ArticlePDF Available

Lighting for well-being: a revolution in lighting?

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

A model of lighting quality proposed in the 1990s defined good lighting as that which balances the needs of humans, economic and environmental issues, and architectural design. The model made explicit what had long been implicit: Lighting is not just about seeing details. Good lighting provides for the needed level of visual performance, but also determines spatial appearance, provides for safety, and contributes to human health and well-being. Far from being a revolutionary proposal, lighting for everyday well-being has long been a goal of lighting recommendations. The question for today is how quickly we should incorporate new research findings in revisions of recommendations. This paper will address the knowledge base and the state of lighting recommendations for three aspects of interior lighting that contribute to health and well-being: areas of high luminance (about which much is known, but more to be learned); luminous modulation (flicker) (about which we have some knowledge); and, total daily light exposure (about which knowledge is weak, but suggestive). Appropriately, recommendations are most specific for those areas about which knowledge is strongest. Revisions should keep pace with evolving knowledge, but not run ahead. Selon un modèle de la qualité de l'éclairage qui a été proposé dans les années 1990, celui-ci doit offrir un équilibre entre les besoins humains, les considérations économiques et environnementales, et les critères de conception architecturale. Ce modèle a rendu explicite ce qui avait été depuis longtemps implicite, à savoir que l'éclairage n?intéresse pas uniquement la capacité de distinction visuelle des détails. Un bon éclairage doit procurer le niveau requis de performance visuelle, mais également doit déterminer l'apparence spatiale, assurer la sécurité des occupants et contribuer aux besoins en matière de santé humaine et de bien-être. Loin d'être un concept révolutionnaire, l'éclairage de qualité pour le bien-être quotidien des utilisateurs a longtemps représenté un objectif à atteindre en matière de recommandations connexes. La question qui se pose aujourd?hui est de savoir à quelle cadence il nous faut incorporer aux révisions des recommandations les conclusions des nouvelles recherches en la matière. Dans le cadre de ce document, nous traiterons de la base de connaissances et de l'état des recommandations en matière d'éclairage relativement à trois (3) aspects de l'éclairage intérieur qui contribuent à la santé et au bien-être : 1) les zones de niveau d'éclairement élevé (sur lesquelles nous en savons déjà beaucoup, mais devons apprendre encore plus); 2) la modulation lumineuse (scintillement) (au sujet de laquelle nous possédons un certain degré de connaissance); et 3) l'exposition à la lumière du jour totale (domaine où nous avons peu de connaissances, mais où celles-ci demeurent significatives). Il va de soi que les recommandations émises sont le plus spécifiques dans les domaines précis où les connaissances accumulées sont les plus pertinentes. Les révisions devraient suivre l'évolution des connaissances, et non la devancer. RES
Content may be subject to copyright.
htt
p
://irc.nrc-cnrc.
g
c.ca
Lighting for well-being: a revolution in
lighting?
NRCC-49205
Veitch, J.A.
A version of this document is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans:
Proceedings of the 2nd CIE Expert Symposium on Lighting and Health, Ottawa, Ontario,
Sept. 7-8, 2006, pp. 56-61
Co
py
ri
g
ht Notice
/ Droits d'auteur
Originally published in the Proceedings of the 2nd CIE Expert Symposium on Lighting and Health
(CIE x031:2006, pp. 56-61). Vienna, Austria: CIE.
LIGHTING FOR WELL-BEING: A REVOLUTION IN LIGHTING?
Jennifer A. Veitch, Ph.D.
National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
ABSTRACT
A model of lighting quality proposed in
the 1990s defined good lighting as that
which balances the needs of humans,
economic and environmental issues, and
architectural design. The model made
explicit what had long been implicit: Lighting
is not just about seeing details. Good
lighting provides for the needed level of
visual performance, but also determines
spatial appearance, provides for safety, and
contributes to human health and well-being.
Far from being a revolutionary proposal,
lighting for everyday well-being has long
been a goal of lighting recommendations.
The question for today is how quickly we
should incorporate new research findings in
revisions of recommendations. This paper
will address the knowledge base and the
state of lighting recommendations for three
aspects of interior lighting that contribute to
health and well-being: areas of high
luminance (about which much is known, but
more to be learned); luminous modulation
(flicker) (about which we have some
knowledge); and, total daily light exposure
(about which knowledge is weak, but
suggestive). Appropriately,
recommendations are most specific for
those areas about which knowledge is
strongest. Revisions should keep pace with
evolving knowledge, but not run ahead.
1. INTRODUCTION
The World Health Organization has
defined health as follows: “…a state of
complete physical, mental, and social well-
being and not merely the absence of
disease or infirmity” [1]. Although some have
argued that this definition is too broad, it has
the merit of being both negative (not a
disease state) and positive (a state of
complete fitness and contentment). My
contention here is that lighting installations
can, and do, contribute to both states. The
question we face today is to what extent,
and how quickly, we will modify our
recommendations to take into account new
science concerning light effects on human
physiology and psychology.
Figure 1 shows a model of lighting quality
that appeared in the 2000 edition of the
IESNA lighting handbook [2], and which is
consistent with discussions at the First CIE
Symposium on Lighting Quality here in
Ottawa in 1998 [3]. It represents a major
change in thinking about lighting design, a
shift away from the dominance of visual
performance as the chief goal for a lighting
installation. Individual well-being for the
people in the space – all the many and
various needs of all the different people who
encounter the lighting installation – is among
three dimensions of good-quality lighting.
