sampson H, Thomas M. The social isolation of
seafarers: causes, effects, and remedies. Int Marit
Health 2003; 54: 58–67.
31) Hot P, Saito Y, Mandai O, Kobayashi T, Sequeira H.
An ERP investigation of emotional processing in
European and Japanese individuals. Brain Res 2006;
29: 171–8.
32) Ayub Q, Tyler-Smith C. Genetic variation in South
Asia: assessing the influences of geography, language
and ethnicity for understanding history and disease risk.
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2009; 8: 395–404.
33) Kahveci E, Lane T, Sampson H. Transnational seafarer
communities. Seafarers Int Res Centre Cardiff (SIRC);
2001.
34) Salyga J, Juozulynas A. Association between
environment and psycho-emotional stress experienced
at sea by Lithuanian and Latvian seamen. Medicina
(Kaunas) 2006; 42: 759–69.
35) World Health Organization. Sustainable development
and healthy environments. Sanitation on ships.
Compendium of outbreaks of foodborne and
256 J Occup Health, Vol. 52, 2010
waterborne disease and legionair’s disease associated
with ships, 1970–2000, WHO/SDE/WSH/01.4; 2001.
[Online]. 2001 [cited 2010 Mar 6]; Available from:
URL: http://www:who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/
fs269/en/
36) Schlaich CC, Oldenburg M, Lamshöft M. Estimating
the risk of communicable diseases aboard cargo ships.
J Travel Med 2009; 16: 402–6.
37) Brotherton JML, Delpech VC, Gilbert GL, Hatzi S,
Paraskevopoulos PD, Mcanulty JM. A large outbreak
of influenza A and B on a cruise ship causing
widespread morbidity. Epidemiol Infect 2003; 130:
263–71.
38) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza
B virus outbreak on a cruise ship—northern Europe
2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001; 50: 137–
40.
39) Buff AM, Deshpande SJ, Harrington TA, et al.
Investigation of mycobacterium tuberculosis
transmission aboard U.S.S. Ronald Reagan 2006. Mil
Med 2008; 173: 588–93.
40) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rubella
among crew members of commercial cruise ships—
Florida 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;
46: 1247–50.
41) Nikolic N, Poljak I, Troselj-Vukic B. Malaria, a travel
health problem in the maritime community. J Travel
Med 2000; 7: 309–13.
42) Tomaszunas S. Malaria in seafarers. 1. The magnitude
of the problem and the strategy of its control. 2.The
status of malaria in large ports of the world. Protective
measures against malaria in crews of ships. Bull Inst
Marit Trop Med Gdynia 1998; 49: 53–61, 63–71.
43) Schlaich C, Reinke A, Rosin I, et al. Seafarers health
counselling in the port of Hamburg—revisiting the
Brussels agreement 1924. In: Quality maritime health
& seafarers welfare—a global perspective. 10th
International symposium on maritime health, Goa–
India 23–26.9.2009. Book of abstracts. Goa (India):
International Maritime Health Association.
44) Kak V. Infections in confined spaces: cruise ships,
military barracks, and college dormitories. Infect Dis
Clin North Am 2007; 21: 773–84.
45) Cayla JA, Maldonado R, Gonzalez J, et al.
Legionellosis study group. A small outbreak of
Legionnaires disease in a cargo ship under repair. Eur
Respir J 2001: 1322–7.
46) Lamshöft MM, Schlaich C. Estimating the risk of
communicable diseases aboard cargo ships. In:
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control,
ed. European Scientific Conference on Applied
Infectious Disease Epidemiology (ESCAIDE) 2008.
Abstract book. Berlin: ECDC; 2008. p.26.
47) Nilsson R. Cancer in seamen with special reference to
chemical health hazards. Department of
InternalMedicine, Section of Occupational Medicine,
Göteborg University. ISBN 91-7876-999-X; 1998.
