DSM-V and the stigma of mental illness

Institute of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA.
Journal of Mental Health (Impact Factor: 1.01). 08/2010; 19(4):318-27. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2010.492484
Source: PubMed


Stigma associated with mental illness has been shown to have devastating effects on the lives of people with psychiatric disorders, their families, and those who care for them. In the current article, the relationship between diagnostic labels and stigma is examined in the context of the forthcoming DSM-V. Three types of negative outcomes are reviewed in detail - public stigma, self-stigma, and label avoidance. The article illustrates how a clinical diagnosis may exacerbate these forms of stigma through socio-cognitive processes of groupness, homogeneity, and stability. Initial draft revisions recently proposed by the DSM-V work groups are presented, and their possible future implications for stigma associated with mental illness are discussed.

  • Source
    • "This was achieved soon after (Ennis et al., 2014;Robotham et al., 2015). Mental health conditions do have associated stigma (Ben-Zeev et al., 2010;Michaels & Corrigan, 2013;Schreiber & McEnany, 2015) and therefore the process of engagement needs to be clear and their informed consent needs to be one which is a nuanced agreement. In addition to all this we know that information sheets for mental health studies are poorly written and so service users do have problems in understanding the research that we do (Ennis & Wykes, 2015)Skills and access to the internet Individuals need to be able to access information electronically in a safe and private manner which means having access to the hardware as well as the internet in a private space. "

    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Journal of Mental Health
    • "Nothing achieves the stigmatization of the patient in the framework of mental health care, as the very diagnosis of his illness/disease (Ben-Zeev et al., 2010). Careless use of the diagnostic label constitutes an obvious source of stigmatization by health professionals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction:The stigma of mental illness is not a modern phenomenon, but it can now be approached scientifically. The stigma, because of the mental illness which characterizes a person, can be explained by the natural propensity of man to deliver biased and stereotyped estimates to phenomena he cannot explain, accept or face. Methodology:This study is an attempt to describe the concept of stigma and the impact of the stigma of mental illness in the personal and social life of the individual. The search for sources of this review was made through books on the topic and articles of the last twenty years, from online internet sources (pubmed, scopus, google scholar). Literature Review:Stigma brought about by illness from mental illness, is a complex process and concept, located in social interaction and the dynamics of social relations. The social stigma borne by mental illness in general, as well as the lack of information, ignorance, stereotypes, myths and prejudices, are the main reasons that characterize, even today, depression as a taboo subject. The stigma of mental illness is indeliblyimprinted in the identity of human suffering. In any case, the impact of stigma is critical for people who are sick. The psychological stress and difficult conditions that shape their daily lives aggravate their already compromised mental health, having a significant impact on the course and outcome of the disease itself. Key strategies to address stigma are protest, education and contact. Conclusions:A significant step in combating the stigma is to raise public awareness on the issues of mental health and their inclusion in society.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2015
  • Source
    • "Label avoidance is the phenomenon leading individuals to avoid mental health services in order to avoid the deleterious impact of a stigmatizing label. In addition, three processes can further exacerbate the stigma associated with psychiatric labels (Ben-Zeev et al., 2010). The first is groupness defined as the degree to which a collection of people is perceived as a unified or meaningful entity (Campbell, 1958; Hamilton and Sherman, 1996). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we review the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental health (DSM), its scientific bases and utility. The concepts of "normality," "pathology," and boundaries between them are critically reviewed. We further use the concepts of mindfulness and mindlessness, and evidence from cognitive and social sciences to investigate the DSM clinical and social impact and we argue against its assigned overpower. We recommend including alternative perspectives to the DSM, such as mindfulness and positive psychology. We also argue for including mindfulness training in psychiatric residency and clinical psychology programs.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2014 · Frontiers in Psychology
Show more