Content uploaded by Ali Ghorbanali
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ali Ghorbanali on Apr 24, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
A. A. Alesheikh, et al.
Coastline change detection using remote sensing
1
A. A. Alesheikh,
2
A. Ghorbanali,
3
N. Nouri
1
Department of GIS Engineering, Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2
Department of Geomatics Engineering, Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3
Departmentof Environmental Engineering,
Graduate School of the Environment and Energy,
Science and Research Campus, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Received 1 October 2006; revised 20 November 2006; accepted 1 December 2006; available online 1 January 2007
*Corresponding author, Email: alesheikh@kntu.ac.ir
Tel: +9821 8877 0006; Fax: +9821 8877 9476
ABSTRACT:
Coast is a unique environment in which atmosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere contact each other.
Coastline is one of the most important linear features on the earth’s surface, which display a dynamic nature. Coastal
zone, and its environmental management requires the information about coastlines and their changes. This paper
examines the current methods of coastline change detection using satellite images. Based on the advantages and
drawbacks of the methods, a new procedure has been developed. The proposed procedure is based on a combination
of histogram thresholding and band ratio techniques. The study area of the project is Urmia Lake; the 20
th.
largest, and
the second hyper saline lake in the world. In order to assess the accuracy of the results, they have been compared with
ground truth observations. The accuracy of the extracted coastline has been estimated as 1.3 pixels (pixel size=30 m).
Based on this investigation, the area of the lake has been decreased approximately 1040 square kilometers from August
1998 to August 2001. This result has been verified through TOPEX/Posidon satellite information that indicates a
height variation of three meters.
Key words:
Coastline extraction, TM & ETM+ sensors, histogram thresholding, band ratios, remote sensing
INTRODUCTION
Coastal zone monitoring is an important task in
sustainable development and environmental
protection. For coastal zone monitoring, coastline
extraction in various times is a fundamental work.
Coastline is defined as the line of contact between land
and the water body. Coastline is one of the most
important linear features on the earth’s surface, which
has a dynamic nature (Winarso, et al., 2001). Remote
sensing plays an important role for spatial data
acquisition from economical perspective (Alesheikh,
et al., 2003). Optical images are simple to interpret and
easily obtainable. Further more, absorption of in frared
wavelength region by water and its strong reflectance
by vegetation and soil make such images an ideal
combination for mapping the spatial distribution of land
and water. These characteristics of water, vegetation
and soil make the use of the images that contain visible
and infrared bands widely used for coastline mapping
(DeWitt, et al., 2002). Examples of such images are: TM
(Thematic Mapper) and ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic
Mapper) imagery (Moore, 2000). Coastline change
mapping for Urmia Lake by TM and ETM+ imagery is
the main aim of this paper. Furthermore, a new semi-
automatic approach for coastline extraction from TM
and ETM+ imagery has been developed and presented.
History
From 1807 to 1927, all coastline maps have been
generated through ground surveying. In 1927 the full
potential of aerial photography to complement the
coastline maps was recognized. From 1927 to 1980,
aerial photographs were known as the sole source for
coastal mapping. However, the number of aerial
photographs required for coastline mapping, even at a
regional scale, is large (Lillesand, et al., 2004).
Collecting, rectifying, analyzing and transferring the
information from photographs to map are costly and
time consuming. In addition to cost, using black and
white photographs creates several other problems.
First, the contrast between the land and water in the
spectral range of panchr omatic photographs is minimal,
particularly for the turbid or muddy water of coastal
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1): 61-66, 2007
ISSN: 1735-1472
© Winter 2007,
IRSEN, CEERS, IAU
A. A. Alesheikh, et al.
62
region, and the interpretation of the coastline is difficult
(De Jong and Van Der Meer, 2004). Second, the
photographs and the resultant maps are in a non-digital
format, reducing the versatility of the data set. Labor
intensive digitization is required to transfer the
information to a digital format, and this process
introduces additional costs and errors. The geometric
complexity and fragmented patterns of coastlines
compounds these problems. In addition to the above,
other possible limitations are: (1) the lack of timely
coverage, (2) the lack of geometrical accuracy unless
ortho-rectified, (3) the expense of the analytical
equipment, (4) the intensive nature of the procedure
(Miao and Clements, 2002), and (5) the need for skilled
personnel. In addition to high costs and difficulties,
generation of coastline maps has fallen sadly out of
date. From 1972 the Landsat and other remote sensing
satellites provide digital imagery in infrared spectral
bands where the land-water interface is well defined.