48) Jianguang J, Hemminki K. Occurrences of leukemia
subtypes by socioeconomic and occupational groups
in Sweden. J Occup Environ Med 2005; 47: 1131–40.
49) Jianguang J, Hemminki K. Occupation and upper
aerodigestive tract cancers: a follow-up study in
Sweden. J Occup Environ Med 2005; 47: 785–95.
50) Baur X, Yu F, Poschadel B, Veldman W, Vos TK. Health
risks by bromomethane and other toxic gases in import
cargo ship containers. Int Marit Health 2006; 57: 46–
55.
51) Moen BE, Nilsson R, Nordlinder R, et al. Assessment
of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in
engine rooms by measurement of urinary 1-
hydroxypyrene. Occup Environ Med 1996; 53: 692–6.
... Competence needs are easily fulfilled because of the nature of seafarer work, which involves global navigation and offers high income [16,17]. By contrast, satisfying autonomy and relatedness needs can be more challenging because of onboard work discipline and social isolation [18,19]. ...
... From the job demands-resources viewpoint, the fit between an individual and their work depends not only on their job characteristics but also on their work conditions [32]. Seafaring jobs involve long periods characterized by family separation, social isolation, male dominance, and obedience [18,19,33]. These job demands are more likely to generate a personework fit with seafarers characterized by higher competence, lower autonomy, and relatedness needs. ...
... Leading international charities and insurance companies in the maritime sector express concerns regarding the mental health and well-being of seafarers (Sampson & Ellis, 2021). Based on the opinions of maritime experts, (Oldenburg et al., 2010) emphasized in their study that the maritime profession is a stressful occupational group due to the risks it entails. They highlighted unsafe conditions, hazardous chemicals, psychological stress, and lifestyle risks at sea as some of the threatening factors to seafarers' health. ...
... Hence, they find their social lives circumscribed, 1 predisposing them to a myriad of psychological and physical challenges. 2 Seafarers are often onboard a ship for several long hours faced with adverse weather conditions such as "high pitched noises, vibrations, cold spells, high temperatures and unstable moisture conditions" 3 which does not augur their physical health. ...
Article
Full-text available
The psychosocial well-being of every individual is as important as the well-being of long-distance voyages, especially that they have to spend longer hours and days travelling to their destinations with all the experiences of adventure and adversities characterizing the journey. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the psychosocial well-being of long-distance travellers on board shipping vessels to gain an understanding of their psychological and social well-being with the objective of ameliorating the adversities associated with these travels. A systematic review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2020) statement. The databases to be searched for the data will be limited to Scopus, Web of Science, and Advanced Google Scholar using keywords selected by the reviewers. Meta-analysis, narrative synthesis, or both will be used depending on the extent of heterogeneity across eligible observational studies included in the review. Some specific countries will be selected for data extraction, and only data published in English will be included. It is expected that the findings from this review will bring to bear if these categories of travellers are prone to risks that affect their psychosocial wellbeing and if so discovered. This protocol was registered with the PROSPERO. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024517277(08/03/2024)
... A study with a South Korean sample shows that married seafarers have significantly lower levels of interpersonal sensitivity, obsessive-compulsive behaviour and psychoticism than unmarried seafarers (Kim & Jang, 2016). Research on seafaring identified various stress factors related to the characteristics of work at sea that can affect the well-being of crew on board, such as noise, heat, cold, ship movements and jet lag (Oldenburg et al., 2010). However, one of the biggest stressors of seafaring is living and working in a close environment with the same crew members over a long period of time, which affects mental health (Sandal et al., 2006). ...
