Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Ameliorates Chronic Pain and Reduces Short Intracortical Inhibition

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Journal of pain and symptom management (Impact Factor: 2.8). 05/2010; 39(5):890-903. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.023
Source: PubMed


Consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) may be a suitable therapy to treat chronic pain, as it can modulate neural activities in the stimulated and interconnected regions.
The present study investigated the analgesic effect of five consecutive days of anodal/sham tDCS using subjective (visual analog scale [VAS]) and objective (cortical excitability measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS]) measurements.
Patients with therapy-resistant chronic pain syndromes (trigeminal neuralgia, poststroke pain syndrome, back pain, fibromyalgia) participated. As this clinical trial was an exploratory study, statistical analyses implemented exploratory methods. Twelve patients, who underwent both anodal and sham tDCS, were analyzed using a crossover design. An additional nine patients had only anodal or sham stimulation. tDCS was applied over the hand area of the M1 for 20 minutes, at 1mA for five consecutive days, using a randomized, double-blind design. Pain was assessed daily using a VAS rating for one month before, during, and one month post-stimulation. M1 excitability was determined using paired-pulse TMS.
Anodal tDCS led to a greater improvement in VAS ratings than sham tDCS, evident even three to four weeks post-treatment. Decreased intracortical inhibition was demonstrated after anodal stimulation, indicating changes in cortico-cortical excitability. No patient experienced severe adverse effects; seven patients suffered from light headache after anodal and six after sham stimulation.
Results confirm that five daily sessions of tDCS over the hand area of the M1 can produce long-lasting pain relief in patients with chronic pain.

Download full-text


Available from: Andrea Antal
  • Source
    • "Accordingly, antiglutamatergic approaches have been suggested as effective treatment and neuroprotection options for these subjects (Nardone et al., 2010). Thus, TMS provides an opportunity to noninvasively assess neurochemical changes in the brain and monitor the effects of individually tailored interventions. 2 Monitoring the brain plasticity over time and during interventions: TMS protocols can be used to noninvasively explore the functional effects of different therapeutic modulations, such as neurocognitive, psychological, pharmacological, and NIBS interventions on the human brain cortex plasticity (Antal et al., 2010;Horvath et al., 2015;Liepert et al., 2001;Luber et al., 2013;Romero Lauro et al., 2014;Ziemann et al., 1996). Better understanding of the neurobiology of addiction and its effects at the cellular and network levels makes it possible to target and modulate the altered neural circuits with the most appropriate therapeutic agent. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Addiction is a chronic relapsing brain disease with significant economical and medical burden on the societies but with limited effectiveness in the available treatment options. Better understanding of the chemical, neuronal, regional, and network alterations of the brain due to drug abuse can ultimately lead to tailoring individualized and more effective interventions. To this end, employing new assessment and intervention procedures seems crucial. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques including transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulations (tES and TMS) have provided promising opportunities for the addiction medicine in two main domains: (1) providing new insights into neurochemical and neural circuit changes in the human brain cortex and (2) understanding the role of different brain regions by using NIBS and modulating cognitive functions, such as drug craving, risky decision making, inhibitory control and executive functions to obtain specific treatment outcomes. In spite of preliminary positive results, there are several open questions, which need to be addressed before routine clinical utilization of NIBS techniques in addiction to medicine, such as how to account for interindividual differences, define optimal cognitive and neural targets, optimize stimulation protocols, and integrate NIBS with other therapeutic methods. Therefore, in this chapter we revise the available literature on the use of NIBS (TMS and tES) in the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic aspects of the addiction medicine.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2015 · Progress in brain research
    • "No significant difference between the group effects on tension (F[1] [46] 5 0.34, P 5 0.561, h 2 p , 0.01) and stress (F[1] [46] 5 0.36, P 5 0.543, h 2 p , 0.01) was found; however, tension changed during the observed participation period as an effect of Time (F[6] [276] 5 2.17, P 5 0.046, h 2 p 5 0.05), but this effect was not evident for stress (F[2] [276] 5 1.06, P 5 0.388, h 2 p 5 0.02). Furthermore, there was no interaction between the 2 treatment conditions and tension (F[6] [276] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies suggest that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) reduces chronic pain levels. In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effects of 5 consecutive 20-minute sessions of 2-mA anodal tDCS directed to the M1 in 48 patients (45 females) with fibromyalgia. Changes in pain, stress, daily functioning, psychiatric symptoms, and health-related quality of life were measured. Pain and stress were measured 30 days before treatment, at each treatment, and 30 days after treatment by using short message service on mobile phones. Patients were randomized to the active or sham tDCS group by receiving individual treatment codes associated either with the sham or active tDCS in the stimulator. Adverse effects were registered using a standardized form. A small but significant improvement in pain was observed under the active tDCS condition but not under the sham condition. Fibromyalgia-related daily functioning improved in the active tDCS group compared with the sham group. The stimulation was well tolerated by the patients, and no significant difference in the adverse effects between the groups was observed. The results suggest that tDCS has the potential to induce statistically significant pain relief in patients with fibromyalgia, with no serious adverse effects, but small effect sizes indicate that the results are unlikely to reflect clinically important changes.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2015 · Pain
    • "Further studies with additional H-reflex-measurements after cathodal stimulation and larger sample sizes are needed to explore the relationship between clinical effects and neurophysiology more deeply and to corroborate our findings. Future studies should also explore whether the clinical effects of anodal tsDCS can be enhanced, for example, by repeated stimulation [28] [33] similar to repetitive anodal tDCS for the treatment of chronic pain [14] [16]. Furthermore, the pathophysiology of RLS might influence the response to spinal stimulation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a new non-invasive technique to modulate spinal cord activity. The pathophysiological concept of primary RLS proposes increased spinal excitability. Objective This pilot study used tsDCS to reduce pathologically enhanced spinal excitability in RLS patients and to thereby ameliorate clinical symptoms. Methods 20 patients with idiopathic RLS and 14 healthy subjects participated in this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. All participants received one session of cathodal, anodal and sham stimulation of the thoracic spinal cord for 15 min (2.5 mA) each, in randomized order during their symptomatic phase in the evening. The soleus Hoffmann-reflex with Hmax/Mmax-ratio and seven different H2/H1-ratios (of two H-reflex responses to double stimuli) were measured. The RLS symptoms were assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). All parameters were measured before and twice after tsDCS. Results RLS patients showed increased H2/H1-ratios during their symptomatic phase in the evening. Application of anodal stimulation led to a decreased H2/H1-ratio for 0.2 and 0.3 sec interstimulus intervals in patients. Furthermore, application of anodal and cathodal stimulation led to a reduction in restless legs symptoms on the VAS, whereas application of sham stimulation had no effects on either the VAS or on the H2/H1-ratio in patients. VAS changes did not correlate with changes of H2/H1-ratios. Conclusions This is the first tsDCS study in idiopathic RLS, which resulted in short-lasting clinical improvement. Furthermore, our results support the pathophysiological concept of spinal cord hyperexcitability in primary RLS and provide the basis for a new non-pharmacological treatment tool.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2014 · Brain Stimulation
Show more