Article

Atrial fibrillation before and after pacemaker implantation (VVI and DDD) in patients with complete atrioventricular block

Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Collegium Medicum, Studenckie Koło Naukowe przy Klinice Elektrokardiologii.
Polski merkuriusz lekarski: organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego 05/2010; 28(167):345-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent problem of patients with pacemakers, and depends not only on disease but also on stimulation method. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of AF before and after pacemaker implantation as well as to assess the influence of VVI and DDD cardiac pacing on onset of AF in patients with complete atrioventricularblock (AVB).
We included 155 patients controlled between 2000 and 2008 in Pacemaker Clinic because of AVB III degree, treated with VVI or DDD pacemaker implantation. Information about the health status of the patients was gathered from medical documentation and analysis of clinical ambulatory electrocardiograms.
The study group comprised of 68 women and 87 men, mean age 68.7 +/- 13.9 years during implantation. 69% of patients had VVI pacemaker. There were 72.3% of patients with sinus rhythm before pacemaker implantation. During follow-up 4 +/- 2.8 years in 19.6% cases onset of atrial fibrillation de novo was diagnosed (in 31.3% in VVI mode vs. 2.2% in DDD mode; p = 0.00014). Mean time to AF since implantation was approximately 2.5 years. In VVI group (21 persons) amounted 32.1 months, while in 1 patient with DDD pacemaker 18 months. Between group with AF after implantation and with sinus rhythm preserved there was no statistically significant difference in age or gender (p = 0.89512 and p = 0.1253, respectively). Prevalence of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation increased to 40%.
Atrial fibrillation is frequent in patients before and after pacemaker implantation, especially in patients stimulated in VVI mode. Major possibility of atrial fibrillation onset after pacemaker implantation should result in more attention during routine ECG examination.

0 Followers
 · 
7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the effects of VVI (ventricular demand) and DDD (dual-chamber) pacing models on cardiac remodeling and the long-term clinical outcome of patients with symptomatic bradycardia. All patients with DDD and VVI pacing models at our hospital from January 1991 to January 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. After a follow-up period of over 8 years in DDD and VVI groups (97 ± 27, 107 ± 44 months), left atrial diameter [(45 ± 12) mm vs (39 ± 12) mm, P < 0.01] and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter [(53 ± 11) mm vs (50 ± 9) mm, P = 0.01] in 57 patients with VVI pacing model were markedly enlarged than those at pre-implantation. And tricuspid regurgitation increased (42.4% vs 16.9%, P < 0.05). But in 59 patients with DDD pacing model, except for increased tricuspid regurgitation (42.1% vs 10.5%, P < 0.01), left atrial diameter [(37 ± 5) mm vs. (35 ± 5) mm, P = 0.07] and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter [(47 ± 7) mm vs (47 ± 5) mm, P = 0.32] were not significantly different. Mitral regurgitation significantly increased only in the VVI group (P < 0.01). The increases of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = 0.04), mitral valve (P = 0.02) and tricuspid regurgitation (P < 0.01) were much more pronounced in the VVI group than those in the DDD group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed no difference with that at pre-implantation (P = 0.11 in DDD group, P = 0.05 in VVI group). But the LVEF value was lower (P = 0.04) while the incidence of thrombosis was higher (P = 0.03) in the VVI group than those in the DDD group at post-implantation. However, the incidence of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.14), hospitalization (P = 0.08) and survival (P = 0.77) showed no significant difference between two groups. DDD pacing offers more benefits over VVI pacing through improving cardiac functions and arresting left ventricular remodeling. However, neither groups showed any difference in decreasing mortality rate and hospitalization. Moreover, both pacing modes fail to reverse cardiac electrical and anatomical remodeling. It is imperative to explore more physiological pacing site and rational atrioventricular (AV) interval to improve the prognosis of patients.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2011 · Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Catheter ablation has been established to be an effective therapy for drug-refractory paroxysmal AF and is recommended as the treatment of choice for many patients, including those with a permanent pacemaker (PM). However, the clinical efficacy of catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF in patients with a permanent PM for atrioventricular block (AVB) is not clear. Twenty-nine patients with a permanent PM for AVB (AVB + PM group), and 145 age- and gender-matched control patients (on a 1:5 basis) without AVB and without a permanent PM (no-AVB + no-PM group), were included in this study. Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence was defined as the occurrence of confirmed atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting more than 30 seconds beyond 3 months after catheter ablation in the absence of any antiarrhythmic treatment. During a mean follow-up period of 14.2 ± 8.6 months (range, 3-30 months), 54 patients (31.0%) developed recurrence of AF. The recurrence rate was higher in the AVB + PM group than in the no-AVB + no-PM group (48.3% versus 27.6%, P = 0.005). Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age, valvular heart disease, AVB and a PM together, left atrial (LA) diameter and PV isolation identified LA diameter (hazard ratio 1.054, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.110, P = 0.047) and AVB and a PM together (hazard ratio 2.095, 95% confidence interval 1.109-3.960, P = 0.023) as two independent predictors of recurrence of AF. Patients with a permanent PM for AVB were at an increased risk of recurrence of AF after catheter ablation.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2014 · International Heart Journal