Visibility (seeing fine details) remains an
essential part of any lighting installation, but
is not the only purpose of the installation.
Figure 1. Lighting quality model. From
Veitch (1998), courtesy of the National
Research Council of Canada.
One example of how this new model
might be applied is evident in the report of
CIE's technical committee TC 6-11 [4]. The
© 2006, Her Majesty in Right of Canada. National Research Council Canada, Ottawa K1A 0R6
page 2 of 6
report was the first review of the literature on
light, lighting and health, and made the first
attempt at formulating principles of healthy
lighting together with preliminary
suggestions for achieving healthy lighting
within the framework of good-quality lighting.
Two of the five principles are particularly
relevant to this paper:
The daily light dose received by
people in Western countries might be too
low.
The important consideration in
determining light dose is the light
received at the eye, both directly from the
light source and reflected off surrounding
surfaces.
The science of light effects on human
physiology and psychology is moving
rapidly; for example, the TC 6-11 report
included an appendix with citations to 58
original research papers published between
the close of the literature review phase and
the final editing of the report (January 2002
– November 2003) [4]. Further advances
were reported in Vienna in September 2004
at the 1st CIE Symposium on Light and
Health, which was attended largely by the
scientific community [5]. Now, at the 2nd CIE
Symposium on Lighting and Health, the
challenge for lighting applications people is
to consider how this work might change
lighting recommendations.
Some have considered this to be a
revolution in lighting [6]; others are more
cautious in their excitement [7,8]. In this
paper I review three ways in which lighting
can influence well-being, with the aim of
demonstrating that lighting practice has long
addressed well-being in at least a limited
way. The question before us now is not
whether to use lighting to influence health
and well-being, but which specific effects
have sufficient scientific support to change
recommendations now. These three aspects
of well-being are not the whole picture, but
they illustrate the progression of knowledge
that one hopes will arise from prolonged
investigation.
2. LIGHTING AFFECTS WELL-BEING
2.1 Direct Glare
Direct glare has a long history in the
lighting research literature [9,10,11]. By
“direct glare” I mean unwanted light shining
directly into the eye (or glancing off the
cornea, in the case of what's been called
"overhead glare"). This is an instance in
which lighting recommendations already aim
to provide well-being; in this case,
prevention is the goal. The phenomena are
somewhat well-understood, have been
studied for decades, and have resulted in
the adoption of predictive models in
recommendations [12,13].
There are two dominant predictive
models: Visual Comfort Probability (VCP)
[12] and Unified Glare Rating (UGR) [13].
Although the models differ in their details,
both predict the discomfort experienced by
viewers as a function of luminaire
luminance, adaptation luminance, luminaire
position and luminaire size. VCP is less
commonly used today, but UGR limit values
are a feature of CIE’s standard for lighting of
interior workplaces [14].
Nonetheless, there remain unanswered
questions, and reasons to think that the
models might not be the best predictors of
discomfort in real settings. Glare from
daylight induces less discomfort than would
be predicted from the electric lighting
models [15]. Little attention has been paid to
evidence that psychological variables (for
example, task involvement [16]) influence
discomfort, or to evidence that view content
influences discomfort [17,18]. Wide
individual differences in discomfort also
have received little research attention [16].
Lighting recommendations that aim to
reduce direct glare do so in order to
preserve well-being, despite these gaps in
knowledge. There is room for improvement,
but no one would recommend that we ignore
direct glare in lighting recommendations
because of the need for improved models.
2.2 Flicker
Luminous modulation of light source
output, or flicker, is an example of a lighting
dimension for which the evidence of effects
on well-being is reasonably strong but which
receives little emphasis in lighting
recommendations.
Several studies have found that low-
frequency luminous modulation, as from the
operation of fluorescent lamps on magnetic
ballasts (~100 – 120 Hz operation), can
page 3 of 6
interrupt saccadic eye movements [19,20],
reduce visual performance [21,22], and
increase the incidence of headache and
eyestrain [23]. High-frequency operation, as
when electronic ballasts with an operating
frequency on the order of 40 kHz are used,
improved well-being in these studies. It is
thought that the effect is caused by
meaningless neural signals in phase with
the lamp operation that impede cortical
functioning [24]. That is to say, there can be
a sensory response to low-frequency flicker
even when the luminous modulation is not
perceived.
Although several studies have found
deleterious effects of flicker, not all have
been successful. Küller and Laike [25] found
only that individuals with a low critical flicker
fusion frequency showed the effect, raising
the possibility that individual differences
moderate the effect. The effect may diminish
with age [26].
The principal lighting recommendations
documents do discuss flicker and
recommend the use of high-frequency
control gear for discharge lamps in order to
promote well-being [2,14,27]. However, it
may be said that there is little emphasis
given to this aspect of well-being. For
example, flicker is rated as not important to
reading in the Lighting Design Guide of the
IESNA Lighting Handbook [2], and the topic
rates a scant paragraph in the equivalent
CIE document [14]. Reading the technical
magazines one obtains the impression that
energy savings, not improvements to well-
being, are more likely reasons for the
adoption of electronic over magnetic
ballasts.
