On-line preconcentration for the determination of aflatoxins in rice samples by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography with laser-induced fluorescence detection

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Electrophoresis (Impact Factor: 3.03). 07/2010; 31(13):2180-5. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000062
Source: PubMed


MEKC coupling with LIF detection has been used for the determination of four aflatoxins (B(1), B(2), G(1) and G(2)). Separations were performed in an uncoated fused-silica capillary (70 cm x 75 microm id, 55 cm effective length), using 20 mM borate buffer with 30 mM SDS (pH 8.5) and 7% ACN. In order to increase sensitivity, an on-line preconcentration procedure was applied, based on sweeping, using the same separation buffer without SDS as solvent of the sample. The precision of the method was evaluated in terms of repeatability and intermediate precision and the results were acceptable in all cases (RSD<12%). With the on-line preconcentration LODs (obtained as 3 x S/N) were as low as 0.11, 0.52, 0.04 and 0.10 microg/L for G(2), G(1), B(2) and B(1), respectively. Recovery studies were developed with extracts of rice samples spiked with aflatoxins, being in the range between 93.0 and 105.4%. The method has also been applied to the determination of aflatoxins in rice samples, and the results compared with those obtained by a standard method, being in good agreement.

Download full-text


Available from: Ana M. García-Campaña, Oct 13, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sample stacking is of vital importance for analytical CE since it may bring the required sensitivity of analyses. A lot of new relevant papers are published every year and regular surveys seem to be very helpful for experts and practitioners. The contribution presented here is a continuation of a series of regularly published reviews on the topic and covers the last two years. It brings a survey of related literature organized, in accord with the main principle used in the procedure published, in the following mainstream sections: Kohlrausch adjustment of concentrations, pH step, micellar systems and combined techniques. Each part covers literature sorted according to the field of application as, e.g. clinical, pharmaceutical, food, environmental, etc.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2011 · Electrophoresis
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review highlights developments in mycotoxin analysis and sampling over a period between mid-2010 and mid- 2011. It covers the major mycotoxins: aflatoxins, Alternaria toxins, ergot alkaloids, fumonisins, ochratoxin, patulin, trichothecenes, and zearalenone. Analytical methods for mycotoxins continue to be developed and published. Despite much interest in immunochemical methods and in the rapid development of LC-MS methodology, more conventional methods, sometimes linked to novel clean-up protocols, have also been the subject of research publications over the above period. Occurrence of mycotoxins falls outside the main focus of this review; however, where relevant to analytical method development, this has been mentioned.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2012 · World Mycotoxin Journal
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electrokinetic supercharging (EKS), a new and powerful on-line preconcentration method for capillary electrophoresis, was utilized in non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE) to enhance the sensitivity of acromatic acids. The buffer acidity and concentration, leader and terminator length and electrokinetic injection time were optimized, with the optimum conditions being: a background electrolyte of 30 mmol L- 1 tris-acetic acid (pH 7.9), hydrodynamic injecting of 100 mmol L- 1 ammonium chloride (22 s, 0.5 psi) as leader, electrokinetic injection of the sample (200 s, -10 kV), hydrodynamic injecting of 10 mmol L- 1 2-(cyclohexylamino)ethanesulphonic acid (32 s, 0.5 psi) as terminator, before separation (-25 kV). Under these conditions the sensitivity was enhanced between 3868-6480 times when compared to a normal hydrodynamic injection. Detection limits for the five aromatic acids were in the range of 0.08-0.30 ng mL- 1. The developed method was further verified by application to river water real sample analysis and with good results.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2012 · Asian Journal of Chemistry
Show more