Hence remote sensing imagery and image processing
techniques provide a possible solution to some of the
problems of generating and updating the coastline
maps (Winarsoet, et al., 2001).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Area
The study site of this investigation is Urmia Lake.
The lake is located between latitude 37°N to 38.5°N
and longitude 45°E to 46°E. Urmia Lake is the 20th
largest and the second hypersaline lake in the world.
The Urmia Lake covers an average area of 5,100 square
kilometers. The maximum and average depth of this
lake are 16 and 5 meters, respectively. Urmia Lake is
listed as a biosphere reserve by UNESCO (United
Nation Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization)
(Birkett, et al., 1995). Also, it is recognized as a national
park. The digital images used in this research are: three
Landsat 7 ETM+ images; three Landsat 5 TM images;
three Landsat 4 TM images. The following Table shows
the spectral and spatial characteristics of Landsat 7
ETM+ and Landsat 5 TM sensors. For this experiment
ENVI V3.5 and ERMapper software are used for all the
image processing needs.
Methodology
Various methods for coastline extraction from optical
imagery have been developed. Coastline can even be
extracted from a single band image, since the
reflectance of water is nearly equal to zero in reflective
infrared bands, and reflectance of absolute majority of
landcovers is greater than water. This can be achieved,
for example, by histogram thresholding on one of the
infrared bands of TM or ETM+ imagery. Experience
has shown that of the six reflective TM bands, mid-
infrared band 5 is the best for extracting the land-water
interface (Kelley, et al., 1998). Band 5 exhibits a strong
contrast between land and water features due to the
high degree of absorption of mid-infrared energy by
water (even turbid water) and strong reflectance of mid-
infrared by vegetation and natural features in this
range. Of the three TM infrared bands, band 5
consistently comprises the best spectral balance of
land to water. The dynamic and complex land-water
interaction in coastal Urmia Lake wetlands makes the
discrimination of land-water features less certain,
especially in marsh environments (Ghorbanali, 2004).
The histogram of TM band 5 ordinarily displays a sharp
double peaked curve, due to tiny reflectance of water
and high reflectance of vegetation (Chen, 2003). The
transition zone between land and water resides between
the peaks. The transition zone is the effect of mixed
pixels and moisture regimes between land and water. If
the reflectance values are sliced to two discrete zones,
they can be depicted water (low values) and land
(higher values). But the difficulty of this method is to
find the exact value, as any threshold value will be
exact on some area, not all. Another method is to use
the band ratio between band 4 and 2 and also, between
band 5 and 2. With this method water and land can be
separated directly.
Table 1: Landsat 7 ETM+ and landsat 5TM spectral and spatial resolution
Band No. Spectral range (Microns) ETM+/TM Ground resolution (m)
ETM+/TM
1 .45 to .515 / .45 to .52 30
2 .525 to .60 / .52 to .60 30
3 .63 to .69 / .63 to .69 30
4 .75 to .90 / .76 to .90 30
5 1.55 to 1.75/1.55 to 1.75 30
6 (L/H) 10.4 to 12.5/10.5 to 12.4 60 / 120
7 2.09 to 2.35/2.08 to 2.35 30
Pan .52 to 90 / Nil 15 / Nil
A. A. Alesheikh, et al.
63
Fig. 1: Flowchart of extracting coastlines from images
The ratio b2/b5 is greater than one for water and
less than one for land in large areas of coastal zone.
ERMapper software uses this ratio as an algorithm for
sepa rat ing wa ter fr om lan d from TM or ETM+ imagery.
This law is exact in coastal zones covered by soil, but
not in land with vegetative cover. Actually, this law
mistakenly assigns some of the vegetative lands to
water. To solve this problem, the two ratios are
combined in this investigation. Applying this method,
the coastline can be extracted with higher accuracy.
But the problem occurs in some of the coastal zones
(i.e. in some areas, the coastline moves toward water).
If the aim is rapid coastline extraction, then it is a
supreme method. But when the aim is accurate coastline
extraction, then it is not a fine method. To solve this
problem, two techniques exist. In the first technique, a
color composite can be used for editing the coastline
map. The best color composite for this technique is
RGB (Red Green Blue) 5 43. Th is color composite n icely
depicts water-land interface. Furthermore, it is very
similar to the true-color composite of earth’s surface.