2.3 Daily Light Dose
This topic is more controversial: The
suggestion that people in industrialized
countries receive too little total light
exposure each day. Although this was
expressed as a principle in the CIE report
[4], it is a novel suggestion based on a
comparatively small research foundation
and one which raises many questions.
One key study surveyed 106 middle-
aged adults in San Diego, California [28],
measuring daily patterns of light exposure
and combined with self-reported mood. The
median person spent 4% of each 24 hr in
illumination greater than 1000 lx, and more
than 50% of the time in illuminance levels
from 0.1 to 100 lx. The questionnaire results
showed a moderate correlation between
atypical seasonal affective disorder
symptoms and time in bright light (r=-.27).
This suggests that inadequate light
exposure is associated with depressed
mood, but does not establish a causal link.
Older adults in New York City
participated in a similar study, to which
detailed ophthalmologic measurements
were added [29]. The total daily light
exposure was low, although it is difficult to
compare the two studies because the NYC
study reported only that the median daily
illuminance was 518 lx. Those with higher
daily light exposure had less depressed
mood; however, the correlation was reduced
when ophthalmologic problems were added
to the equation. The authors suggested that
people with ophthalmologic problems
experience lower retinal illuminance than
healthy people, and therefore derive less
benefit from light exposure.
Studies in Finland have found that
modest increases in light exposure can
improve feelings of vitality in healthy adults
[30,31,32,33]. In several studies they
delivered the light exposure (2400-4000 lx
vs 400-600 lx) in a gymnasium while
participants exercised for one hour two to
three times a week. In general, all the
participants became more fit than a
relaxation-training control group, but the
bright-light group showed a bigger
improvement in mood and mental health
scores over the 8-week study period.
However, the beneficial effect seems to rely
on continued exposure: 4 months later, the
people who had received the bright light
(which had stopped after the 8-week study
period) showed the biggest declines [30].
Overall, these studies are interesting
because they suggest that a relatively
modest increase in light exposure (both in
terms of intensity and duration), delivered
during other activities, might improve well-
being.
At the First CIE Symposium on Light and
Health, Noguchi reported on two small
experiments into increasing light exposures
in an office [34]. In these two experiments,
the authors boosted light exposure for part
of the morning and afternoon, from 750 lx to
2500 lx, and observed trends in
page 4 of 6
physiological and self-report measures
suggesting that the higher light exposure
increased alertness and modified
physiological indices of circadian rhythms.
Although inconclusive, the findings are
suggestive enough to warrant further
research. They also highlight a reason for
there being little work of this type: The
physiological measurements are both
intrusive and expensive, making it very
challenging to track changes over a day,
and then cumulatively over time.
The evidence that increasing light dose
can improve mood and feelings of well-being
in healthy adults is fairly strong; the Finnish
studies were randomized, controlled trials
that set a high standard for causal inference.
However, none of the studies has provided
enough information to form the basis for
lighting recommendations. In particular,
there is no systematic work that has
established the light dose (its intensity,
spectrum, duration, and timing) required for
good health. None of the studies cited here
specified the light exposure in terms of light
received at the eye, and all reported
photopic illuminance, which is an
inappropriate weighting of radiant energy for
non-visual processes [4]. As a result, it is
impossible to precisely calculate how much
light triggered the beneficial responses.
Without this information we cannot establish
even the most simple design goals.
We also know too little about the
physiological mechanisms behind the
observed effects. It is unlikely to be
melatonin suppression, because there is
very little circulating melatonin during the
daytime periods when the experimental
exposures were received. Thus, lighting
interventions to modify circadian rhythms
are probably not appropriate to influence
general feelings of well-being.
Furthermore, we do not know whether
light exposure follows the principle of
reciprocity: Is a longer exposure at a lower
intensity equivalent to a shorter exposure at
a higher intensity? What is the appropriate
time-of-day for the light exposure? What is
the spectral sensitivity curve for this
response? All of these questions require at
least a preliminary answer before
considering the creation of lighting
installations to deliver an increased light
dose.
3. CONCLUSIONS
Great excitement has arisen in the
lighting community because advances in
photobiological science have provided
unexpected insights into fundamental
processes, insights that will probably change
interior lighting recommendations. However,
this is not a revolution: Lighting
recommendations already aim at providing
for health and well-being of occupants,
where the evidence base warrants. Future
revisions of lighting recommendations
documents will continue the evolution
towards high-quality lighting that integrates
individuals’ well-being, architectural goals,
and economic and environmental
constraints.
In considering how to apply the latest
scientific insights to lighting practice, we
must remember that much of the recent
work into light and lighting effects on health
stems from research into the effects of light
on melatonin suppression and release, and
the associated consequences for circadian
rhythms. Figure 2 shows that the neural path
from the retina to the pineal gland is not the
only route for retinal information about light
and dark [4]. These several other pathways
await more thorough investigation. Despite
all the important advances thus far, we are a
long way from having all the answers about
how light affects physiology and psychology.
Figure 2. Light information pathways from
eye to brain. From CIE 158:2004, courtesy
International Commission on Illumination
(CIE).
