What Do You Mean by "European"? Evidence of Spontaneous Ingroup Projection

ISCTE-Lisbon University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Impact Factor: 2.52). 07/2010; 36(7):960-74. DOI: 10.1177/0146167210367488
Source: PubMed


The ingroup projection model posits that group members project ingroup features onto a superordinate category. The present research aimed at isolating the cognitive underpinnings of this process. If ingroup projection is a spontaneous cognitive process, a superordinate category prime should facilitate the processing of the ingroup prototype rather than the outgroup prototype. Three studies support this hypothesis by comparing subliminal semantic priming in two different populations, an intra- versus intergroup situation, and with an ingroup prototype manipulated by changing the intergroup context. Results indicated that the superordinate category prime facilitated the processing of ingroup rather than outgroup traits (Experiment 1) and that these traits depended on the particular content of the ingroup prototype made salient by different contexts (Experiments 2 and 3). The findings indicate that the cognitive representation of the superordinate category is based on ingroup traits and that this representation is context dependent.

Download full-text


Available from: Melanie C. Steffens
  • Source
    • "This makes European identity a more accessible and permeable category (see also Bruter, 2004; Faas, 2007). The higher permeability of the European identity for ethnic minorities can also be framed with the Ingroup Projection Model (IPM; see Bianchi et al., 2010; Mummendey and Wenzel, 1999). IPM posits that people tend to spontaneously project their features onto the superordinate category. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article investigates whether European identity is a feasible and functional alternative to national identity. We examine the extent, determinants and consequences of national and European identification among (immigrant) Turkish and native Belgian pupils, with data gathered from 1629 pupils across 68 Belgian schools. The results show that immigrant Turkish pupils identify more strongly with Europe than with Belgium. The groups are closer to each other with respect to their European identification, while the latter is not in conflict with national identification. Moreover, European identity is less ethnically and more civically defined than national identity. Importantly, European identification was moderately related to academic achievement, though it is hard to make a causal claim.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · European Union Politics
  • Source
    • "Previous research investigating IPM processes has primarily relied on questionnaires or alternatively on implicit, computer-assisted measures but not behavioral outcomes (for a review, see Wenzel et al., 2007; Bianchi, Mummendey, Steffens, & Yzerbyt, 2010; Imhoff, Dotsch, Bianchi, Banse, & Wigboldus, 2011). Extending these findings to behavioral outcome measures is crucial given that attitudes do not necessarily translate into corresponding behavior (for a meta-analysis, see Kraus, 1995). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent research on inclusive identities suggests that the highly inclusive superordinate group “humans” is a relevant social category such that identification with all humans is related to various pro-social outcomes. In this research, we tested whether dual identity affects the extent to which the superordinate group humans serves as a relevant comparison standard for relations between developed and developing countries. Overall, participants from a developed country perceived their ingroup as more relatively prototypical for all humanity than people from developing countries. Study 1 revealed that relative prototypicality perceptions predicted weaker behavioral intentions to act against global inequality. In Studies 2 and 3, higher levels of relative prototypicality tended to predict fewer donations and a lower probability to seek fair trade information. Perceived legitimacy of global inequality explained the relation between relative prototypicality and donation behavior (Study 3). Dual identification with both developed countries and humanity did not predict relative prototypicality judgments. We discuss that the social representation of all humans can be a meaningful comparison standard for individuals, and we discuss the role of dual identity in international relations.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · International Journal of Intercultural Relations
  • Source
    • "With regard to ingroup projection, it could be claimed that participants have no prior conviction of greater typicality of their ingroup for the superordinate group but that asking them directly will produce such a response. Likewise, priming them with words pretested as particularly typical for their ingroup (Bianchi et al., 2010) might prompt such responses. In RCIC tasks participants are entirely free to create an image they find representative of the given (superordinate) category without any mention of any subgroup, the self, or attributed typical for either in-or outgroup. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People see their own group as more typical of a larger, superordinate category than they see other, included subgroups (ingroup-projection). This basic effect is not restricted to verbally encoded characteristics but also expands to the domain of what people think superordinate group members typically look like. Despite the robustness of the ingroup-projection phenomenon, it could be argued that it is a side effect of an even more basic process of seeing groups and individuals as similar primarily to the self (selfprojection). In the present research, the authors sought to address and rule out this potential alternative explanation of visual ingroup-projection as an artifact of self-projection to the subgroup and the superordinate group. Thirty-one participants completed three two-image, forced-choice reverse correlation image classification tasks to create subjective, prototypical images, called classification images, of (a) themselves; (b) their national ingroup (German); and (c) the larger, superordinate group (European). With the use of partial pixel correlations, the objective, unique physical similarity between pairs of classification images was calculated. Both the selfimage and the ingroup image independently predicted the superordinate group image, indicating that both self-projection and ingroup-projection contribute to visual mental representations of superordinate group faces.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · Social Cognition
Show more