Article
Seafaring is a demanding profession, characterised by environmental stressors such as noise, extreme temperatures, ship movements and jet lag. However, a particular challenge for seafarers is living with the same crew for long periods of time, which often affects their quality of life on board. The male-dominated culture of the sector, which promotes traditional masculinity and occasional bullying, further complicates matters. The study explores how seafarers’ sensitivity to diversity affects their quality of life at sea. Data were collected from 292 Italian seafarers between January and August 2023. The predominantly male sample, (95.2% male) with an average age of 40.63 years and 16.26 years of sea service, represented different ranks in deck and engine departments. An online questionnaire was used to collect demographic data, stress sensitivity, sleep patterns, burnout, and job satisfaction. Latent class analysis revealed three groups of seafarers based on their responses to diversity and shared spaces. Class 1 (10.6%) was highly sensitive to all stressors, while Class 3 (45.5%) had moderate levels of stress related to shared spaces, interpersonal conflict, and language barriers. Class 2 (43.8%) had the lowest stress levels in these areas. ANOVAs were performed to assess differences between groups on psychological well-being indicators (stress sensitivity, sleep-wake cycle problems, burnout, and organisational satisfaction). Class 1 reported lower job satisfaction and higher perceptions of a negative work environment than Class 2, while Class 3 denoted no significant differences with other classes. In summary, seafarers’ sensitivity to diversity significantly affects their well-being, consistent with the Minority Stress Model. It is critical to acknowledge and address these diversity-related stressors. Creating an inclusive, non-discriminatory work environment can improve the quality of life for seafarers from diverse backgrounds in the maritime industry.
... A study with a South Korean sample shows that married seafarers have significantly lower levels of interpersonal sensitivity, obsessive-compulsive behaviour and psychoticism than unmarried seafarers (Kim & Jang, 2016). Research on seafaring identified various stress factors related to the characteristics of work at sea that can affect the well-being of crew on board, such as noise, heat, cold, ship movements and jet lag (Oldenburg et al., 2010). However, one of the biggest stressors of seafaring is living and working in a close environment with the same crew members over a long period of time, which affects mental health (Sandal et al., 2006). ...
Article
Seafaring is a demanding profession, characterised by environmental stressors such as noise, extreme temperatures, ship movements and jet lag. However, a particular challenge for seafarers is living with the same crew for long periods of time, which often affects their quality of life on board. The male-dominated culture of the sector, which promotes traditional masculinity and occasional bullying, further complicates matters. The study explores how seafarers’ sensitivity to diversity affects their quality of life at sea. Data were collected from 292 Italian seafarers between January and August 2023. The predominantly male sample, (95.2% male) with an average age of 40.63 years and 16.26 years of sea service, represented different ranks in deck and engine departments. An online questionnaire was used to collect demographic data, stress sensitivity, sleep patterns, burnout, and job satisfaction. Latent class analysis revealed three groups of seafarers based on their responses to diversity and shared spaces. Class 1 (10.6%) was highly sensitive to all stressors, while Class 3 (45.5%) had moderate levels of stress related to shared spaces, interpersonal conflict, and language barriers. Class 2 (43.8%) had the lowest stress levels in these areas. ANOVAs were performed to assess differences between groups on psychological well-being indicators (stress sensitivity, sleep-wake cycle problems, burnout, and organisational satisfaction). Class 1 reported lower job satisfaction and higher perceptions of a negative work environment than Class 2, while Class 3 denoted no significant differences with other classes. In summary, seafarers’ sensitivity to diversity significantly affects their well-being, consistent with the Minority Stress Model. It is critical to acknowledge and address these diversity-related stressors. Creating an inclusive, non-discriminatory work environment can improve the quality of life for seafarers from diverse backgrounds in the maritime industry.
... Environmental concerns, such as the impact of cruise ships on marine ecosystems and air quality, have been raised by environmental activists and governments (Brida & Zapata, 2010;Copeland, 2008;GhulamRabbany et al., 2013;Klein, 2010). In addition, there have been concerns about crew members' labour practices, working conditions, and safety and security issues on board cruise ships (Dahl, 2020;Oldenburg et al., 2010;Vukonić et al., 2016). Despite these challenges, the cruise tourism industry remains a significant and growing sector of the global tourism industry. ...