Moreover, it includes the bands that have low
correlation coefficient, and therefore, it contains higher
information in comparison to other color composites
(Moore, 2000). However, this technique is time
consuming and needs a lot of editing. In the second
technique, histogram thresholding method is used on
band 5 for separating land from water. The threshold
values have been chosen such that all water pixels are
classified as water, and most of land pixels have been
classified as land. In this case, few land pixels
mistaken ly have been assigned to water pixels but not
vice versa. Water pixels are then assigned to one and
land pixels to zero. Therefore, a binary image has been
achieved. This image is named “image No. 1”. The
image obtained from band ratio technique, also labels
water pixels to one and land pixels to zero. This second
image is named “image No. 2”. Then the two images
are multiplied. The final obtained binary image
represents the coastline accurately. Fig. 1 illustrates
the steps of the developed technique.
RESULTS
To evaluate the accuracy of this approach, it is
required to compare the extracted coastline with the
extracted coastline from a ground truth map. Because
of the lack of a reliable ground truth map, an image-
driven reference data is utilized (Alesheikh, et al., 1999).
The ground truth image was provided via fusing the
ETM+ multispectral bands with ETM+ panchromatic
band. Then, the coastline from the ground truth image
is extracted via visual interpretation.
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1): 61-66, 2007
Histogram thresholding
on band 5
Radiometric calibration
TM and ETM+
i
Applying the b2/b4>1 and b2/b5>1
conditions on images
Image N o. 1 Image No. 2
Multiplying 2 images
Final binary
Raster to vector
Coastline map
A. A. Alesheikh, et al.
64
Fig. 2: Urmia Lake in Aug-1998 color composite
RGB (543) Fig. 3: Urmia Lake in Jun-1989 color composite
RGB (543)
Fig. 4: Urmia Lake in Aug-2001
color composite RGB (543)
Fig. 5: The map of shorelines
Coastline change detection using remote...
2001
1998
1989
Map of Shorelines
A. A. Alesheikh, et al.
(m)
(years)
65
Next the two mentioned coastline data are compared,
and the accuracy of the extracted coastline was
estimated as 1.3 pixels (pixel size=30meters). Figs. 2, 3
and 4 illustrate mosaicked images of Urmia Lake in the
years 1989, 1998 and 2001 respectively. These images
are color composite RGB 543. Fig. 5 illustrates the
coastline change map for Ur mia La ke. Fig . 5 sh ows tha t
the area of Urmia Lake in 1998 and 2001 equaled to
5650 and 4610 square kilometers respectively.
Therefore, the area of this lake has been decreased
approximately 1040 square kilometers from August 1998
to August 2001.
DISCUSION AND CONCLUSION
To compare the coastline map to Urmia Lake level
variations, the obtained information from TOPEX/
POSEIDON satellite has been used. This satellite is in
orbit at a height of 1330 km, and sends back
information that measures the average ocean height
very accurately (Jupp, 1988). Fig. 6 illustrates the
relative lake height variations computed from TOPEX/
POSEIDON satellite data. Because of the lack of
TOPEX/POSEIDON data from 1989 to 1993, four
points have been drawn in these years. These four
points represent the height of water that has been
measured by dipstick (Fig. 6). Fig. 6 illustrates that
the lake level variation equals 0.2 meters, from Junuary
1989 to August 1998, which is small in comparison to
seasonal level variations of this lake. But the lake
level variation equals to 3 meters from August 1998 to
August 2001, approximately. It is necessary to mention
that the tide-range in Urmia Lake is inconsiderable.
Therefore, the lake level variations and coastline
changes are not affected by tide. In fact, these
changes derive from water balance of Urmia Lake.
Several methods have been devised to detect the
coastline changes. Among them, remote sensing
appears to be a cost effective way. Histogram
thresholding is inadequate in depicting the real
changes especially in marsh area, as any threshold
value will be exact only on some area. Using the band
ratio between band 4 and 2, and also, between band 5
and 2 can result in water-land discrimination.
