Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine (Carcinoid) Tumors of the Extrahepatic Biliary Ducts
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
(Impact Factor: 2.84).
07/2010; 134(7):1075-9. DOI: 10.1043/2008-0764-RS.1
Primary, well-differentiated neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors of the extrahepatic biliary ducts are an uncommon cause of biliary obstruction. As compared to cholangiocarcinomas, which are more commonly seen at this location, these tumors tend to behave less aggressively, and only one-third metastasize. Tumor size (>2 cm) appears to be the best predictor of aggressive behavior. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and complete resection offers prolonged disease-free survival. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is therefore important and can be made by examining brush cytology specimens obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and/or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. It is important to keep this entity in mind, especially when examining cytologic or small biopsy specimens, so that appropriate immunohistochemical stains can be used to arrive at the correct diagnosis.
Available from: Jaihwan Kim
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Neuroendocrine tumours very rarely occur in the biliary tract; information about them is limited.
To present the clinical characteristics and prognosis of curatively resected biliary neuroendocrine tumours.
Review of medical records dated between 2000 and 2010 of 20 patients from three medical centres with biliary neuroendocrine tumour based on curative resection.
Based on the World Health Organization 2010 classification, five and one patients had neuroendocrine tumour grades 1 and 2, seven had neuroendocrine carcinoma, and seven were diagnosed with mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. The locations were the following: seven in the gallbladder, four in the extrahepatic bile duct, and nine in the ampulla of Vater. Lymph node and hepatic metastases were noted in 11 and 4 patients, respectively. Fourteen patients experienced recurrence; most had recurrence in the liver. Patients with neuroendocrine tumour grade 1 had a lower rate of recurrence compared to others (p=0.001). The median disease-free and overall survival times were 5.8 (0.4-53.6) and 13.7 (1.9-102.1) months for all four subtypes. However, the median disease free and overall survival rates of neuroendocrine tumours were significantly longer than those of neuroendocrine carcinomas or mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma.
Patients with biliary neuroendocrine tumour showed extremely different clinical outcomes according to histopathologic subtypes by World Health Organization 2010 classification.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract We encountered a rare case of a well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma originating from the bile duct in association with a congenital choledochal cyst (CCC). The patient is a 28-year-old woman referred to our clinic for pruritus. Laboratory data showed mild elevation of serum hepatobiliary enzymes. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated pancreatobiliary maljunction and a Todani type IV-A CCC from the inferior bile duct to the bilateral intrahepatic bile ducts. A solid tumor was detected in the middle portion of the common bile duct. Pancreatoduodenectomy and total extrahepatic bile duct resection was performed. Based on pathologic and immunohistochemical examinations, a diagnosis of well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma was made according to the World Health Organization criteria. To our knowledge, this is the third report of a neuroendocrine tumor originating from the bile duct in association with a CCC.
Available from: sciencedirect.com
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
PET with (68)Ga-DOTATOC allows for imaging and quantitative assessment of somatostatin receptor expression in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze whether pre-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT is able to predict response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT).
Patients and methods:
Forty patients with advanced stage NET were treated with a fixed dose of (90)Y-DOTATOC (5550 or 3700MBq). Prior to PRRT, each patient received (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Treatment results were evaluated after 3months by CT, tumor marker levels and clinical course and correlated with (68)Ga-DOTATOC uptake (SUVmax) and the assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC in tumor manifestations (MBq/g). ROC analysis and pairwise comparison of area under the curve (AUC) were performed with pre-treatment uptake of (68)Ga-DOTATOC, assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC and treatment activity alone and in relation to body weight as continuous variables, and response/no response as classification variable.
According to conventional criteria (tumor shrinkage, decrease of tumor markers, improved or stable clinical condition), 20 patients were classified as responders, 16 as non-responders and in four patients findings were equivocal. Using a SUV more than 17.9 as cut-off for favorable outcome, PET was able to predict treatment response of all responders and 15 out of 16 non-responders. All four patients with equivocal findings showed SUV less than or equal to 17.9 and soon experienced tumor progression. The assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC in tumor manifestations using a cut-off more than 1.26MBq/g as predictor of response was able to correctly classify 19 out of 20 responders, and 14 out of 16 non-responders. In all patients with equivocal findings, the assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC was below 1.26MBq/g.
Pre-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC tumor uptake as well as assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC are strongly associated with the results of subsequent PRRT. The defined cut-off values should be confirmed by prospective studies and may then provide the rationale for individual dosing and selecting patients with high likelihood of favorable treatment outcome.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.