Article
Full-text available
Cruise tourism comprises having a vacation on a large passenger ship or boat, typically visiting several destinations along a predetermined itinerary, and it has taken the attention of academicians for the past two decades. This research study conducts a comprehensive longitudinal analysis of cruise tourism research covering 2003 to 2022. A meticulous selection process identifies 590 seminal articles from the Scopus database, which are then subjected to thorough bibliometric analysis. The R package (Bibliometrix R-package) is utilised to conduct the bibliometric analysis that incorporates various indicators to comprehend the overall trends in cruise tourism research, including annual output, top journal, prolific author, influential articles, author keywords, co-citations, and social structures. The analysis findings indicated that the United States and China emerged as the leading countries in cruise tourism research. Moreover, keywords like cruise tourism, cruise industry, cruise ships, cruise travel, and cruise experience appeared frequently, indicating their prominence within the domain. The insights gained from this analysis provide valuable strategic information for researchers, aiding them in developing and planning their future studies in cruise tourism.
... This research delves into the intricate domain of ship machinery maintenance and control systems, situated within the broader context of maritime transportation vocational schools. These institutions play a pivotal role in preparing future seafarers and maritime professionals equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate the challenges of a rapidly evolving industry (Oldenburg et al., 2010). Central to this study is the integration of qualitative perspectives and experiential insights from various stakeholders: maritime professionals, seasoned educators, and senior cadets who have immersed themselves in year-long internships within port and shipping environments. ...
Article
Full-text available
This research investigates ship machinery maintenance and control systems within maritime transportation vocational schools, focusing on integrating practical experiences and stakeholder perspectives. Qualitative data from maritime professionals, educators, and senior cadets highlight the importance of predictive maintenance strategies and advanced technologies such as IoT and AI in enhancing operational efficiency and reducing costs. The study identifies a skills gap among professionals, emphasising the need for continuous training to bridge this divide. Longitudinal internship analysis reveals significant skill development and practical knowledge acquisition among senior cadets, underscoring the effectiveness of experiential learning in vocational education. Furthermore, a transdisciplinary approach elucidates trends in sustainability integration, promoting eco-friendly practices and economic resilience within maritime operations. The findings advocate for curriculum updates that align with industry demands, preparing graduates for sustainable and competitive careers in the evolving maritime sector.
Article
Full-text available
This study explores how internship programmes empower maritime education by effectively aligning academic training with dynamic industry demands. Through qualitative analysis involving industry experts, vocational students, and academicians, the research assesses the profound impact of internships on competency development in port and shipping management, marine sciences, and sustainable practices. Findings demonstrate that internships significantly enhance both technical and soft skills among students, equipping them with the practical knowledge and adaptability crucial for success in maritime careers. Industry experts consistently recognise internship graduates as well-prepared, while employers express high satisfaction in their performance and readiness for professional roles. Vocational students report substantial personal and professional growth, attributing their career readiness to the hands-on experiences gained during internships. A longitudinal study affirms the enduring benefits of internship initiatives, revealing sustained career advancement and job satisfaction among alumni. The research underscores the pivotal role of internships in empowering maritime education, fostering industry-ready professionals, and driving innovation across maritime sectors. Recommendations include ongoing curriculum alignment, emphasis on soft skills development, and enhancement of internship frameworks to sustain educational excellence and industry relevance.