However, the method mistakenly assigns some of the
vegetative lands to water. Based on the evaluation,
and the dynamic and complex land-water interaction
in coastal Urmia Lake, a new procedure has been
developed and presented in this paper. In the new
approach, histogram thresholding and band ratio
techniques are used together. The results have been
evaluated using ground truth image-driven data and
showed superior accuracy, namely; 1.3 pixels (pixel
size=30 m). Topex/Posidon satellite information can
be used to determine water level variations. Using
such data for Urmia Lake showed three meters decrease
in the lake level from August 1998 to August 2001. It
has caused approximately 1000 square kilometers
decrease in the area of Urmia Lake. The lake level
variations and coastline changes are not affected by
tide, as tide-range in Urmia Lake is inconsiderable. In
this research, Urmia Lake coastlines have been
extracted from ETM+ and TM imagery. The coastline
map illustrates that the shoreline has small changes
from 1989 to 1998 year, and great changes from August
1998 to August 2001. The small changes in Urmia Lake
coastline are perpetual. The great changes have
happened as the result of 3 m decrease in the height
of water of Urmia Lake.
Fig. 6: Urmia Lake Level variations from 1989 to 2001
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1): 61-66, 2007
A. A. Alesheikh, et al.
REFERENCES
Alesheikh, A.A., Sadeghi Naeeni F., Talebzade A., (2003).
Improving classification accuracy using external knowledge,
GIM International, 17 (8), 12-15.
Alesheikh, A.A., Blais J.A.R.,. Chapman, M.A., Karimi, H.,
(1999). Rigorous geospatial data uncertainty models for
GIS in spatial accuracy assessment: Land information
uncertainty in natural resources, Chapter 24. Ann Arbor
Press, Michigan, USA.
Birkett, C., Mason, I., (1995). A new global lakes database for
remote sensing programme studying climatically sensitive
large lakes. J. Grt. Lakes Res., 21 (3), 307-318.
Chen, C.H., (2003). Frontiers of remote sensing information
processing. World scientific publishing Co. Singapour. 628.
Chen, L.C., Shyu, C.C.,(1998). Automated extraction of
shorelines from optical and SAR images, Proceeding of the
19
th.
Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Manila, Philipine,
Ava i lable on: http://www.gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/
De Jong, S.M., Freek, D., Van Der, M., (2004). Remote sensing
image analysis: Including the spatial domain. Kluwer
Academic Publishers. MA, USA. 359.
DeWitt, H., Weiwen Feng, J.R., (2002). Semi-Automated
construction of the Louisiana coastline digital land-water
Boundary using landsat TM imagery, Louisiana’s Oil Spill
Research and Development Program, Louisiana State
University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.
Ghorbanali, A., (2004). Coastline monitoring by remote sensing
technology. MSc thesis. Department of GIS Engineering,
Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Jupp, D.L.B., (1988). Background and extensions to depth of
penetration (DOP) mapping in shallow coastal water.
Proceeding of the symposium on remote sensing of coastal
zone, Gold Coast, Queensland, 1-19.
Kelley, G.W., Hobgood, J.S., Bedford, K.W., Schwab D.J.,
(1998). Generation of three-dimensional lake model forecasts
for Lake Erie, J. Weat. For., 13, 305-315.
Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W., Chipman, J.W., (2004). Remote
sensing and image interpretation., 15
th.
Ed., John Wiley and
Son, USA.704.
Miao, G.J., Clements, M.A., (2002). Digital signal processing
and statistical classification. Artech House Inc. MA. USA.,
414.
Moore, L.J., (2000). Shoreline mapping techniques. J. Coast.
Res., 16 (1), 111-124.
Winarso, G., Budhiman, S., (2001). The potential application
of remote sensing data for coastal study, Proc. 22
nd.
Asian
Conference on Remote Sensing, Singapore. Available on:
http://www.crisp.nus.edu.sg/~acrs2001.
This article should be referenced as follows:
Alesheikh, A.A., Ghorbanali, A., Nouri, N., (2007). Coastline change detection using remote sensing. Int. J.
Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (1), 61-66.
66
AUTHOR (S) BIOSKETCHES
Alesheikh, A.A., Assistant professor, Department of GIS Engineering, Khaje Nasir Toosi University of
Technology, Tehran, Iran. Email: alesheikh@kntu.ac.ir
Ghorbanali, A., Department of Geomatics Engineering, Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran,
Iran. Email: alighorbanali@yahoo.com
Nouri, N., M.Sc. Student, Departmentof Environmental Engineering,
Graduate School of the Environment and
Energy, Science and Research Campus, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Email: nourinahal@yahoo.com