Lighting practitioners and applied lighting
researchers (the “lighting community” –
designers, industry, researchers, educators)
together have a role to play in developing
the necessary knowledge base. We need
substantial evidence to warrant changes to
recommendations; but we cannot expect
page 5 of 6
basic science to provide the necessary
evidence without our input and participation.
Many scientists who study fundamental
processes lack the understanding of the
information needs of the lighting community
and the motivation to work on applied
questions. Advances of the required type will
occur only through interdisciplinary
research, and only if promoted by the
lighting community [35].
4. REFERENCES
1 World Health Organization. (1948).
Preamble . In Constitution of the World
Health Organization As Adopted by the
International Health Conference, New
York, 19-22 June, 1946; Signed on 22
July 1946 by the Representatives of 61
States (Official Records of the World
Health Organization, No. 2, P. 100) and
Entered into Force on 7 April 1948.
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
Organization.
2 Illuminating Engineering Society of
North America (IESNA). (2000). Lighting
handbook: Reference & application (9th
ed.). New York: Illuminating Engineering
Society of North America .
3 Veitch, J. A. (Ed.). (1998). Proceedings
of the First CIE Symposium on Lighting
Quality (Vol. CIE-x015-1998). Vienna,
Austria: CIE.
4 Commission Internationale de
l'Eclairage (CIE). (2004). Ocular lighting
effects on human physiology and
behaviour (CIE 158:2004). Vienna,
Austria: CIE.
5 Commission Internationale de
l'Eclairage [CIE]. (2004). Proceedings of
the CIE Expert Symposium on Light and
Health (Vol. CIE x27:2004). Vienna,
Austria: CIE.
6 Bommel, W. J. M. v., & Beld, J. G. v. d.
(2004). Lighting for work: a review of
visual and biological effects. Lighting
Research and Technology, 36, 255-269.
7 Boyce, P. R. (2006). Lemmings, light,
and health. Leukos, 2(3), 175-184.
8 DiLaura, D. L. (2005). Editorial: The next
big thing. Maybe. Leukos, 2(1), 4-6.
9 Luckiesh, M., & Guth, S. K. (1949).
Brightnesses in visual field at borderline
between comfort and discomfort (BCD).
Illuminating Engineering, 44(11), 650-
670.
10 Einhorn, H. D. (1991). Discomfort glare
from small and large sources. In
Proceedings of the First International
Symposium on Glare. New York:
Lighting Research Institute.
11 Ngai, P., & Boyce, P. R. (2000). The
effect of overhead glare on visual
discomfort. Journal of the Illuminating
Engineering Society, 29(2), 29-38.
12 Committee on Recommendations for
Quality and Quantity of Illumination
[RQQ]. (1966). Outline of a standard
procedure for computing visual comfort
ratings for interior lighting - Report No.
2. Illuminating Engineering, 61, 643-666.
13 Commission Internationale de
l’Eclairage [CIE]. (1995). Discomfort
glare in interior lighting (Publication No.
117-1995). Vienna, Austria: CIE.
14 Commission Internationale de
l'Eclairage [CIE]. (2001). Lighting of
indoor work places (ISO 8995:2002 CIE
S 008 / E:2001). Vienna, Austria: CIE.
15 Hopkinson, R. G. (1970). Glare from
windows. Construction Research and
Development Journal, 2(3), 98-105.
16 Osterhaus, W. K. E., & Bailey, I. L.
(1992). Large area glare sources and
their effect on visual discomfort and
visual performance at computer
workstations. In Proceedings of the
1992 IEEE Industrial Applications
Society Meeting, Houston, TX, October
4-9, 1992 (Vol. 2, pp. 1825-1829).
Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers.
17 Hopkinson, R. G. (1972). Glare from
daylighting in buildings. Applied
Ergonomics, 3(4), 206-215.
18 Tuaycharoen, N., & Tregenza, P. R.
(2005). Discomfort glare from interesting
images. Lighting Research and
Technology, 37(4), 329-341.
19 Wilkins, A. (1986). Intermittent
illumination from visual display units and
fluorescent lighting affects movement of
the eyes across text. Human Factors,
28(1), 75-81.
page 6 of 6
20 West, D. C., & Boyce, P. R. (1968). The
effect of flicker on eye movement. Vision
Research, 8(2), 171-192.
21 Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (1998).
Lighting quality and energy-efficiency
effects on task performance, mood,
health, satisfaction and comfort. Journal
of the Illuminating Engineering Society,
27(1), 107-129.
22 Veitch, J. A., & McColl, S. L. (1995).
Modulation of fluorescent light: Flicker
rate and light source effects on visual
performance and visual comfort.
Lighting Research and Technology,
27(4), 243-256.
23 Wilkins, A. J., Nimmo-Smith, I., Slater,
A. I., & Bedocs, L. (1989). Fluorescent
lighting, headaches and eyestrain.
Lighting Research and Technology,
21(1), 11-18.
24 Eysel, U. T., & Burandt, U. (1984).
Fluorescent tube light evokes flicker
responses in visual neurons. Vision
Research, 24(9), 943-948.
25 Küller, R., & Laike, T. (1998). The
impact of flicker from fluorescent lighting
on well-being, performance, and
physiological arousal. Ergonomics,
41(4), 433-447.
26 Brundrett, G. W. (1974). Human
sensitivity to flicker. Lighting Research
and Technology, 6, 127-143.
