Asymmetric information: the multiplier effect of financial instability

Source: OAI
Financial markets and financial intermediation are essential to well-functioning economy. They perform the role of channeling funds to parties that have value creating investment opportunities. However, asymmetric information can seriously impair the process when parties to the financial contract are not fully aware of the risks involved and, as a result, can limit their exposure to financial agreements to prevent themselves from possible losses. Increasing asymmetric information as we explain in the article has a tendency to bring a ripple effect in the financial system. This negative money multiplier then sets the stage until it severely hampers money supply, productive investment opportunities and finally aggregate economic activity. The article introduces the reader with the framework of asymmetric information developed by several authors in the last few decades and builds on the recent financial developments that pose new challenges.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: We test the hypothesis that the degree of asymmetric information should decrease as financial systems develop, in a panel co-integration framework with annual data for 32 countries. To this end, we extend Barron et al.'s (1998) model to derive a measure of analysts' consensus that takes into account biases and herding in their forecasts. We calculate this measure, which is negatively related to asymmetric information, at the country level, with data from the I/B/E/S Global Aggregates database. In addition, we proxy financial development with the extensive set of indices found in the Word Bank's Financial Development and Structure database. Consistent with expectations, and despite the substantial differences across countries in terms of financial development and the quality of the institutional framework, the measure of analysts' consensus is positively related to indices proxying for the development of the financial system.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2008 · SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This paper examines the effects of the financial crisis of the 1930s onthe path of aggregate output during that period. Our approach is complementary to that of Friedman and Schwartz, who emphasized the monetary impact of the bank failures; we focus on non-monetary (primarily credit-related) aspects of the financial sector--output link and consider the problems of debtors as well as those of the banking system. We argue that the financial disruptions of 1930-33 reduced the efficiency of the credit allocation process; and that the resulting higher cost and reduced availability of credit acted to depress aggregate demand. Evidence suggests that effects of this type can help explain the unusual length and depth of the Great Depression.
    Preview · Article · Feb 1983 · American Economic Review
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This paper develops a theory of financial intermediation based on minimizing the cost of monitoring information which is useful for resolving incentive problems between borrowers and lenders. It presents a characterization of the costs of providing incentives for delegated monitoring by a financial intermediary. Diversification within an intermediary serves to reduce these costs, even in a risk neutral economy. The paper presents some more general analysis of the effect of diversification on resolving incentive problems. In the environment assumed in the model, debt contracts with costly bankruptcy are shown to be optimal. The analysis has implications for the portfolio structure and capital structure of intermediaries.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 1984 · Review of Economic Studies
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: I. Introduction, 488. — II. The model with automobiles as an example, 489. — III. Examples and applications, 492. — IV. Counteracting institutions, 499. — V. Conclusion, 500.
    Preview · Article · Feb 1970 · Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This paper provides a survey on studies that analyze the macroeconomic effects of intellectual property rights (IPR). The first part of this paper introduces different patent policy instruments and reviews their effects on R&D and economic growth. This part also discusses the distortionary effects and distributional consequences of IPR protection as well as empirical evidence on the effects of patent rights. Then, the second part considers the international aspects of IPR protection. In summary, this paper draws the following conclusions from the literature. Firstly, different patent policy instruments have different effects on R&D and growth. Secondly, there is empirical evidence supporting a positive relationship between IPR protection and innovation, but the evidence is stronger for developed countries than for developing countries. Thirdly, the optimal level of IPR protection should tradeoff the social benefits of enhanced innovation against the social costs of multiple distortions and income inequality. Finally, in an open economy, achieving the globally optimal level of protection requires an international coordination (rather than the harmonization) of IPR protection.
    Preview · Article · Jan 1991
  • Source
    Full-text · Article · Feb 1983 · American Economic Review
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This paper relates quality and uncertainty. The existence of goods of many grades poses interesting and important problems for the theory of markets. On the one hand, the interaction of quality differences and uncertainty may explain important institutions of the labor market. On the other hand, this paper presents a struggling attempt to give structure to the statement: “Business in under-developed countries is difficult”; in particular, a structure is given for determining the economic costs of dishonesty. Additional applications of the theory include comments on the structure of money markets, on the notion of “insurability,” on the liquidity of durables, and on brand-name goods.
    No preview · Article · Nov 1969
Show more