ArticlePDF Available

A closed vacuum drainage system for the management of postoperative seromas

Authors:
TECHNICAL SECTION
Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 353–356
354
ureteric stents, but is probably only suitable in women where the
distal coil is more readily accessible. In conclusion, this mini-
mally invasive technique appears safe and definitive.
References
1. Bultitude MF, Tiptaft RC, Glass JM, Dasgupta P. Management of encrusted
ureteral stents impacted in upper tract. Urology 2003; 62: 622–6.
2. Lam JS, Gupta M. Tips and tricks for the management of retained ureteral
stents. J Endourol 2002; 16: 733–41.
3. Canby-Hagino ED, Caballero RD, Harmon WJ. Intraluminal pneumatic lithotripsy
for the removal of encrusted urinary catheters. J Urol 1999; 162: 2058–60.
BACKGROUND
Seroma formation is a common complication of any surgery produc-
ing a significant dead space or causing disruption of the lymphatic
drainage. Traditionally, large seromas require multiple aspirations
using a 60-ml syringe with the contents dispensed into a kidney
bowl. This method can introduce infection, which is of particular sig-
nificance when the seroma cavity is associated with a biomedical
A closed vacuum drainage system for the
management of postoperative seromas
CHARLES J BAIN, SAMER SAOUR, PARI-NAZ MOHANNA
GKT Cancer Reconstruction Service, St Thomas’ Hospital,
London, UK
CORRESPONDENCE TO
Charles J Bain, GKT Cancer Reconstruction Service, St
Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1
7EH, UK. E: bainage@hotmail.com
Figure 1 The lithoclast probe (white arrow) beside the nephrostomy tube
(black arrow).
Figure 2 Intraluminal insertion of lithoclast probe into nephrostomy tube.
Figure 3 The potential for the lithoclast probe to exit the nephrostomy
tube side holes (white arrow).
Figure 1 A white (14-G) needle is connected to a 3-way tap and the exten-
sion of the latter is attached to the suction tubing of a 600-ml Redovac®drain.
Figure 2 Aspiration of a large abdominal seroma using the closed vacu-
um drainage system.
TECHNICAL SECTION
Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 353–356 355
device such as an implant or mesh. In addition, multiple aspirations
can dislodge the needle causing pain and also increasing the likeli-
hood of exposure to bodily fluids. The use of a calibrated drainage
bag to maintain a closed system has been described previously.1We
have developed a closed drainage system which utilises the negative
pressure from a Redovac®drain (B. Braun, PO Box 1120, D-34209
Melsungen, Germany).
TECHNIQUE
Under aseptic conditions, a white (14-G) needle is connected to a 3-way
tap and the extension of the latter is attached to the suction tubing of a
600-ml Redovac®drain (Fig. 1). With the needle inserted into the most
dependent part of the seroma, the negative pressure of the Redovac®
drain is applied by releasing the clamp, resulting in rapid aspiration of
the collection (Fig. 2). The Redovac®bottle can be changed whilst main-
taining a closed system thereby avoiding fluid spillage.
DISCUSSION
We have described a safe, simple and efficient technique using a
closed vacuum drainage system for aspiration of large seromas.
This method allows rapid aspiration of large seroma volumes,
whilst reducing the possibility of introducing infection and the
spillage of bodily fluids.
Reference
1. Ashraf O, Donnelly PK. A safe closed seroma aspiration system. Ann R Coll
Surg Engl 2007; 88: 412.
BACKGROUND
Correct handling and manipulation of a needle is not only a basic sur-
gical skill and principle but it is also an important component of the-
atre etiquette as well as surgical safety. Scrub nurses are vital to safe
and successful surgery. The surgeon and the scrub nurse should have
a mutual respect for one another. It is the scrub nurses duty to hand
the surgeon the correct needle on the correct suture on the correct nee-
dle holder. Similarly, it is the surgeon’s responsibility to hand back the
needle and suture in a safe manner as demonstrated below. Junior sur-
gical trainees in particular would benefit from getting into good habits
early in their surgical careers.
TECHNIQUE
Traditionally, the suture is handed back to the scrub nurse as soon as
the final throw has been placed, the suture has been cut and the nee-
dle remounted. Often, little attention is paid to how the needle is
mounted when being handed back to the scrub nurse, which can
potentially cause needle-stick injuries.1–3 Needle-stick injuries are an
occupational hazard; however, they can be minimised by simple and
safe measures as shown below. This technique involves reverse
mounting the needle in the jaws of the needle holder thereby pre-
venting exposure of the sharp needle tip which could leave the sur-
geon, scrub nurse or patient’s skin prone to inadvertent injury.
DISCUSSION
This technique is now standard surgical practice for the first
author after the senior author introduced this concept when oper-
ating together. He had picked it up 20 years before from a New
Zealand cardiac surgeon. We advocate this simple and easily
Impressing the scrub nurse
Z AHMAD, RP COLE
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Salisbury
General Hospital, Salisbury, UK
CORRESPONDENCE TO
Z Ahmad, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery,
Salisbury General Hospital, Odstock Road, Salisbury SP2 8BJ, UK
E: zeeshan.ahmad@doctors.org.uk
Figure 1 The exposed sharp mounted on the needle holder as it is usually passed
from surgeon to scrub nurse.