27 Chartered Institution of Building
Services Engineers/Society of Light and
Lighting [CIBSE/SLL]. (2002). Code for
lighting. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-
Heinemann.
28 Espiritu, R. C. et al. (1994). Low
illumination experienced by San Diego
adults: Association with atypical
depressive symptoms. Biological
Psychiatry, 35(6), 403-407.
29 Jean-Louis, G., Kripke, D., Cohen, C.,
Zizi, F., & Wolintz, A. (2005).
Associations of ambient illumination with
mood: contribution of ophthalmic
dysfunctions. Physiology & Behavior,
84(3), 479-487.
30 Partonen, T., Leppämäki, S., Hurme, J.,
& Lönnqvist, J. (1998). Randomized trial
of physical exercise alone or combined
with bright light on mood and health-
related quality of life. Psychological
Medicine, 28(6 ), 1359-1364.
31 Leppämäki, S. , Partonen, T., &
Lönnqvist, J. (2002). Bright-light
exposure combined with physical
exercise elevates mood. Journal of
Affective Disorders, 72(2), 139-144.
32 Leppämäki, S. J., Partonen, T. T.,
Hurme, J., Haukka, J. K., & Lönnqvist, J.
K. (2002). Randomized trial of the
efficacy of bright-light exposure and
aerobic exercise on depressive
symptoms and serum lipids. Journal of
Clinical Psychiatry, 63(4), 316-321.
33 Partonen, T., & Lönnqvist, J. (2000).
Bright light improves vitality and
alleviates distress in healthy people.
Journal of Affective Disorders, 57(1-3),
55-61.
34 Noguchi, H., Ito, T., Katayama, S.,
Koyama, E., Morita, T., & Sato, M.
(2004). Effects of bright light exposure in
the office. In Proceedings of the CIE
Expert Symposium on Light and Health
(CIE x27:2004, pp. 153-156). Vienna,
Austria: Commission Internationale de
l'Eclairage.
35 Veitch, J. A. (2005). Light, lighting, and
health: Issues for consideration. Leukos,
2(2), 85-96.
CONTACT
Jennifer A. Veitch, Ph.D.
National Research Council of Canada
Institute for Research in Construction
Building M-24, 1200 Montreal Road
Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6 Canada
tel. +1-613-993-9671
fax +1-613-954-3733
e-mail: jennifer.veitch@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
... Although much is still unknown about the relationships between lighting conditions and the functioning of the circadian system, we do know how the CIE (2004; see also Veitch, 2006) understands the design of lighting conditions. On the basis of this change, certain proposals have recently been promoted for healthy lighting (adapted from Bellia et al., 2011Bellia et al., , pp. 1986Bellia et al., -1987: ...
Article
A critical analysis was performed of legislation regarding lighting conditions in working environments. It is shown that the Royal Decree 486/1997 uses a version of the traditional approach to lighting design as conceptual framework, in which: (1) Only the effects of light related to visual system performance are considered. (2) The quantitative effects associated with changes in type of lighting (different coloured lights) are ignored. A review was carried out of the aspects of lighting which should be taken into consideration to complement those included in the traditional approach. These aspects were: (1) Differentiation between photometric and apparent illumination. (2) The type (colour temperature) and quality (colour rendering index) of illumination. (3) The effects of lighting on the health of workers owing to its influence on the functioning of the circadian system. Keywords: Lighting, colour, working environment, physical environment, circadian system, light therapy. Se efectuó un análisis crítico de la legislación sobre condiciones de iluminación en entornos laborales. Se muestra que el Real Decreto 486/1997 utiliza como marco de referencia una versión de la aproximación tradicional al diseño de la iluminación en la que: (1) Solo se consideran relevantes los efectos de la luz relacionados con el funcionamiento del sistema visual. (2) Se ignoran los efectos cuantitativos asociados a los cambios en los tipos de iluminante (luces de colores distintos). Se efectuó una revisión de los aspectos de la iluminación que deberían considerarse para complementar a los incluidos en la aproximación tradicional. Tales aspectos fueron: (1) La diferenciación entre iluminación fotométrica y aparente. (2) El tipo (Temperatura del color) y calidad (Índice de rendimiento cromático) de los iluminantes. (3) Los efectos producidos por la iluminación en la salud de los trabajadores debido a su influencia en el funcionamiento del sistema circadiano. Palabras clave: Iluminación, color, entorno laboral, ambiente físico, sistema circadiano, terapia lumínica.