Article
One of the uniqueness and challenges of seafarers in working on a ship is transferring from one ship to another, where each ship is different so that the risks or dangers of each ship also vary. The purpose of this research is to find out the initial steps for seafarers who have just joined work, so that they are familiar with their new ship (safety equipment, equipment and work procedures, etc.) as well as the potential dangers that may occur including alarms, tasks and actions in dealing with these distress situations. The research uses a literature review method, with references to national and international regulations in the maritime sector, maritime publications, journals, books and other relevant sources. The results of the research, Shipboard Safety Familiarization is an obligation that must be given to crew members who have just joined a ship, even though by standard Seafarers before working on a ship already have knowledge and skills related to safety equipment, firefighting, medical, effective communication, and distress conditions. (from alarms, fastest refugee routes, to actions that must be implemented). Familiarization is provided by the Captain or appointed Officer and the Crew they replace regarding safety equipment and work equipment, Duties and Responsibilities according to position and when there is a Danger situation, rules and decisions regarding Work Safety and Security of the Company that operates the ship with a gradual duration of time
Article
Full-text available
Abstract There have been scores if not hundreds of in-house commercial studies aimed at finding ways of reducing port turnaround times and it would be surprising if at this very moment of reading these words someone, somewhere, is not considering how turnaround in some port or other cannot be shaved by an hour or two. An enormous amount of logistical and technological ingenuity has been deployed by production engineers, naval architects, civil engineers and transport planners to finding ways of ensuring that ships spend the maximum possible amount of time at sea. Unfortunately, the application of all this intelligence and disciplined energy was not matched by studies of the effects of these 'efficiency gains' for the lives of seafarers. For whatever reasons, this study is the very first publicly available detailed comparative analysis of turnaround times. The study also offers some preliminary exploration of the social cost incurred by seafarers but acknowledges that the effects of social isolation produced as a consequence of fast turnarounds, is a subject needing further investigation. The data presented here compares turnaround times in two periods - 1970 and 1998 - in a real port which has been given the fictitious name of Sandhaven. 1970 marks the beginning of our inquiry here because, as Alderton’s study suggests, in the century prior to the 1970s turnaround times had changed very little. The substantial and across the board reductions that have occurred in the industry are relatively recent. As we shall see in some detail, in 1970 the average turnaround time in the port of Sandhaven for all ship-types was almost six days (138 hours). By 1998 the average stay had been reduced to 16 hours and over the whole voyage cycle the average ship regardless of type spent 93 per cent of its time at sea – a nine-fold reduction. over the last 30 years. A discussion of the impact of these changes on seafarers’ lives changes is the subject of a more exploratory investigation in the final section of the study where first-person commentaries from seafarers and other professionals concerned with welfare are used to raise important issues concerned with seafarers’ mental and physical well-being.
Article
Full-text available
To study the mortality of women in an occupation known to have a high mortality among men. A total of 6788 female seafarers of all job categories who had been employed on Danish merchant ships, passenger ships, and privately owned ferries between 1986 and 1993, were followed up until the end of 1993. Standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.20 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.89 to 1.58) for all causes of death and job categories together. For women in traditionally male jobs, SMR was 2.82 (1.41-5.05), whereas galley and catering staff had SMRs close to the general female population. The high mortality among women in traditional male jobs could be explained by a high risk of fatal accidents including occupational accidents. In the whole cohort, there were fewer deaths from natural causes than expected but an excess risk of death due to lung cancer, heart diseases, and non-natural deaths. The increased mortality could primarily be explained by an excess risk of fatal accidents and suicide. Especially, female seafarers entering traditional male jobs had a high risk of fatal accidents, not only at sea but also ashore. An excess risk of dying of lung cancer and heart diseases probably reflects a high tobacco consumption. Female seafarers are probably influenced by their occupation towards hazardous behaviour and a high risk lifestyle but people with a high risk lifestyle may also be attracted by or forced into high risk jobs such as traditional male jobs at sea.
