Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of the Superior Glenoid Labrum

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA.
Annals of Biomedical Engineering (Impact Factor: 3.23). 12/2010; 38(12):3766-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0105-4
Source: PubMed


Pathology of the superior glenoid labrum is a common source of musculoskeletal pain and disability. One of the proposed mechanisms of injury to the labrum is superior humeral head migration, which can be seen with rotator cuff insufficiency. Due to the size, anatomical location, and complex composition of the labrum, laboratory experiments have many methodological difficulties. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a finite element model of the glenoid labrum. The model developed includes the glenoid labrum, glenoid cartilage, glenoid bone, and the humeral head cartilage. Labral displacements derived from the finite element model were compared to those measured during a controlled validation experiment simulating superior humeral head translations of 1, 2, and 3 mm. The results of the finite element model compared well to experimental measurements, falling within one standard deviation of the experimental data in most cases. The model predicted maximum average strains in the superior labrum of 7.9, 10.1, and 11.9%, for 1, 2, and 3 mm of humeral translation, respectively. The correspondence between the finite element model and the validation experiment supports the use of this model to better understand the pathomechanics of the superior labrum.

Download full-text


Available from: Mark L Palmer
  • Source
    • "The average strain for stable versus unstable shoulders was 10% and 17%, respectively. A previous computational labral model reported strains of 14% at 3 mm without consideration of the LHBT, after conversion from a logarithmic strain to the Green strain (Gatti et al., 2010). In contrast, the mean strain at failure was reported for the human shoulder labrum as approximately 40% (Smith et al., 2008), and from the human hip labrum as approximately 50% (Ishiko et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs), the most common injury of the shoulder, are often accompanied by tears in the superior glenoid labrum. We evaluated whether superior humeral head (HH) motion secondary to RCTs and loading of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) are implicated in the development of this associated superior labral pathology. Additionally, we determined the efficacy of a finite element model (FEM) for predicting the mechanics of the labrum. The HH was oriented at 30° of glenohumeral abduction and neutral rotation with 50 N compressive force. Loads of 0 N or 22 N were applied to the LHBT. The HH was translated superiorly by 5 mm to simulate superior instability caused by RCTs. Superior displacement of the labrum was affected by translation of the HH (P<0.0002), position along the labrum (P<0.01), and interaction between the location on the labrum and LHBT tension (P<0.03). The displacements predicted by the FEM were compared with mechanical tests from 6 cadaveric specimens and all were within 1 SD of the mean. A hyperelastic constitutive law for the labrum was a better predictor of labral behavior than the elastic law and insensitive to ±1 SD variations in material properties. Peak strains were observed at the glenoid-labrum interface below the LHBT attachment consistent with the common location of labral pathology. These results suggest that pathomechanics of the shoulder secondary to RCTs (e.g., superior HH translation) and LHBT loading play significant roles in the pathologic changes seen in the superior labrum.
    Full-text · Article · May 2014 · Journal of Biomechanics
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in computational mechanics, constitutive modeling, and techniques for subject-specific modeling have opened the door to patient-specific simulation of the relationships between joint mechanics and osteoarthritis (OA), as well as patient-specific preoperative planning. This article reviews the application of computational biomechanics to the simulation of joint contact mechanics as relevant to the study of OA. This review begins with background regarding OA and the mechanical causes of OA in the context of simulations of joint mechanics. The broad range of technical considerations in creating validated subject-specific whole joint models is discussed. The types of computational models available for the study of joint mechanics are reviewed. The types of constitutive models that are available for articular cartilage are reviewed, with special attention to choosing an appropriate constitutive model for the application at hand. Issues related to model generation are discussed, including acquisition of model geometry from volumetric image data and specific considerations for acquisition of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data. Approaches to model validation are reviewed. The areas of parametric analysis, factorial design, and probabilistic analysis are reviewed in the context of simulations of joint contact mechanics. Following the review of technical considerations, the article details insights that have been obtained from computational models of joint mechanics for normal joints; patient populations; the study of specific aspects of joint mechanics relevant to OA, such as congruency and instability; and preoperative planning. Finally, future directions for research and application are summarized.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2013 · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of finite element models as research tools in biomechanics and orthopedics has grown exponentially over the last 20 years. However, the attention to mesh quality, model validation and appropriate energy balance methods and the reporting of these metrics has not kept pace with the general use of finite element modeling. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to summarize the current state of finite element modeling validation practices from the literature in biomechanics and orthopedics and to present specific methods and criteria limits that can be used as guidelines to assess mesh quality, validate simulation results and address energy balance issues. Of the finite element models reviewed from the literature, approximately 42% of them were not adequately validated, while 95% and 98% of the models did not assess the quality of the mesh or energy balance, respectively. A review of the methods that can be used to assess the quality of a mesh (e.g., aspect ratios, angle idealization and element Jacobians), measure the balance of energies (e.g., hour glass energy and mass scaling), and quantify the accuracy of the simulations (e.g., validation metrics, corridors, statistical techniques) are presented.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2013 · Journal of Biomechanics
Show more