... Subjective evaluation of the lighting quality in both groups under the modeled discomfort glare conditions (ordinal scale:[1][2][3][4][5] ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze discomfort glare sensation in subjects aged 50 years and more in comparison with younger subjects (i.e. younger than 35 years of age). Material and methods: The experiments were performed on a computer workstation placed in controlled lighting environment where 2 discomfort glare conditions were modeled. Each participant performed for about 1 h specially designed visual tasks, including the tests with Landolt's rings presented on the screen by a computer program. The glare evaluation method consisted of subjective evaluation of discomfort glare on the semantic glare rating scale, tests of mesopic contrast and glare sensitivity, subjective assessment of lighting quality and asthenopic symptoms. The time needed to perform the task and the number of mistakes were also recorded. The subjective evaluation of glare was compared with the Unified Glare Rating (UGR) index calculated by the DIALux simulation program. Results: A higher percentage of the younger group subjects assessed glare after the experimental session as uncomfortable and intolerable than in the 50+ group, who more often assessed glare as acceptable. The assessment of discomfort glare in the younger group corresponded to higher UGR value compared to UGR value calculated by DIALux. In the 50+ group, such correlation was found only for lower discomfort glare (UGR = 19). The results showed that younger participants more frequently suffered from visual fatigue and assessed lighting as less comfortable. However, the mesopic glare sensitivity increased significantly after the experiments only in the 50+ group under both glare conditions. Conclusions: The obtained results showed that discomfort glare sensation changes with age. The younger population seems to be more sensitive and demanding than the older one in relation to discomfort glare limiting, in spite of the lack of significant objective measures of fatigue. The exposure of the elderly to bigger discomfort glare could adversely affect the objective measures of fatigue like mesopic glare sensitivity and visual performance.
... The identification of ipRGCs generated great excitement, and provided new impetus for the lighting research field (Commission Internationale de l 'Eclairage, 2004;Veitch, 2006). Indeed, many international research groups with experts in very different fields have started to explore the role of the spectrum of light sources, the ratio of light to dark periods, the relative sensitivity of the different parts of the visual field and, more generally, the effects of light exposure on health and behaviour (Bellia & Bisegna, 2013;Bellia, Spada & Bisegna, 2011;van Bommel, 2006;Boyce, 2010;Pechacek, Andersen, & Lockley, 2008;Rea, Figueiro, & Bullough, 2002). ...
Article
Recent studies investigated the non-visual effects of light on cognitive processes and mood regulation and showed that light exposure has positive effects on circadian rhythms and alertness, vigilance and mood states and also increases work productivity. However, the effects of light exposure on visuo-spatial abilities and executive functions have only been partially explored. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of new LED light sources on healthy participants’ performance on some components of visuo-spatial abilities and executive functions in a specifically-designed and fully-controlled luminous environment. Participants had to mentally rotate 3-D objects and perform a switching task in which inhibitory processes and switch cost were measured. Results suggest that cooler light exposure improves the cognitive system’s capacity to deal with multiple task representations, which might remain active simultaneously without interfering with each other, and visuo-spatial ability, producing fewer errors in the mental rotation of 3-D objects.
... The transparent area of office building facades is continuously increasing as a result of two factors: (i) the availability of glazings with higher thermal resistance and suitable daylight transmittance and (ii) the association of large win-dow areas with better view to the outdoor environment and with an enhanced feeling of well being (Veitch, 2006), increasing occupants' alertness and productivity (Heschong, 2002), due to higher levels of daylight (Webb, 2006). Therefore, in order to properly integrate daylighting into a building, shading devices should be considered as a part of the integrated fac ßade design (Lee et al., 1998;Guillemin and Morel, 2002). ...
Article
This paper presents an experimental and simulation study for quantifying the daylighting performance of bottom-up roller shades installed in office spaces. The bottom-up shade is a motorized roller shade that opens from top to bottom operating in the opposite direction of a conventional roller shade, so as to cover the bottom part of the window, while allowing daylight to enter from the top part of the window, reaching deeper into the room. A daylighting simulation model, validated with full-scale experiments, was developed in order to establish correlations between the shade position, outdoor illuminance and work plane illuminance for different outdoor conditions. Then, a shading control algorithm was developed for application in any location and orientation. The validated model was employed for a sensitivity analysis of the impact of shade optical properties and control on the potential energy savings due to the use of daylighting. The results showed that Daylight Autonomy for the bottom-up shade is 8-58% higher compared to a conventional roller shade, with a difference of 46% further away from the facade, where the use of electric lighting is needed most of the time. The potential reduction in energy consumption for lighting is 21-41%. (author)
... Some writers are enthusiastic about the possibilities for immediate changes to lighting design and practice (Bommel & Beld, 2004;Bommel, 2005). Others are more circumspect, recommending more thorough investigation (Boyce, 2006;DiLaura, 2005;Veitch, 2005;Veitch, 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
Canadians, like others in the industrialized world, spend approximately 90% of their time indoors, making these environmental conditions important determinants of our health and well-being. For instance, noise exposure in the home and classroom adversely affects children's' acquisition of reading skills; noise exposure at work can contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease. A growing literature on exposure to daylight and nature views shows benefits for these conditions in reducing strain and improving healing following surgery. These findings have had limited influence on building design, construction, and operation, in part because of limited interaction between the relevant disciplines. Success in understanding how our built environment affects our health demands such interdisciplinary work; success in improving our living conditions demands further co-operation with designers, builders, and policy-makers. This presentation will briefly summarize current research, and make the case for an urgent need for broadly-based interdisciplinary research to provide a basis for practical interventions. Les Canadiens, à l'instar d'autres peuples du monde industrialisé, passent environ 90 % de