Risk Factors for Food Residue after Distal Gastrectomy and a New Effective Preparation for Endoscopy: The Water-Intake Method

Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Gut and liver (Impact Factor: 1.81). 09/2009; 3(3):186-91. DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2009.3.3.186
Source: PubMed


Food residue is frequently observed in the gastric remnant after distal gastrectomy, despite adequate preparation. We devised a water-intake method to reduce food residue in the gastric remnant by drinking large quantities of water in a short time. The aims of this study were to identify the risk factors for food residue and to study the effectiveness of this new method for endoscopy preparation.
A cohort of 708 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer was reviewed prospectively. Sixty patients with large amounts of food residue were randomly divided into two groups: a water-intake group (n=40) and a prolonged fasting group (n=20).
The incidences of a large amount of food residue were 15.7%, 5.8%, 7.5%, and 2.8% at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, after distal gastrectomy. Independent risk factors for food residue were endoscopy at 3 months, diabetes mellitus, a body mass index of <19.5, and laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of successful preparations at follow-up endoscopy was higher for the water-intake group (70%) than for the prolonged fasting group (40%, p=0.025).
The water-intake method can be recommended as a preparation for endoscopy in patients who have had repetitive food residue or risk factors after distal gastrectomy.

Full-text preview

Available from: PubMed Central
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Reducing food residue by proper preparation methods before endoscopy after distal gastrectomy can increase the quality of examination and decrease patient discomfort. We evaluated the risk factors for food residue and proper methods of preparation for endoscopy after distal gastrectomy. Methods: Follow-up endoscopy with questionnaires was performed on 1,001 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy at Asan Medical Center between December 2010 and July 2011. Results: Endoscopic examination failed in 94 patients (9.4 %) as a result of large amounts of food residue. Rates of failure were significantly higher in patients who ate a regular diet rather than a soft diet at last dinner before examination (13.9 vs. 6.1 %, p = 0.050), and in those who ate lunch rather than not eating lunch on the day before examination (14.6 vs. 7.7 %, p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis showed that the rate of failed examination was lower in patients who had a history of abdominal surgery (p = 0.011), those who ate a soft (p < 0.001) or liquid (p = 0.003) diet as a last meal rather than a regular diet, those who underwent Billroth I rather than Billroth II reconstruction (p = 0.035), patients with longer fasting time (p = 0.009), and those with a longer gastrectomy-to-endoscopy time interval (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients who undergo follow-up endoscopy after surgery should fast more than 18 h and ingest a soft or liquid diet on the day before examination.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2012 · Surgical Endoscopy
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food residue in the remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy (STG) interferes with endoscopic observation. We investigated whether intravenous erythromycin improves gastric mucosa visualization in patients with STG. This study was conducted from April 2012 to October 2012 as a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Patients who received STG with complete resection (stage T1-2N0M0) were included. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, neurologic disease, myopathy, recent viral enteritis history, concomitant therapy influencing gastrointestinal motility and severe comorbidity. Patients were instructed to consume a soft diet for dinner between 1800 and 2000 h, and endoscopies were performed between 0900 and 1200 h. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either erythromycin (125 mg in normal saline 50 cc) or placebo saline. The endoscopy was performed 15 min after infusion. Grade of residual food was rated as follows: G0, no residual food; G1, a small amount of residual food; G2, a moderate amount of residual food; G3, a moderate amount of residual food that hinders observation of the entire surface, even with body rolling; G4, a great amount of residual food such that endoscopic observation is impossible. When good visibility was defined as G0+G1, visibility was significantly better in the erythromycin group (61 + 19 %) than in the placebo group (38 + 12 %, p < 0.001). However, this effect was not seen in patients within 6 months after gastrectomy. The risk factor for food stasis in the placebo group (n = 58) was food stasis at last endoscopy. The only factor predicting erythromycin response in the erythromycin group (n = 56) was elapsed time since surgery. Adverse effects included nausea [11 (19.7 %)] and vomiting [1 (1.8 %)] in the erythromycin group and vomiting [3 (5.2 %)] in the placebo group. However, they were transient and tolerable. Premedication with erythromycin improves mucosal visualization during endoscopy in patients with STG. (Clinical Trials registration number: NCT01659619).
    No preview · Article · May 2014 · Surgical Endoscopy
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background In spite of appropriate preparation, food residue that interferes with endoscopic examination is occasionally observed in an operated stomach. The present study aimed to elucidate the incidence of such food residue and determine its risk factors in gastric pull-up after esophagectomy. Methods A total of 116 esophagectomized patients underwent the first postoperative endoscopy to survey their gastric pull-up with a median interval of 14 months (range 6–24) after the surgery. Fasting time was 13–16 h before the examination. The amount of food residue was retrospectively classified from Grade 0 (no food residue) to Grade 4 (a large amount of food residue) by two expert endoscopists. Results Among the 116 patients, 73 patients were classified as Grade 0, 23 patients as Grade 1, 10 patients as Grade 2, 9 patients as Grade 3, and 1 patient as Grade 4. Food residue (≥Grade 2) that interfered with the examination was observed in 20 patients (17.2 %). There was no significant association between the food residue and patient baseline characteristics. Conclusion The food residue interfering with postoperative endoscopic examination was observed in 17.2 % of all surveyed gastric pull-ups.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Esophagus