Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study

Catharina Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 16.5). 07/2010; 56(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this study was to investigate the 2-year outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
In patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI, coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding stent placement. The FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study showed that routine FFR in addition to angiography improves outcomes of PCI at 1 year. It is unknown if these favorable results are maintained at 2 years of follow-up.
At 20 U.S. and European medical centers, 1,005 patients with multivessel CAD were randomly assigned to PCI with drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified based on their angiographic appearance. Patients randomized to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those randomized to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was <or=0.80.
The number of indicated lesions was 2.7+/-0.9 in the angiography-guided group and 2.8+/-1.0 in the FFR-guided group (p=0.34). The number of stents used was 2.7+/-1.2 and 1.9+/-1.3, respectively (p<0.001). The 2-year rates of mortality or myocardial infarction were 12.9% in the angiography-guided group and 8.4% in the FFR-guided group (p=0.02). Rates of PCI or coronary artery bypass surgery were 12.7% and 10.6%, respectively (p=0.30). Combined rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization were 22.4% and 17.9%, respectively (p=0.08). For lesions deferred on the basis of FFR>0.80, the rate of myocardial infarction was 0.2% and the rate of revascularization was 3.2 % after 2 years.
Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces mortality and myocardial infarction at 2 years when compared with standard angiography-guided PCI. (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation [FAME]; NCT00267774).

Download full-text


Available from: Fumiaki Ikeno
  • Source
    • "One such factor that has been studied is wall shear stress [21]. It has been postulated that at regions of low wall shear stress, there is flow stagnation leading to increased local accumulation of cholesterol and inflammatory cells that contributes to plaque formation [21] [22]. In this study, wall shear stress distribution through the entire coronary artery was investigated and compared for Newtonian and non-Newtonian viscosity models. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During cardiac catheterization, in order to determine the physiological importance of a coronary stenosis, it is sometimes required to measure pressure drop across the stenosis by passing a pressure wire through it, which is known as the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) procedure. If the pressure drop is significant, the stenosis is relieved by stent deployment. This pressure measurement approach leads to a considerable increase in procedure time, in addition to subjecting patients to increased radiation and increased risk of procedure related complications. The main objective of this study is to assess the reliability of using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling principles to calculate the FFR accurately. Realistic three-dimensional geometries were constructed based on a patient-specific angiography images. Then CFD simulations were conducted and its results compared to the invasively measured FFR. Two different blood viscosity models were investigated: 1) Newtonian model and 2) non-Newtonian model. Both viscosity models well-predicted the FFR across the coronary artery. However, the obtained results showed that modeling blood flow as Newtonian versus non-Newtonian fluid has minimal effect on the predicted FFR as compared with invasive reference standard.
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Nov 2015
  • Source
    • "http://eurheartj long-ref-6Recent studies however, have used FFR ≤0.80 as the optimal cut-off point to guide revascularisation [4]. Although clinical decision making based on FFR can be safely made with a good predictive value, it does not provide morphological and anatomical information. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The appropriate assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenosis continues to be a challenge for cardiologists. Several studies have shown that anatomic parameters obtained by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed a correlation with fractional flow reserve (FFR) values in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses. However, the efficacy of IVUS/OCT versus FFR integration in intermediate coronary lesions is still debated. This review will allow for an independent analysis of research data and outlines the diagnostic efficiency of IVUS and OCT derived-anatomical parameters in identifying the hemodynamic significance of an angiographically intermediate stenosis as determined by FFR.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
  • Source
    • "MCE and microvascular dysfunction pharmacological arteriolar vasodilation. FFR was proposed as the best available technique to guide clinical decision making (whether mechanical revascularization or medical therapy), and FFR-guided PCI is the way to improved prognoses with respect to PCI based on angiographic severity23242526. Absolute CFR equals the ratio of maximal to baseline flow for any given arterial distribution with or without a stenosis or diffuse narrowing[27]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our understanding of coronary syndromes has evolved in the last two decades out of the obstructive atherosclerosis of epicardial coronary arteries paradigm to include anatomo-functional abnormalities of coronary microcirculation. No current diagnostic technique allows direct visualization of coronary microcirculation, but functional assessments of this circulation are possible. This represents a challenge in cardiology. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was a breakthrough in echocardiography several years ago that claimed the capability to detect myocardial perfusion abnormalities and quantify coronary blood flow. Research demonstrated that the integration of quantitative MCE and fractional flow reserve improved the definition of ischemic burden and the relative contribution of collaterals in non-critical coronary stenosis. MCE identified no-reflow and low-flow within and around myocardial infarction, respectively, and predicted the potential functional recovery of stunned myocardium using appropriate interventions. MCE exhibited diagnostic performances that were comparable to positron emission tomography in microvascular reserve and microvascular dysfunction in angina patients. Overall, MCE improved echocardiographic evaluations of ischemic heart disease in daily clinical practice, but the approval of regulatory authorities is lacking.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · World Journal of Cardiology (WJC)
Show more