leur temps à l'intérieur de bâtiments; ainsi, les conditions d'ambiance sont des déterminants importants de notre santé et de notre bien-être. Par exemple, l'exposition au bruit à la maison et en classe a des incidences néfastes sur l'acquisition par l'enfant de l'aptitude à la lecture; et l'exposition au bruit au travail peut contribuer au développement de maladies cardiovasculaires. La documentation de plus en plus riche portant sur l'exposition à la lumière du jour et à des vues sur des scènes naturelles démontre les avantages que procurent ces conditions en termes de réduction des effets de l'astreinte au travail et d'amélioration de la guérison suite à une intervention chirurgicale. Ces découvertes n'ont eu jusqu'ici qu'une influence minime sur la conception, la construction et l'exploitation des bâtiments, en partie dû au fait de l'interaction limitée entre les disciplines pertinentes. Or, la compréhension de la façon dont nos milieux bâtis influent sur notre santé requiert une approche et une démarche interdisciplinaires, et le succès de l'amélioration de nos conditions de vie repose sur une plus grande coopération avec les concepteurs, les constructeurs et les responsables des orientations politiques. Cette présentation résumera brièvement la recherche actuelle dans ce domaine et exposera le point de vue d'un besoin urgent en matière de recherche interdisciplinaire élargie, de manière à procurer une fondation à des interventions pratiques. RES
Article
Full-text available
Chiang Mai Old City, a cultural heritage site and major tourist destination in Thailand, has significant cultural capital but lacks a well-designed urban lighting system, limiting its nighttime development potential. This issue arises from the absence of an urban lighting master plan, a crucial tool for guiding the city’s growth. The challenge lies in reconciling the diverse perspectives of stakeholders to create a comprehensive lighting master plan that meets shared goals. This research proposes a system dynamics approach to analyze stakeholder complexity. A qualitative, multi-stage method was employed, through in-depth interviews and focus groups with 60 stakeholders from three groups: government, professionals, and end users, to prioritize critical factors. Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs) were used to illustrate the interrelations among those factors, leading to alternative scenarios for the lighting master plan’s development. The findings demonstrate that safety and security is the top priority, followed by cultural and economic factors. Eleven reinforcing loops and two balancing loops are proposed through CLD visualization. This framework highlights the importance of a participatory process, advocating for a systematic and holistic approach where all stakeholders with diverse perspective collaborate side-by-side in the development of the urban lighting master plan for Chiang Mai Old City.
Article
Energy is a significant part of socio-economic development of modern societies. By increasing fossil fuel consumption as almost the main source of energy throughout the world, it is essential to search for more sustainable alternatives or a method to decrease this huge amount of usage. On the other hand, the building industry is known as one of the biggest energy consumers. Among building energy efficiency measures, openings are playing a key role in declining energy consumption, especially in hot summers of Cyprus. Therefore, this study carries out a field measurement of various opening sizes in the case study in order to make a satisfactory situation both from energy efficiency and visual comfort considerations. Meanwhile, a studio in a faculty of architecture, Famagusta, North Cyprus, has been selected as an experimental examination to show the effectiveness of the method. In order to analyze its energy performance, the calculation simplified method is chosen. Outcomes are intended to illustrate the benefits of the calculation method and to authorize opening size comparisons to display the differences in energy conservation measures inherent in the various compliance methods allowable by the regulations. Finally, the results obviously display that by decreasing the window to wall ratio, the heat loss significantly reduces. But, by considering the daylight factor (DF) in the standard defined range and applying 750lux as an essential lighting requirement for the studio, finding the minimum WWR seems more meaningful. Therefore, according to the mentioned criteria in this special case an optimum amount of WWR can be considered in the range of 10 to 20%, which gives architects some flexibility to apply in their designs.
Article
After decades of intense research, the effects of light on the circadian system have been proved to exist. By studying the relationship between human physiology and light, research has also advanced to the point that there is the belief that these effects will be in future regulated by Standards. Establishing a direct connection among the fundamental radiometric, the traditional photometric and the new circadian approach to lighting becomes a fundamental step for introducing new concepts to lighting practitioners.This theoretical paper has the aim to propose a correlation between the traditional approach to lighting design with the new and still not definitely defined circadian approach by means of a photometric to circadian correlation factor. By this way, once the circadian efficiency function will be experimentally determined, technicians will be able to evaluate also from a numerical point of view the impact of lighting on the circadian system, adding health considerations to the traditional design process.
Article
Full-text available
With the detection in 2002 of a novel photoreceptor cell in the eye, the biological effects that light has can be better understood. From the research on the biological effects of lighting, it is evident that the rules governing the design of good and healthy lighting installations are, to a certain degree, different from the conventionally held rules. We demonstrate that it can be beneficial to be able to adapt both the level and the colour of the lighting. Not only the light on the visual task, but also that entering the eye determines the overall quality of lighting. In a working environment, not only are the advantages in terms of health and wellbeing important for the workers themselves, they also lead to better work performance, fewer errors, better safety, and lower absenteeism.
Article
The factors influencing flicker sensitivity are reviewed. Sensitivity is increasing because of improving lighting standards and personal peak sensitivity occurs for people approximately 20 years old. There is wide variability between people and the effect of flicker is related to the individual threshold. Office surveys reveal that significant numbers of people see flicker and that this feature is associated with the 'unsatisfactory' ratings of the lighting. Some headaches and eyestrain are related to seeing flicker. Light modulation from fluorescent lamps at 50 and 100 Hz has been measured and the growth in the 50 Hz component with time has been studied. The 50 Hz component is the one which is normally seen. The lamp characteristics show this 50 Hz modulation to remain at a low value for the first 7-8000 hours operation and thereafter to rise more rapidly with operation. Planned lamp replacement is now essential.