Figure 2 The needle re-mounted with the tip securely locked in the jaws
of the needle holder together with the swage thereby making it impossible
to suffer a sharps injury from the tip.
... There was no connection of seroma with mediastinum and there was no pericardial effusion. We proceed with drainage of collection under local anaesthesia using vacuum-assisted drainage, as described by Fitzgerald and Charles [1,2] and evacuated 150ml of serous fl uids with immediate improvement. Patient was discharged home same day. ...
Article
Full-text available
Seroma formation is a common complication of any surgery producing a significant dead space or causing disruption of the lymphatic drainage. Although this is uncommonly reported in cardiac surgery. Such collections can cause localized pain, wound dehiscence, infection and can reoccur frequently, requiring multiple interventions. We present case of large sternal wound seroma after wound debridement with Computed tomography imaging for the patient, that initially underwent Coronary artery bypass grafting.
Article
Full-text available
Article
Urologists frequently treat patients requiring long-term urinary drainage with a percutaneous nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent. When such tubes are neglected and become encrusted, removal challenges even experienced urologists. We describe a new, minimally invasive technique for safely and rapidly removing encrusted, occluded tubes using the Swiss Lithoclast pneumatic lithotriptor. Patients presenting with an encrusted urinary catheter were evaluated by excretory urography for renal function and obstruction. Gentle manual extraction of the tube was attempted, followed by traditional extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and/or ureteroscopy. When the tube was not extracted, patients were then treated with intraluminal insertion of a pneumatic lithotripsy probe. One patient presented with an encrusted, occluded nephrostomy tube and 2 had an encrusted, occluded, indwelling ureteral stent. None was removed by manual traction. Intraluminal encrustations prevented the pigtail portions of these tubes from uncoiling and removal. In each case a pneumatic lithotripsy probe was inserted into the lumen of the catheter and advanced in a jackhammer-like fashion. This technique resulted in disruption of the intraluminal encrustations and straightening of the tubes so that they were removed in an atraumatic manner. Intraluminal pneumatic lithotripsy is a safe, easy and rapid technique for removing encrusted urinary catheters. It is unique in that the pneumatic lithotripsy probe functions in an aqueous and nonaqueous environment, and dislodges intraluminal calcifications. We recommend its use as first line treatment for removing encrusted urinary catheters.
Article
Retained ureteral stents, especially those that are encrusted and associated with a stone burden, can be a difficult management problem. We review our experience and the different options employed for treating this complication. From July 1998 to February 2002, 26 retained ureteral stents were managed in our department. The average patient age was 45.9 years (range 8-77 years). The average time the stent had been in place was 10.7 months (range 3-28 months). Prior to planning definitive therapy, a plain radiograph with tomographic views was reviewed. A guidewire or Glidewire was often placed adjacent to the stent in order to maintain ureteral access and in some cases was able to facilitate removal of the retained stent. The patients required an average of 2.7 endourologic procedures (range 1-4) performed at one or more sessions to remove the stent and all associated stone burden. If the stone burden could not be entirely removed then stent extraction and subsequent sessions were performed until stone-free status was achieved. Cystolitholapaxy was required to treat the distal component of stent encrustation in 20 cases. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in four patients, antegrade ureteroscopy with or without intracorporeal lithotripsy in four patients, retrograde ureteroscopy with or without laser lithotripsy in five patients, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in seven patients to treat the proximal component of stent encrustation. The stent could be removed in a single anesthetic session in 23 of 26 cases (88.5%). Analysis revealed that the major component of the encrustations was a combination of calcium oxalate and phosphate. Successful management of retained ureteral stents requires careful planning and may entail a combination of endourologic approaches. It is imperative to avoid using significant force, which can result in severe ureteral injury or breakage of the stent. If encrustations are present along the stent, we believe in treating the distal component prior to managing any proximal or ureteral components.
Article
To present our series of patients with ureteral stent encrustation and give indwelling times and management. Encrustation is one of the most serious complications of ureteral stents. A retrospective review was undertaken of all encrusted stents during a 4-year period. The inclusion criterion was a stent that required some form of intervention above the ureteral orifice to remove it. Combinations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and open surgery were used to achieve stent removal. Forty-nine impacted encrusted stents were treated in 41 patients. Of these, 75.5% had become encrusted within 6 months and 42.8% within 4 months. The mean indwelling time was 5.6 months. Forty-seven stents were removed by endourologic techniques, with 4 requiring extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone, 28 ureteroscopy, and 10 a combination of both. Five patients underwent successful percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One patient underwent open surgery, and in one removal failed. The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.94. Stent encrustation can pose a serious challenge to the endourologist, and indwelling times should be minimized to avoid problems. Patients often require multiple treatments and a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy offers highly successful outcomes and often avoids the need for more invasive techniques.