NAPS: A residue-level nucleic acid-binding prediction server

Department of Bioengineering/Bioinformatics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nucleic Acids Research (Impact Factor: 9.11). 07/2010; 38(Web Server issue):W431-5. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq361
Source: PubMed


Nucleic acid-binding proteins are involved in a great number of cellular processes. Understanding the mechanisms underlying
these proteins first requires the identification of specific residues involved in nucleic acid binding. Prediction of NA-binding
residues can provide practical assistance in the functional annotation of NA-binding proteins. Predictions can also be used
to expedite mutagenesis experiments, guiding researchers to the correct binding residues in these proteins. Here, we present
a method for the identification of amino acid residues involved in DNA- and RNA-binding using sequence-based attributes. The
method used in this work combines the C4.5 algorithm with bootstrap aggregation and cost-sensitive learning. Our DNA-binding
model achieved 79.1% accuracy, while the RNA-binding model reached an accuracy of 73.2%. The NAPS web server is freely available

Download full-text


Available from: Matthew Brandon Carson, May 05, 2015
  • Source
    • "On the other hand, owing to the exponential increase in the gap between the available sequences and structures of DNA-binding proteins in Uniprot (35) and Protein Data Bank (2), several methods have been proposed to identify the binding site residues just from amino acid sequences. These methods are based on amino acid frequency, evolutionary profile, sequence conservation, predicted secondary structure and solvent accessibility, electrostatic potential, hydrophobicity, position-specific scoring matrix by using various machine learning methods such as support vector machine, neural network, Naïve Bayes classifier and random forest (33,36–51). Careful inspection of these methods revealed the fact that they are applicable to specific types of proteins, and the performance of each method varies drastically in the range of 20–90%. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protein-DNA complexes play vital roles in many cellular processes by the interactions of amino acids with DNA. Several computational methods have been developed for predicting the interacting residues in DNA-binding proteins using sequence and/or structural information. These methods showed different levels of accuracies, which may depend on the choice of data sets used in training, the feature sets selected for developing a predictive model, the ability of the models to capture information useful for prediction or a combination of these factors. In many cases, different methods are likely to produce similar results, whereas in others, the predictors may return contradictory predictions. In this situation, a priori estimates of prediction performance applicable to the system being investigated would be helpful for biologists to choose the best method for designing their experiments. In this work, we have constructed unbiased, stringent and diverse data sets for DNA-binding proteins based on various biologically relevant considerations: (i) seven structural classes, (ii) 86 folds, (iii) 106 superfamilies, (iv) 194 families, (v) 15 binding motifs, (vi) single/double-stranded DNA, (vii) DNA conformation (A, B, Z, etc.), (viii) three functions and (ix) disordered regions. These data sets were culled as non-redundant with sequence identities of 25 and 40% and used to evaluate the performance of 11 different methods in which online services or standalone programs are available. We observed that the best performing methods for each of the data sets showed significant biases toward the data sets selected for their benchmark. Our analysis revealed important data set features, which could be used to estimate these context-specific biases and hence suggest the best method to be used for a given problem. We have developed a web server, which considers these features on demand and displays the best method that the investigator should use. The web server is freely available at Further, we have grouped the methods based on their complexity and analyzed the performance. The information gained in this work could be effectively used to select the best method for designing experiments.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2013 · Nucleic Acids Research
  • Source
    • "These algorithms usually employ amino acid physicochemical properties, sequence conservation, the local sequence context, solvent accessibility and/or secondary structure. Publicly available web servers that implement sequence-based methods for predicting DNA-binding residues include DBS-PRED (3), DBS-PSSM (5), DNABindR (6), DP-Bind (8), DISIS (9), BindN-rf (14), BindN+ (12), NAPS (15) and MetaDBSite (16). Methods that use the protein structure, if available, generally improve the DNA-binding site prediction, as they replace the predicted solvent accessibility, hydrophobicity and secondary structure in sequence-based methods with observed ones and can additionally employ energies or frequencies, computed from the atomic coordinates, as well as experimental geometrical features. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DR_bind is a web server that automatically predicts DNA-binding residues, given the respective protein structure based on (i) electrostatics, (ii) evolution and (iii) geometry. In contrast to machine-learning methods, DR_bind does not require a training data set or any parameters. It predicts DNA-binding residues by detecting a cluster of conserved, solvent-accessible residues that are electrostatically stabilized upon mutation to Asp−/Glu−. The server requires as input the DNA-binding protein structure in PDB format and outputs a downloadable text file of the predicted DNA-binding residues, a 3D visualization of the predicted residues highlighted in the given protein structure, and a downloadable PyMol script for visualization of the results. Calibration on 83 and 55 non-redundant DNA-bound and DNA-free protein structures yielded a DNA-binding residue prediction accuracy/precision of 90/47% and 88/42%, respectively. Since DR_bind does not require any training using protein–DNA complex structures, it may predict DNA-binding residues in novel structures of DNA-binding proteins resulting from structural genomics projects with no conservation data. The DR_bind server is freely available with no login requirement at
    Full-text · Article · May 2012 · Nucleic Acids Research
  • Source
    • "An interface residue was defined as any amino acid residue within 3.9Å of the atoms in the RNA. NAPS [48] is a server which uses sequence-derived features such as amino acid identity, residue charge, and evolutionary information in the form of PSSM profiles to predict residues involved in DNA- or RNA-binding. It uses a modified C4.5 decision tree algorithm. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background RNA molecules play diverse functional and structural roles in cells. They function as messengers for transferring genetic information from DNA to proteins, as the primary genetic material in many viruses, as catalysts (ribozymes) important for protein synthesis and RNA processing, and as essential and ubiquitous regulators of gene expression in living organisms. Many of these functions depend on precisely orchestrated interactions between RNA molecules and specific proteins in cells. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which proteins recognize and bind RNA is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions, but the recognition ‘code’ that mediates interactions between proteins and RNA is not yet understood. Success in deciphering this code would dramatically impact the development of new therapeutic strategies for intervening in devastating diseases such as AIDS and cancer. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein-RNA interfaces, there is an increasing reliance on statistical machine learning methods for training predictors of RNA-binding residues in proteins. However, because of differences in the choice of datasets, performance measures, and data representations used, it has been difficult to obtain an accurate assessment of the current state of the art in protein-RNA interface prediction. Results We provide a review of published approaches for predicting RNA-binding residues in proteins and a systematic comparison and critical assessment of protein-RNA interface residue predictors trained using these approaches on three carefully curated non-redundant datasets. We directly compare two widely used machine learning algorithms (Naïve Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)) using three different data representations in which features are encoded using either sequence- or structure-based windows. Our results show that (i) Sequence-based classifiers that use a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM)-based representation (PSSMSeq) outperform those that use an amino acid identity based representation (IDSeq) or a smoothed PSSM (SmoPSSMSeq); (ii) Structure-based classifiers that use smoothed PSSM representation (SmoPSSMStr) outperform those that use PSSM (PSSMStr) as well as sequence identity based representation (IDStr). PSSMSeq classifiers, when tested on an independent test set of 44 proteins, achieve performance that is comparable to that of three state-of-the-art structure-based predictors (including those that exploit geometric features) in terms of Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), although the structure-based methods achieve substantially higher Specificity (albeit at the expense of Sensitivity) compared to sequence-based methods. We also find that the expected performance of the classifiers on a residue level can be markedly different from that on a protein level. Our experiments show that the classifiers trained on three different non-redundant protein-RNA interface datasets achieve comparable cross-validation performance. However, we find that the results are significantly affected by differences in the distance threshold used to define interface residues. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that protein-RNA interface residue predictors that use a PSSM-based encoding of sequence windows outperform classifiers that use other encodings of sequence windows. While structure-based methods that exploit geometric features can yield significant increases in the Specificity of protein-RNA interface residue predictions, such increases are offset by decreases in Sensitivity. These results underscore the importance of comparing alternative methods using rigorous statistical procedures, multiple performance measures, and datasets that are constructed based on several alternative definitions of interface residues and redundancy cutoffs as well as including evaluations on independent test sets into the comparisons.
    Full-text · Article · May 2012 · BMC Bioinformatics
Show more