Article
The nonvisual biological and behavioural effects of light in animals and humans are mediated by specific neuroanatomical pathways. Controlled empirical studies have shown that light can be used to treat some clinical disorders and may have broader, nonclinical applications for problems of shift work and jet lag. Studies are testing how lighting may be incorporated into architectural designs that are optimal for vision as well as physiological and behavioural stimulation. Les effets, non visuels, biologiques et comportementaux de la lumière chez les animaux et les humains sont acheminés par des voies neuro-anatomiques spécifiques. Des études empiriques, contrôlées, ont montré que la lumière peut être utilisée pour traiter des pathologies et peut avoir de plus larges applications, non médicales, pour les problèmes posés par le décalage horaire et les travaux décalés dans le temps. Les études évaluent comment l'éclairage peut être introduit dans les réalisations architecturales, optimisées pour la vision comme pour les stimulations comportementale et physiologique. RES
Article
Recordings of fixation eye movements were made in the presence of flickered illumination using both the optical lever and strain gauge techniques. It was found that for low frequency fucker (⩽3 c/s) the saccade rate increased significantly and that there existed a definite time relationship between the onset of the light phase of the flicker and the occurrence of a saccade. Further experiments revealed that this effect only occurred when the information available concerning the position of the fixation target was intermittent. The results are discussed in terms of the control of drift rate to optimise the operation of the fixation control system.
Article
We explored the illumination exposure of middle-aged adults to determine normal values and to explore several correlates of daily light exposures. Subjects aged 40-64 years in San Diego, CA were recruited by random telephone dialing. Subjects completed a demographic interview and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression self-rating scale (the CES-D) supplemented with eight questions related to seasonal affective disorders (SAD). Data were analyzed for 106 volunteers who wore a device that monitors illumination exposures and activity. The median subject was exposed to illumination > or = 1000 lux for only 4% of the time observed, that is, only about 58 min per day were spent in daylight. Subjects scoring higher on the atypical SAD mood symptoms spent less time in bright illumination rs = -0.266, p = 0.003. The CES-D depression score was similarly correlated with illumination but of borderline significance (rs = -0.150, p = 0.063). These results suggest the hypothesis that many Americans may be receiving insufficient light exposure to maintain optimal mood.
Article
In working environments all over the world, fluorescent tubes are by far the dominating light source. Still, there have been very few studies on the impact of the non-visible flicker from fluorescent tubes. The purpose of the study was to compare the impact on subjective well-being, performance and physiological arousal of fluorescent light powered by conventional and high-frequency ballasts. Thirty-seven healthy males and females were subjected to either condition in a laboratory office on two separate occasions with 1 week in between. Although the methodology was quite extensive, only a few general effects were observed. However, when the light was powered by the conventional ballasts, individuals with high critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF) responded with a pronounced attenuation of EEG alpha waves, and an increase in speed and decrease in accuracy of performance. These results may be understood in terms of heightened arousal in the central nervous system in response to the pronounced light modulation caused by the conventional ballasts. In order to alleviate this potential stress source, it is recommended that fluorescent lighting be powered by electronic high-frequency ballasts of good quality.
Article
So-called atypical depressive symptoms (carbohydrate craving, prolonged sleep, weight gain, increased appetite) frequently emerge in association with low illumination to which people are ordinarily exposed indoors, or even outdoors at extreme latitudes in wintertime. Our objective was to analyse the effect of physical exercise alone or combined with bright light on mood and the health-related quality of life during winter. We carried out a randomized controlled trial on 120 indoor employees in southern Finland between November and January. The subjects were allocated to supervised fitness training under bright (2500-4000 lx) or ordinary (400-600 lx) light conditions in a gym 2-3 times weekly for 8 weeks, or supervised relaxation training once a week over the same period as active placebo. We collected questionnaire data on the changes in mood and health-related quality of life after 4 and 8 weeks of training, and after 4 months follow-up. Fitness training in bright light resulted in greater relief from atypical depressive symptoms and more vitality than in ordinary room light. Compared with relaxation alone, the former regime improved general mental health and social functioning in addition to the improvement in depressive symptoms and vitality, whereas the latter only increased vitality. Supervised physical exercise combined with exposure to bright light appears to be an effective intervention for improving mood and certain aspects of the health-related quality of life in wintertime. This effect appears unrelated to the history of season-dependent symptoms, being noticeable among healthy individuals.
Article
The relative shortage of light during the decreasing photoperiod may compromise well-being. Earlier studies suggest that bright-light exposure may be of help to alleviate winter-bound symptoms. We carried out a field study with exposure to bright light on office employees during winter. Repeated bright-light exposure improved vitality and reduced depressive symptoms. The benefit was observed not only in healthy subjects with season-dependent symptoms but also in those not having the seasonal variation. Bright-light exposure during winter appears to be effective at improving the health-related quality of life and alleviating distress in healthy subjects. Administration of bright light is a useful option to improve vitality and mood among subjects working indoors in wintertime. LIMITATIONS OF STUDY: Our field setting used self-reports, not interviews, for the assessment of outcome.