Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: An evaluation of four commonly used DNA extraction methods

Centre for Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 23, P.O. Box 2461, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (Impact Factor: 3.34). 09/2010; 88(1):299-307. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2770-5
Source: PubMed


The effectiveness of three commercially available direct DNA isolation kits (Mobio, Fast, Qiagen) and one published direct DNA extraction protocol (Bead) for extracting bacterial DNA from different types of activated sludge was investigated and mutually compared. The DNA quantity and purity were determined using real-time PCR targeting the bacterial 16S rDNA gene. Microbial community fingerprints were assessed by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. The resulting community profiles were analyzed with canonical correspondence analysis. Our results clearly demonstrate that direct DNA extraction methods can significantly influence the DNA quantity, purity, and observed community patterns of microbiota in activated sludge. Fast and Mobio generated high amounts of good quality DNA compared to Bead and Qiagen. Mobio also resulted in the detection of the highest number of species while Fast scored the best in discriminating between the community patterns of different activated sludge types. With respect to the characterization of community profiles, our analyses demonstrated a strong sludge type dependent variability among methods. Taking into account our results, we recommend Fast as the most suitable DNA extraction method for activated sludge samples used for bacterial community studies.

Download full-text


Available from: Ivo Vankelecom, Apr 16, 2015
  • Source
    • "Aliquot (0.6 mL) of the mixed sediment was centrifuged at 10 000 3 g for ~3 minutes at room temperature. The pellet was proceeded for total genomic DNA isolation using an UltraClean t Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MO-BIO, Carlsbad, California) (Kwon et al., 2010; Vanysacker et al., 2010) following the manufacturer's manual. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSRACT: This study determined the greenhouse gas emission from two laboratory-scale duckweed ponds for stormwater treatment. The rate of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission from the two duckweed systems was 1472 ± 721 mg/m2·d and 626 ± 234 mg/m2·d, respectively. After the removal of duckweeds, CO2 emissions decreased to 492 ± 281 mg/m2·d and 395 ± 53 mg/m2·d, respectively. The higher CO2 emissions in the duckweed systems were attributed to duckweed biomass decay on the pond soil surface. A thin-film model was able to predict the increasing CO2 concentrations in the closed static chamber during 2 weeks of sampling. The initial methane fluxes from the duckweed systems were 299 ± 74 mg/m2·d and 180 ± 91 mg/m2·d, respectively. After the removal of duckweeds, the flux increased to 559 ± 215 mg/m2·d and 328 ± 114 mg/m2·d, respectively.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015 · Water Environment Research
  • Source
    • "These DNA extraction procedures are essentially based either on mechanical and chemical lysis by chaotropic agents, detergents, and denaturing agents, or by a combination of heat, detergent, and mechanical action. Their efficiency in extracting DNA, which has been tested on feces (Tang et al. 2008), on sludge (Vanysacker et al. 2010) or on soil samples (Whitehouse and Hottel 2007; Dineen et al. 2010; Knauth et al. 2013), varies depending on the matrix analyzed. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Four commercial DNA extraction kits and a minor modification in the DNA elution procedure were evaluated for the quantitation of bacteria in pig manure samples. The PowerSoil®, PowerFecal®, NucleoSpin® Soil kits and QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini kit were tested on raw manure samples and on lagoon effluents for their ability to quantify total bacteria and a subdominant bacteria specific of pig manure contamination: Lactobacillus amylovorus. The NucleoSpin® Soil kit (NS kit), and to a lesser extent the PowerFecal® kit were the most efficient methods. Regardless of the kit utilized, the modified elution procedure increased DNA yield in the lagoon effluent by a factor of 1.4 to 1.8. When tested on 10 piggery effluent samples, compared to the QIAamp kit, the NS kit combined with the modified elution step, increased by a factor up to 1.7 log10 the values of the concentration of L. amylovorus. Regardless of the type of manure, the best DNA quality and the highest concentrations of bacteria were obtained using the NS kit combined with the modification of the elution procedure. The method recommended here significantly improved quantitation of subdominant bacteria in manure.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · MicrobiologyOpen
    • "Activated sludge biofouling was characterized using DNA-based assays. For this end, DNA of the acquired cell suspension was extracted using the Mobio Ultraclean soil DNA kit (Cambio) [34]. Afterwards, the total amount of cells was quantified by 16S rRNA qPCR [13], and bacterial community fingerprints were generated by ARISA [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since many years, membrane biofouling has been described as the Achilles heel of membrane fouling. In the present study, an ecological assay was performed using model systems with increasing complexity: a monospecies assay using Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Escherichia coli separately, a duospecies assay using both microorganisms, and a multispecies assay using activated sludge with or without spiked P. aeruginosa . The microbial adhesion and biofilm formation were evaluated in terms of bacterial cell densities, species richness, and bacterial community composition on polyvinyldifluoride, polyethylene, and polysulfone membranes. The data show that biofouling formation was strongly influenced by the kind of microorganism, the interactions between the organisms, and the changes in environmental conditions whereas the membrane effect was less important. The findings obtained in this study suggest that more knowledge in species composition and microbial interactions is needed in order to understand the complex biofouling process. This is the first report describing the microbial interactions with a membrane during the biofouling development.
    Preview · Article · Aug 2013
Show more