What's Behind the Mask? A Look at Blood Flow Changes With Prolonged Facial Pressure and Expression Using Laser Doppler Imaging
Burn Center, Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC 20010, USA.Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association (Impact Factor: 1.43). 05/2010; 31(3):441-7. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181db5250
Clinically, the initial blanching in burn scar seen on transparent plastic face mask application seems to diminish with time and movement requiring mask alteration. To date, studies quantifying perfusion with prolonged mask use do not exist. This study used laser Doppler imaging (LDI) to assess perfusion through the transparent face mask and movement in subjects with and without burn over time. Five subjects fitted with transparent face masks were scanned with the LDI on four occasions. The four subjects without burn were scanned in the following manner: 1) no mask, 2) mask on while at rest, 3) mask on with alternating intervals of sustained facial expression and rest, and 4) after mask removal. Images were acquired every 3 minutes throughout the 85-minute study period. The subject with burn underwent a shortened scanning protocol to increase comfort. Each face was divided into five regions of interest for analysis. Compared with baseline, mask application decreased perfusion significantly in all subjects (P < .0001). Perfusion did not change during the rest period. There were no significant differences with changing facial expression in any of the regions of interest. On mask removal, all regions of the face demonstrated a hyperemic effect with the chin (P = .05) and each cheek (P < .0001) reaching statistical significance. Perfusion levels did not return to baseline in the chin and cheeks after 30 minutes of mask removal. Perfusions remain constantly low while wearing the face mask, despite changing facial expressions. Changing facial expressions with the mask on did not alter perfusion. Hyperemic response occurs on removal of the mask. This study exposed methodology and statistical issues worth considering when conducting future research with the face, pressure therapy, and with LDI technology.
Full-text previewDOI: · Available from: silon.com
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
Article: The year in burns 2010[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: For 2010, roughly 1446 original burn research articles were published in scientific journals using the English language. This article reviews those with the most impact on burn treatment according to the Editor of one of the major journals (Burns) and his colleagues. As in previous reviews, articles were divided into the following topic areas: epidemiology, demographics of injury, wound characterisation and treatment, critical care, inhalation injury, infection, metabolism and nutrition, psychological considerations, pain and itching management, rehabilitation and long-term outcomes, and burn reconstruction. Each paper is considered very briefly, and the reader is referred to full manuscripts for details.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Transparent Face Orthosis (TFO) is widely used in the treatment of facial burns to minimize hypertrophic scarring and maintain the contours of the face against deforming scars. Compression of the TFO is achieved with forces provided by the harness system (straps and anchors) used to secure the TFO on the face. A variety of harness system designs are used clinically yet none have been described or compared in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare seven common methods of TFO harnessing including cost, time, and ease of fabrication. Results showed that harness systems vary in cost from $0.22 to 96.45 and take 2-49min to fabricate. The 4-point harness was the least expensive and the easiest harness to fabricate. The Beanie Cap harness was the most complex system to make, while the Open Mask Stabilizer was the most expensive. The systems resulted in varying distributions of compression when depicted with three-dimensional laser scanned images. This description and comparison of fabrication materials and methods for TFO harnessing can guide clinicians within the burn community worldwide who have varying skills and resources for facial scar management.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objective: Glass-fiber reinforced composite has been suggested to be used as framework material in silicone elastomer facial prostheses. The glass-fiber reinforced framework makes it possible to make the margin of the prosthesis very tight, so that it will lean tightly against the skin even during facial expressions and jaw movements. The purpose of this study was to study how the compression of the glass-fiber reinforced framework would affect the microcirculation of the facial skin. Materials and methods: A face mask, with a compression pad corresponding to the outer margin of a glass fiber-reinforced composite framework beam of a facial prosthesis, was used to apply pressure on the facial skin of healthy volunteers. The skin blood flow during touch, light and moderate compression of the skin was measured by laser Doppler imaging technique. Results: None of the compressions had any marked effects on local skin blood flow. No significant differences between the blood flow of the compressed skin, compared to the baseline values, were found. Conclusions: The pressure applied to the skin by the tight margins of a facial prosthesis, fabricated with a framework of glass-fiber reinforced composite, does not remarkably alter the skin blood flow.