Article
Worldwide, cardiovascular diseases are now the most common cause of death and a substantial source of chronic disability and health costs. In the light of new data from clinical trials and a fuller understanding of risk factors, the International Task Force for the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease, in cooperation with the International Atherosclerosis Society, prepared a revised and comprehensive statement regarding the scientific basis of the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. The following is a short account of the clinical implications of this statement. It is best read in conjunction with the full document, which can be found at http://www.chd-taskforce.com Assessing a patient’s overall or global risk of cardiovascular disease is the first step in preventive care, for it enables the physician to identify and provide the appropriate level of treatment for risk factors. Much can be learned from measuring even a few risk factors. The fuller the knowledge of the patient’s risk status, the sounder the treatment decisions. Initial costs may be offset by long-term rational treatment. The goals of treatment and, hence, the extent of dietary change and the need for (and choice and dosage of) drug treatment all depend on global risk assessment. Two methods for determining global risk follow. Note and tabulate the following risk factors, including those laboratory investigations that are available. ### Age, Sex, and Menopausal Status Risk increases progressively with adult age, and coronary heart disease (CHD) is most common after the age of 60 years. In premenopausal women, CHD is rare (except in those who use oral contraceptives and smoke). After menopause, risk increases steeply, approaching that of men after the age of 70 years. ### History of Cardiovascular Disease The risk of further CHD events or stroke is much higher in persons with a history of myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, or intermittent claudication and in those who have ischemic …
Article
Background: Three to five hundred million cases of malaria occur annually, causing over one to two million deaths. Malaria is one of the leading causes of fever, resulting from travel in tropical or subtropical countries. That risk is very high, especially for sailors. By the nature of their job they cannot avoid malarial regions and generally suffer from the lack of medical help aboard, insufficient knowledge of preventive measures, and lack of up-to-date information about chloroquine resistant areas.Methods: Retrospective analysis embraced all cases of malaria among seafarers employed in the years 1990–1993 by the Croatian sea carrier Losšinjska Plovidba, and cases treated at the Clinic for Infectious Diseases, Rijeka, in the same period.Results: In that period, among seafarers treated in our Port Health Office there were registered 23 cases of malaria; 19 cases among sailors and 4 among tourists, all of them aboard merchant ships. Among seafarers treated in the Clinic for Infectious Diseases from 1990–1993 there were 13 malaria patients, 12 of them sailors and 1 tourist.Conclusion:The aim of this work is to study the morbidity of malaria on board ships owned by the Croatian shipping company Losšinjska Plovidba in the 4-year period 1990–1993 and point to the lack of a health system for their health protection. It can be concluded that the severity of malaria, the number of complications, the period of disablement for work, permanent health damage in a marked number of young persons on duty abroad, all clearly demonstrate the individual and social costs of this disease in Croatia and the maritime community worldwide.
Article
International travel and trade are known to be associated with the risk of spreading communicable diseases across borders. No international surveillance system for infectious diseases on ships exists. Outbreak reports and systematic studies mainly focus on disease activity on cruise ships. The study aims to assess the relevance of communicable disease occurrence on cargo ships. Retrospective analysis of all documented entries to 49 medical log books from seagoing cargo ships under German flag between 2000 and 2008. Incidence rates were calculated per 100 person-years at sea. Case series of acute respiratory illness, influenza-like illness, and infectious gastrointestinal illness affecting more than two persons within 1 successive week were classified as an outbreak. Attack rates were calculated based on number of entries to the medical log book in comparison to the average shipboard population during outbreak periods. During more than 1.5 million person-days of observation, 21% of the visits to the ship's infirmary were due to presumably communicable diseases (45.8 consultations per 100 person-years). As many as 33.9 patients per 100 person-years sought medical attention for acute respiratory symptoms. Of the 68 outbreaks that met predefined criteria, 66 were caused by acute respiratory illness with a subset of 12 outbreaks caused by influenza-like illness. Attack rates ranged between 3 and 10 affected seafarers per ship (12.5&-41.6% of the crew). Two outbreaks of gastrointestinal illness were detected. Respiratory illness is the most common cause of presumably communicable diseases aboard cargo ships and may cause outbreaks of considerable morbidity. Although the validity of the data is limited due to the use of nonprofessional diagnoses, missing or illegible entries, and restriction of the study population to German ships, the results provide guidance to ship owners and to Port Health Authorities to allocate resources and build capacities under International Health Regulations 2005.